July Mortgage Forecast: Will Interest Rates Budge This Summer?
Tharon Green/CNET
The average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was around 6.7% on Monday, down roughly 0.25% from the previous month, according to Bankrate data. Despite the recent decline in rates, forecasts for the housing market have remained unchanged.
Mortgage rates, linked to the bond market, have been stuck in limbo between 6.5% and 7% for months. President Trump's on-and-off-again tariffs, stock market swings and geopolitical turbulence have created ongoing uncertainty in the housing market. This week, financial markets are bracing for a bevy of White House announcements, including threats of new tariffs.
Though jobless claims and layoffs are increasing, the most recent jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed a lower-than-expected unemployment rate. Strong labor market data tends to drive up bond yields, which translates to higher mortgage rates.
As I've discussed in the past, a steady job market also makes it less likely that the Federal Reserve will carry out an interest rate cut this summer. Bond market investors drive yields (rates) higher or lower based on their expectations for inflation, unemployment, Fed policy decisions and government debt.
Market watchers are currently betting on September for a Fed reduction. But that won't be a magic cure for the housing market. Fannie Mae projects mortgage rates to stay above 6.5% throughout 2025. Mortgage rates would need to fall substantially from current levels to encourage homebuying demand, said Beth Ann Bovino, chief economist at U.S. Bank.
CNET
Tariffs, the Fed and mortgage rates
The central bank is responsible for ensuring full employment and controlling inflation, mainly by setting short-term interest rates for banks. Though the Fed's policy changes have a ripple effect on all borrowing rates, the central bank doesn't directly set the rates on home loans.
The market currently projects an interest rate cut in the fall, though two Fed officials floated the possibility of a rate cut this month. Fed Chair Powell has reaffirmed a "wait and see" posture, with concerns over the inflationary impact of tariffs.
Despite widespread pleas for lower consumer borrowing costs, including from the White House, the Fed held interest rates steady so far this year, and is likely to do the same at its July 29-30 meeting.
"With inflation data still sticky and tariffs ongoing, the consensus possibility remains a first cut in September, if not later," said Erin Sykes, housing economist and founder of Sykes Properties.
Since mortgage rates are highly sensitive to fiscal policy and supply chain shocks, a global trade war could impact their direction. For example, if the official inflation rate does increase due to tariff-induced price hikes, the Fed could further postpone rate cuts, and mortgage rates could increase.
"Even though many of the tariffs are in place, some of the big ones have yet to take effect," said Beth Ann Bovino, chief economist at U.S. Bank. The average household in the US is expected to lose about $3,000 in income from tariffs, with lower-income households getting hit even harder, according to Bovino.
Plus, with recession risks still on the horizon, people who are nervous about finances will be more reluctant to take on mortgage loan debt.
Navigating today's housing market
Major affordability challenges resulted in another inactive spring homebuying season. Even as the long-standing housing shortage eases in several local markets and gives some buyers improved negotiating power, the rest remain locked out by steep home prices.
"Prices are still incredibly high," Bovino said. "Add to that the borrowing costs of a mortgage, and it's prohibitively expensive for most people to get into the housing market." Plus, with recession risks still on the horizon, people who are nervous about finances will be more reluctant to take on mortgage loan debt.
Prospective buyers waiting for mortgage rates to drop may soon have to adjust to the "higher for longer" rate environment, with mortgage rates fluctuating between 5% and 7% over the longer term.
While market forces are out of your control, there are ways to make buying a home slightly more affordable. Last year, nearly half of all homebuyers secured a mortgage rate below 5%, according to Zillow.
Here are some proven strategies that can help you save up to 1.5% on your mortgage rate.
💰 Build your credit score. Your credit score will help determine whether you qualify for a mortgage and at what interest rate. A credit score of 740 or higher will help you qualify for a lower rate.
