Trump and Pete Hegseth inspiring Islamic State recruitment propaganda
So far, in his second presidency, his administration has much less to do with IS. But the terror group has still benefited from him.
Experts tell the Guardian that IS is capitalizing on Trump's dismantling of the international order, his affinity for Benjamin Netanyahu's government in Israel, and most of all – his most controversial cabinet appointment – in its recruitment propaganda.
In the US, IS supporters consuming that online messaging have become bona fide security threats in recent months, with a string of incidents dating back to before the presidential election.
On New Year's Day in New Orleans, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, 42, a 13-year veteran of the US army, used a truck to kill fourteen partygoers in the name of IS. Earlier in May, Ammar Abdulmajid-Mohamed Said, 19, an ex-national guardsman, was arrested and charged with plotting a mass shooting at a military base near Detroit, on behalf of the group.
'The January 1 New Orleans attack and subsequent IS-linked arrests in the country demonstrate the continued influence the organization can project into the US,' said Lucas Webber, a senior threat intelligence analyst at Tech Against Terrorism, who has tracked the terrorist group for several years.
'These incidents also highlight how IS leverages the online space through social media and messaging applications to spread its ideology and inspire supporters to plot attacks.'
Part of that, as Webber explained, was persistently defining the US as a 'crusader' state – the name jihadists have long used for all western countries.
But secretary of defense Pete Hegseth's tattoos, referential to those pan-European medieval invaders, have fueled IS propaganda dispersed on Rocket.Chat – a recruitment platform the terror group uses to communicate with its followers and recruits.
An April IS-article, titled Clear Evidence in Ink, zeroed in on Hegseth's ink, which features crosses associated with crusaders and another on his arm that reads 'infidel' or 'non-believer' in Arabic.
The term also became better known among war on terror soldiers, who, like Hegseth, served in Iraq and Afghanistan, as a pejorative for themselves.
'This takes us back to the media stir just days ago when the American 'crusader' secretary of defense published photos of himself with the word 'kafir' written on his arm in Arabic, alongside other explicit phrases glorifying the crusades!' said the IS propaganda, amid a backdrop of Hegseth's tattooed chest and arms.
'Events like these, orchestrated by Allah's wisdom, serve as warnings and clear evidence of the true nature of the war waged by Jews and Christians against us – it is a deeply rooted religious war.'
On Rocket.Chat, pro-IS users fervently responded.
'What more do you want as proof that they want to wipe us all together?' wrote one user underneath an image of Hegseth's tattoos.
Other fodder tapped for its digital propaganda, is Trump's associations with Netanyahu and the IDF's continued flattening of Gaza, which several experts and governments have called a modern-day genocide.
IS images and articles call for 'revenge for the Muslims in Gaza' and the war, which has become one of its most valuable recruitment topics.
IS also sees the stream of international tariffs unleashed by the Trump administration as a sign the west and its power structures are unravelling. As another IS article described how 'the reckless Trump has repeatedly claimed victory over jihad, yet now he is preoccupied with fighting German cars and Chinese goods' and stoking 'commercial wars' that would lead to the demise of 'kafir nations'.
Combinations of these topics are mainstay recruitment hooks that IS and its predecessor organization, al-Qaida, have used for years attracting men into its ranks. IS is in a rebuilding stage as Syria – once a base for its most successful era – has vowed to banish the group and other jihadist elements from operating within its borders, as the nascent government seeks rapprochement with the US.
But other IS chapters have shown they are attracting Americans, foreigners, and locals to their cause, by peddling anti-US messaging.
'Trump and the US have been monitored by [IS-Khorasan] Pashto, Urdu and Farsi channels specifically referring to developments in Syria and Afghanistan,' said Riccardo Valle, the director of research at the Islamabad-based publication the Khorasan Diary and an expert on the group's Afghan wing.
'[IS-K] continue to foster the idea that there is no difference between Afghanistan and Syria trajectories and that both are puppets in the hands of the US, Russia, and China.'
