logo
Farmers in the war against fly-tipping: ‘We're the victims yet we're being made to pay'

Farmers in the war against fly-tipping: ‘We're the victims yet we're being made to pay'

Telegrapha day ago
A discarded cistern marks the entrance to a field in St Albans – a fitting prelude to the unwitting dumping ground beyond. Mounds of mattresses, sofas and pallets lie abandoned; an Amazon delivery bag, a doll's house and a skateboard are scattered across what's estimated to be 200 tons of waste, strewn across land intended to nourish wild birds and insects.
Though he had nothing to do with its arrival, the farmer – 80, and recently widowed – is now responsible for clearing up the £40,000 mess dumped on his doorstep.
This site in Hertfordshire is one of many making life even more difficult for struggling farmers. As custodians of the land, they are legally responsible for clearing the waste left on it – often at a personal cost of tens of thousands of pounds. 'It's an utter injustice,' says sixth-generation farmer Will Dickinson, surveying the grim scene around us on his 700-acre farm. 'The liability's on [the farmer], which is hideously unfair.' The law, he adds, seems to say: 'You're the victim of a crime – and now we're going to make you pay for it. And if you don't, we'll criminalise you too.'
His own livery backs onto the field where we meet. A few times a week, he says, local farmers call to say they have become the latest target. According to figures from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), there were 1.5 million fly-tipping incidents in the countryside between 2023 and 2024 – a scourge that affects two thirds of farmers, according to the National Farmers' Union (NFU).
Perhaps inevitably, Dickinson, 64, has also been a victim – once discovering five acres of cropland strewn with the contents of eight tipper trucks, including a bathroom suite and garden waste. Unsure whether the load contained asbestos or glass, he was forced to scrap the entire crop. Nothing he had planted could be harvested, dealing a further blow to food security and his seasonal earnings – all while facing an inordinate clean-up job.
Across farms in Britain, similar stories abound. In March, Eevey Hunter, an arable farmer in Hertfordshire, spent £6,000 clearing rubbish dumped in her fields over what she believes was a matter of weeks, with the perpetrators 'effectively using it as a free tip'.
Dickinson suspects that most perpetrators are 'white van men' or families who can't be bothered to go to the tip themselves. 'But this is something else,' he says of the disaster left on his elderly neighbour's land. (His terrier, who he tries to coax out of the car, wisely refuses.)
'This must be organised criminality. It's quite staggering how much waste [there is].'
Chris Traill, the strategic director for community at St Albans City and District Council, describes the incident as 'a well-organised operation, not a random or impulsive act,' adding that it is being linked to eight other large fly-tips across the district. Following investigations by the council's environmental enforcement team, 'two individuals have already been contacted and asked to attend an interview, and more people may also be approached'.
Fly-tipping is a criminal offence that can carry a £50,000 fine and, under a Government initiative launched in April, a five-year prison sentence. Yet Dickinson notes that, according to 2020 figures, 95 per cent of those caught and prosecuted received a fine of less than £1,000 (with the number of fixed penalty notices also falling by 5 per cent last year) – 'which is absolute nonsense,' he says. That amount barely covers the cost of hiring an asbestos skip, let alone the much higher recycling and removal fees farmers are left to shoulder. The environmental impact of unfiltered dumping can be severe too, contaminating water and soil and destroying wildlife and their habitats.
'I get disheartened every day,' Dickinson says of what's happening to Britain's farmland, citing one case where mountains of rubbish – later found to contain asbestos and human waste – were dumped amid the bluebells in another neighbour's ancient woodland. (The landowner was quoted £100,000 for its removal; the damage 'still sits in among the trees now'.)
