Chief Minister Rekha Gupta declares Anupam Kher's directorial Tanvi The Great tax-free in Delhi
Delhi CM announced it on X
In a post on X, CM Rekha Gupta wrote, "I am pleased to share that the Delhi Government has declared the film 'Tanvi the Great' tax-free in the state. With an impactful narrative of inclusion, the film is an inspiring story of a young, 'special' girl-Tanvi, who is determined to achieve her dreams against all odds."
"Tanvi's story is emotional and inspirational. We are committed to promote films that strengthens the spirit of Rashtra Seva, ignites patriotism, and awakens the conscience of the nation. Best wishes to the entire team of the film," her post read.
CM Rekha Gupta also shared a picture with Kher and actor Shubhangi Dutt from the film's screening which conducted in the national capital recently.
Madhya Pradesh also declared the film tax-free
Earlier, on Monday, the film was declared tax-free in Madhya Pradesh by the Chief Minister Mohan Yadav.
"Today, I had the opportunity to watch the film *Tanvi The Great* with the renowned actor and director Shri @AnupamPKher ji in Bhopal. I announce that the film will be made tax-free in Madhya Pradesh," CM Yadav stated in a post on X.
About Tanvi The Great
Centred on the Indian Army and autism, Tanvi The Great tells the story of a young girl (Shubhangi Dutt) who lives with her mother and grandfather (Anupam Kher). Inspired by her late father, she is determined to join the armed forces.
The film also features Boman Irani, Jackie Shroff, Karan Tacker, Arvind Swami, Nasser, and British actor Iain Glen.
Produced by Anupam Kher Studios along with NFDC, the film has received global accolades during its festival run in Cannes, New York, London, and Houston. It also earned standing ovations at special previews held at the National Defence Academy and the Southern Command in Pune. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
6 hours ago
- NDTV
71st National Film Awards: Shah Rukh Khan's First Best Actor Win Is Historic, Says Ashutosh Gowariker
New Delhi: Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan on Friday was announced the best actor (male) at the 71st National Film Awards for his work in the 2023 action thriller Jawan. This is his first National Award in the acting category in 33 years of his career in films. He shared the award with Vikrant Massey, who was recognised for his performance in the social drama 12th Fail. Filmmaker Ashutosh Gowariker, who serves as the chairperson of the Feature Film Jury of the 71st National Awards, said he feels amazing that Shah Rukh Khan finally won the award after so many years in showbiz. Ashutosh Gowariker, director of the Shah Rukh Khan-starrer Swades (2004), told NDTV after the press briefing of the awards, "It's amazing. It's quite historic that one of the biggest stars of India and Indian cinema after such a long, prolific career, has got an award for best acting at the National Film Awards in a year when he had three films. Him getting the award for Jawan is great because he has played a double role in that." In Jawan, Shah Rukh Khan played the double role of Indian Army officer Vikram Rathore and his son Azaad. The film, which earned over Rs 1,600 crore at the global box office, marked the actor's first film with Tamil cinema director Atlee. But why did the jury decide to award Shah Rukh for Jawan, not Pathaan or Dunki, since all three films released in the same year? Ashutosh Gowariker told NDTV, "That's again a jury's decision, as to what appeals to the jury together, which film should we select to represent the performance. So, Jawan was an easy and a unanimous choice." The filmmaker also said he had a "wonderful" time serving on the jury. "I have never been part of the jury. The National Film Awards are the country's greatest awards and to be selected as the chairperson of the jury is a great honour. It has been quite a ride to watch all these films and select," he added. Jawan followed a man's journey to uproot corruption from the country with the help of an all-woman team. It starred Vijay Sethupathi, Nayanthara, and Deepika Padukone in pivotal roles, with performances by Priyamani, Sanya Malhotra, Sanjeeta Bhattacharya, Girija Oak, Lehar Khan, and Aaliyah Qureishi. The film was also produced by Shah Rukh Khan's production company Red Chillies Entertainment.
News18
8 hours ago
- News18
National Awards 2025: Not Shah Rukh Khan's Jawan Or Ranbir Kapoor's Animal, But THIS Film Bagged Maximum
Last Updated: Sam Bahadur beats Jawan, Animal, and others by bagging the maximum awards at the 71st National Film Awards, including Best Values Film, Make-Up & Costume. The winners of the 71st National Film Awards for the year 2023 were officially announced today, August 1. The ceremony began at 6 PM, with the jury unveiling the winners across all major categories. While today's ceremony was quite special for the industry, with Shah Rukh Khan winning his first-ever National Award in his three-decade-long career and Vikrant Massey bagging big as he shared the award with Shah Rukh Khan, there is one film that defeated all the biggies of Bollywood. Jawan won two awards, one for Shah Rukh Khan, who received his first National Award for Best Actor, and another for Shilpa Rao, who was honoured for the song Chaleya. Meanwhile, 12th Fail also won two awards, Best Feature Film and Best Actor (Leading Role) for Vikrant Massey, marking his first National Award. The Kerala Story gave a neck-to-neck fight, bagging awards in the Best Cinematography and Best Direction categories. Animal won two awards as well, in the Best Sound Design and Best Music Direction categories. Meanwhile, Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahaani also earned two awards, Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment and Best Choreography (for Dhindhora Baje Re, choreographed by Vaibhavi Merchant). Now, with five major films bagging two National Awards each in one or the other category, there is one film that defeated them all, and it is none other than Vicky Kaushal's historical biographical drama Sam Bahadur. The movie won three National Awards, as the jury presented the honours today in the evening at around 6 PM. Vicky Kaushal's Sam Bahadur won in the categories of Best Feature Film Promoting National, Social, and Environmental Values, Best Make-Up, and Best Costume. Sam Bahadur explores the highs and lows of Sam Manekshaw's illustrious career and his journey to becoming the first Indian Army officer to be promoted to the rank of Field Marshal. This biopic sheds light on Manekshaw's unparalleled contributions, showcasing his valour, strategic brilliance, and unwavering dedication to the nation. The film also delves into the intricate dynamics of military and political relations, adding depth to the narrative and providing a comprehensive understanding of Sam Manekshaw's impactful legacy. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