The IS-K branch has shown its reach inside the US, too. An Afghan national and a co-conspirator were arrested in October, after the FBI disrupted an IS-K sponsored plot to attack a mass gathering on election day.
The justice department also described in 2024 court documents that IS-Somalia, an upstart branch which has become the intense focus of Pentagon airstrikes, had attracted an American foreign fighter who was in contact with their recruiters.
'IS-Somalia is becoming more internationally ambitious in its recruitment, associated online propaganda, and incitement efforts,' Webber said. 'Pro-IS Somalia outlets are creating media content focused on US policy in the region and support for governments in the area.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
European markets head for a lower open as traders digest Trump's tariffs announcement
City of London skyline with 20 Fenchurch Street, affectionately nicknamed the Walkie Talkie, in London, United Kingdom. Mike Kemp | In Pictures | Getty Images Welcome to CNBC's live blog covering all the action and business news in European financial markets on Tuesday. Futures data from IG suggests regional markets will open lower, with London's FTSE 100 expected to open 0.3% lower, Germany's DAX and France's CAC 40 0.1% lower, respectively. Futures tied to Italy's FTSE MIB, were around 0.1% lower this morning. Global markets are seesawing this week, as traders digest the latest trade tariff news, and any potential trade deals ahead of a July 9 deadline, when higher trade duties are due to come into effect. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Monday that there would be several trade announcements over the next 48 hours, adding that he expects "it's going to be a busy couple of days." He did not specify which countries were involved. Asia-Pacific markets swung between gains and losses overnight, however, as investors assessed Trump's latest tariff threats on 14 trading partners. Read more Goods exported to the U.S. from Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan and Tunisia are now set to face 25% tariffs starting Aug. 1, according to the letters Trump posted on Truth Social. Other Asia-Pacific markets facing higher tariffs include Indonesia, which will be hit with a 32% excise duty, Bangladesh, which was slapped with a 35% duty, as well as Cambodia and Thailand, which are set for 36% tariff rates, the president's letters indicated. Meanwhile, imports from Laos and Myanmar will face a 40% duty, Trump's letters posted on Truth Social showed. — Holly Ellyatt, Amala Balakrishner
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Natural-disaster blame games obscure the steps needed to keep Americans safe
America's endless natural-disaster blame game is thwarting answers to life-and-death questions over worsening extreme weather crises. Every time a hurricane, flood or wildfire strikes, political enemies heap knee-jerk blame on their foes – usually long before all the victims are accounted for. This pattern was back on display after a horrific tragedy in Texas, where floods killed more than 100 people after raging through summer camps and July Fourth celebrations. Some liberals whipped up viral social media posts claiming that Elon Musk's DOGE budget cuts were directly to blame for extreme weather alerts not reaching those in the torrent's way. President Donald Trump on Sunday seemed about to pin the disaster on President Joe Biden before backing away. But his Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who is dismembering the Federal Emergency Management Agency, went on Fox to criticize the last administration. And her department, now an arm of the MAGA movement, accused the media of lying about what really happened. The ugly partisan wars that broke out as parents face unfathomable loss are typical of a political culture that has severed itself from basic humanity. And they underscore that social media remains a Wild West of misinformation and spite that worsens malign political instincts. Natural disasters are always perilous for those in power. But recriminations intensified after Hurricane Katrina. The 2005 monster storm hit New Orleans and the Gulf Coast and, along with Iraq, destroyed President George W. Bush's second term. Beltway pundits now react to every act of God by predicting the current president's 'Katrina' is nigh. Questioning what happened in the wake of a natural disaster and whether political failings at the local, state or national levels contributed to deaths and devastation is perfectly appropriate. Victims deserve accountability untainted by politics. It's important to understand what went wrong in order to save lives in the future. But it's increasingly rare in an age of partisan media on the right and left for activists to wait for the facts, or to accept outcomes that don't fit their political goals. It's too early to say for sure whether Trump's budget cuts to agencies like FEMA and the National Weather Service made the Texas disaster worse. Investigations will probe communications of the federal government and Texas authorities and the actions of local officials. There will be a focus on whether weather warnings were sufficiently specific or clear and whether infrastructure in Kerr County is up to the job of extreme weather situations. Kerrville Mayor Joe Herring Jr., for instance, told CNN's Pamela Brown that he didn't receive an emergency alert in the predawn hours of Friday when floodwaters arrived. There will also surely be questions over why children's summer camps were sited in such a vulnerable area. Sometimes political choices do end up leading to disastrous outcomes. But not always. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted Monday that NWS offices in Texas made 'timely and accurate forecasts and warnings.' She said that the relevant NWS offices in New Braunfels had extra staff on duty for the storms despite claims to the contrary. Leavitt slammed what she said were 'depraved and despicable' efforts by some on the left to exploit the disaster politically 'especially when so many Americans are mourning the loss of their children.' It's hard to disagree. But there's a difference between social media users jumping to premature or outright false conclusions and politicians questioning whether Trump's efforts to stifle government research and to gut the federal government will make it harder to forecast disasters like the one in Texas in the future. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer demanded an immediate investigation by the Commerce Department's inspector general into whether administration staff cuts made the tragic loss of life worth. He focused on vacancies at the San Angelo and San Antonio NWS offices. Leavitt accused Schumer of pushing 'falsehoods.' There's a whiff of hypocrisy in the White House's outrage, considering that Trump has politicized natural disasters for his own gain more than any modern president. Trump slammed Democrats including Biden and local leaders over fatal wildfires that charred swaths of residential areas in Los Angeles just before he took office in January; he made false claims about water supplies and FEMA aid. Trump also misrepresented federal relief efforts after storms hit North Carolina and Georgia last year. And he claimed that a collision between a civilian jetliner and military helicopter close to Washington's National Airport that killed everyone on both aircraft was due to diversity and inclusion policies at the Federal Aviation Administration. His track record raises the question of whether the White House would have been as keen to rush aid and to praise local officials if the holiday weekend's flooding had occurred in a Democratic-run state rather than Republican Texas under Gov. Greg Abbott, an outspoken Trump supporter. Prev Next There are lessons and warnings that the Trump White House might heed in the aftermath of the Texas floods – even if its statements about appropriate pre-disaster staffing and funding are ultimately validated. The disaster is a reminder that jobs like those of forecasters at agencies like NWS and experts contracted by FEMA may seem superfluous 364 days a year – but on one crucial day, they can save scores of people. Putting money into basic infrastructure like early flood warning signs might annoy taxpayers and be targeted by conservatives as examples of bloated public spending, but it can be critical. Benjamin Franklin is often quoted as having said that those who fail to prepare are preparing to fail. If the Trump administration continues to slash expertise, institutional experience and what it sees as redundancies in vital government agencies, it will lay the groundwork for botched disaster responses in future. CNN reported earlier this year that the administration had failed to staff a White House Office for Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy – an odd decision considering Trump's mismanagement of the Covid-19 emergency in his first term. The White House on Monday refused to say whether the president would push ahead with a plan to eliminate FEMA entirely by the end of the year. 'The president wants to ensure American citizens always have what they need during times of need,' Leavitt said. The White House is pushing to put far more of a burden on states to respond to disasters rather than relying on the federal government to step in. Relief and rebuilding after storms, wildfires and other natural disasters are likely to still require billion-dollar emergency appropriations from Congress. But wiping out FEMA's standing reserve of relief funds and its capacity, expertise and personnel could weaken rescue workers' capacity to prepare and position before forecastable natural disasters. And it could drain the store of accumulated knowledge that states can't match. 'We need to improve FEMA, not destroy it,' retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré, who led National Guard troops into New Orleans after Katrina, told CNN. 