
Putin was one of the losers of the Israel-Iran war
If things work out, the U.S. president will be a hero. If they don't, he won't.
The implications of the American attack on Iran may be more certain for Russia and Ukraine.
We know that the Kremlin is upset. Oblivious to the irony, Russian President Vladimir Putin called it 'an absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran.' Putin evidently failed to see that his criticism of Trump applies with equal force to his 'absolutely unprovoked aggression' against Ukraine.
On the other hand, Putin might take solace from the fact that Trump's indifference to international law mirrors his own. In effect, if not in intent, Trump legitimized Russia's invasion of Ukraine — as if either man cared about such legal subtleties.
So much for the semi-good news for Russia. In contrast, the bad news is really bad.
For starters, Trump demonstrated that the U.S. is a legitimate military superpower — unlike Putin's Russia, which has lost over 1 million men and thousands of tanks and vehicles in its hopeless struggle against Ukraine. Trump showed that Russia is a bit player with oversized delusions of grandeur.
One Russian supremacist, the self-styled philosopher Aleksandr Dugin, concluded that Trump's attack could even undermine Russia. 'Some still cling to the illusion that World War III might somehow pass us by. It won't,' Dugin said. 'We are already in the thick of it. The U.S. has carried out a bombing strike against Iran — our ally. Nothing stopped them. And if nothing stopped them from bombing Iran, then nothing will stop them from targeting us next. At some point, they may decide that Russia, like Iran, shouldn't be allowed to possess nuclear weapons — or find some other pretext to strike. Make no mistake: we are at war.'
Equally oblivious to irony was Konstantin Kosachev, the vice speaker of the Federation Council, who noted: 'Let's state the obvious: Iraq, Libya — and now Iran — were bombed because they couldn't hit back … The message to so-called 'threshold' nations couldn't be clearer: If you don't want to be bombed by the West, arm yourself. Build deterrence. Go all the way — even to the point of developing weapons of mass destruction. That's the grim conclusion many countries will draw. It's a dangerous lesson, and one that flies in the face of global security and the very idea of a rules-based international order.'
Ukraine has no intention to acquire the bomb, but according to Kosachev it should. Is Putin listening?
Both Dugin and Kosachev implicitly suggested that, just as Trump might turn out to be the hero, Putin was definitely the incompetent emperor with almost no clothes. After all, who if not Putin misjudged Trump, lost Iran, induced NATO to expand and entangled Russia in an unwinnable war? One can well imagine the Russian dictator's sense of betrayal by his pal Trump.
The key question at present is whether Trump will react to Putin's criticism of his assertion of American power with the realization — finally — that Putin is no different from the ayatollah, and that Russia is as much of a threat to Ukraine and the West as Iran was a threat to Israel and its allies. Such an eventuality still seems unlikely in view of Trump's consistently cuddly treatment of Putin and his fascist regime, but miracles do occasionally happen.
Russia has also been exposed as a fair-weather friend. To be sure, its Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Iran — signed earlier this year — did not obligate Moscow to provide military assistance, but Tehran surely expected a bit more from the country it supplied with thousands of deadly Shahed drones at Russia's time of need. Did Russia just admit to being a paper tiger? Its allies and friends will remember that Moscow's promises may be less trustworthy than Washington's threats.
Bad news for Russia always means good news for Ukraine. True, the war in Ukraine has dropped out of the public eye. Oil prices have risen. But Putin is very likely to commit an atrocity that will remind the West of Ukraine's fight, and the spike in oil prices appears to be temporary.
All in all, Putin and Russia are losers, whereas the U.S. and Ukraine are probable winners.
Alexander J. Motyl is a professor of political science at Rutgers University-Newark. A specialist on Ukraine, Russia and the USSR, and on nationalism, revolutions, empires and theory, he is the author of 10 books of nonfiction, as well as 'Imperial Ends: The Decay, Collapse, and Revival of Empires' and 'Why Empires Reemerge: Imperial Collapse and Imperial Revival in Comparative Perspective.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
9 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Pushes Republicans to Pass Stalled Megabill
WASHINGTON—President Trump exhorted holdout House Republicans to get behind his sprawling tax-and-spending bill early Thursday, after the party's effort to pass it ran into stubborn resistance from a handful of rank-and-file members. On Wednesday evening, five GOP lawmakers—Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Keith Self of Texas, Victoria Spartz of Indiana, Andrew Clyde of Georgia and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania—voted with Democrats against a procedural 'rule' vote, blocking the party, at least for the moment, from proceeding to final passage. A handful of other Republicans held back from voting.


CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
Hamas reviews Gaza ceasefire deal as Netanyahu heads to D.C.
Hamas said it was reviewing President Trump's Gaza ceasefire deal as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu heads to Washington D.C. CNBC's Dan Murphy speaks to The National's Mina Al-Oraibi for more.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount and Trump in 'Advanced' Settlement Talks As Merger Deadline Nears
A deal to settle a lawsuit from President Trump against CBS News over its handling of a 60 Minutes interview could be close. Lawyers for both sides moved to pause all proceedings until Thursday, citing 'good faith' and 'advanced' settlement discussions, according to a court document filed on Monday. More from The Hollywood Reporter Canada Scraps Digital Services Tax After Trump Trade Talks Threat Trump "Terminating" U.S.-Canada Trade Talks Over Streaming Tax That's It, The F-Word Is Officially Boring The move comes ahead of the merger termination deadline on July 7. If the deal isn't completed by then, a second 90-day extension would expire on Oct. 6. In the scenario that the transaction isn't greenlit at that point, it's believed that Paramount and Skydance will abandon the deal rather than seek another extension. The holdup involves the Federal Communication Commission's refusal to transfer Paramount's broadcast licenses. The dispute has influenced Paramount's approach to a lawsuit accusing it of deceptively editing an interview with Kamala Harris. A mediator recently proposed a $20 million settlement to resolve the lawsuit, with the majority going to Trump's presidential foundation, The Wall Street Journal reported, which noted that Trump has insisted on an apology. It's been reported that CBS offered as much as $15 million. Trump's legal team faced a Monday deadline to reply to CBS' motion to compel discovery. 'The Parties respectfully submit that good cause to stay all proceedings exists because the Parties are engaged in good faith, advanced, settlement negotiations,' reads the filing. Absent a deal, the court is expected to rule on CBS' bid to dismiss the lawsuit in the coming months. In that filing, the network argued that the complaint is an 'affront to the First Amendment' and that Trump is looking to 'punish a news organization for constitutionally protected editorial judgments they do not like.' The pathway to Skydance's acquisition of Paramount getting approved involves a settlement of the 60 Minutes lawsuit, after which the FCC will approve the transfer of the broadcast licenses. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire