Chang Bingyu returns from match-fixing ban with back-to-back wins
Still just 22 years old, Chang was given a two-year ban in June 2023 for fixing a match, which kept him out of snooker until December 2024 – backdated to his original suspension.
In April he comfortably won the Asia-Pacific Snooker Championship to book his place back on the professional circuit and has made a bright start to his return.
It didn't look like it was going to be a winning return when Chang fell 4-1 down to Daniel Wells in Wuhan Open qualifying on Monday, with the Welshman knocking in two centuries.
However, the Chinese youngster won the last four frames, with breaks of 84, 60 and 70 to dramatically claim a 5-4 win.
It was a more comfortable victory on Thursday as he beat India's Kreishh Gurbaxani 4-2 in British Open qualifying, with breaks of 118, 93, 64 and 70.
There is now every chance that Chang can make a big impression on the World Snooker Tour, maybe not to the same level, but as world champion Zhao Xintong has done since returning from his own ban.
Chang was a wildly talented junior player, winning the IBSF World Snooker Championship at just 16 years old, having made a maximum in tournament play at just 14.
His first stint on the professional tour did not yield many notable results, but has clearly spent his time away from the pro ranks working on his game, preparing for a return.
Chang admitted to fixing a match against Jamie Jones at the 2022 British Open, but did so as a result of pressure and influence from Liang Wenbo, who subsequently received a lifetime ban.
The Disciplinary Commission's findings read that Chang 'accepted that he on 28th September 2022 had fixed a snooker match that he was playing in.'
He gave evidence to the commission that he was called by Liang Wenbo on the morning of the match 'with a threatening tone' and told that Liang 'had placed a lot of money on his bet without my knowledge, for my match with Jamie Jones that evening.'
Chang 'reluctantly agreed' but said he never received the money he was told he would be given for the fix.
The independent tribunal's findings on Chang read: 'We have found that Chang fixed or contrived, or was a party to an effort to fix or contrive, the result or score of a snooker match on one occasion.
'We note that, at the time that his match fixing took place, Chang was aged 20. He was young and impressionable and under the influence of Liang, of whom he was scared. Chang has given evidence that he thought Liang would take action against him if he did not comply with Liang's demands. We accept that, in all probability, Chang would not have offended absent that element of threat. He was also suffering financial difficulties at the time, he has shown genuine remorse for his actions and he admitted his office at the earliest opportunity. There is no suggestion that Chang committed any betting offence.'
10 players were banned in June 2023 as part of the match-fixing investigation, with Zhao and Chang the first two to return to the professional circuit.
Zhao did not fix a match himself so received the shortest ban, but was punished for being party to another player fixing matches and betting on snooker.
Chang received the shortest ban of those found guilty of match-fixing, due to the circumstances surrounding his case as he was believed to be caught up in the scandal against his will.
The 22-year-old will look to keep up his 100 per cent record early in the season when he plays in the Championship League on July 3 against Ricky Walden, Steven Hallworth and Rob Milkins. Liang Wenbo has been found in to be in breach of the Conduct Regulations as follows:• That he fixed or was a party to fix five snooker matches between 24th July and 28th September 2022• That he solicited, induced, enticed, persuaded, encouraged, or facilitated players to fix nine matches between 24th July and 13th December 2022• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules.• That he behaved in conduct that was corrupt by threatening another player and making him delete his messages on his phone.• That he threatened another player to seek to persuade him not to assist the WPBSA enquiry.• That he on or after 1st September 2022 when aware of the WPBSA enquiry covered up or attempted to cover up his involvement in match fixing by deleting messages on his mobile phone and by requesting that other players deleted messages on their phones.
• That he failed to cooperate with the WPBSA enquiry by failing to attend interviews and provide material requested by the WPBSA enquiry. Li Hang has been found to be in breach of the Conduct Regulations as follows:• That he fixed or was a party to fix five snooker matches between 24th July and 29th September 2022• That he solicited, induced, enticed, persuaded, encouraged or facilitated players to fix seven snooker matches between 24th July and 13th December 2022.• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules.
• That he on or after 1st September 2022 when aware of the WPBSA enquiry covered up or attempted to cover up his involvement in match fixing by deleting messages on his mobile phone and by requesting that other players deleted messages on their phones. Lu Ning was found not to have been involved in inducing others to fix matches. He accepted the following:• That in the 2014-15 season he fixed three snooker matches that he played in• That he on 23rd July 2022 he fixed one snooker match that he played in.• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules.
• That he on or after 1st September 2022 when aware of the WPBSA enquiry covered up or attempted to cover up his involvement in match fixing by deleting messages on his mobile phone. Yan Bingtao accepted the following:• That he on 29th August 2016 fixed one match that he played in• That he between 3rd March 2022 and 29th September 2022 fixed three snooker matches that he played in.
• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules. Zhao Xintong accepted the following:• That he on 3rd March and 11th March 2022 he was a party to another player fixing two snooker matches.
• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules. Zhao Jianbo accepted the following:• That he on 26th August 2022 fixed a snooker match that he was playing in
• That he bet on the snooker match that he fixed. Chang Bingyu accepted that he on 28th September 2022 had fixed a snooker match that he was playing in. Bai Langning accepted that he on 26th September 2022 had fixed a snooker match that he was playing in. Chen Zifan accepted the following:
• That he between 24th July and 23rd August 2022 fixed or contrived, or were a party to an effort to fix or contrive the result or score of three snooker matches that he played in Zhang Jiankang accepted the following:• That he on 22nd July 2022 fixed a match that he was playing in• That between 1st September 2019 and 31st December 2022 he bet on snooker matches in breach of the rules.
• That he failed to provide information requested by the WPBSA
Punishments Liang Wenbo has been given a lifetime from snooker and is to pay £43,000 in costs. Li Hang has been given a lifetime from snooker and is to pay £43,000 in costs. Lu Ning has been given an 8 year suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 5 years and 4 months until 6 April 2028. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Yan Bingtao has been given a 7 year and 6 months suspension, reduced following early admissions and plea of guilty, to 5 years until 11 December 2027. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Zhao Xintong has been given a 2 year and 6 months suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 1 year and 8 months until 1 September 2024. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Zhao Jianbo has been given a 3 year and 6 months suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 2 years and 4 months until 7 April 2025. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Chang Bingyu has been given a 3 year suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 2 years until 7 December 2024. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Bai Langning has been given a 4 year suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 2 years and 8 months until 6 August 2025. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Chen Zifan has been given a 7 year and 6 months suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 5 years until 20 December 2027. He is to pay £7,500 in costs. Zhang Jiankang has been given a 4 year and 5 months suspension, reduced following early admissions and his plea of guilty, to 2 years and 11 months until 1 December 2025. He is to pay £7,500 in costs.
MORE: Snooker chiefs reveal fines for Ding Junhui and Seniors champ for disciplinary issues
MORE: Luca Brecel pulls out of British Open in bizarre start to his snooker season
MORE: Three major World Snooker Tour events move to new TV channel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Newcastle's Alexander Isak offered £600,000-a-week tax-free deal by Al-Hilal
Alexander Isak has been offered a staggering £600,000-a-week tax-free deal by Al-Hilal in Saudi Arabia with further lucrative bonuses on top. The Newcastle striker is open to leaving St James' Park and Liverpool, who are long-term admirers, are keeping an eye on the situation. Isak has not travelled to Asia with his Newcastle teammates for the club's pre-season tour, officially because of a minor muscle injury, and is assessing his options. They include Al-Hilal, who reached the Club World Cup quarter-finals, losing to Fluminense, and want to make a grand statement by signing Isak – one of the most coveted players on the market. Al-Hilal, who are managed by Simone Inzaghi, are prepared to sweeten the package for the striker with bonuses if he were to win the league and/or the Asian Champions League and top the scoring charts. Isak has been unsettled by the transfer talk and he did not play for Newcastle in the friendly at Celtic last Saturday. The club have no desire to sell him and the fans would surely take the dimmest of views of their Saudi owners if they were to let him go to Al-Hilal. Like Newcastle, Al‑Hilal are owned by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund. Liverpool would not be able to match the personal terms that Al‑Hilal have proposed and it is unclear whether they would be able to afford the fee; Isak is valued at about £120m. Liverpool have signed another striker – Hugo Ekitiké, for £79m from Eintracht Frankfurt – and spent heavily in other areas, most notably the £116m package for the midfielder Florian Wirtz from Bayer Leverkusen. Their other big deals have been for Milos Kerkez (£40m from Bournemouth), Jeremie Frimpong (£29.5m, Leverkusen) and Giorgi Mamardashvili (£25m, Valencia). Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion When sales are factored in, chiefly those of Jarell Quansah (£30m to Leverkusen), Caoimhín Kelleher (£12.5m to Brentford) and Trent Alexander-Arnold (£10m to Real Madrid), Liverpool's net transfer spend stands at £235.5m. It is possible they could raise further funds by selling Darwin Núñez, Harvey Elliott and even Luis Díaz, although they have maintained the Colombian is not for sale. Isak is contracted to Newcastle until 2028.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The fun has gone for frazzled India as Shubman Gill's passivity leaves teammates drifting
