Measles outbreak in US has 'hit a plateau,' CDC says
The measles outbreaks that have sickened at least 1,227 people across 36 states may be hitting a plateau, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials said Wednesday, June 25.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met for the first time on June 25 after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. fired all 17 original members on June 9, replacing them with members that critics have called unqualified. Some of the members, like Kennedy, have a history of anti-vaccine sentiments, prompting backlash that had experts and organizations calling for a delay in the meeting.
The new ACIP met anyway on Wednesday for the first part of a two-day meeting. During this time Demetre Daskalakis, Director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, provided updates on communicable disease outbreaks the CDC is currently monitoring in the U.S. Of all confirmed measles cases, he said, 89% of them are associated with the outbreak, which was centered heavily in the southwest, with Texas reporting 750 cases across 35 counties and New Mexico reporting 81 total cases as of June 25.
"There's some really good indicators that we have hit a plateau, the cases are definitely decreasing," he told the committee. "As we are seeing fewer cases in the southwest, we continue to see global introductions come into the U.S., which thankfully to date have mainly been short, terminal trains of transmissions as opposed to more sustained transmissions we saw in the southwest."
Overall risk to the U.S. population is low, he said, though health agencies will continue to watch transmissions and communities at higher risk closely.
Daskalakis also briefly spoke on the bird flu outbreak, which in 2024 transmitted to cows for the first time in known history. Over 1,000 herds have been diagnosed with H5N1 since and 70 cases have been reported in humans, though transmission to humans is rare.
"We are seeing overall a decrease in the number of infections that are being detected in non-human mammals and in birds," he said, adding that increased milk testing conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture has allowed for earlier detection in herds. "The effect of that is, to date, we have had no new human cases in 15 weeks."
Risk to the general public remains low.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: CDC: US measles outbreak has hit 'plateau'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The CDC won't fund local organizations' HIV prevention, ignoring KY health needs
In a recent decision, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) abruptly eliminated $200,000 in annual HIV prevention funding to AVOL Kentucky, a trusted, community-based nonprofit that has served Kentuckians for more than 30 years. This decision wasn't based on poor performance. Quite the opposite, AVOL Kentucky exceeded every benchmark and was preparing to expand outreach in the region. But in a sweeping national overhaul of HIV prevention funding, the CDC chose to bypass local and statewide community organizations like ours. For context, AVOL's persistence over the past three-plus decades melted the willful ignorance of the problem on the part of federal actors. AVOL Kentucky began to receive funding to provide direct HIV prevention outreach, and ever since we have been a critical part of the federal and state government's approach to stopping the spread of HIV. What began as a smattering of Lexingtonians trying to help their neighbors grew to an organization that serves all 120 Kentucky counties. Today we are at the most difficult last mile of prevention and health care delivery, without which the current successes in HIV management would not be possible. To be clear, this wasn't a budget cut. The funding is still there, just no longer supporting AVOL or similar service providers. As a result, Kentuckians will pay the price. More Kentuckians WILL get HIV, and our state will become less healthy. The CDC's decision to bypass trusted, grassroots organizations in favor of institutions that often lack presence in the communities most in need is a step backward. It creates a cascade of consequences: delayed testing, fewer prevention tools, disrupted care and the dismantling of years of trust built by local educators and advocates. At AVOL Kentucky, where I serve as board president, we assist all 120 counties across the commonwealth, many of which are rural and underserved parts of our state. Our staff and volunteers conduct more than 1,500 HIV tests annually and distribute thousands of condoms, educational materials and prevention resources. We connect individuals to affirming providers, help navigate testing and treatment and often serve as the first point of contact for those who are uninsured or unsure where else to turn. In many communities, we're not just a resource, we're the only resource. Opinion: As a family court judge, I know chronic absenteeism is a public health crisis These services matter. Kentucky has some of the highest rates of HIV and Hepatitis C in the country. Without consistent prevention efforts, and without trusted local providers offering these services without judgment, infection rates will rise, public health systems will become strained and individuals who are already vulnerable will become even more isolated. Often those who walk into our doors do not have health insurance, so our free services are the only way they can readily get sexual health testing and information. Our specialists work with those clients to explore their options to get covered. The CDC's decision ignores the unique realities of rural states like ours. Transportation, broadband access and stigma already create significant barriers to care. Replacing a responsive, community-rooted organization with a research institution, however