'We need FEMA and we need them to do what they're doing and do it better, but not destroy FEMA. That's a bad idea.' More broadly, the Texas flooding catastrophe is the latest in a string of disasters – more intense storms, more ravenous wildfires, and sudden unusual rainfall – that promise to become more frequent as the global climate warms. Yet it's impossible to have a mature national debate about what America needs to do to protect its citizens from such extreme weather events. Trump denies the science that says climate change exists, bemoans the Democrats' 'Green New Scam' and has eviscerated the government's capacity to act against man-made climate change. He has even made it hard to conduct research on climate change with his attacks on science in his budgets, his new 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' law and through Musk at DOGE before his spectacular break-up with the Tesla electric vehicle pioneer. It's an indictment of a fractious public square that something as basic as weather – a naturally occurring force that affects all humanity – has become a bitter political issue on which a fractured nation can't find common ground. 'This was a once-in-a-century flash flood, a tragic natural disaster,' Leavitt said of the Texas floods on Monday. That may be true. But it's no basis for real policy that keeps Americans safe in years to come.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Today's trade deadline was no such thing
Three months later, President Donald Trump's endgame for his once market-rattling tariffs was supposed to arrive tonight at midnight. But it won't. As the clock rapidly ticked toward the long-standing July 9 end of Trump's 90-day pause on soaring 'reciprocal' tariff rates on more than 60 countries, Trump on Monday signed an executive action extending that reprieve until August 1. Despite significant progress with several trading partners, including India, Brazil, the European Union and several Asian countries, according to US officials, the global financial system has started to grapple with the reality that the deals, the details and even the deadline sit in a state of limbo. Trump's top trade and economic advisors insisted, as they have for the better part of the last two months, that deals will be announced in rapid succession this week. They also spent Sunday telling the world tariff rates wouldn't snap back into place until August 1, in an implicit hedge if those deal predictions once again proved hollow. It has been a whirlwind since then: Trump then announced on social media late Sunday night that he'd begin sending letters outlining the tariff rates or terms of bilateral agreements to trading partners. Then he announced a 25% tariff on Japan and South Korea and higher tariffs on a number of smaller trading partners Monday, with more letters expected to come in the days ahead. He also launched a new tariff threat at the 10-nation bloc known as BRICS, which he's long viewed as a direct and acute threat to US dominance in the global financial system. Trump didn't mention that several BRICS countries are top US trade partners and currently engaged in intensive bilateral trade talks with Trump's lead negotiators. The actual deadline – whether August 1 or some future date Trump announces on social media – is a lot like the months-long bilateral talks launched in early April: fuzzy on actual details, light on actual outcomes, ambiguous on actual goals, all while projecting unflinchingly bold predictions of success. All of it, most critically, contingent on the whims of the current inhabitant of the Oval Office. 'When you think about it, it's kind of the perfect window into the whole second term approach,' a trade lawyer who worked in Trump's first term told CNN. 'Everything revolves around the president, and you can safely assume he rather enjoys everything that entails.' Trump has spent the last 80-plus days fielding a steady stream of offers with concessions on market access for US products, reduced tariff rates, delayed tax and regulatory enforcement for US-based companies and a veritable potpourri of offers on unrelated policy matters thought to be important to his domestic agenda, according to multiple people involved in the process. Trump views the deadline – or deadlines – as the most critical leverage to squeeze trading partners for a few more concessions or to drop their own red lines in the ongoing bilateral talks, officials said. In other words, the pervasive uncertainty and ambiguity are kind of the point. 'I think what President Trump is concerned about is the quality of the deals, not the quantity,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday on CNBC. The US economy has held up and overcome the dire predictions of catastrophe that sent the stock and bond markets into a sustained period of tumult through the spring. Wall Street has settled into a general state of Zen about Trump's actual tariff intentions after a series of pauses and de-escalations. The general exhaustion consuming investors after months on a hair trigger isn't an insignificant factor driving that view, according to several market participants, who nonetheless expressed little anxiety about the optimism that has driven stocks to record highs. Trump just signed the cornerstone of his legislative agenda into law, a major win. At the same time, the US has collected $81.5 billion in tariff revenue through June, according to the US Customs and Border Protection, only serving to bolster Trump's position, officials say. 