
A hunt for ghostly particles found strange signals coming from Antarctic ice. Scientists are still trying to explain them
Scientists are trying to solve a decade-long mystery by determining the identity of anomalous signals detected from below ice in Antarctica.
The strange radio waves emerged during a search for another unusual phenomenon: high-energy cosmic particles known as neutrinos. Arriving at Earth from the far reaches of the cosmos, neutrinos are often called 'ghostly' because they are extremely volatile, or vaporous, and can go through any kind of matter without changing.
Over the past decade, researchers have conducted multiple experiments using vast expanses of water and ice that are designed to search for neutrinos, which could shed light on mysterious cosmic rays, the most highly energetic particles in the universe. One of these projects was NASA's Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna, or ANITA, experiment, which flew balloons carrying instruments above Antarctica between 2006 and 2016.
It was during this hunt that ANITA picked up anomalous radio waves that didn't seem to be neutrinos.
The signals came from below the horizon, suggesting they had passed through thousands of miles of rock before reaching the detector. But the radio waves should have been absorbed by the rock. The ANITA team believed these anomalous signals could not be explained by the current understanding of particle physics.
Follow-up observations and analyses with other instruments, including one recently conducted by the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, have not been able to find the same signals. The results of the Pierre Auger Collaboration were published in the journal Physical Review Letters in March.
The origin of the anomalous signals remains unclear, said study coauthor Stephanie Wissel, associate professor of physics, astronomy and astrophysics at the Pennsylvania State University.
'Our new study indicates that such (signals) have not been seen by an experiment … like the Pierre Auger Observatory,' Wissel said. 'So, it does not indicate that there is new physics, but rather more information to add to the story.'
Larger, more sensitive detectors may be able to solve the mystery, or ultimately prove whether the anomalous signals were a fluke, while continuing the search for enigmatic neutrinos and their sources, scientists say.
Detecting neutrinos on Earth allows researchers to trace them back to their sources, which scientists believe are primarily cosmic rays that strike our planet's atmosphere.
The most highly energetic particles in the universe, cosmic rays are made up mostly of protons or atomic nuclei, and they are unleashed across the universe because whatever produces them is such a powerful particle accelerator that it dwarfs the capabilities of the Large Hadron Collider. Neutrinos could help astronomers better understand cosmic rays and what launches them across the cosmos.
But neutrinos are difficult to find because they have almost no mass and can pass through the most extreme environments, like stars and entire galaxies, unchanged. They do, however, interact with water and ice.
ANITA was designed to search for the highest energy neutrinos in the universe, at higher energies than have yet been detected, said Justin Vandenbroucke, an associate professor of physics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The experiment's radio antennae search for a short pulse of radio waves produced when a neutrino collides with an atom in the Antarctic ice, leading to a shower of lower-energy particles, he said.
During its flights, ANITA found high-energy fountains of particles coming from the ice, a kind of upside-down shower of cosmic rays. The detector is also sensitive to ultrahigh energy cosmic rays that rain down on Earth and create a radio burst that acts like a flashlight beam of radio waves.
When ANITA watches a cosmic ray, the flashlight beam is really a burst of radio waves one-billionth of a second long that can be mapped like a wave to show how it reflects off the ice.
Twice in their data from ANITA flights, the experiment's original team spotted signals coming up through the ice at a much sharper angle than ever predicted by any models, making it impossible to trace the signals to their original sources.
'The radio waves that we detected nearly a decade ago were at really steep angles, like 30 degrees below the surface of the ice,' Wissel said.
Neutrinos can travel through a lot of matter, but not all the way through the Earth, Vandenbroucke said.
'They are expected to arrive from slightly below the horizon, where there is not much Earth for them to be absorbed,' he wrote in an email. 'The ANITA anomalous events are intriguing because they appear to come from well below the horizon, so the neutrinos would have to travel through much of the Earth. This is not possible according to the Standard Model of particle physics.'
The Pierre Auger Collaboration, which includes hundreds of scientists around the world, analyzed more than a decade's worth of data to try to understand the anomalous signals detected by ANITA.
The team also used their observatory to try to find the same signals. The Auger Observatory is a hybrid detector that uses two methods to find and study cosmic rays. One method relies on finding high-energy particles as they interact with water in tanks on Earth's surface, and the other tracks potential interactions with ultraviolet light high in our planet's atmosphere.
'The Auger Observatory uses a very different technique to observe ultrahigh energy cosmic ray air showers, using the secondary glow of charged particles as they traverse the atmosphere to determine the direction of the cosmic ray that initiated it,' said Peter Gorham, a professor of physics at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa. 'By using computer simulations of what such a shower of particles would look like if it had behaved like the ANITA anomalous events, they are able to generate a kind of template for similar events and then search their data to see if anything like that appears.'
Gorham, who was not involved with the new research, designed the ANITA experiment and has conducted other research to understand more about the anomalous signals.