well-intentioned, doesn't address those barriers. In many cases, it makes them worse. The secondary effect of regular, judgment-free access to sexual health care through AVOL Kentucky is increased, overall good health. Studies show that gaining access to HIV testing leads to increased testing for other sexually transmitted infections and more immediate treatment. It leads to increased condom use, and it reduces psychological strain from HIV-related anxiety. These improvements translate into fewer emergency room visits, lower long-term health care costs and longer, healthier lives. It's the kind of preventive care we should all be championing. Instead, AVOL Kentucky is being asked to do more with less, or in this case, to do the same life-saving work without the federal funding that has long sustained it. I've served on the board of AVOL Kentucky for many years, and I've watched firsthand how our team meets people where they are, literally and figuratively. Whether at pride festivals, churches, recovery centers or food pantries, AVOL shows up with compassion, integrity and information. There's no substitute for that kind of consistent, local presence. It can't be replicated by a new grant or an outside institution. Agree or disagree? Submit a letter to the editor. Roy Harrison is the board president of AVOL Kentucky. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Kentucky needs CDC funds for local HIV prevention | Opinion
Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
RFK Jr. is dismantling trust in vaccines, the crown jewel of American public health
When it comes to vaccines, virtually nothing that comes out of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s mouth is true. The man in charge of the nation's health and well being is impervious to science, expertise and knowledge. His brand of arrogance is not just dangerous, it is lethal. Undermining trust in vaccines, he will have the blood of children around the world on his hands. Scratch that. He already does, as he presides over the second largest measles outbreak in this country since the disease was declared 'eliminated' a quarter century ago. 'Vaccines have become a divisive issue in American politics,' Kennedy wrote the other day in a Wall Street Journal essay, 'but there is one thing all parties can agree on: The U.S. faces a crisis of public trust.' The lack of self-awareness would be funny if it weren't so tragic. Over the past two decades or so, Kennedy has done more than almost any other American to destroy the public's trust in vaccines and science. And now he's bemoaning the very thing he has helped cause. Earlier this month, Kennedy fired the 17 medical and public health experts of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — qualified doctors and public health experts — and replaced them with a group of (mostly) anti-vaxxers in order to pursue his relentless, ascientific crusade. On Thursday, at its first meeting, his newly reconstituted council voted to ban the preservative thimerosal from the few remaining vaccines that contain it, despite many studies showing that thimerosal is safe. On that point, even the Food and Drug Administration website is blunt: 'A robust body of peer-reviewed scientific studies conducted in the U.S. and other countries support the safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines.' 'If you searched the world wide, you could not find a less suitable person to be leading healthcare efforts in the United States or the world,' psychiatrist Allen Frances told NPR on Thursday. Frances, who chaired the task force that changed how the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM, defines autism, published an essay in the New York Times on Monday explaining why the incidence of autism has increased but is neither an epidemic nor related to vaccines. 'The rapid rise in autism cases is not because of vaccines or environmental toxins,' Frances wrote, 'but is rather the result of changes in the way that autism is defined and assessed — changes that I helped put into place.' But Kennedy is not one to let the facts stand in the way of his cockamamie theories. Manufacturers long ago removed thimerosal from childhood vaccines because of unfounded fears it contained mercury that could accumulate in the brain and unfounded fears about a relationship between mercury and autism. That did not stop one of Kennedy's new council members, Lyn Redwood, who once led Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy, from declaring a victory for children. 'Removing a known neurotoxin from being injected into our most vulnerable population is a good place to start with making America healthy again,' Redwood told the committee. Autism rates, by the way, have continued to climb despite the thimerosal ban. But fear not, gullible Americans, Kennedy has promised to pinpoint a cause for the complex condition by September! Like his boss, Kennedy just makes stuff up. On Wednesday, he halted a $1-billion American commitment to Gavi, an organization that provides vaccines to millions of children around the world, wrongly accusing the group of failing to investigate adverse reactions to the diptheria vaccine. 'This is utterly disastrous for children around the world and for public health,' Atul Gawande, a surgeon who worked in the Biden administration, told the New York Times. Unilaterally, and contrary to the evidence, Kennedy decided to abandon the CDC recommendation that healthy pregnant women receive COVID vaccines. But an unvaccinated pregnant woman's COVID infection can lead to serious health problems for her newborn. In fact, a study last year found that babies born to such mothers had 'unusually high rates' of respiratory distress at or just after birth. According to the CDC, nearly 90% of babies who were hospitalized for COVID-19 had unvaccinated mothers. Also, vaccinated moms can pass protective antibodies to their fetuses, who will not be able to get a COVID shot until they are 6 months old. What else? Oh yes: Kennedy once told podcaster Joe Rogan that the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic was 'vaccine-induced flu' even though no flu vaccine existed at the time. He also told Rogan that a 2003 study by physician scientist Michael Pichichero, an expert on the use of thimerosal in vaccines, involved feeding babies 6 months old and younger mercury-contaminated tuna sandwiches, and that 64 days later, the mercury was still in their system. 'Who would do that?' Kennedy demanded. Well, no one. In the study, 40 babies were injected with vaccines containing thimerosal, while a control group of 21 babies got shots that did not contain the preservative. None was fed tuna. Ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal, the researchers concluded, 'seems to be eliminated from blood rapidly via the stools.' (BTW, the mercury found in fish is methylmercury, a different chemical, which can damage the brain and nervous system. In a 2012 deposition for his divorce, which was revealed last year, Kennedy said he suffered memory loss and brain fog from mercury poisoning caused by eating too much tuna fish. He also revealed he has a dead worm in his brain.) Kennedy's tuna sandwich anecdote on Rogan's podcast was 'a ChatGPT-level of hallucination,' said Morgan McSweeney, a.k.a. 'Dr. Noc,' a scientist with a doctorate in pharmaceutical sciences, focusing on immunology and antibodies. McSweeney debunks the idiotic medical claims of non-scientists like Kennedy in his popular social media videos. Speaking of AI hallucinations, on Tuesday, at a congressional committee hearing, Kennedy was questioned about inaccuracies, misinformation and made up research and citations for nonexistent studies in the first report from his Make America Healthy Again Commission. The report focused on how American children are being harmed by their poor diets, exposure to environmental toxins and, predictably, over-vaccination. It was immediately savaged by experts. 'This is not an evidence-based report, and for all practical purposes, it should be junked at this point,' Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Assn. told the Washington Post. If Kennedy was sincere about improving the health of American children he would focus on combating real scourges like gun violence, drug overdoses, depression, poverty and lack of access to preventive healthcare. He would be fighting the proposed cuts to Medicaid tooth and nail. Do you suppose he even knows that over the past 50 years, the lives of an estimated 154 million children have been saved by vaccines? Or that he cares? @ @rabcarian
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
As new variant spreads, what's the latest COVID-19 vaccine guidance? It's complicated.
As a new COVID-19 variant takes over in the U.S., guidance surrounding vaccines has become increasingly confusing. Changes in vaccination guidelines, ever-evolving variants and strains, along with threats to health insurance, have sent average Americans looking for the latest recommendations as members of the federal government often conflict with independent medical agencies and healthcare professionals. In the two weeks leading up to June 21, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported just shy of 14,500 positive COVID tests, and while hospitalizations and deaths are fortunately down significantly since the pandemic's peak, vulnerable people are still grappling with limiting their risk amid changing practices. Having trouble keeping track of variants and vaccines? Here's what we know. What is the new NB.1.8.1 COVID variant? NB.1.8.1 is one of the latest variants of COVID-19, a "slightly upgraded version" of the LP.8.1 variant that is prominent right now, Subhash Verma, microbiology and immunology professor at the University of Nevada, Reno, previously told USA TODAY in May. Verma previously stated that NB.1.8.1 may be transferred more easily than LP.8.1. Additionally, he noted that NB.1.8.1 can evade antibodies created by vaccines or past infections more easily than LP.8.1. In early April, NB.1.8.1 accounted for 0% of COVID cases in the U.S. In the two weeks ending June 21, it accounted for the majority of cases at 43%, according to the CDC. The variant has similar symptoms to other strains, including fever or chills, cough, shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, sore throat, congestion or a runny nose, new loss of taste or smell, fatigue, muscle or body aches, headache, nausea or vomiting. One of its more unique features is "razor blade throat," reported by patients as an exceptionally sore throat. RFK and HHS change COVID vaccine guidance Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said on May 27 that the COVID-19 vaccine would no longer be included in the CDC's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, a move that broke with previous expert guidance and bypassed the normal scientific review process. Under the changes, the only people who will be recommended for COVID-19 vaccines are those over 65 and people with existing health problems. This could make it harder for others who want the COVID-19 vaccine to get it, including health care workers and healthy people under 65 with a vulnerable family member or those who want to reduce their short-term risk of infection. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), among other organizations, issued statements condemning the change, with the ACOG saying it was "...concerned about and extremely disappointed by the announcement that HHS will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy." "It is very clear that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy can be catastrophic and lead to major disability, and it can cause devastating consequences for families. The COVID-19 vaccine is safe during pregnancy, and vaccination can protect our patients and their infants after birth," President Steven J. Fleischman said in a statement. Insurance coverage typically follows federal recommendations, so anyone who is healthy and under 65 is likely to have to pay out of pocket to get the shot, which runs about $200, if they can get it. It's not clear what insurance companies will do about the new recommendations. AMA, AAP other organizations break from RFK and HHS on vaccines The American Medical Association (AMA) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), in partnership with other professional medical organizations, broke from RFK and HHS after this announcement, sharing plans to develop their own guidelines independent of the government organization. In an open letter signed by 80 medical organizations across the country and published on June 25, the AMA called for physicians, healthcare networks and insurance companies to continue supporting "evidence-based immunizations to help prevent severe disease and protect public health." "Vaccines for influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 remain among the best tools to protect the public against these illnesses and their potentially serious complications—and physicians are among the most trusted voices to recommend them. We come together as physicians from every corner of medicine to reaffirm our commitment to these lifesaving vaccines," the letter said. "Recent changes to federal immunization review processes raised concerns across the medical and public health community. In this moment of uncertainty, physicians must align around clear, evidence-based guidance for patients." The AAP likewise said in a June 26 statement that it will "continue to publish its own evidence-based recommendations and schedules." AAP President Susan J. Kressly said the creation of federal immunization policy is 'no longer a credible process," adding, "...we're not stepping back, we're stepping up. The AAP will continue to publish our own immunization schedule just as we always have, developed by experts, guided by science, trusted by pediatricians and families across the country.' These latest independent guidelines have yet to be released. Vaccine committee adjourns without fresh recommendations Meanwhile, the new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) gathered for the first time on June 25 in a meeting that drew criticism from some experts. RFK fired all 17 original members of the committee on June 9, replacing them with members that critics have called unqualified. Some of the members, like Kennedy, have a history of anti-vaccine advocacy, prompting backlash that had doctors and organizations calling for a delay in the meeting. Anti-vaccine sentiments were repeated by ACIP Chair Martin Kulldorf at the meeting, who said the panel will be "investigating" MMR and childhood vaccines. The CDC panel also reviewed data about COVID-19 vaccines, questioning their safety and effectiveness. They also raised questions about the study design, methodologies and surveillance monitoring systems behind the data, which Dr. Pamela Rockwell, clinical professor of family medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School, addressed as a standard of medical research. "Our efforts, through a very robust system of checks and balances, are to create vaccines and vaccination programs that result in the most benefit with the least harm," said Dr. Gretchen LaSalle, a family physician in Spokane, Washington, who represented the American Academy of Family Physicians. Despite this, the committee didn't vote on COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for the fall and isn't expected to reconvene until 'September/October,' according to the CDC website. ACIP commitee: Inside the unusual, RFK-appointed panel that's deciding on childhood vaccines FDA updates warning label for COVID vaccines The FDA likewise announced updated requirements for mRNA COVID-19 vaccine warning labels on June 25, which apply to Comirnaty by Pfizer Inc. and Spikevax by ModernaTX Inc. Prescribing information will now include warnings of the connection between the vaccines and a rare side effect that causes inflammation of the heart muscle and lining. The new warning label discloses the risk of myocarditis, which appeared in 8 cases per 1 million people who got the 2023-2024 COVID shots between the ages of 6 months and 64 years old, mostly commonly among males aged 12 to 24. The previous label, which also disclosed the risk, said the problem mostly occurred in minors aged 12-17. So, how do you protect yourself from NB.1.8.1 and other variants? Despite the back-and-forth in the U.S., the World Health Organization (WHO) has kept its recommendation consistent. Currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are expected to remain effective against the NB.1.8.1 variant, it said. In a webpage dated Jan. 7, the CDC advised that everyone over the age of six months get the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine, specifically the 2024-2025 Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. The page has since been updated with a banner, reading "COVID-19 vaccine recommendations have recently been updated for some populations. This page will be updated to align with the updated immunization schedule." The original recommendations align with the WHO's current guidelines. WHO, AMA, AAP and existing standards recommend that people who have never received a COVID-19 vaccine, are age 65 and older, are immunocompromised, live at a long-term care facility, are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant, and/or want to avoid getting long COVID, should get the vaccine, especially. Contributing: Greta Cross, Adrianna Rodriguez, USA TODAY