11 hours ago
- Indian Express
Syndey Sweeney's ad isn't selling ‘great jeans', but the body in them — and that's the problem
'Hey, eyes up here,' says Sydney Sweeney as the camera pans down from her face, focusing on her breasts for a moment too long. It's an advertisement for American Eagle jeans, but you wouldn't know until the punchline arrives: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Arguably, the ad could be for anything. Brands have long sexualised women to sell everything from cars and deodorants to body lotions and even mango juice. Remember Katrina Kaif caressing a mango for 45 seconds, inhaling and biting into it, as a breathy voice whispers promises of 'pure mango pleasure'? Since the early days of commercial advertising, women have been slotted into tired, recurring tropes. They are either objectified, used as props next to a male lead, or portrayed as the ever-smiling, perfect housewife or mother. For years, the 'Lux girl' was promoted as the ideal beauty standard. Then came the 'Santoor mom,' where women were told they could raise a child, yet must look like they hadn't aged a day. Let's not even get into hair removal ads, where female confidence is portrayed as being innately tied to body hair — or rather, the absence of it. Which brings us to American Eagle's latest campaign that seems to have divided the American polity. Some argue that Sweeney's ad smacks of racism, while others have dismissed the criticism as a product of 'wokeness'. At the centre of the backlash is a teaser video where Sweeney says: 'My body's composition is determined by my genes.' She continues, 'Jeans are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality and even eye colour. My jeans are blue.' Another video features a poster that reads, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes,' with the word 'genes' crossed out and replaced by 'jeans'. Critics argue that casting a blue-eyed, blonde, conventionally attractive white woman while referencing 'great genes' inadvertently echoes eugenics — the discredited pseudo-scientific belief in racial and genetic superiority. Coined in the 1880s by British scientist Francis Galton, 'eugenics' linked heredity to intelligence, morality, and social status. It gained currency in the West post-World War I, but its most chilling manifestation came under Nazi Germany, where Adolf Hitler co-opted eugenics to justify the genocide of European Jews. The Aryan ideal – tall, blonde, blue-eyed, athletic – of the Nazis became a propaganda tool used to promote a 'master race,' a theory now universally debunked. Not everyone shared the criticism. Some brushed aside the backlash, calling it an overreaction, and arguing that the genius of the ad was all about a 'simple pun'. Fox News host Katrina Campins said the ad was simply a reminder that 'hot women sell products.' And that, precisely, is the problem. Throughout the ad, the camera pans across Sweeney's body as she smiles, stares into the lens, and, in one clip, adjusts her jeans while saying, 'I bet you wanna try these jeans.' The messaging appears more targeted at the male gaze than at women shopping for denim. The subtext seems to be: buy these jeans, and maybe you will look like her. Or better still, be desired like her. In pandering to this idea of desirability, the ad joins a long tradition of marketing that reduces women to their bodies — packaging female sexuality to sell a fantasy. Social media, meanwhile, has turned Sweeney into a shorthand for an outdated ideal of womanhood. One user wrote, 'What makes Sydney Sweeney so attractive is that she invites and welcomes you to look at her sexually.' Another said, 'She reminds men of the way women acted before fourth-wave feminism. She smiles. She's an actual woman.' Advertising doesn't operate in a vacuum. It shapes, reflects, and often reinforces societal standards of desirability, particularly for women. And it's a loop. Brands reflect culture, and culture reflects advertising. Few campaigns ever attempt to break that cycle, save for the token International Women's Day post. A 2024 report by the UK's Advertising Standards Authority found that 45 per cent of respondents were concerned about 'idealised body images of women' in ads, and 44 per cent were worried about the 'objectification of women and girls'. Meanwhile, Creative X, a brand content firm, found that although brands are spending more to portray women in non-stereotypical roles, they still overwhelmingly appear in family settings rather than professional ones. And women with darker skin tones make up less than 30 per cent of female representation in ads. Of course, there have been exceptions. One thinks of the Nirma ad that replaced women cheerfully scrubbing clothes with four women helping push an ambulance out of the mud while the men looked on. The Hemas, Rekhas, Jayas and Sushmas shifted from domesticity to strength. Then, there's Mohey's 'Kanyamaan' campaign, which critiqued the idea of daughters as paraaya dhan (another's property). These examples stand out precisely because they are rare. And let's be clear: the problem isn't Sweeney's sex appeal. A 27-year-old woman celebrating her sexuality can be liberating. The issue is when that sexuality is carefully curated, commodified, and used to reinforce the same narrow beauty standards that advertising has peddled and profited from for decades. When a campaign leans on innuendo and wordplay, all the while a conventionally attractive woman flirts with the language of genetics, it isn't just trying to be clever. It's reiterating, subtly, but persistently, who gets to be seen as desirable. And when that happens, the ad isn't selling 'great jeans', but the body that wears them. Sonal Gupta is a senior sub-editor on the news desk. She writes feature stories and explainers on a wide range of topics from art and culture to international affairs. She also curates the Morning Expresso, a daily briefing of top stories of the day, which won gold in the 'best newsletter' category at the WAN-IFRA South Asian Digital Media Awards 2023. She also edits our newly-launched pop culture section, Fresh Take. ... Read More
