How Delhi Police constable posed as ‘decoy customer', caught man with Rs 60,000 counterfeit currency in 2018
The informer told Constable Manu that a man named Mohammed Hussain was selling counterfeit currency at the service road near the Cross River Mall in Shahdara. This tip-off led the police to believe that Hussain had been circulating and trafficking fake Indian currency notes (FICNs). The information was conveyed to Inspector Sanjay Sharma, the AATS in-charge, and a raiding team of five police officials was formed to bust Hussain's network.
According to court records, Head Constable Giriraj posed as Yakoob, a decoy customer, and stood near the location where the informer had said he had seen Hussain. Giriraj then saw Hussain and went to strike a deal with him. For two genuine Rs 500 notes, he was given counterfeit currency worth Rs 2,000 by Hussain.
At close to 5 pm, Giriraj waved his hand—a predetermined signal decided by the raiding team—and the others closed in and apprehended Hussain within minutes. While conducting a search of the accused, the police found 29 fake Rs 2,000 notes from his right pant pocket. The recovered currency was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Rohini, and after the results showed that the currency was fake, a chargesheet was filed on January 11, 2019, as per court records.
Six and a half years later, a Delhi court convicted Hussain under Section 489B of the Indian Penal Code (using as genuine, forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes).
'It is highly improbable that without any rhyme or reason for the police to pick only accused Mohd. Hussain and plant FICNs upon him…Moreover, in view of the unbreached testimonies of the witnesses available on record, the plea of accused regarding his false implication is without any basis,' Additional Sessions Judge Hardeep Kaur of Patiala House Court noted in her order dated May 30.
The counsel for Hussain had argued that the accused belonged to a poor strata of society and had been falsely implicated in the case. He argued that the money had been planted by the Delhi Police. The defence lawyer had also argued that no CCTV footage of the incident had been collected and no public witnesses had joined the investigation.
'…this Court has no hesitation to hold that accused Mohd. Hussain having possession of 30 FICNs in the denomination of Rs.2,000/- reached at the spot in order to supply the same to the customers,' Additional Sessions Judge Kaur said.
Arguments on Hussain's sentence were heard on July 2. His sentence is likely to be decided on July 7.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Wasn't told of rights at time of arrest: Pannun plot-accused Gupta to NY court
In his latest plea, Indian citizen Nikhil Gupta, accused in the Gurpatwant Singh Pannun assassination plot, has sought to exclude some statements made to law enforcement officers, saying he was not made aware of any rights at the time of his arrest, including the right to remain silent or to an attorney. Documents submitted on Gupta's behalf by his New York-based attorney Nola Heller are learnt to include a motion to suppress certain pieces of evidence and statements, as well as the third count of the second superseding indictment, pertaining to money laundering conspiracy, which can lead to 20 years' imprisonment. 'I was not made aware of any rights at the time of my arrest including any right to remain silent or to an attorney,' Gupta said in the declaration submitted to the court on June 23, along with a motion to suppress some pieces of evidence and drop money laundering charges submitted by Heller. It is learnt that the defence has challenged the use of data from his phones and some of the statements made to Czech and US officials immediately after his arrest in Prague on June 30, 2023. Subsequently, he was extradited to the US on June 17, 2024, to face murder-for-hire charges. Gupta is lodged in a federal prison in New York and his trial is slated to begin on November 3. In his plea, Gupta has said that two American special agents — who questioned him during a car ride in Prague on the day of his arrest — did not talk about the allegations in the case or mention any assassination plot. 'Neither Special Agent Franks nor Task Force Officer Sandobal brought up the allegations in this case to me during the car ride. At no point during the car ride did I mention anything about having someone in New York City killed,' he said in a declaration submitted to New York's Southern District court. Recalling the evening of his detention and arrest in Prague, he said that after exiting the airport, in handcuffs, he was made to board 'a dark coloured SUV with tinted windows'. Besides the five Czech officers, already waiting for him in the car, were two other men — who he later learnt were (US) Special Agent Mark Franks and Task Force Officer Jose Sandobal. 