ChatGPT helps US woman pay off her $23,000 credit card debt
"Not because I don't make enough, but because I was never taught financial literacy. I avoided budgeting, and I figured if I just kept working harder, I could overcome the problem. That worked... until it didn't," the US-based weekly news magazine quoted her as saying.Things began to fall apart after her daughter's birth. "I shut down emotionally, and I used credit cards to keep our life afloat. We weren't living lavishly. We were just surviving. But the debt piled up while I wasn't looking," she told Newsweek.WHEN JENNIFER ALLAN FINALLY TURNED TO CHATGPT TO CLEAR DEBTAfter being inspired by online 30-day challenges, she decided to challenge herself to use ChatGPT every day for a month to pay off the debt — whether that was brainstorming side hustles or just giving her expenses a little structure, according to the report.advertisementEvery day, the AI bot gave Allan a single money-saving or earning task — like cancelling a subscription, selling things on Facebook Marketplace, checking for unclaimed funds, or digging for spare change in bags and couches — which ended up making her over $100, the report stated.One of the biggest breakthroughs during the challenge was uncovering more than $10,000 in unclaimed or forgotten funds.In June, Allan shared a clip to her TikTok account, revealing she had hit day 30 of her challenge — and over the past month, had paid off $12,078.93 (Approximately Rs 10.08 lakh).ChatGPT also reportedly helped her save $600 monthly.CHATGPT AND TIKTOK'S CONSISTENT SUPPORT HELPED ALLAN STAY MOTIVATEDAllan attributed her motivation to ChatGPT's steady support."It wasn't some big financial hack," Allan told Newsweek. "It was the act of facing it every day — of tracking it, talking about it, looking at it every day. I stopped being afraid of my numbers. I built a debt tracker. I started sharing my journey publicly. And for the first time in my life, I didn't feel ashamed. I felt empowered, like I could conquer anything," she added.For those facing debt and thinking about a similar step, Allan recommended: "Don't wait until you feel ready or 'smart enough' to start. You don't have to know all the answers — you just have to stop pretending it's not happening."advertisementShe advised making the process enjoyable, saying: "For me, using AI gave me a sense of structure without judgment, and TikTok allowed me to hold myself accountable because (the) community I had built was showing up every day waiting for the next task."- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
40 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian designer A. Balasubraman wins U.K.'s Hills Millennium Award
The first Indian to receive the Hills Millennium Award, professor A. Balasubramaniam, 64, will be felicitated in Birmingham, U.K., on July 12. The award is given annually by the UK-based IED (Institute of Engineering Designers est. 1945) to an international designer who has made significant contributions in the fields of product design and/or engineering design. Recipients are chosen by the Council, and its delegates, from nominations. The late professor Peter Hills who presented the cup to the IED in 2000 to mark the millennium, was the President of IED at that time. Past winners include Moroccan-born Spanish American automobile designer Frank Stephenson, and Marcus Engman, Creative Director at Ingka Group (IKEA Retail). Bala, as he is known fondly in design and academic circles, is a NID graduate and director at the Institute of Design at JKLU, Jaipur. Inspired by thinkers like MP Ranjan, Don Norman and Peter Hills, Bala has been a passionate advocate of design. His 2015 blog post pushing for a Ministry of Design went viral with 4,000 hits the first day. Cited as an educator to watch out for in the Higher Education Digest 2023, this win for Bala is a timely acknowledgement of India's contribution to design and design education. The designer-educator talks to us about the award and the product design scene in India. Can you tell us about getting the Hills Millennium Award? It was a surprise. I got a message from one Harrison Stocker at IED on LinkedIn saying, 'You have won an award'. I had worked with Hills, an engineering designer, years back when he came to India as an external consultant to NSIC (National Small Industries Corporation Ltd.), which is now MSME. I was a bit miffed that they needed a foreigner for expert advice, but later, we hit it off. We put together the design initiative at NSIC called PRIDE (Prototype Initiative for Design Excellence). While Hills was heading IED, I wrote an article on the state of Indian design. Over casual conversations, we found out that we both shared a birthday. I'd drop him a greeting card every year, along with a letter venting my joys and frustrations about design in India. This correspondence went on over 20 years. This year when I sent him a letter, his wife Jane wrote back saying he'd passed away in September last year. He would have been 90 this year. What does the award mean for you personally, and what does it mean for designers in India? For one, it is acknowledging an individual's contribution to the profession. This is important. At JKLU, I began the Design Guru award in honor of MP Ranjan. We celebrate one senior designer every year. In 2020 we picked Don Norman as he has been evangelizing design for a while. I'm very happy Don accepted it. Industrial designer and educator Shuchi Mathur said to me once, 'You start from nothing and you build it into something.' I was invited in an advisory role to JKLU, as founder Pramath Raj Sinha wanted to start a school of design. They already had engineering and management. Sinha was excited with my vision document, which began with a quote from Don Norman — 'Design education has to move away from schools of art and architecture and move into the schools of science and engineering.' I was the first employee at JKLU's Institute of Design and I put a team together. We decided on 4 disciplines: Interdisciplinary Design, Product Design, Interaction Design and Integrated Communication. You have practiced since the 1980s when design was not well understood in India. How did you address its perception? We would identify industries that manufactured products — like Usha – and make a design presentation. Basically, we would educate the client about design to get a project. My interest in teaching began right here. It was a 3-stage pitch-to-project process that worked. One of my earliest products was a flashlight for Eveready, with a reach to rural areas. The brief was — inexpensive to make but cannot look cheap. My product cost was just 7 rupees, including