Republicans report progress, but no deal on critical SALT issue
It's crunch time for negotiations over the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap.
After a high-stakes meeting with Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday, House Republicans in the SALT Caucus and a key GOP senator reported 'progress' but no deal, leaving one of the thorniest issues in the party's tax and spending bill unresolved.
Stakeholders say talks have zeroed in on keeping in place the $40,000 deduction cap — which the SALT Caucus negotiated in the House — but lowering the $500,000 income threshold and adjusting the numbers for inflation, a compromise of sorts that would appease moderate House Republicans while also placating Senate conservatives.
The clock, however, is ticking: Senate GOP leaders are hoping to put their version of the 'big, beautiful bill' on the floor by Friday — officially kicking off the consideration process — but can't move forward without a SALT deal.
Some lawmakers say an agreement is imminent.
'We've made a little bit of progress; we're still working through it,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), a former House member who has served as a key liaison between the chambers, told The Hill after Wednesday's meeting. 'I think we'll have something shaken out by tomorrow — maybe, hopefully. I think we're in good shape.'
Others, however, were more pessimistic. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), a key member of the SALT Caucus who attended the meeting with Bessent on Wednesday, said the gathering was 'pleasant' and 'cordial,' but the two chambers are still a ways away from consensus.
'Everybody wants a deal, everybody wants to get to yes, everybody wants to put the nation on a better track,' LaLota said. 'But it does seem like the Senate and the House right now are far apart.'
In one signal that negotiations may be approaching their final phase, Bessent huddled with Republicans on the issue twice this week, meeting with Senate Republicans on Tuesday and SALT Caucus members Wednesday.
Attendees were coy about the contents of the meeting, though some said they were glad to see the Cabinet member taking an increasingly active role. Lawmakers didn't emerge from the meeting floating any new policy proposals, but instead making tweaks to existing parameters.
'He's a former constituent and certainly understands my district, understands the issue of SALT, so I think it's good to engage in the conversation with the secretary,' said Rep. Mike Lawler (R), who represents New York's 17th Congressional District.
Asked if Bessent's presence should be taken as a sign that a deal is close, LaLota replied, 'I hope that we're closer today than we were yesterday.'
'He's the Treasury secretary speaking on behalf of the administration on a bill that affects the nation's financial well-being,' LaLota said.
According to one Senate GOP aide, Mullin and the White House presented multiple options to the SALT Caucus members. Those would likely keep the $40,000 figure in place, but would focus on altering the threshold and cap phaseouts to secure more savings.
'We're getting close to where we need that issue landed,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said, adding that talks have been 'very productive' of late. 'This is one of those deals where nobody's going to get everything that they want.'
Lawler seemed to agree.
'Well we're near the end of the bill, aren't we? I mean, the Senate is barreling towards a vote, and obviously the president and the White House want to get this bill across the finish line. So, obviously we're getting towards the end here,' he said.
Moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states — including New York, New Jersey and California — have been at odds with Senate Republicans for months over SALT, with stakeholders in the lower chamber pushing for a higher deduction cap and those in the upper chamber voicing sharp opposition to such a move.
The disagreement escalated into a full-on fight earlier this month when the Senate Finance Committee released its portion of the megabill that had a $10,000 deduction cap for individuals making $500,000 or less — down from the $40,000 cap House SALT Caucus members landed after months of tenuous negotiations with their leadership. The cap, as implemented in the 2017 Trump tax cuts, currently stands at $10,000.
Now, members are trying to bridge that gap. After initially shutting down the idea of lowering the $500,000 income threshold — 'I am done negotiating,' LaLota told The Hill when asked about the prospect last week — key lawmakers in the SALT Caucus appear open to the proposal, if the price is right.
'The Senate's been describing it like that, yes, to not futz with the $40K deduction, but it seems that they're endeavoring to change the $500K income cap,' he told reporters Wednesday. 'And I've been clear, if they do that, if they water the income cap down, they need to strengthen other provisions like the inflation adjustment.'
'Otherwise, it's not a compromise,' he added. 'Otherwise, it's them just trying to jam their preferences down our throats.'
The phaseout figures are also something Senate GOP members are angling to lower. The House GOP plan would have shrunk the deduction cap down to $10,000 for individuals making $600,000 — giving Senate Republicans another area they believe they can find much-needed savings.
Negotiations on the topic were always poised to be difficult. No Senate Republicans hail from high-tax blue states, leaving SALT without an advocate in the upper chamber — a stark difference from the House GOP conference, as leadership in both chambers is acutely aware of.
'We've been clear from the very beginning with our Senate counterparts that the issues with SALT in the House are very different than the issues in the Senate,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) said. 'We have about a dozen members that are voting on this bill exclusively based on what happens with SALT. There's not a single senator on the Republican side that has that same issue.'
'So, it is a House challenge that we've had to work on from the beginning that just doesn't exist over in the Senate side,' he added. 'But it has to get resolved if you're going to have a bill that passes.'
Mullin has held numerous discussions with the key House faction in recent days, having told reporters throughout that stretch that the goal was not necessarily to strike an agreement but to get to a point of 'acceptance.'
'I don't think either side is going to like it,' he said Tuesday, adding that they need to get 'to the point where it's palatable enough to take it and not vote not against, and that goes for both chambers.'