💰 Save for a bigger down payment. A larger down payment allows you to take out a smaller mortgage and get a lower interest rate from your lender. If you can afford it, a down payment of at least 20% will also eliminate private mortgage insurance.
💰 Shop for mortgage lenders. Comparing loan offers from multiple mortgage lenders can help you negotiate a better rate. Experts recommend getting at least two to three loan estimates from different lenders.
💰 Consider mortgage points. You can get a lower mortgage rate by buying mortgage points, with each point costing 1% of the total loan amount. One mortgage point equals a 0.25% decrease in your mortgage rate.
Now Playing: 6 Ways to Reduce Your Mortgage Interest Rate by 1% or More
02:31
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump, Term-Limited, Amasses $200 Million War Chest for Political Ambitions
President Trump's super PAC is sitting on about $200 million that it can spend against his rivals, giving a term-limited president a never-before-seen amount of power in his party's finances and future. In the first half of 2025, Mr. Trump's group, MAGA Inc., collected about $177 million from the likes of Elon Musk, Mr. Trump's erstwhile ally, the TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass and the Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, according to a filing on Thursday with the Federal Election Commission. Mr. Trump has been able to capitalize on a thirst from corporate America to get into his good graces. He held a half-dozen fund-raisers for his super PAC this year with tickets costing seven figures a seat. At the dinners, often held at one of Mr. Trump's properties, executives and lobbyists had the chance to tell the president about their businesses. The super PAC's exact cash on hand is $196.1 million, according to the filing. There is no precedent for politicians so aggressively raising money for their own entities when they do not have a campaign to use it for. In the first half of 2013, a similar political group supporting a term-limited Barack Obama, Priorities USA, raised just $356,000. As of that June, it held $3.4 million, less than 2 percent of the cash on hand of Mr. Trump's super PAC. The money raised by MAGA Inc. during the first six months of the year is almost twice the amount collected by the Republican National Committee, which is subject to contribution limits. Mr. Yass donated $15 million to the super PAC and Mr. Horowitz and Mr. Andreessen combined to donate an additional $11 million. That Mr. Trump is raising so much money for his group has confounded some Republicans. Some of Mr. Trump's most loyal supporters have argued that he should try to run for a third term, despite it being unconstitutional. Mr. Trump's aides have argued that he would be foolish not to accept money that is essentially for the taking, and that the assets can be used to target Mr. Trump's rivals, beginning with Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican whom MAGA Inc. is attacking. Mr. Massie broke with Mr. Trump on the president's decision to bomb Iran and on his domestic bill. With a $200 million war chest, MAGA Inc. figures to be a big part of Republican primaries, making Mr. Trump's endorsements in those races all the more important. The money is sure to be spent on advertising to back Mr. Trump's endorsed candidates. The sum raised by Mr. Trump's group has scrambled the Republican fund-raising landscape and worried some conservatives. Mr. Trump's group, not those of the Republican leadership in the House and Senate, will most likely be the biggest spender in the 2026 midterm elections, weakening the power of allies like Speaker Mike Johnson and Senator John Thune, the majority leader. Mr. Johnson's and Mr. Thune's groups, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds, reported holding just $32.7 million and $29.7 million as of June 30. Super PACs had to file reports with the F.E.C. by midnight Thursday, detailing fund-raising and spending activity from January to June. Perhaps the only group that could rival the influence of Mr. Trump's super PAC is Fairshake, a super PAC supported by the crypto industry that entered July with about $140 million on hand, filings show. MAGA Inc. also has an allied political nonprofit group that is not required to disclose its donors or total donations but can spend some of its money on political advocacy. The New York Times reported in May that MAGA Inc. and the nonprofit had raised about $400 million since the November election. Support from Mr. Musk was never guaranteed. He initially pledged to Mr. Trump that he would spend about $100 million on the president's political operation, but his eventual contributions were far smaller — just $5 million. Mr. Musk's relationship with Mr. Trump has recently blown up, and Mr. Musk now considers himself unaligned politically. The Tesla chief also made contributions to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds, the filings reveal. Mr. Musk donated $5 million to each group a few weeks after his public blowup with Mr. Trump, seemingly a signal that he planned to back Republicans in the midterms. But a few days later, after Mr. Trump's budget bill passed, he pledged to leave the Republican Party and start a rival entity. He has made little headway in that work. The filings also reveal that Mr. Musk spent about $45 million through his super PAC, America PAC, on a Wisconsin judicial race. Two-thirds of the money that Mr. Musk put into the super PAC in the first half of the year went to incentives for people who had signed or promoted a petition hawked by the super PAC, according to its filing. Mr. Musk's chosen candidate lost badly. Other significant donations in the first half of 2025 revealed this week included $10 million from Mr. Yass to a super PAC supporting Vivek Ramaswamy, who is running for governor of Ohio; $1 million from the Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison to support Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican and a longtime friend; and millions from Paul Singer, John Paulson and a group backed by Miriam Adelson to another anti-Massie group, donations that Mr. Musk deemed 'interesting.'
