
Ford Ranger Driving, Engines & Performance
Driving
What is it like to drive?
A reminder, then: in diesel form the Ford Ranger is available with the choice of two 2.0-litre turbodiesels, plus a 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6. The entry model gets 168bhp and 299lb ft of torque and a six-speed manual gearbox, the upper-powered version 202bhp and 369lb ft, and the twin-turbo V6 237bhp and 333lb ft, both mated to a 10-speed auto box.
Zero to 62mph pickup times matter little, but you're looking at 11.6 seconds, 10.5s and 8.7s respectively as you move up the range. The V6 we tried felt perky enough when travelling light – and we doubt you're going to be flooring it fully loaded.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Done with the numbers yet?
For now. The first thing that strikes you when you get in is the hugely commanding driving position: you really do tower above everyone else in this. Below lorry drivers but somewhere around the same height as bus drivers. It's an addictive place to sit. Prod the start/stop button and the instrument cluster cuts to a Ranger graphic together with the words 'BUILT TOUGH'. In case you weren't already aware.
Still, it handles any on-road stuff with aplomb. The steering is light and disguises the weight well, and while it's best to be gentle with the throttle to avoid any jerkiness, it's pleasingly tidy around town. Threading your way around narrow streets can be terrifying due to the Ranger's sheer size, but the reversing camera and sensors are a godsend when it comes to parking. We did find the gear shifter a little fiddly when switching between D and R, mind.
We tried the self-parking in the top-spec car which was a white knuckle experience. It worked fine, but parking a little far from the kerb for our high standards. You haven't got the luxury of giving yourself a wide berth in something this huge.
For heading off the beaten track, there are two- and four-wheel-drive modes with low and high range options, a new 'set and forget' mode that automatically switches between the two when required, and selectable off-road driving modes that optimise the set-up depending on the terrain you're on. Plus you've got a locking rear diff, so you've really no more excuses for getting stuck in the mud.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Dare we ask about fuel economy?
Ah, yes. Ford claims (sorry, more numbers coming up) between 27.4 and 33.2mpg for the four-pots and 28mpg for the V6, but in our experience we averaged a rather sorry 20.2 miles per gallon in the latter. Regular longer distance runs might result in a slight improvement, but it ain't going to be cheap to run.
This is where the PHEV comes in, surely?
Absolutely. To recap, the plug-in hybrid Ranger pairs a 2.3-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a 10-speed auto gearbox, an electric motor integrated into the bellhousing and an 11.8kWh battery. Any difference in the way the hybrid drives?
The addition of a battery and other electrical gubbins means the PHEV tips the scales at just over 2.5 tonnes. Yikes. In fact, the hybrid is around 300kg heavier than the diesel Ranger, so Ford has beefed up the suspension and when unladen the ride is quite firm and fidgety.
The brakes can be slightly grabby too as it balances regen and friction braking, but the steering is still pleasant, and the auto gearbox is smooth. The PHEV will run in all-electric mode for 27 miles, reckons Ford, and you're able to select a mode to go EV-only, petrol-only or petrol-charging-electric. You can also leave it in auto and let the car decide, and if you do, you'll find a strong wave of torque and impressive acceleration when required.
The engine itself – which initially kicks in without too much fuss – is actually from the old Focus RS or four-pot Mustangs, and it can get a little noisy when asked to work hard, but this thing still gets a payload of almost a tonne and can tow 3.5 tonnes. Oh, and there's a great bit of turbo whoosh at times too. How efficient is the PHEV?
On a short on-road drive using a mix of roads and modes, we saw a very impressive 35.9mpg. Ford also reckons that the hybrid is more efficient to run than the 3.0-litre diesel even without regular charging, so combined with the tax breaks this should be much cheaper to operate even if you never plug it in.
