Jay Leno on steering clear of politics on The Tonight Show: ‘Don't think anybody wants to hear lecture'
Leno was known for walking a fine line between humour and neutrality during his run from 1992 to 2009 (and again briefly from 2010 to 2014). He told Trulio that his strategy was simple: appeal to everyone. 'Why shoot for just half an audience? Why not try to get the whole?'
'I don't understand why you would alienate one particular group,' he said. 'Or just don't do it at all. I'm not saying you have to throw your support or whatever, but just do what's funny.'
According to Fox News, Leno recalled receiving conflicting hate mail over the same jokes, with one viewer accusing him of siding with Republicans, and another calling him a Democratic sympathiser. 'And I go, 'Well, that's good.' That's how you get a whole audience,' he said.
Leno's philosophy on comedy is simple. 'Funny is funny,' he told Trulio. 'I don't think anybody wants to hear a lecture.'
He drew a contrast with the current political climate in comedy, where many late-night hosts have embraced explicit political opinions. 'Now you have to be content with half the audience because you have to give your opinion,' Leno noted.
He pointed to his long friendship with fellow comedian Rodney Dangerfield as a model for apolitical comedy. 'I knew Rodney 40 years,' Leno said. 'I have no idea if he was Democrat or Republican. We never discussed, we just discussed jokes.'
The interview comes just before CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As reported by CNN and Fox News, the network cited financial constraints, but the decision drew speculation about political motives, given Colbert's consistent criticism of Donald Trump.
Weeks before the announcement, CBS and its parent company Paramount paid Trump $16 million in a settlement related to a 60 Minutes segment. Colbert had openly criticised the deal, calling it a 'big fat bribe' on-air.
The show is now set to end in May 2026.
(With inputs from CNN, Fox News)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Friendship With Epstein Ended As He "Stole People Who Worked For Me": Trump
Washington: President Donald Trump said Monday that he ended his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and threw the now-disgraced financier out of his private club in Florida after Epstein betrayed him more than once by hiring people who had worked for him. Trump did not say what his employees did or where they worked, and the White House declined further comment. But the White House had previously offered a different explanation for the falling-out. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement last week: 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep.' Epstein killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to power. They are now struggling to manage the fallout after the Justice Department said Epstein did, in fact, die by suicide and that it would not release additional documents about the case. The president and his allies, some of whom are now in the administration, had promised to release the files. The case has dogged Trump at home and abroad and even followed Vice President JD Vance during an appearance in his home state of Ohio on Monday. A small group of protesters assembled outside a factory in Canton that Vance toured, holding signs that spelled out 'JD Protects Pedophiles' and indicating that 'GOP' stands for 'Guardians Of Pedophiles.' The Republican president spoke at his golf property in Turnberry, Scotland, as he sat with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after the leaders had met and were answering questions from US and UK journalists. Asked to explain why the relationship had faltered, Trump said, 'That's such old history, very easy to explain, but I don't want to waste your time by explaining it.' He then explained, saying he stopped talking to Epstein after 'he did something that was inappropriate.' 'He hired help and I said, 'Don't ever do that again,'' Trump said. 'He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place, persona non grata.' 'I threw him out, and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth,' Trump added. Trump recently directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the public release of sealed grand jury transcripts in the case. One federal judge has denied that request; a second judge has yet to rule. Vance, on Monday, visited the factory to promote Trump's tax cut and border bill, but also addressed the Epstein matter, saying the president wants 'full transparency' in the case. 'The president has been very clear. We're not shielding anything,' Vance said in response to a reporter's question. 'The president has directed the attorney general to release all credible information and, frankly, to go and find additional credible information related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.' 'Some of that stuff takes time,' Vance said, adding that Trump has been 'very clear. He wants full transparency.' Trump had said back in 2019 that Epstein was a fixture in Palm Beach, but that the two had had a falling-out a long time ago and he hadn't spoken with Epstein for 15 years. Trump on Monday also denied contributing to a compilation of letters and drawings to mark Epstein's 50th birthday, first reported on by the Wall Street Journal. The newspaper said the letter, believed to be from Trump, included a drawing of a woman's body. 'I'm not a drawing person,' Trump said. 'I don't do drawings of women, that I can tell you.' Trump also said he declined Epstein's invitation to visit a private island the financier owned. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island,' Trump said. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.'
