These Should Be The Next Mail Trucks When The Post Office Gets Privatized
We asked our readers earlier this week what the ideal vehicle would be for a privatized Post Office. Their suggestions featured a balanced mix of serious recommendations and attempts at comedic political commentary. The basic gist is that we're going to need a tow truck for every Cybertruck hauling the mail. Without further ado, here are what you think should be the next mail trucks:
Read more: These New Cars Just Aren't Worth The Money
"Can we reboot the Windstar? Ford has to have some parts for it in a warehouse somewhere."
Submitted by: Emperor Norton Why not? It's been 18 years since Ford discontinued the Freestar, but enough of them could be put into service with spares fabricated out of the parts bin.
"The vehicle won't matter as long as it has a device that shreds all mail-in ballots going to and fro an urban area. That device may well be the driver, who will be fired by the Musk-owned USPS for non-compliance otherwise."
Submitted by: GTO1962
"The corpse of Canoo is still warm -- buy up that factory/tooling and get those vans on the road. Most of the work is already done; they even had a USPS model in the works. It looks freaking awesome."
Submitted by: BuddyS
If NASA and the Postal Service couldn't save Canoo, I don't think anything is bringing them back from the grave.
"I love everything posted so far. On a more serious note, Toyota hybrids are the obvious answer to every automotive question ever asked. With the exception of anything to do with fast or fun."
Submitted by: Caddyshack03
"I'm pretty sure there's a large number of Cybertrucks that Elon would LOVE to sell at top dollar to the USPS. Would they make it 100k miles? Yeah. Yeah, that's the ticket!!"
Submitted by: Stillnotatony
"Chevy Express. It's made in Missouri (Red State), available with a V8 (Murica!) and it only seems to be available in white. Plus it can tow up to 9,000 lbs so it'll drag a cyber truck if it needs to."
Submitted by: Drg84
"Pre-owned Ladas."
"We're importing Russia's old politics, might as well import their old cars too."
Submitted by: Skeffles
"We should look at getting a slew of used Yugos from Russia. Should be able to pay them a steep premium with the current relationship the two countries' leaders have."
Submitted by: Yugo, no I go.
I hope I'm not the first person to tell you that the Yugo was built in Serbia, not Russia.
"Individual household's own vehicle driving 50 miles each way to get their own mail from the closest regional post office."
Submitted by: PJE
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 minutes ago
- Politico
Ross Perot Transformed Politics. It Will Be Harder for Elon Musk.
Imagine for a moment a tech tycoon whose business empire relies on a cozy relationship with the federal government. Once a major Republican donor, he has gotten fed up with the two-party system and launched his own third-party political operation. His big concern is massive budget deficits, and he pledges to clean up government fraud, waste and abuse and sweep away bureaucratic red tape — applying the know-how of a systems engineer to tame the federal behemoth. He has adoring fans who see in him an almost superhuman capacity to save the country, though he also has many detractors who see an erratic, paranoid and authoritarian personality, a megalomaniac in waiting. Opponents suspect the billionaire of offering political donations for lucrative government contracts. He promotes wild conspiracy theories involving high government officials. He wants to replace Congress and possibly the Constitution itself with government by electronic plebiscite where the public will instantly weigh in on the issues. And he routinely proposes grandiose plans only to get frustrated with media scrutiny, lose interest and sulk away. Then, all of a sudden, he announces a dramatic return to political life. I think you all know who I'm talking about: H. Ross Perot, the eccentric Texan founder of Electronic Data Systems and two-time presidential candidate. But you get the conceit: I could just as easily be talking about Elon Musk. Musk might even see Perot as his intentional model. On a February episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, the podcast host admiringly brought up Perot's strong challenge to the Republican-Democrat 'uniparty' system in his 1992 presidential bid, and Musk replied, 'I think most of what he was saying was true.' Perot never became president, but his nearly 19 percent of the popular vote in 1992 marked the most successful independent White House bid in modern times. He also reshaped American politics for years to come, forcing both parties to focus on the deficit and planting the seeds for the kind of populist revolt that would bring Newt Gingrich control of the House and ultimately lift Donald Trump to power. But replicating Perot's successes in 2025 and beyond won't be easy for Musk. Not only are the men actually quite different, but so is the moment. When Perot launched his campaign on 'Larry King Live' in 1992, the public was deeply disillusioned with both political parties. The perception was that Democrats and Republicans alike were corrupt and beholden to special interests. A financial debacle revealed a political and economic elite in cahoots, with little accountability afterwards. The country was in the throes of a recession, and throughout the previous decade, the standard of living for the middle class was stagnant or falling. The Cold War had ended abruptly, and the nation felt adrift. Perot spoke directly to these concerns, monopolizing cable and talk radio coverage during the election. He excited an electorate that felt alienated and angry. While Perot was eccentric — and spoke to a part of the country that felt increasingly left behind — he was also Middle American, folksy and quite conventional. He deployed charming old idioms with a Texan twang. He was the ultimate square with a flattop: a churchgoer, a doting husband and father, who never swore in public. He wore a suit, always with a white shirt and conservative ties. He decorated his office with Norman Rockwells and sculptures of cowboys. After a stint in the Navy during the Korean War, he worked as a salesman for IBM, perhaps the most buttoned-up corporation in a buttoned-up age. He took its corporate ethos into his entrepreneurial ventures. His image was not one of 'chaos