How photo overload might be warping our ability to remember
Oluban, 37, has only a handful of birthday photos from when she was young. But her seven-year-old-son, Arlo, has 'easily 200,' captured by different attendees on their smartphones. 'Practically every single second of his life is documented,' she says. 'Arlo's almost got a virtual reality representation of an event because there are so many pictures and videos. I think for him, it's quite vivid.'
In 2023, people around the world took an estimated 5.3 billion photos, about 61,400 every second, according to photography data site Photutorial. Oluban alone has more than 140,000 pictures on her phone: selfies with Arlo, sunsets, butterflies, ice cream. They're instantly accessible, searchable, and sharable.
'People record much more data about their lives than any previous generation,' says Fabian Hutmacher, a psychologist at the University of Würzburg who studies how digital media shapes our memories. 'It's natural to ask: does that change anything about the way we remember our lives?' How digital photos are reshaping our memories
Autobiographical memory—our recollection of personal life events—is central to how we understand ourselves. 'Memories are crucial for defining who we are,' says Hutmacher. 'They are a sort of reservoir that we refer to whenever we think about our lives.'
Memory, however, isn't like playing back a video. Neuroscientific research shows that this type of memory depends on interactions between the hippocampus, which helps consolidate new experiences, and the prefrontal cortex, which organizes them into coherent life narratives. These systems are especially sensitive to attention and emotional engagement—factors that may be disrupted when we're more focused on photographing a moment than experiencing it.
'Our memory is not faithful,' says Julia Soares, assistant professor of psychology at Mississippi State University. 'It's tied up with who you are and your story making throughout your life. It's your autobiography.'
Photos can support this reconstructive storytelling. Researchers agree that images often help jog memory by surfacing details or emotions we might otherwise forget. 'I take them partly to document, but also as a way of holding onto moments I know I'll want to revisit,' says 20-year-old Alina Nguyen. 'It's like a time capsule—sometimes I remember specific feelings or details I'd completely forgotten until I see an image…I think I've learned a lot about myself just by noticing patterns or changes in the photos over time.'
For Hutmacher, though, photos are more than just a cue for memories. He argues that in the digital age, photos are actually changing how we form memories in the first place. Remembering, he says, is no longer purely internal; it's an interaction between our minds and resources like photos, meaning it's built not only from what we store in our brains but also from what we offload onto devices like smartphones.
While offloading can reduce cognitive burden, studies suggest it may also weaken our ability to recall details unless we actively review the material later. As a result, when we turn to digital images to reconstruct an event, those files don't just support our memory—they become part of it.
This shift raises new questions. If our memories are partly constructed through what we photograph—and what we choose to revisit—then our devices aren't just reflecting our past. They're shaping which moments we remember, how vividly, and supposedly how well we interpret our personal histories.
(Are you better than AI at guessing what makes a photo memorable?) When too many photos backfire
Still, more pictures don't necessarily mean stronger memories. A 2013 study by cognitive psychologist Linda Henkel found that photographing objects can actually impair memory, with participants appearing to 'rely on the external device of the camera to 'remember' for them.' However, when participants engaged with the objects they photographed, they remembered them better. 'If you go to a concert and you spend 90 minutes filming, focusing on getting a good angle, then it reduces your enjoyment of the situation, as well as the memory you have of it,' says Hutmacher. 'On the other hand, if you record a snapshot because it's your favourite song, then it can improve memory later.'
Even so, most people don't regularly revisit their photos. And without reviewing or organizing them, pictures can become overwhelming, making it harder to find the meaningful ones. 'It can be a rose with a thorn,' says Soares. 'Photos provide these incredible memory cues. But if you never review them, you're not capitalizing on that benefit, and you may actually be losing something from the act of taking the photo.'
(Want to improve your memory? The MIND diet may help)
Parenting expert Kirsty Ketley understands that trade-off. With thousands of images stored on her phone—and backed up to the cloud—she began to feel burdened by her digital archive. 'It does become very overwhelming,' she says. When she was alerted that her storage was running out, she decided to take fewer photographs, focusing on special occasions and events. 'Parents just [take photos] without thinking,' she says. 'I feel I can enjoy the time more because I'm not so worried about whether I've got the positioning right. I'm there in the moment…It does help to keep those memories alive.' Curating what we remember—and what we forget
Psychologists have long recognized that forgetting is an essential part of how memory works. But in a world saturated with digital images, what we choose to capture—and what we choose to revisit or erase—may be subtly reshaping that process, says Soares.
(Use this ancient technique to remember (almost) anything.)
Our photo habits are no longer just about preserving memories; they're part of how we construct them in the first place. For example, when we share photos on social media, evidence shows that we remember the experiences better. Conversely, in her 2023 study, Soares found that deleting photos meant that people remembered their experiences less vividly. Some participants had intentionally deleted photos they wanted to forget, like an ex or a bad night out.
'People are trying to curate their photos to do the type of remembering that they want do,' says Soares. 'These photographed events might create hills, and there may be valleys where non-photographed stories or life events may be. It remains to be seen the extent to which that will be the case.'
For Nguyen, the fear of forgetting is enough to keep every photo. 'I do worry about forgetting things that weren't photographed,' says Nguyen, who has 33,000 photos on her phone. 'I think that's why I'm so drawn to taking photos – to make sure some piece of it stays with me. Forgetting can be scary, especially when it comes to people or moments that shaped me.'
This article is part of Your Memory, Rewired, a National Geographic exploration into the fuzzy, fascinating frontiers of memory science—including advice on how to make your own memory more powerful. Learn more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
02-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
July 2025 full moon: Here's when the ‘buck moon' will rise in Ontario skies
There are various names given to the full moon in July — the most common of which is the Buck Moon. July's full moon gets this name because this is the time of year when the antlers of male deer (bucks) are in full-growth mode, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac . The whitetail deer, the most common species of deer in North America, sees rapid antler growth during spring and summer, according to Mississippi State University . During the peak growth period, antlers — which are the fastest-growing bones humans are aware of — can grow as quickly as three-quarters of an inch per week for yearlings and one and a half inches per week for adults. This growth rate slows down in late summer as the antlers mineralize and the antlers become complete. July's full moon will reach peak illumination on Thursday, July 10, at 4:37 p.m. eastern time, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac. Below are the July 2025 moon phases, according to the Old Farmer's Almanac: Check out more cool events in this year's lunar and solar lineup . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

National Geographic
17-06-2025
- National Geographic
How photo overload might be warping our ability to remember
When Lavania Oluban looks at photos from her childhood, the memories feel incomplete. 'It's hazy around the edges—I'm filling in missing pieces of the puzzle with a memory that's not quite real,' she says. Oluban, 37, has only a handful of birthday photos from when she was young. But her seven-year-old-son, Arlo, has 'easily 200,' captured by different attendees on their smartphones. 'Practically every single second of his life is documented,' she says. 'Arlo's almost got a virtual reality representation of an event because there are so many pictures and videos. I think for him, it's quite vivid.' In 2023, people around the world took an estimated 5.3 billion photos, about 61,400 every second, according to photography data site Photutorial. Oluban alone has more than 140,000 pictures on her phone: selfies with Arlo, sunsets, butterflies, ice cream. They're instantly accessible, searchable, and sharable. 'People record much more data about their lives than any previous generation,' says Fabian Hutmacher, a psychologist at the University of Würzburg who studies how digital media shapes our memories. 'It's natural to ask: does that change anything about the way we remember our lives?' How digital photos are reshaping our memories Autobiographical memory—our recollection of personal life events—is central to how we understand ourselves. 'Memories are crucial for defining who we are,' says Hutmacher. 'They are a sort of reservoir that we refer to whenever we think about our lives.' Memory, however, isn't like playing back a video. Neuroscientific research shows that this type of memory depends on interactions between the hippocampus, which helps consolidate new experiences, and the prefrontal cortex, which organizes them into coherent life narratives. These systems are especially sensitive to attention and emotional engagement—factors that may be disrupted when we're more focused on photographing a moment than experiencing it. 