It'll also do the off-road stuff just as well as the diesels, with an 800mm wading depth, a locking rear diff, low range gearbox and all the same off-road modes. Even on road tyres we found it able to stroll through some fairly serious rough stuff.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Jack Draper could be in for £3million payout if he wins Wimbledon this year... in which case the British number one could swap his humble £1,000 Polo for a Porsche like Emma Raducanu
As Britain's No 1 tennis player, he is in line for a bumper £3 million payday if he can battle through a challenging draw to scoop this year's Wimbledon trophy. But unlike many successful sports stars, Jack Draper looks set to keep things pretty humble. These exclusive pictures show the 23-year-old still driving around in a battered VW Polo – quite the contrast to the £125,000 Porsche that Emma Raducanu bagged in a lucrative sponsorship deal after winning the 2021 US Open. Taken earlier this month, the photos show Jack filling up the 12-year-old car – worth a measly £1,000 – at a petrol station in Ashtead, Surrey. It is close to where he grew up as the son of former Sport England and Lawn Tennis Association chief executive Roger Draper, and 12 miles from the All England tennis club where he will make his first appearance this week against Argentinian Sebastian Baez, the world's No 38. Draper clearly has a down-to-earth approach that shows his mind is on the game – and not on any potential spoils, which may, in any case, be transient. Raducanu had to hand back her Porsche 911 Carrera late last year, after her world rankings slipped, and she was subsequently seen driving her own modest car, a £5,000 second-hand Dacia Sandero. While Draper's vehicle looked like it has taken a battering over the years, the same cannot be said of his career. These exclusive pictures show the 23-year-old still driving around in a battered VW Polo The past 12 months have seen a remarkable breakthrough, having started last year's grass court season as the world No 40. He reached his first grand slam semi-final at the US Open in September, and took his first Masters 1000 title at Indian Wells in March before reaching the semi-finals at Queen's this month. Now ranked fourth in the world, it is thought his professional earnings have topped £5 million. But Wimbledon, where he has yet to pass the second round, could be his toughest challenge yet with a tough route to the final. 'I'm really excited to go out there to compete,' said Draper, who has just recovered from a bout of tonsillitis. '[I'm] full of excitement knowing the crowd is right behind me – that I'm going to be playing on the courts that I wanted to play on since I was young, watching [Andy] Murray, watching all these great players perform out there – and it feels amazing to know that.'


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
BMW recalls over 70,000 EVs for software issue
Software Issue Could Cause Loss Of Drive Power BMW is recalling 70,852 electric vehicles because of a software issue that could shut down electric motors, leading to a sudden loss of drive power, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The recall includes the following models: 2022-2025 BMW i4 2022-2024 BMW iX 2023-2024 BMW i7 2024 BMW i5 Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:09 / 0:09 Full screen 2024 Kia EV6 GT-Line review: Is this the EV that will convert you? Watch More False Alarm Can Trigger High-Voltage Shutdown Source: BMW According to the recall documentation, software in the affected vehicles may receive erroneous indications of a 'double-isolation condition,' which would warrant shutdown of the vehicle's high-voltage electrical system, cutting off power to the motors. This false alarm will trigger a shutdown even if there is no issue. This condition can lead to loss of drive power while moving, which increases the risk of a crash, the NHTSA noted. However, power-assisted braking and steering are not affected, the safety agency noted. A red warning symbol may be shown on the dashboard 15-20 seconds before loss of power occurs. BMW estimates that approximately 43 warranty claims related to this issue, but told the NHTSA that it is unaware of any related accidents or injuries. OTA Fix The remedy is an over-the-air (OTA) software update that will be pushed to the recalled vehicles free of charge. Owners can also take their vehicles to a BMW dealership to have the update performed, if they wish. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. BMW plans to mail owner notification letters explaining this beginning August 5. In the meantime, owners can also contact BMW's customer service department at 1-800-525-7417 for more information. Next-Generation EVs On The Way The models included in this recall represent BMW's current strategy of using common underpinnings for its electric and internal-combustion models, but that's about to change. Aptly dubbed the Neue Klasse (German for 'new class') BMW's next-generation EVs will feature new, more distinctive designs and a dedicated architecture. A new 800-volt electrical architecture and cylindrical battery cells (currently used by Tesla and Lucid, but new territory for BMW) will improve charging speed and range, respectively, BMW claims. The first Neue Klasse model will be the iX3 crossover, which is scheduled for a full reveal in September at the IAA Mobility Show in BMW's hometown of Munich, Germany. The iX3 will be followed by a sedan that could also serve as the basis for a future electric M3. About the Author Stephen Edelstein View Profile


Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
Lexus, Nissan Top 2025 J.D. Power Quality Rankings