'I respectfully submit this declaration in support of the defense's motions to suppress certain evidence and to exclude statements that the government contends were made by me to law enforcement officers,' he said while submitting the document. On the Czech authorities accessing his phones, the data from which was later used by the US government as evidence, the 53-year-old said: 'The officers had taken three phones from me… they told me they wanted to look at the phones. I did not feel like I had any choice in the matter. I was not given the option to speak with an attorney or to refuse the request.' He said in the declaration that while sitting in the car, the two American officers asked him to sign a form which said he didn't need an attorney for the Americans to question him, which he refused. However, earlier, he had printed his name on 'a piece of paper which he couldn't read, or wasn't read to him'. 'Task Force Officer Sandobal did not give me the time necessary to read the document, and so I printed my name without knowing what the document said,' he said, adding that he was later asked to sign a form. 'I asked what the form was, and Task Force Officer Sandobal told me, in sum and substance, that the form said that I didn't need an attorney for the Americans to question me. I refused to sign my name and did not write anything further on the paper,' Gupta said. Earlier, the jailed Indian national had submitted a signed letter to a federal New York judge seeking dismissal of his indictment, which was later withdrawn as his lawyer informed the court that the filing had been made 'inadvertently'. On May 29, the court received Gupta's letter asking the judge to throw out the charges against him and release him immediately on bail. However, a day later, his defence submitted a letter stating that Gupta did not wish to move forward with the self-filed motion, which was accepted by the court. Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sebi Bars Global Trading Giant Jane Street for ‘Manipulation'
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has barred New-York based trading firm Jane Street from the securities market for allegedly manipulating stock indices through large derivative positions mostly on the Bank Nifty, leading to losses for retail investors caught on the other side of these trades. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Securities and Exchange Board of India Sebi ) has barred New-York based trading firm Jane Street from the securities market for allegedly manipulating stock indices through large derivative positions mostly on the Bank Nifty , leading to losses for retail investors caught on the other side of these one of the toughest punitive actions against an international trader of this size, Sebi has ordered the seizure of what it said were 'illegal gains' made by the company to the tune of ₹4,844 crore ($570 million). This is likely the largest amount thus impounded by the regulator till entities tied to Jane Street Group (JS Group)—JSI Investments, JSI2 Investments, Jane Street Singapore and Jane Street Asia Trading —have been prohibited from dealing in securities, directly or Street has 21 days to file a response.'JS Group is not a good faith actor that can be, or deserves to be, trusted,' Sebi whole-time member Ananth Narayan said in his 105-page, ex-parte, interim order issued on July 3. 'The integrity of the market, and the faith of millions of small investors and traders, can no longer be held hostage to the machinations of such an untrustworthy actor.'The firm disputed the findings of the Sebi interim order and said it will engage with the regulator on the matter. 'Jane Street is committed to operating in compliance with all regulations in the regions we operate around the world,' the company spokesperson said in an emailed regulator examined Jane Street's trades in India between January 1, 2023, and March 31, 2025. During this period, it made over ₹43,289 crore ($5.07 billion) profit in index options and ₹7,687 crore ($900 million) in losses across stock futures, index futures and cash markets on the in New York in 2000, Jane Street is a prominent quantitative trading firm with offices in all the key financial centres of the world. It uses complex algorithms developed in-house to execute high-frequency regulator's finding is that the NSE's Bank Nifty Index —comprising the stocks of India's top dozen lenders—had prima facie been manipulated in a complex and illegal manner aided by the JS Group's immense trading, financial and technological prowess. Jane Street would drive up prices with heavy buying in the morning and send them down through a selling spree later in the day, according to Sebi. It also sought to push index levels down with heavy sell orders close to the option expiry, the regulator found that the Bank Nifty options alone contributed Rs 17,319 crore, amounting to 40% of the total index option's profits.'This is an unusual case where prima facie, multiple liquid stocks with high retail participation have together been manipulated to facilitate the manipulation of the index options market, resulting in massive profits for the manipulators, at the cost of other participants and retail traders,' Sebi said.A detailed investigation is still underway. It would cover other major stock indexes including NSE's Nifty.'It is important to note, however, that this examination has so far been limited to select high-profit expiry days in the Bank Nifty index. There may exist similar patterns in other indices or trading behaviours reflecting alternate strategies which have not yet been analysed. Accordingly, many more trading days may merit detailed investigation to assess the full scope and recurrence