He's well aware that 'if you're going to fly-tip, you don't care about the environment, you just want to get rid of [the rubbish] and make a few quid' – but the impact is proving both ecologically and financially devastating for those left to clean up.
Hertfordshire's police and crime commissioner last year launched a 'fly-tipping fund', which landowners can apply for if they have been targeted. Yet between 2024 and 2025, just seven applications were successful, with a total of £11,173 paid out.
The Government maintains it is taking the issue seriously, with a Defra spokesperson stating: 'Waste criminals and fly-tippers who blight our villages and undermine our hard-working farmers have gone unpunished for too long. This Government is cracking down on cowboy waste operators, including seizing and crushing fly-tippers' vans to clean up Britain's rural areas and support our crucial farming sector.'
In March, £800,000 in funding was earmarked for the National Rural Crime Unit and National Wildlife Crime Unit – a fraction of the £44.1 million cost of rural crime last year.
Is enough being done to change the current punitive fate of battle-weary British farmers? 'Sadly no, not at all,' says Victoria Collins, Liberal Democrat MP for Harpenden and Berkhamsted, where the most recent large-scale incident took place.
'There just seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the difficulty that a lot of our farmers have,' she says, with ministerial promises rarely translating into action. 'This is a criminal issue; this is not just something which is small fry anymore, and so that's why the Government should be tackling it head on.'
Collins's party is pushing for more reinforcements, such as dedicated teams within police forces – currently, just 0.4 per cent of officers focus on countryside offences. Without that support, farmers remain single-handedly responsible for deterring criminals. For some, that means installing CCTV, though this often proves ineffective: Dickinson says he has images of one intruder blasting his camera with a BB gun. Heavy blockades offer little protection either; his neighbour's farm had a large concrete block moved by intruders and a gate mangled.
'The reality is that when you're in the countryside, there aren't that many cameras around, and you can find secluded spots – hidden in trees, down back lanes, that nobody really knows about,' says Rachel Hallos, the vice-president of the NFU, on how easily fly-tippers are able to blight the countryside.
'It seems that once somebody's found a place, it keeps on being tipped there again and again and again.'
These incessant attacks – and the lack of recourse afterwards – are yet another blow to farmers, who have already been saddled with inheritance tax changes on land worth more than £1 million (previously exempt) and Government cuts to subsidies. In March, applications to the Sustainable Farming Incentive, launched in 2022 to reward eco-friendly farming practices supporting food production and the environment, were also closed.
This has left Dickinson in the same position as many of his peers: caught between continuing to work to stave off economic turmoil or passing his farm to the next generation much sooner to avoid a multimillion-pound tax bill. He describes the situation as 'hideous; absolutely hideous. Mental stress in farming is a pretty serious thing these days'. (An NFU report found that 96 per cent of those surveyed felt rural crime was negatively affecting farmers' mental wellbeing.)
'A friend of mine's father committed suicide; another neighbour committed suicide back in the spring. It's a dodgy old job.'
Dickinson maintains that of all the challenges farmers face today, fly-tipping is one that surely can be cracked. 'If you lose hope, you give up. I don't want to give up.' Still, he says, 'it's been a long, long war' – and there's no sign of it ending yet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on proscribing Palestine Action: blurring civil disobedience and terrorism is a dangerous step
The Guardian view on proscribing Palestine Action: blurring civil disobedience and terrorism is a dangerous step

The Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on proscribing Palestine Action: blurring civil disobedience and terrorism is a dangerous step

When the Labour government introduced anti-terrorism legislation 25 years ago, it stressed that it was targeting extreme crimes. 'Terrorism involves the threat or use of serious violence for political, religious or ideological ends. It … aims to create a climate of extreme fear,' said Jack Straw, the then home secretary. Some MPs still feared that a group like Greenpeace, which had destroyed genetically modified crops and temporarily halted nuclear weapons production at Aldermaston, might be proscribed. Mr Straw reassured them that such bans would be used only when absolutely necessary; he knew of 'no evidence whatever' that the actions of the environmental group 'would fall remotely under [its] scope'. UN experts warned this week that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. Yet on Wednesday, MPs voted – by 385 to 26 – to proscribe Palestine Action under the 2000 legislation. The Lords were expected to approve the order on Thursday. Unless a high court judge orders its suspension at a hearing on Friday, from Saturday, being a member of or simply expressing support for the group will carry a maximum penalty of 14 years. The ban was announced days after Palestine Action claimed responsibility for breaking into an RAF base and spraying paint on to planes that it claimed were supporting the Israeli military campaign. Four people have been charged. Hundreds of lawyers, cultural figures and groups such as Amnesty International have condemned the ban. It is lamentable that MPs backed it. But cynically listing two white-supremacist organisations on the same order – Maniacs Murder Cult, whose members have claimed violent attacks globally, and Russian Imperial Movement, which seeks to create a new Russian imperial state – made it harder for legislators to vote it down. The British state has plenty of legislation to deal with direct action. Palestine Action activists have been arrested and charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and burglary. The suspicion is that frequent acquittals have led to this order. Pouring paint over military aircraft and buildings, and tossing smoke bombs, does not sound like the kind of extreme act that the public rightly reviles as terrorism. Rather, the ban appears designed not only to silence supporters but to reduce public sympathy by placing the group on a par with Islamic State and the extreme-right group National Action. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, alleges that Palestine Action's methods 'have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The public will need to see evidence of this – rather than take such claims on trust – if their faith in the state is not to be undermined. Palestine Action has targeted property to challenge a war in which tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. The group's protests embarrass the government: the UK continues to supply equipment to Israel's military as it slaughters Palestinians. Despite overwhelming evidence that war crime is piling on war crime in Gaza, and reportedly contrary to the advice of its own lawyers, the British government will not say that Israel has broken international law. The government should be doing all it can to end this conflict, not to criminalise protests against it. But you do not need to sympathise with Palestine Action's aims to believe that its proscription sets a chilling precedent and undermines democracy.

Home Secretary: Government accepts court ruling on ‘serious failing' by MI5
Home Secretary: Government accepts court ruling on ‘serious failing' by MI5

The Independent

time33 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Home Secretary: Government accepts court ruling on ‘serious failing' by MI5

The Home Secretary has said she is 'deeply concerned' that MI5 gave false evidence to the High Court and that the Government accepts a further investigation should take place. Yvette Cooper told MPs that 'internal processes at MI5 must improve' after three judges ruled on Wednesday that a further investigation should be carried out into how it came to give incorrect evidence to the High Court in a bid to secure an injunction against the BBC. Then-attorney general Suella Braverman asked the court for the injunction in 2022, which prevented the BBC from disclosing information likely to identify a man who allegedly abused two women and is a covert human intelligence source. But at a hearing earlier this year, the court was told that part of the written evidence provided by MI5 was false. The Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled on Wednesday that, while it was 'premature' for contempt of court proceedings to be launched against the organisation, a further investigation should be carried out as probes conducted by MI5 into the matter 'suffer from serious procedural deficiencies'. In a statement on Thursday, Ms Cooper told MPs that MI5 must 'always maintain the highest of standards and rigour'. She said: 'I remain deeply concerned that inaccurate evidence was provided to the High Court and Investigatory Powers Tribunal. This was a serious failing by MI5. 'The Government accepts the High Court's conclusion that a 'further, robust and independent investigation' should take place. I will provide further details to the House in due course. 'I have also asked the attorney general to conduct an internal review of how evidence from MI5 should be prepared and presented in future, to respond to the court's specific findings on witness statements in this regard. 'Alongside this I have asked my officials to review the wider issues raised by this case. 'The vital work MI5 does every day keeps our country safe and saves lives in the face of myriad threats. 'We owe them a debt of gratitude for the work they do. 'But that is also why it is essential that they always maintain the highest of standards and rigour, including in responding to the courts.' Following the ruling, MI5 director-general Sir Ken McCallum offered a 'full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings'.