The Winners If you're looking for a new car and want to ensure the best quality right off the assembly line you might take a closer look at Lexus and Nissan. The two Japanese automakers topped the 2025 J.D. Power Initial Quality Study – which tallies up what owners have to say about their vehicles during the first 90 days of ownership. Nissan Ariya at the automaker's global headquarters in Japan — Source: Getty The IQS looks at the number of issues owners have experienced – everything from electronic glitches to faulty transmissions – tallied up as 'problems per 100 vehicles, or PP100 in Power-speak. The lower the score the higher the quality. And by that measure, Lexus had a score of 166, making it both the best brand in the luxury category but tops overall. Nissan was surprisingly close behind, at 169 PP100, making it second overall and tops among mainstream brands. And the Losers The list of losers in this year's IQS starts with Ram. Last year's overall winner, the Stellantis truck division tumbled 24 spots in the overall ranking – among the 33 brands covered by the 2025 IQS. With a score of 218, it fell well below the industry average of 192 PP100, largely due to owner complaints about the Ram 1500, which went through a complete makeover for this model year. In general, all-new models, as well as those that went through a major redesign, tended to have more quality problems than carryover vehicles, the IQS revealed. Source: Ram Audi anchored the list, with a score of 269 problems per 100, a 10% increase in owner complaints this year. And Volvo was again second-to-last, at 258 PP100, Infiniti doing only slightly better with a score of 242. Rivian, actually, would have been dead last this year with 274 problems reported by owners. But it wasn't officially rolled into the list 'due to limited data,' said Power in a summary of the 2025 IQS results. Tesla, the biggest of the all-electric brands, was a mixed bag. It also was left out of the formal list since the automaker makes it difficult for Power to track owners in some states and then get them to fill out surveys. Based on the data it did get, however, Tesla had a score of 200. While still well below the industry average, the EV company managed to reduce the number of complaints substantially compared to 2024 when it had a score of 266. Some Surprises While Ram's sharp tumble in the IQS rankings was easily the biggest surprise this year, there were a number of other unexpected findings. That started with Jaguar which this year is the fourth-ranked brand – just behind Korea's Hyundai – with a score of 175 PP100. The British brand has a historical record of quality problems but has been working its way up the J.D. Power charts in recent years. It was ninth in 2024. As for why it's doing so well? Jaguar has slashed its line-up to a few core products – all older models that it has had time to work out the bugs with, according to Power. The challenge will be maintaining quality when Jaguar begins rolling out a new range of EVs over the coming years. 2025 Jaguar F-Pace — Source: Jaguar Then there was Dodge, the Stellantis muscle car brand. It scored the biggest turnaround on the IQS, going from dead last in 2024 to seventh this year. But there's an asterisk here: Dodge was previously dragged down by problems with its little Hornet model. But the Italian SUV wasn't included in the latest study due to a lack of data. What Ticked Off Owners The good news is that traditional, mechanical problems, such as faulty powertrains, have become increasingly uncommon with today's vehicles. These days, high-tech features tend to be the biggest concern for motorists, notably faulty voice control systems. 'While customers do find the larger touchscreens visually appealing,' said Frank Hanley, Power's senior director of auto benchmarking, 'owners find these things to be overly complicated and too distracting to use while driving. By retaining dedicated physical controls for some of these interactions, automakers can alleviate pain points and simplify the overall customer experience.' Source: James Riswick Another source of trouble? Cupholders. There are more than enough in most vehicles today. The problem, owners told Power, is that they're often too small, or not flexible enough to handle the variety of beverage containers passengers bring into their vehicles: juice boxes, soda bottles, Big Gulps and Yetis. 'While it seemed like manufacturers had cupholders figured out,' Power noted, they're struggling to keep up with being able to accommodate all the different shapes and sizes that are increasingly available.' Electrified Vehicles Cause More Problems Conventional hybrids, like the Toyota Prius, have become increasingly common these days, and despite having more complex drivetrains they tend to create only slightly more problems than models running entirely on gasoline, an average 196 PP100 compared to 184, respectively. Tesla Model Y — Source: Tesla More advanced battery-based drivetrains still give motorists headaches, according the IQS. And, for the first time, plug-in hybrids were reported to have more issues – an average 237 problems per 100 vehicles – than pure battery-electric models. The lower score for BEVs, at 212 PP100, largely reflects the improvements made by Tesla this past year, Power reported. The Top Models As for the single best vehicle on the market, at least in terms of initial quality? The Porsche 911 which experienced just 116 problems per 100 according to its owners. 911 GT3 The IQS also breaks out the best models in 22 separate vehicle segments. Of these, General Motors had the most top-ranked products, a total of five, with Ford landing four, Honda another three. Ford was the top-ranked brand, again with four segment winners, including the Super Duty named tops in the Large Heavy Duty Pickup category. Its F-150 had a tie in the Large Light Duty Pickup category with the Chevrolet Silverado. Chevy placed three segment winners, overall. About the Author Paul Eisenstein View Profile