'In his mind, he's in a no-lose situation,' the former official said. 'He's going to keep amping up the pressure.' That's the backdrop to keep in mind throughout the critical week ahead. The Trump administration has announced two bilateral agreements and a third with China that is better described as a de-escalation than a deal. That's not to dismiss the China détente, as the de facto trade embargo between the world's two largest economies that existed in April carried with it the potential to fracture the backbone of global commerce. Trump has inked a trade framework with the UK (which wasn't actually subject to the stratospheric 'reciprocal' rates announced on April 2 in the Rose Garden). The granular details of that agreement are still in process, officials said. Trump announced on social media last week that he'd signed off on a deal with Vietnam, which was facing a catastrophic 46% 'reciprocal' rate at the end of the 90-day pause. The agreement would implement a 20% tariff on the country and a more draconian penalty on goods deemed by the US to be of Chinese origin but passed through Vietnam to avoid harsher tariffs. The details remain opaque on how exactly that would be applied – or defined – and Vietnamese officials have been more cautious about declaring the agreement final. We got our first glimpse Monday of Trump's regularly promised trade letters, with missives sent to the leaders of South Korea, Japan, South Africa, Malaysia and several others that the president posted to Truth Social. He decried America's imbalance of trade with those countries, as well as tariffs and other non-tariff barriers they place on US goods. Trump said the door was open to negotiation, but he threatened the countries with higher tariffs if they retaliate. Is this how trade talks actually work? Not normally. Bessent during his CNBC interview described the contents like this: 'Thank you for wanting to trade with the United States of America. We welcome you as a trading partner, and here's the rate unless you want to come back and try to negotiate.' The administration is not seeking or planning to secure 'trade deals' in the historical sense. Those pacts, which take years to negotiate and even longer to implement, have never really been the goal. Instead, the White House is seeking frameworks with a heavy focus on market access for US industries and products, while at the same time including commitments to reduce or remove entirely regulatory and legislative barriers to US exports. So where do the crush of bilateral talks actually stand? India has long been viewed as the most likely major partner to sign onto a framework with the US and may still do so this week, though Indian officials have hardened their positions in recent days, according to US officials. India is also a member of the BRICS group, so it's unclear what Trump's tariff threat Sunday means for trade negotiations. South Korea had also been viewed for weeks as likely to reach an agreement, though Trump's auto tariffs remain a key sticking point in those talks, and Trump's letter Monday may have thrown a wrench in those gears. Japan steadily moved further away from an outcome in recent weeks, and Trump cast significant doubt on talks that once seemed on a path to a certain agreement. Japanese officials, who just weeks ago were scrambling to lay the groundwork for an announcement by last month's Group of Seven summit, have delivered far more pessimistic messages in their public statements in recent days. EU officials have signaled more optimism in the last few days about clinching a framework with Trump's trade negotiators after an intensive series of meetings and technical discussions in the last two weeks. Indonesia, Cambodia and Thailand have all delivered substantial offers to their US counterparts in the last 10 days in an effort to move to the front of the line for an agreement and are likely candidates for any near-term deal in the next few days, officials said. Brazil has ramped up its efforts to secure an agreement, including bilateral talks at the end of last week designed to expand on an earlier offer to sharply reduce tariffs on certain US products, officials said. The most prevalent point of contention among foreign trade teams has been a lack of clarity on what their US counterparts envision for any final agreement. But the most biggest roadblock in the more expansive negotiations has been the existence – or promised imposition - of Trump's sectoral tariffs on autos, steel and pharmaceuticals, officials said.