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
What Is FAFO? Decoding The New Parenting Trend That's Viral
"What is FAFO?" is the question taking over online conversations lately, and it's not just internet slang; it's a parenting shift in action. Borrowing from comedian Russell Peters' iconic line, "Somebody's gonna get hurt real bad," a phrase many South Asian kids grew up hearing, today's parents are embracing a similar no-nonsense attitude. Ditching the gentle parenting trend, many are turning to a firmer style summed up by the viral acronym FAFO, short for "F*** Around and Find Out." Here's what it really means, and why it's resonating across generations. What Is FAFO? According to The Wall Street Journal, the internet calls it "FAFO," short for "F-Around and Find Out." It's a child-rearing style that elevates consequences over the "gentle parenting" methods that have helped shape Gen Z. FAFO (often pronounced "faff-oh") is based on the idea that parents can ask and warn, but if a child breaks the rules, Mom and Dad aren't standing in the way of the repercussions. Won't bring your raincoat? Walk home in the downpour. Didn't feel like having lasagna for dinner? Survive until breakfast. Left your toy on the floor again? Go find it in the trash under the lasagna you didn't eat. Parenting that's light on discipline has dominated the culture in recent decades. But critics blame the approach for some of Gen Z's problems in adulthood. They cite surveys that show young adults struggling with workplace relationships (was it because their parents never told them "no"?) and suffering from depression and anxiety (was it because their parents refereed all their problems?). For parents who have spent years trying to meet their children's emotional needs without slipping into overt permissiveness, FAFO can sound blessedly simple. History The term FAFO became widely popular through memes and internet culture in the late 2010s, but its origins go back further. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it is an expression of warning or schadenfreude. According to Urban Dictionary, it was first associated with biker slang. However, its meaning and use have expanded over time. The Washington Post has linked the phrase to African American slang and highlighted its increasing use in political conversations, especially as it gained traction on social media. FAFO Enters Political Discourse The phrase FAFO has gained political relevance in recent years, especially during critical events. During the 2024 US presidential election, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner used a censored version of the term in a press conference to warn against any attempts to disrupt the voting process in the city. Similarly, former Democratic congressman Bakari Sellers used the phrase on CNN to describe the possible consequences of a second term for Donald Trump, referencing the unpredictability seen during his first term. FAFO's cultural influence has grown beyond politics, especially after Elon Musk used it in 2022 in response to Kanye West's suspension from Twitter. It quickly became the "word of the year" and spread across platforms like TikTok, where it's used for political takes and everyday humour. Once a casual warning, FAFO is now a widely used phrase to assert boundaries, express frustration, and highlight that actions come with consequences.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
US Senator sends letter to Elon Musk: Block Starlink in Southeast Asia's 'criminal compounds' using the satellite internet service to scam Americans
'Dear Mr Elon Musk, Starlink satellite internet services are being used by criminals in Southeast Asia to scam Americans of billions,' so says the letter from Democratic senator Maggie Hassan to SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. In the long letter, Hassan urges Elon Musk to block transnational criminal groups in Southeast Asia from using Starlink satellite internet service to commit fraud against Americans. Hassan cited United Nations and other recent reports to support her claim that Starlink is being used to facilitate fraud against Americans by a broad range of transnational criminal organizations operating "scam compounds" in Southeast Asia. The letter asks Elon Musk to respond by August 18, 2025. Here's the complete letter sent by Senator Maggie Hassan to Starlink CEO Elon Musk: Dear Musk, According to an October 2024 report from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, transnational criminal groups have used Starlink, a satellite internet serviced owned by SpaceX, to facilitate fraud against individuals in the United States. The U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has warned that these groups have caused billions of dollars in losses for Americans. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo In addition, since November 2022, the Secret Service has received more than 8,000 complaints related to digital asset scams, many with traces to scam networks in Southeast Asia. Given the significant financial consequences for Americans, I write today to request information about SpaceX's efforts to prevent the misuse of Starlink in transnational fraud. Experts have stated that scam networks in Southeast Asia turn to Starlink for its portability, decentralized infrastructure, and independence from national telecom networks. In one example, a Wired investigation found that across eight scam compounds in Myanmar, at least 412 devices identified Starlink as their provider and recorded more than 40,000 logins. In another example, one law enforcement operation in Thailand seized more than 130 Starlink devices from scam compounds around the country. While SpaceX has stated that it investigates and deactivates Starlink devices in various contexts, it seemingly has not publicly acknowledged the use of Starlink for scams originating in Southeast Asia — or publicly discussed actions the company has taken in response. Scam networks in Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos, however, have apparently continued to use Starlink despite service rules permitting SpaceX to terminate access for fraudulent activity. A United Nations report has confirmed that SpaceX can restrict access to Starlink through 'geofencing,' making the service unavailable in specific countries or locations, but it is unclear whether the company has done so in Southeast Asia. According to one expert based in the region, 'Starlink [is] failing the first basic test of business and human rights, which is to ensure that your operations do no harm.' Transnational fraud has imposed significant human and economic costs in the United States, Southeast Asia, and around the world. According to recent estimates, scams emanating from Southeast Asia likely result in more than $43.8 billion in losses globally each year, with Americans losing $3.5 billion in 2023 alone. This fraud, often carried out by forced labor, can also cause profound psychological distress that drives victims of scams to suicide. The United Nations has also reported that scam networks in Southeast Asia force at least 220,000 trafficked individuals to carry out online scams — a situation its experts describe as a 'humanitarian and human rights crisis.' To aid Congress in understanding the scope of Starlink's role in transnational fraud and efforts to prevent related criminal misuse of its devices, please provide responses to the following information requests. These requests cover the time period of January 1, 2020, to the present: 1. Is SpaceX aware of reports that scam networks in Southeast Asia are using Starlink to facilitate fraud? If so, when and how did SpaceX become aware of such use? 2. What are SpaceX's policies and procedures for investigating, deactivating, or restricting Starlink devices? 3. What guardrails, policies, or procedures are in place to prevent scam networks in Southeast Asia from acquiring — directly or indirectly — Starlink devices? 4. Has SpaceX independently identified, or taken any actions in response to, indications of misuse or improper distribution of Starlink devices by purchasers or third-party intermediaries based in Southeast Asia? 5. How many third-party reports or complaints has SpaceX received concerning Starlink use in scam networks in Southeast Asia? Please break down this number by the entity issuing the report or complaint, including United States federal agencies, United Nations offices or agencies, or multilateral organizations. a. How many of these complaints or reports, if any, led SpaceX to investigate, deactivate, or restrict Starlink devices? b. In total, how many devices has SpaceX investigated, deactivated, or restricted due to their use in Southeast Asian scam networks? c. How many devices has SpaceX investigated, deactivated, or restricted due to their use in fraudulent activity generally? 6. What vulnerabilities, if any, has SpaceX identified in Starlink's security protocols that bad actors, including criminal groups operating scam networks in Southeast Asia, may exploit, and what actions has the company taken to address them? 7. What steps, if any, has SpaceX taken to cooperate and work with U.S. and international law enforcement entities to address Starlink's reported use in scam networks in Southeast Asia? 8. What revenue, if any, has SpaceX generated to date related to Starlink devices that the company later investigated, deactivated, or restricted due to their use in scam networks in Southeast Asia? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