'Everybody's got very strong opinions about it,' he added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
Trump admin live updates: Senate to begin 'One Big Beautiful Bill' vote-a-rama Monday
The Senate on Sunday afternoon began debate on President Donald Trump's megabill for his second term priorities after a dramatic procedural vote late Saturday night. There could be up to 20 hours of debate. While Democrats will use their allotted 10 hours, Republicans are expected not to. The Senate will begin its "vote-a-rama" at 9 a.m. Monday, during which time senators will offer amendments to the bill. Overnight Sunday, the Senate parliamentarian ruled more provisions out of order with the reconciliation process Republicans are using to pass the bill with a simple majority. If it passes in the Senate, the bill goes back to the House to consider changes the Senate made to the House's version of the bill, which passed by one vote.
an hour ago
Debate is underway in the Senate on Trump's big bill, but overnight voting is delayed
WASHINGTON -- Debate has been underway in the Senate late into the night, with Republicans wrestling President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts over mounting Democratic opposition — and even some brake-pumping over the budget slashing by the president himself. The outcome from the weekend of work in the Senate remains uncertain and highly volatile, and overnight voting has been pushed off until Monday. GOP leaders are rushing to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass the package, but they barely secured enough support to muscle it past a procedural Saturday night hurdle in a tense scene. A handful of Republican holdouts revolted, and it took phone calls from Trump and a visit from Vice President JD Vance to keep it on track. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced Sunday he would not seek reelection after Trump badgered him for saying he could not vote for the bill with its steep Medicaid cuts. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. It also said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. But other Senate Republicans, along with conservatives in the House, are pushing for steeper cuts, particularly to health care, drawing their own unexpected warning from Trump. 'Don't go too crazy!' the president posted on social media. 'REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected.' All told, the Senate bill includes some $4 trillion in tax cuts, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions in green energy tax credits that Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide, and impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements and making sign-up eligibility more stringent. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. If the Senate can pass the bill, it would need to return to the House. Speaker Mike Johnson has told lawmakers to be on call for a return to Washington this week. Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took some 16 hours. Then senators took over the debate, filling the chamber with speeches, while Republicans largely stood aside. 'Reckless and irresponsible," said Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan. "A gift to the billionaire class,' said Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sen. Patty Murray, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. 'In my 33 years here in the United States Senate, things have never — never — worked this way,' said Murray, the longest-serving Democrat on the Budget Committee. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. "Go back home and try that game with your constituents," she said. 'We still need to kick people off their health care — that's too expensive. We still need to close those hospitals — we have to cut costs. And we still have to kick people off SNAP — because the debt is out of control.' Sanders said Tillis' decision not to seek reelection shows the hold that Trump's cult of personality has over the GOP. 'We are literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids,' Sanders said, while giving tax breaks to Jeff Bezos and other wealthy billionaires. Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, and appeared undeterred, even as they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. "We're going to pass the 'Big, beautiful bill," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman. The holdout Republicans remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. He threatened to campaign against Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026. In an impassioned evening speech, Tillis shared his views arguing the Senate approach is a betrayal of Trump's promise not to kick people off health care. 'We could take the time to get this right,' he thundered. But until then, he said he would remain opposed. Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can rely on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats have latched on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Democrats also intended to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, which was underway. And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package, a process called vote-a-rama. But Republicans late Sunday postponed that expected overnight session to early Monday. As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska, but some were out of compliance of the strict rules by the Senate parliamentarian. A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. Later, Scott said, 'We all want to get to yes.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Experts weigh in on Tillis not seeking re-election, and who could run instead
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Senator Thom Tillis will not run for re-election next year. The announcement comes one day after President Donald Trump threatened to support other Republicans planning to challenge Tillis for the Senate seat. 'Thom Tillis was going to have a tough primary fight, but it didn't look like anything that he couldn't win,' said Dr. Chris Cooper, a political science professor at Western Carolina University. 'There was no one who had declared who was very prominent, who's already running against him. And so to get this kind of announcement on a Sunday was a-it was a shock.' Senator Tillis's surprise decision not to seek re-election will open up a seat in what is expected to be one of the most competitive U.S. Senate elections next fall. The announcement comes after President Trump attacked the senator over his opposition to the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. The president took to Truth Social Saturday night, saying, 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against Senator Thom Tillis. I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the great people of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.' 'I think certainly going against the president meant that he would have a potential primary challenger who could receive Trump's endorsement,' said Dr. Michael Bitzer, a political science professor at Catawba College. 'And we know that Trump's endorsement in this state in Republican party primary politics carries a lot of weight.' Then again, Sunday morning, Trump put out another post, reading, 'Thom Tillis has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' He went on to say, 'Tillis is a talker and a complainer, not a doer!' About three hours later, Tillis sent out a statement saying he would not run for Senate again. 'So many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven't exactly been excited about running for another term,' said Tillis. 'That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It's not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election.' 'There's no question that Tillis's opposition to the Big Beautiful Bill, Trump attacking Tillis on Truth Social definitely had something to do with it,' said Cooper. 'I mean, I doubt this was a spur-of-the-moment decision. Sounds like he was leading in that direction anyway, and this was kind of the last straw.' Now the question is, who will run for the empty seat? 'I think everybody on the Democratic side is waiting for what will former Governor Roy Cooper do,' said Bitzer. 'He has left himself open to the possibility of running. He would probably be the strongest Democratic candidate if he chooses to pursue that.' Former U.S. Representative Wiley Nickel has already announced his candidacy on the democratic side. As for Republicans, there are some questions. 'Does Laura Trump decide to, you know, throw her hat into the ring?' said Bitzer. 'She would be, ideally, the top republican candidate to get the nomination.' If not the president's daughter-in-law, there are some other names floating around. 'Michael Whatley, he used to be head of the North Carolina GOP and is now co-chair of the National GOP,' said Cooper. 'Pat Harrigan is a name that a lot of folks have talked about. He's a first-term member of Congress. Brad Knott is another name people have talked about. Another first-term member of Congress.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