While the Auger Observatory was designed to measure downward-going particle showers produced in the atmosphere by ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays, the team redesigned their data analysis to search for upward-going air showers, Vandenbroucke said. Vandenbroucke did not work on the new study, but he peer-reviewed it prior to publication.
'Auger has an enormous collecting area for such events, larger than ANITA,' he said. 'If the ANITA anomalous events are produced by any particle traveling through the Earth and then producing upward-going showers, then Auger should have detected many of them, and it did not.'
A separate follow-up study using the IceCube Experiment, which has sensors embedded deep in the Antarctic ice, also searched for the anomalous signals.
'Because IceCube is very sensitive, if the ANITA anomalous events were neutrinos then we would have detected them,' wrote Vandenbroucke, who served as colead of the IceCube Neutrino Sources working group between 2019 and 2022.
'It's an interesting problem because we still don't actually have an explanation for what those anomalies are, but what we do know is that they're most likely not representing neutrinos,' Wissel said.
Oddly enough, a different kind of neutrino, called a tau neutrino, is one hypothesis that some scientists have put forth as the cause of the anomalous signals.
Tau neutrinos can regenerate. When they decay at high energies, they produce another tau neutrino, as well as a particle called a tau lepton — similar to an electron, but much heavier.
But what makes the tau neutrino scenario very unlikely is the steepness of the angle connected to the signal, Wissel said.
'You expect all these tau neutrinos to be very, very close to the horizon, like maybe one to five degrees below the horizon,' Wissel said. 'These are 30 degrees below the horizon. There's just too much material. They really would actually lose quite a bit of energy and not be detectable.'
At the end of the day, Gorham and the other scientists have no idea what the origin of the anomalous ANITA events are. So far, no interpretations match up with the signals, which is what keeps drawing scientists back to try to solve the mystery. The answer may be in sight, however.
Wissel is also working on a new detector, the Payload for Ultra-High Energy Observations or PUEO, that will fly over Antarctica for a month beginning in December. Larger and 10 times more sensitive than ANITA, PUEO could reveal more information on what is causing the anomalous signals detected by ANITA, Wissel said.
'Right now, it's one of these long-standing mysteries,' Wissel said. 'I'm excited that when we fly PUEO, we'll have better sensitivity. In principle, we should be able to better understand these anomalies which will go a long way to understanding our backgrounds and ultimately detecting neutrinos in the future.'
Gorham said that PUEO, an acronym that references the Hawaiian owl, should have the sensitivity to capture many anomalous signals and help scientists find an answer.
'Sometimes you just have to go back to the drawing board and really figure out what these things are,' Wissel said. 'The most likely scenario is that it's some mundane physics that can be explained, but we're sort of knocking on all the doors to try to figure out what those are.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
an hour ago
- Medscape
Art's Influence on the Brain Better Understood: New Data
She saw an angel of mercy. You saw a sandwich. Such is the fun of visiting a museum or art gallery with a friend and gazing at an abstract painting together and then realizing you have different interpretations of it. The funny thing is, neither one of you has to be right, or even close, to benefit from the experience. Art history experts would attribute this experience to a long-held idea in the art world known as 'Beholder's Share.' It suggests that individuals actively engage in creating meaning when they're looking at art and that meaning is based on one's personal memories and associations. In other words, an artist never really 'finishes' a work of art on their own. Beholder's Share says the artwork is completed by the person viewing it. The mood-boosting effects of viewing art are well-known, but new brain scan research on Beholder's Share — as well as a more rigorous review of existing data showing the mental health benefits of viewing art — suggested that art's influence on our own creativity, critical thinking, and happiness could be more therapeutic than originally thought. One Key May Be Subjectivity vs Objectivity A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences scientifically supports the notion of Beholder's Share, said its authors. Using functional MRI (fMRI), researchers from Columbia University, New York City, discovered that people use their brains differently when viewing abstract art vs when they look at realistic art, and brain activity was more varied — more person-specific — when viewing abstract paintings. 'People responded more subjectively to abstract paintings' compared to realistic paintings, said study author Celia E. Durkin, PhD. What's more, a specific area of the brain appeared to be involved when they viewed abstract art. Ariana Anderson, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), who shared thoughts about the study but was not involved with the research, said, 'Responses were more dissimilar for abstract art in those areas of the brain typically associated with the Default Mode Network.' The authors had a couple of aims when they were devising their study, said Durkin. 'Our two key goals were to establish whether we do indeed interpret abstract art more subjectively than representational art and whether and where we might see evidence of individual contribution to the meaning of paintings in the brain.' They wondered, would they see patterns of brain activity corresponding to Beholder's Share, and how would these patterns vary across individuals? To answer these questions, Durkin said they needed to both 'operationalize and manipulate' the Beholder's Share (the subjective experience) of an image. 'To manipulate the Beholder's Share in a controlled way, we used abstract and representational paintings by the same artist, with the logic that abstract paintings would elicit more of the Beholder's Share,' she said. 