I hired a PI after Tattle Life trolls outed my pregnancy – it left me heartbroken, says Jeremy Clarkson's daughter Emily
I hired a PI after Tattle Life trolls outed my pregnancy – it left me heartbroken, says Jeremy Clarkson's daughter Emily

The Sun

time33 minutes ago

  • The Sun

I hired a PI after Tattle Life trolls outed my pregnancy – it left me heartbroken, says Jeremy Clarkson's daughter Emily

THE Tattle Life website has been used for years to spread nasty gossip about celebrities and influencers alike. But since its anonymous owner was outed in a Northern Irish court last month, victims of the forums have finally spoken out against the abuse they've endured, including Emily Clarkson. 3 Speaking on her podcast Should I Delete That? with co-host Alex Light, Jeremy Clarkson 's eldest daughter has shared the lengths she went to in an attempt to uncover the trolls targeting her and her family. Englishman, Sebastian Bond, lost his right to anonymity in the courts after he was successfully sued for defamation as the website's founder. The site which attracted 12 million visitors a month was launched seven years ago and supposedly aimed at exposing disingenuous influencers, but has earned the name of a 'troll site; to abuse anyone they see fit.' And Emily was one of thousands of celebrities targeted by people hiding under anonymous accounts to spread hate and abuse. Speaking on the podcast, Emily said: "Tattle has been the biggest thorn in our sides. "You and I, Al, have genuinely been heartbroken by this; it's affected me to the point where I've had to block it on all devices. Emily revealed she has to get those close to her to check the site every few weeks just to ensure images of her kids and her home address wasn't leaked. "I was so broken by it, I haven't been able to check it since Arlo was born, if they say anything bad about my kids I'm gonna die" she continued. The 30-year-old also revealed that her pregnancy with her second child, Xanthe was ruined by trolls on the site who leaked details of her pregnancy. Emily revealed that the cyberbullying got so bad she ended up hiring a private investigator (PI) to find the trolls who were not just harassing her online but stalking her in real life too. 3 Ireland AM guest recalls harrowing online harassment from tattle website "I need to stress, I've found these people, I've hired a PI and I'm incredibly good at finding people on the internet," she continued. Emily's clever detective skills led her to find one Tattle Life user who referred to Emily as 'thrush' as she was 'annoying', but on Instagram would DM Emily being nice as pie. To show her she knew who she was, Emily decided to send her a picture of thrush medication on Instagram and was swiftly left alone by the troll. "She saw it and never replied," Emily chuckled. Tattle Life Timeline Creation of Tattle Life: The online forum Tattle Life was established as a platform for commentary and critiques of influencers and celebrities. Harassment of Neil and Donna Sands: A 45-page thread targeting Neil and Donna Sands appeared on Tattle Life, leading to a campaign of harassment, invasion of privacy, defamation, and breach of data rights against the couple. Legal Action by the Sands: Neil and Donna Sands filed a lawsuit against Tattle Life, seeking justice for the harm caused by the forum's content. Outcome of the Lawsuit: The Sands won £300,000 in damages, marking a significant victory in their legal battle. Unmasking of Tattle Life Owner: The legal action revealed the identity of the website's owner, Sebastian Bond, also known as the vegan cooking influencer Bastian Durward. Repercussions for Tattle Life: Following the lawsuit, many users of Tattle Life began deleting their accounts due to fears of exposure. Other individuals who have been targeted by the site are now considering legal action, including applying for Norwich Pharmacal orders to unmask anonymous trolls. After her pregnancy was leaked on the site, Emily got a PI to track down who it was. "It felt really nice to know they could be found, and if you push me too far, I know who you are," she continued. "If I read my thread, I'd think I'm the worst person in the world," she added. Emily made the point that not only did the comments hurt her but could also affect future work partnerships and relationships, and the platform never gave those targeted a chance to defend themselves. Since it was created in 2017, the founder of Tattle Life was anonymous, but it was found out after fashion brand owner Donna Sands and her husband Neil took the owner to court in Northern Ireland, Sebastian's identity was lifted. Thanks to The Sands, who were targeted by those on the site, Sebastian was found to be the anonymous founder and they have been awarded £150,000 each.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store