of such conduct,' Sebi said in its regulator found at least 15 instances of the JS Group undertaking large and aggressive trades in the underlying Bank Nifty component stocks and futures that wasn't for investment or for any standalone economic rationale. In fact, it said, given the sheer size and aggressive nature of the intervention in cash and futures markets and the immediate reversal the same day, the standalone trades in the cash and futures were more likely to end up showing a large net loss.'These trades were undertaken only to distort Bank Nifty index option prices in the interim and entice market participants in Bank Nifty index options to trade at such distorted levels, while the JS Group would take advantage of this and run much larger opposite side positions in the index options market,' Sebi Street, in an August 30, 2024, letter to Sebi, had argued that these trades were to 'remove unwanted delta' or to 'manage overall delta.'The regulator didn't accept these statements. 'JS Group was undertaking an intentional, well-planned, and sinister scheme and artifice to manipulate cash and futures markets and hence manipulate the Bank Nifty index level, to entice small investors to trade at unfavourable and misleading prices, and to the advantage of the JS Group,' it said. The regulator alleged that the Jane Street Group appeared to be most active on expiry days of index said that by incorporating entities in India, JS Group also managed to 'work around' foreign portfolio investor (FPI) regulations that prohibit such overseas entities from undertaking intraday cash market transactions.'Thereby (Jane Street executed) the manipulative scheme without specifically flouting the FPI regulations," it of the 11,219 FPIs registered with Sebi as of March 31, 2024, only 2.5% are engaged in algorithmic trading, as per regulatory data. JS Group is part of this short-term, algorithmic trading aggressive dumping of Bank Nifty component stocks and futures in sharp reversal of the heavy pumping purchases done in the morning was immensely profitable for the large Bank Nifty option positions being run by the JS Group, and to the detriment of all those that had traded in the morning against JS Group at artificially boosted prices, Sebi said. This was a classic case of 'marking-the-close,' where an entity with huge options exposures that are expiring shortly, is moving the underlying market aggressively in its favour, Sebi Kamath, the founder of discount broker Zerodha, posted on X: 'You've got to hand it to Sebi for going after Jane Street. If the allegations are true, it's blatant market manipulation. The shocking part? They kept at it even after receiving warnings from the exchanges.'He also highlighted that such firms are key to the derivatives market.'Prop trading firms like Jane Street account for nearly 50% of options trading volumes. If they pull back— which seems likely —retail activity (~35%) could take a hit too. So this could be bad news for both exchanges and brokers,' Kamath posted.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Lajpat Nagar double murder: No police verification done when accused was hired, say cops
Two days after a garment shop staffer allegedly killed his employer and her 14-year-old son at their Lajpat Nagar residence, enraged over being reprimanded on Tuesday morning for skipping work, police on Friday said the accused, Mukesh Paswan, did not go through the police verification process when he started his job. 'None of the four employees working at the victim's shop had undergone police verification when they were hired,' DCP (Southeast) Hemant Tiwari said. Mukesh worked as a driver and a helper at the shop in Lajpat Nagar market. The police had found Ruchika Sewani (42) and her son Krish (14), a Class X student, dead when they broke open the main door of the house Wednesday night. Police had found Ruchika's body in the bedroom. As officers followed a trail of bloodstains, they found the boy's body inside the bathroom. There were injuries on their neck, which prima facie appeared to have been inflicted by a sharp-edged weapon. An officer said that during questioning, Mukesh claimed that Krish was alive when he left the scene of the crime and that he left him on the floor of his room. 'It is possible that the 14-year-old crawled to the bathroom of his room in a desperate attempt to save his life and tried to get water… but eventually succumbed to his injuries,' the officer added. The officer further said that Mukesh brought the murder weapon, a kitchen knife, from his own home. 'After killing Ruchika, he slit the throat of the boy in his own room to eliminate witnesses.' According to the police, Mukesh had taken an advance of Rs 45,000 from Ruchika and two mobile phones while going on leave. He, however, did not return to work on time. 'Ruchika had asked Mukesh to return the advance payment of Rs 45,000 and the two phones she gave him and leave the job if he couldn't get his act together,' said the officer. Mukesh, who lived at Amar Colony with his two brothers and father, had attempted to flee to his village in Bihar by boarding the Magadh Express from New Delhi railway station early Thursday. He was traced by the Uttar Pradesh Police, which boarded the train at Deen Dayal Upadhyaya junction and arrested him.