'Our memory is not faithful,' says Julia Soares, assistant professor of psychology at Mississippi State University. 'It's tied up with who you are and your story making throughout your life. It's your autobiography.' Photos can support this reconstructive storytelling. Researchers agree that images often help jog memory by surfacing details or emotions we might otherwise forget. 'I take them partly to document, but also as a way of holding onto moments I know I'll want to revisit,' says 20-year-old Alina Nguyen. 'It's like a time capsule—sometimes I remember specific feelings or details I'd completely forgotten until I see an image…I think I've learned a lot about myself just by noticing patterns or changes in the photos over time.' For Hutmacher, though, photos are more than just a cue for memories. He argues that in the digital age, photos are actually changing how we form memories in the first place. Remembering, he says, is no longer purely internal; it's an interaction between our minds and resources like photos, meaning it's built not only from what we store in our brains but also from what we offload onto devices like smartphones. While offloading can reduce cognitive burden, studies suggest it may also weaken our ability to recall details unless we actively review the material later. As a result, when we turn to digital images to reconstruct an event, those files don't just support our memory—they become part of it. This shift raises new questions. If our memories are partly constructed through what we photograph—and what we choose to revisit—then our devices aren't just reflecting our past. They're shaping which moments we remember, how vividly, and supposedly how well we interpret our personal histories. (Are you better than AI at guessing what makes a photo memorable?) When too many photos backfire Still, more pictures don't necessarily mean stronger memories. A 2013 study by cognitive psychologist Linda Henkel found that photographing objects can actually impair memory, with participants appearing to 'rely on the external device of the camera to 'remember' for them.' However, when participants engaged with the objects they photographed, they remembered them better. 'If you go to a concert and you spend 90 minutes filming, focusing on getting a good angle, then it reduces your enjoyment of the situation, as well as the memory you have of it,' says Hutmacher. 'On the other hand, if you record a snapshot because it's your favourite song, then it can improve memory later.' Even so, most people don't regularly revisit their photos. And without reviewing or organizing them, pictures can become overwhelming, making it harder to find the meaningful ones. 'It can be a rose with a thorn,' says Soares. 'Photos provide these incredible memory cues. But if you never review them, you're not capitalizing on that benefit, and you may actually be losing something from the act of taking the photo.' (Want to improve your memory? The MIND diet may help) Parenting expert Kirsty Ketley understands that trade-off. With thousands of images stored on her phone—and backed up to the cloud—she began to feel burdened by her digital archive. 'It does become very overwhelming,' she says. When she was alerted that her storage was running out, she decided to take fewer photographs, focusing on special occasions and events. 'Parents just [take photos] without thinking,' she says. 'I feel I can enjoy the time more because I'm not so worried about whether I've got the positioning right. I'm there in the moment…It does help to keep those memories alive.' Curating what we remember—and what we forget Psychologists have long recognized that forgetting is an essential part of how memory works. But in a world saturated with digital images, what we choose to capture—and what we choose to revisit or erase—may be subtly reshaping that process, says Soares. (Use this ancient technique to remember (almost) anything.) Our photo habits are no longer just about preserving memories; they're part of how we construct them in the first place. For example, when we share photos on social media, evidence shows that we remember the experiences better. Conversely, in her 2023 study, Soares found that deleting photos meant that people remembered their experiences less vividly. Some participants had intentionally deleted photos they wanted to forget, like an ex or a bad night out. 'People are trying to curate their photos to do the type of remembering that they want do,' says Soares. 'These photographed events might create hills, and there may be valleys where non-photographed stories or life events may be. It remains to be seen the extent to which that will be the case.' For Nguyen, the fear of forgetting is enough to keep every photo. 'I do worry about forgetting things that weren't photographed,' says Nguyen, who has 33,000 photos on her phone. 'I think that's why I'm so drawn to taking photos – to make sure some piece of it stays with me. Forgetting can be scary, especially when it comes to people or moments that shaped me.' This article is part of Your Memory, Rewired, a National Geographic exploration into the fuzzy, fascinating frontiers of memory science—including advice on how to make your own memory more powerful. Learn more.