For 22 overs on the third morning India toiled in the field, rotating through their bowling options, none of them working. Well, all but one of their bowling options: Washington Sundar remained unused, occasionally performing solo warm‑up exercises in the outfield only to be left there to cool down again. But then the right‑armer is primarily known for his ability to generate drift, and drifting was the one thing India were doing pretty effectively already. Finally, he got his chance. By then England's innings was 68 overs old and India's advantage had been whittled from 358 to only 53. In his three overs before lunch, with a tired ball, Washington brought some energy and some hope. Not with immediate reward, but enough to bring the slightest hint of a skip to his teammates' trudge from the field. He returned after lunch to dismiss Ollie Pope and Harry Brook, but in doing so it was hard to know if he was helping India solve their problems, or simply highlighting them. On Thursday they had mystifyingly chosen to give their startlingly pedestrian debutant Anshul Kamboj the new ball over Mohammed Siraj – who was later to add injury to insult – and sidelining for so long the bowler who was to prove their most dangerous was another indication of some seriously ditsy decision-making. And when sheer bad luck seems so intent on bringing a team to its knees, it is best not to give it a helping hand. Shubman Gill was named India's new captain in May, the team reeling from the retirements of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli. One imagines he travelled to England for his debut series in the role hoping to lead a new-look team through a tour that would still be spoken about years from now. And so it might, though as it seems at this point, towards the end of the fourth Test, most likely as actors talk of Macbeth – very cautiously, at the risk of triggering bad memories and ominous superstitions. Four lost tosses. A string of injuries, including a vice‑captain who damaged a hand in one game and a foot in the next. One convincing win, two narrow defeats. And then this. It is not hard to identify the moment for which England will remember this day: it will for sure involve Joe Root, either proudly waving his bat on completing his century, or meekly raising a hand to acknowledge the fans as he hurtled up the ladder of all-time Test run-scorers. But for India there are plenty of choices, each grimmer than the last. It may be the one, just after they took the second new ball, when Sai Sudharsan returned from a brief trip to the dressing-room, ran up to Gill, leaned into his ear to deliver a message – and as he did so Jasprit Bumrah, their premier bowler, left the field for what turned out to be a full half-hour. Or the one soon after Bumrah returned, when Siraj started limping in the middle of an over and, having completed it, was also forced off. Or when Bumrah finally felt ready to bowl again, handed his hat to the umpire, was told that because of his time away he wasn't allowed to, and put his hat back on. So many plans, and each of them, one after the other, shredded. So perhaps Gill had enough to think about, without also shouldering the responsibility of rousing and inspiring a tiring and increasingly dispirited team. But watching him closely in the field, the most obvious thing is the complete lack of obvious things. Occasionally, perhaps, he will gently shift a teammate's position, but apart from the odd weary handclap he says little and does less. Maybe the huddles with which India start each session are where he comes alive, but there is little there for the public to see – and repeatedly the field placings when there was a new batter at the crease, and with them an opportunity to create some pressure, seemed as passive as the captain himself. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion It is too soon, of course, to write off the 25-year-old, and having banked 619 runs in the series it can hardly be considered a failure, but inevitably when a captain does so little to answer the questions the game throws at him he will be subject of a few himself. Certainly, if you observe the players, their behaviour on their own and around others, then KL Rahul, who wears the No 1 on his back and also, it seems, in his heart, is the one who looks to be leading. The day did not in the end develop into the full-blown crisis that was at one stage threatened. Most important, whatever ailed Bumrah and Siraj, both recovered to bowl in the final session, and take a wicket apiece in doing so. But the best that could be said of it is that it might have been worse. For England, the sun shone. For India, the fun's gone.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The eye-watering six-figure weekly sum Alexander Isak could pick up if he goes to Saudi Arabia instead of Liverpool
Alexander Isak has been told he can earn a staggering £600,000 a week net if he signs for Al Hilal in Saudi Arabia. Isak has not travelled with Newcastle on their pre-season tour to Asia and, as revealed by Mail Sport on Thursday, he has informed the club's hierarchy he wants to explore a move away from Tyneside. Premier League Liverpool are interested in adding the 25-year-old Sweden international to Arne Slot 's battery of forward options, despite spending £79million on Hugo Ekitike from Eintracht Frankfurt. Newcastle are keen to negotiate a new deal with Isak who has scored 62 goals in 109 appearances since his arrival from Real Sociedad and three years to run on his current contract. But the greatest riches are on offer in the Saudi Pro League and can eclipse what either Liverpool or Newcastle could afford to pay Isak. Al Hilal have made told his advisors they are prepared to strike a deal worth £600,000 a week net. Liverpool, though, are front-runners to sign the forward in a summer of mega-spending for the Reds On a long-term contract it is a life-changing sum of money on the table for the Swede. The complication at the heart of the issue is that Newcastle and Al Hilal are both owned by PIF, Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund.