the graphics. It sold for 35 rupees a piece. They went on to manufacture 30,000 pieces on 3 shifts a day. If only I had asked for royalty! What are some issues young designers face in the field today? Are there still communication hurdles in addressing clients and industries, or funding a prototype? It is relatively easy to do product design today. There are plenty of opportunities. This generation also understands users much better, and software — they pick up many aspects on their own from YouTube. It becomes far more challenging for faculty to contribute. Projects are well-funded, and the Indian Government is getting into design. The MSME scheme was such a game changer, as it acknowledged designers' contribution to small industries. There's a charm in working for this sector as you can make a greater impact. I worked with grassroots innovators, commissioned by the National Innovation Foundation, one of Government of India's launchpads for design. I designed a multipurpose processor for a client in Haryana to process tomatoes. He thought we were going to steal his idea! We developed a safe, ergonomic and stylish prototype and told him, 'Go ahead, make it.' How has your approach facilitated your evolution as an educator and designer? Educating clients was a starting point. I like converting people, building a constituency for design. My first blog post was 'Demand good design.' Else design won't flourish and we won't have good products. It was all about — 'By now, you would have had your bath and started your day. Did the cistern save water? Did the water splash in the washbasin? Could you hold your newspaper? If all this worked, it was done by a designer.' Name some culture-specific Indian products that stand out for you. How can India become a global contender? In the 1980s, designers from Tesseract made a desktop Idli Wet Grinder — Elgi is still the best. In terms of artisanal work, I like Mukul Goyal's work, using the lost wax process. But it seems we still need a Prada to come and tell us that we have world-class design! The problem starts with the consumer. We need to be ruthless about good stuff. Living with mediocrity irritates me. My latest post is 'Demand Good Designers' with a push to advocate for aspiring graduates. Design still needs evangelizing and I am happy to continue promoting design in all forums. The writer is a brand strategist with a background in design from SAIC and NID.
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Notice the difference': Elon Musk claims major upgrade to Grok chatbot's question-answering abilities
Tech mogul Elon Musk has announced significant improvements to his artificial intelligence chatbot, Grok, as part of a wider strategy to challenge what he perceives as ideological bias in existing AI platforms. In a post shared on X on Friday, the tech billionaire stated, 'We have improved @Grok significantly. You should notice a difference when you ask Grok questions.' The update is the latest development in Musk's bid to position Grok, developed by his AI venture xAI, as a credible alternative to tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT. Last month, the Tesla CEO unveiled plans to retrain Grok using what he described as a 'cleaner and more accurate version of human knowledge'. This retraining effort forms the backbone of an ambitious initiative to revise and enhance the global knowledge base. Writing on X, Musk suggested that the next major release of the system, potentially named Grok 3.5 or Grok 4, will feature heightened cognitive abilities. 'We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors,' he stated. Central to Musk's vision is a pledge to build an AI that is free from what he calls the 'mind virus', a term he uses to describe ideological slant in current AI models. To that end, he is encouraging users to submit so-called 'divisive facts', claims that may be politically controversial but, in his view, reflect reality. xAI's Grok has positioned itself as a more unfiltered and open alternative to other chatbots, often adopting an edgier tone in responses. With this latest update, Musk is doubling down on his plans for a radically different model of AI, one that he argues is more truthful and less constrained by what he sees as prevailing cultural or institutional norms.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cartel probe: CCI seeks 9 years of financial records from UltraTech, Dalmia Bharat, others; flags ONGC tender cartelisation
India's Competition watchdog, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has directed UltraTech Cement — which now controls India Cements — along with Dalmia Bharat and Shree Digvijay Cement, to furnish detailed financial records and income tax data following a Director General (DG) report that flagged violations of competition norms in a tendering process by ONGC. In its order dated May 26, the fair trade regulator asked UltraTech to submit India Cements' audited financial statements — including balance sheets and profit and loss accounts — for the financial years 2014-15 to 2018-19. Dalmia Bharat and Shree Digvijay Cement have been asked to submit similar records spanning nine financial years from 2010-11 to 2018-19, PTI reported. The CCI also instructed designated executives of all three cement companies to provide personal financial details and income tax returns for five years, in addition to formal responses to the DG's report. The move follows a complaint filed by state-run ONGC alleging cartelisation in its procurement tenders. On November 18, 2020, CCI had ordered the DG to investigate. The probe report, submitted on February 18, 2025, found evidence suggesting that India Cements, Shree Digvijay, and Dalmia Bharat, in alleged coordination with a middleman named Umakant Agarwal, were engaged in anti-competitive conduct. Taking note of the findings, the CCI's order said companies must also report the revenues earned from sales related to the alleged cartelised activities. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like La Spezia: L'ultima soluzione acustica svizzera: ingegnosa e quasi invisibile Migliora Udito Undo The regulator cautioned that failure to provide the required information — or providing incomplete or false details — could attract penalties under Section 45 of the Competition Act. In December 2024, UltraTech Cement became the promoter of India Cements after acquiring a 32.72% stake from its promoters and promoter group entities. This followed an earlier market purchase of a 22.77% stake, making the Aditya Birla Group-owned UltraTech the controlling shareholder of the Tamil Nadu-based company. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