agent' or 'disruptor-in-chief' but of competence, thrift and conscientiousness. Although his business was high-tech for its time, he was a figure of nostalgia. He represented the eternal 1950s, offering a hokey but comforting Americana that people still yearned for. And he was highly sober, even threatening to turn the military on drug dealers. Regardless of whether you believe the reports of Musk's recreational activities, a South African immigrant and regular Burning Man attendee doesn't exude wholesome Americana. The voters who flocked to Perot also differ greatly from Musk's supporters. Perot's people had been the managerial middle of the Cold War: engineers, office administrators and plant supervisors. Now they were being pushed into precarity, their worlds eroded by outsourcing and mergers and the sudden reduction of the defense and aerospace industries. Although Perot pitched himself as an alternative to the mainstream parties, Perot's base was rooted in the civic cultures of the Sun Belt suburbs and upper-Midwestern small towns — places where Rotary Clubs still met and where people watched 60 Minutes religiously. He did activate young, downwardly mobile voters who felt left out of the system, but many of his most dedicated volunteers had long histories of civic engagement. His political language was populist and he thrived in new media, but he was still bound by the old rituals of bipartisan America, things like the pledge of allegiance, town halls and debates moderated by broadcast anchors. These were people who had made it in the old system but no longer believed it was working. Their politics was defined not by class position exactly, but by a sense of loss: of competence, seriousness and national unity. They had believed in the postwar order, and when it cracked, they reached for someone who promised to restore it. Musk has a much more fragmented nation and political terrain to navigate, in large part thanks to the social media revolution that he has hijacked. He doesn't speak for a class so much as he performs for fragmented audiences: a lumpenbroletariat of downwardly mobile professionals, bitter Redditors, anime porn addicts, finance bros, crypto hustlers, divorced dads stuck in YouTube rabbit holes. His appeal cuts across the cultural wreckage of the white middle class — not through its shared values, but through shared disillusionment. They don't have a real memory of a lost Golden Age, just AI-generated kitsch images that make Perot's Rockwellian America look like high art. This is not a constituency so much as a fickle public that wants to be entertained and distracted. They do not have the attention span to become the dedicated volunteers that got Perot on the ballot in 50 states. They rise in enthusiasm only to quickly return to indolence. And he has a major competitor for their attention: Trump, who can channel the same anti-system energy, but is genuinely funny and spontaneous in a way that Musk simply isn't. Musk's moment may have passed as well. Richard Hofstadter famously wrote, 'Third parties are like bees: Once they have stung, they die.' Musk may have already stung. He has plenty of money in the bank, but he's spent much of his political capital. He rode into D.C. triumphantly with Trump's inauguration and then sort of skulked away in ignominy after making a spectacle of himself. His bold plan to fix the federal government with DOGE was both disastrous and anticlimactic. If you trust the polls, the public seems fed up with him. And is the deficit really enough of a political issue today? In the 1990s, Perot was able to make the deficit and debt a symbol of the declining economic fortunes of the nation. It's unclear if Musk can do the same in an age of distraction. Heck, it's unclear if Musk will even stay focused on his own political projects if he experiences setbacks or frustrations. Finally, what is Musk's lane? For his era, Perot ran as a social moderate, with liberal views on abortion and guns, but Musk has associated himself with the hard right on cultural and social issues. Perot was not a paragon of racial enlightenment — referring to an NAACP audience as 'you people' hurt his 1992 candidacy — but he also spoke of the military as a true meritocracy that had helped reduce racism. Musk would likely mock such talk as 'woke.' Perot also championed economic nationalism and played to worries over what foreign trade was doing to American manufacturing. Musk, with extensive business interests in China, has no such cares; and besides, that populist issue is fully monopolized by Trump. There is one issue that Musk may be able to exploit, a new vulnerability for the Trump administration: the so-called Epstein Files. Musk has seized on it amid his feud with Trump, and it echoes Perot's own promotion of the 'living prisoner' myth, the idea that the U.S. had abandoned soldiers in Southeast Asia after the Vietnam War. His advocacy for the POW/MIA movement fueled new distrust in the federal government, and no matter how much information was released or how many committees investigated it, the issue would not go away. The Epstein saga certainly has an emotional resonance that could fracture Trump's base and leave the discontented looking around for an alternative. But how many single-issue Epstein voters will there be one year from now, let alone three? Without the ability to run for president, Musk is arguably emulating the least successful part of Perot's political career: his attempt to start a third party. The Reform Party collapsed in a decade, elected just one statewide official in the person of Jesse Ventura, and no members of Congress. At the end of its existence, it was riven with factions, lacked any clear ideological vision for the country and became a catch-all vehicle for cranks and malcontents. Of course, one of those was named Donald Trump, who ran for the Reform Party presidential nomination in 2000. Perot's political endeavors fed on political cynicism, but also deepened it: The message of 'nothing works' resonated. In that sense, there may be some similarities between then and now. Musk's America Party may not succeed in doing much in the short term, but it's worth watching closely. While Perot seemed to fade away and become a piece of political trivia, his movement sowed the seeds of a new type of politics. As Musk's moment may be already passing, it's time to imagine what may come after.
Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney will huddle with premiers in Muskoka to talk trade, Trump and crime
A bucolic resort in Muskoka is the political centre of Canada this week. Canada's premiers are gathering in cottage country to meet with Indigenous leaders Monday afternoon and Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday morning before the official start of their Council of the Federation meeting later that day. In an unusual move, Premier Doug Ford, who is hosting the summit at Huntsville's Deerhurst Resort on Peninsula Lake, invited Carney to attend the provincial and territorial leaders' conference because of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war against Canada. 'It's never been a more important time to welcome my fellow premiers to Ontario to continue the work we've done over the past year to protect Canada and our economy,' Ford said Thursday in Toronto. 'This meeting will be an opportunity to work together on how to respond to President Trump's latest threat and how we can unleash the full potential of Canada's economy,' added the Progressive Conservative premier, a close political ally of the Liberal prime minister . Carney was quick to accept Ford's invitation and emphasized he has other things to discuss with the premiers, including 'bail reform, particularly with respect to repeat offenders,' among other criminal justice matters. 'We have commitments on that. We're working with the provinces on those issues,' the prime minister said Wednesday in Hamilton. 'I'll be meeting with the premiers next week. I'm sure that's one of the elements that we will discuss, and you can expect legislation from this government in the fall,' he said. That's music to Ford's ears — for years he has been urging Ottawa to toughen up bail laws to prevent 'weak-kneed judges' from releasing recidivists. But the primary focus of the Muskoka meetings will be the economy — especially in light of Carney's admission last week that any future deal with Trump would likely mean tariffs on Canadian goods exported stateside. 'There's not a lot of evidence right now from the deals, agreements and negotiations with the Americans, for any country or any jurisdiction, to have a deal without tariffs,' the prime minister conceded last Tuesday. Monday's session with the premiers and Indigenous leaders is expected to be dominated by many First Nations' opposition to Ford's Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, and Carney's Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act. The federal and provincial laws, which are designed to speed up major infrastructure projects like pipelines and rail corridors as well as mines, have raised questions about traditional treaty rights and the environmental impact of fast-tracking development. Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak has warned that 'our rights cannot be implemented or respected without us, in substance and in process.' Still, Carney insisted at a Gatineau meeting Thursday with First Nations leaders — where fears about Bill C-5 were expressed — that 'in many respects, this is the first federal legislation to put Indigenous economic growth at its core.' Ford, meanwhile, is devoting some of his summer to allaying Indigenous communities' concerns over Bill 5, which he hopes will speed up development of the Ring of Fire mining project. But legal challenges against both bills are being launched by nine Ontario First Nations, arguing the laws are unconstitutional. They are seeking a court injunction that would prevent Ottawa and Queen's Park from moving so quickly. One aspect of Bill C-5 that is less contentious is the removal of most federal barriers to interprovincial trade. Because Trump's actions are forcing Canadian leaders to scramble to diversify trade, there has been a push to eliminate internal barriers that could cost the Canadian economy as much as $200 billion annually. Ontario has so far inked deals with all provinces except Quebec, British Columbia and Newfoundland and Labrador to curb hurdles to free trade within Canada. Sources, speaking confidentially in order to discuss internal deliberations, say an accord with B.C. will be signed in Huntsville, putting more pressure on Quebec's François Legault and Newfoundland and Labrador's John Hogan to reach agreements with Ford. B.C. New Democratic Premier David Eby told reporters Thursday in Victoria that his province will be 'seizing new opportunities' to reduce its reliance on trade with the U.S. Officials say Ford is also expected to sign memorandums of understanding with the territorial premiers of Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut. The three-day meeting is being held about 40 minutes drive from the premier's family cottage .
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Alphabet and Tesla Earnings, Powell Speech and More: What to Watch This Week
A Tesla Cybertruck at a store in California. Earnings are due from the EV maker Wednesday. (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg News)