Washington Post
a few seconds ago
- Washington Post
Trump injects new dose of uncertainty in tariffs as he pushes start date back to Aug. 7
WASHINGTON — For weeks, President Donald Trump was promising the world economy would change on Friday with his new tariffs in place . It was an ironclad deadline, administration officials assured the public. But when Trump signed the order Thursday night imposing new tariffs on 68 countries and the European Union, the start date of the punishing import taxes was pushed back seven days so that the tariff schedule could be updated. The change — while potentially welcome news to countries that had not yet reached a deal with the U.S. — injected a new dose of uncertainty for consumers and businesses still wondering what's going to happen and when.
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Special session to address Colorado's projected $1 billion budget shortfall looming
Although nothing has been decided, right now all signs point to a special session to resolve Colorado's projected $1.2 billion shortfall. State leaders say Colorado is disproportionately affected by the Big Beautiful Bill compared to the rest of the country because it's one of four states that mirror or align with federal tax policy. The path forward is complicated. "That's actually a staggering number that we're going to have to adjust this budget, which we already adjusted by $1.1 billion, so there's not a lot of room there to fix this," said Democrat Senator Judy Amabile, who serves House District 49 and sits on the Joint Budget Committee. The expectation is that a special session will be called sooner rather than later. "In that special session, we can address some of the tax treatments, at least for 2026, and we can start to make some of the cuts that need to be made, because every day that goes on, the cuts get bigger," said Amabile. "We have to tell the agencies to stop spending on various things." While there's a lot of work to be done to make up for such a massive shortfall, it doesn't appear Republicans and Democrats are on the same page about much, including how the state got to this point to begin with. "On June 30, we had a balanced budget. And then on July 4, we had a $1.2 billion hole in that budget," said Amabile. "Our budget was balanced and on July 4, we had a $1.2 billion hole; wrong," said Republican Senator Barbara Kirkmeyer, who represents Senate District 23. "On June 15, we knew that we were already dipping into reserves to the tune of about $84 million, approximately. We learned that because of the structural deficit we're in, that we didn't make enough ongoing general fund cuts in the budget." Kirkmeyer also sits on the Joint Budget Committee and says the blame for the federal budget is inflated. "They tried to insinuate that we're going to have to shut off the Family Affordability Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit because of those 'crazy Republicans' trying to give us a tax break in DC. Director Ferrandino, the governor's budget guy, told us back in June that he assumed that both of those tax credits would be triggered, and they would be shut off. So that was already happening prior to the federal bill passing." But regardless of how and why, the fact is, Colorado is facing a massive shortfall and will be receiving less tax revenue. The tax cuts, a big cost for a small benefit to Democrats. Legislative Democrats held a committee meeting Thursday to speak with stakeholders and industry leaders to get a full picture of the scope of impact of the federal budget bill, which includes cuts to SNAP and insurance benefits.