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
Infant twins buried together in Roman Croatia may have died from lead poisoning
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Nearly 2,000 years ago, fraternal twin infants — one boy and one girl — were buried facing each other in a cemetery in what is now Croatia, a new study finds. It's unclear why the twins died, but lead poisoning may have played a role, the researchers wrote in a study published in the April issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. "It is one of the very few double burials known in Croatia and is the only double burial of very young individuals in this cemetery," study first author Anna Osterholtz, a bioarchaeologist at Mississippi State University, told Live Science in an email. The burial ground, known as Dragulin cemetery, was initially excavated in 2016, when construction for a parking lot revealed a handful of ancient stone urns, the researchers wrote in the study. The cemetery is in the modern city of Trogir (Tragurium in Roman times), a UNESCO World Heritage site. This area became a part of the Roman province of Illyricum after Julius Caesar's civil war in 47 B.C. An investigation into the "short life and death of these siblings" revealed that they were buried sometime between the end of the first and the late second century A.D., the researchers wrote in the study. Related: 31,000-year-old burial holds world's oldest known identical twins An ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis showed that the infants were fraternal twins who were either stillborn or died within two months of their birth. "The burial posture of both twins suggests that they were important to their family and buried with significant care," Osterholtz said. "This is the first case of fraternal twins from the Roman period in Croatia that has been confirmed via aDNA analysis." Both individuals showed signs of chronic metabolic disease, or diseases caused by nutritional deficiency (like scurvy or rickets) or the body's inability to utilize nutrients. Given the twins' young age at death, their nutrition would have come entirely from their mother, either through the placenta in the womb or breast milk after birth. So, it's possible that their metabolic diseases reflected their mother's poor health — meaning she was either malnourished or suffered from a metabolic disease herself. Another idea is that the twins died from lead poisoning. Lead was pervasive in the Roman world; it was used in pipes and cookware. A lead compound was even used as a sweetener in wine and as a preservative for fruits. The twins' skeletal conditions are consistent with the effects of lead exposure, such as increased bone porosity and periosteal reactions, or new bone formation that happens when bones weakened from lead poisoning are fractured, the researchers wrote in the study. Chronic lead exposure can disrupt metabolic processes like hemoglobin synthesis, sperm production and neural function, and it can also hinder nutrient absorption, which could manifest in both the mother and the developing infants. "Lead exposure through breast milk is a known cause of elevated infant blood lead levels," Amy Pyle-Eilola, an assistant professor of pathology at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, who was not involved in the study, told Live Science in an email. "Additionally, there is a known correlation between elevated blood lead and metabolic bone disease in children." RELATED STORIES —Medieval 'vampire' burial in Croatia contains decapitated and twisted remains —Ancient Egyptian teenager died while giving birth to twins, mummy reveals —Remains of twin fetuses and wealthy mom found in Bronze Age urn Although the authors did not test the twins' remains for lead, they highlighted several cases of metabolic disorders in Roman-era children with high levels of lead in their teeth whose remains were found near Tragurium. "So, if the mother had a significant lead exposure, which is a realistic possibility based on studies examining the same general time and location, it is absolutely possible that the lead was passed to the twins during pregnancy and/or via breastmilk, and the resulting elevation in lead could cause the observed bone disease," Pyle-Eilola added. However, it's hard to know why the twins' health was so poor; there are many other nutritional, genetic and developmental issues that could account for the metabolic bone disease described in this study, Pyle-Eilola said.