'We operationalized the Beholder's Share as dissimilarity across subjects and compared this dissimilarity between abstract and representational paintings, both in written descriptions and neural responses measured with fMRI.' To first test whether people responded more variably to abstract vs figurative (realistic) art, the researchers collected written captions from an online sample of 30 participants who viewed a total of 164 paintings (82 in each category). The paintings were by abstract expressionist artists — such as the Dutch artist Piet Mondrian — who painted lifelike art early in their careers but whose work evolved into a more abstract style over time. The representational paintings included a recognizable object, person, or scene. The abstract paintings did not feature recognizable images (picture shapes, blobs, and splashes of color). The captions varied more for the abstract paintings, 'suggesting abstract art elicits differences in verbalizable interpretation across participants,' the authors wrote. For the second part of the study, 29 healthy participants were shown abstract and figurative paintings while they were scanned with fMRI and asked to make subjective decisions about each painting they viewed. The researchers analyzed participants' brain activity in anatomical regions based on the Harvard-Oxford Atlas, commonly used in neuroimaging for brain mapping. For each painting, the authors said they 'computed the dissimilarity in regional activations across participants' and discovered that brain patterns linked to responses differed across participants significantly more when they were looking at the abstract paintings compared to when they viewed the realistic paintings. The more abstract a painting, the more dissimilar the participants' brain patterns were. The scientists also performed several control analyses, Durkin noted. How the Brain 'Sees' Art 'Figurative art, being more concrete and recognizable, tends to elicit more consistent brain responses across individuals, especially in early visual areas,' said UCLA's Anderson. This would include the visual cortex, located at the back of the brain. The study results suggested that viewing abstract art goes beyond simply liking or not liking it, the authors wrote, and that there is a complexity to art appreciation shaped by a person's past experiences and personal context — as the Beholder's Share theory posits. While the authors didn't quantify 'how' brain patterns vary during art viewing, Durkin said they did quantify 'where' in the brain these patterns varied. When observing abstract art, the study indicates it involves the brain's Default Mode Network (which functions across numerous brain regions, including the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes). Anderson described the Default Mode Network as 'a set of brain regions that are more active when you're at rest, daydreaming, remembering, or thinking about yourself or others — for example, internally focused tasks.' She said, 'It is associated with mind wandering and creativity.' Anderson said since abstract art lacks clear visual references, it makes sense that 'people rely more on personal interpretation, emotions, and imagination, all functions tied to the Default Mode Network.' Edward A. Vessel, PhD, Eugene Surowitz assistant professor in the Department of Psychology at The City University of New York, New York City, said, 'I think the Default Mode Network is also partly, not fully, but partly responsible for the pleasure we get from the act of sense-making, with art in particular.' Vessel's research has included looking at the idea of shared taste and why it is that two people agree or not. He has published previous work showing that there tends to be less agreement across people for judgments of cultural artifacts, like artwork and architecture. But there is more degree of shared taste for natural landscapes or judgments of faces, he said. The study findings also suggest that more ambiguity in a painting activates regions in the Default Mode Network, the authors wrote. This parallels ideas that Eric R. Kandel, MD, shared during a talk about Beholder's Share in 2013. Kandel, 95 years old, won the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2000 and is recognized for identifying the physiological changes that occur in the brain during memory formation and storage. In his 2013 talk, he said, 'Ambiguity is what brings out difference of interpretation' and pointed to the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci. While it's not abstract, he noted the centuries-old debate about it: Is she smiling or is she not? In the same YouTube talk, he said, 'The painter exercises a dramatic amount of creativity in doing a portrait, but you yourself generate a fair amount of creativity reconstructing it in your head and reconstructing it in a way that is unique for you and slightly different for me.' Can You Increase Your Beholder's Share? Viewing art, in a general sense, has always been regarded as a net positive when it comes to mental health — inspiring creativity, critical thinking, and boosting mood. A new review of 38 studies aimed to collect previous research on visual art and also establish better study protocols going forward. The study covered nearly 7000 people and found that viewing art can improve eudemonic well-being — reflection, empowerment, identity maintenance, and building meaning in life. This builds on a 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) report examining more than 3000 studies on the benefits of art that resulted in the WHO suggesting art as a social determinant of health. All this to suggest: More is better, and maybe the more we experience art, especially abstract art, the more we'll begin to understand how it affects us personally. 'I can't answer this definitively, but I think so,' said Durkin. 'There is research showing that experience with abstract art can change how we interact with it and how much we like it.' And more: A 2023 study in Nature suggested that arts-based programs in schools can enhance creativity in teens. Another recent small study involving 42 students from three universities suggested that participation in extracurricular activities, including painting and drawing, was positively linked to levels of creativity. Vessel said, 'Within the field of neuroaesthetics and empirical aesthetics, I have started to adopt a position that everything is driven by learning. It's not like we're born with any kind of a priori or hedonic marking for certain features, right?' And what people find aesthetically pleasing may change across a lifetime as they continue to learn and be exposed to new visual experiences, he added. Experts at The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, recommend a four-step process involving looking, describing, thinking, and connecting to encourage closer observation and deeper thinking when looking at art. Stanford experts advise doing a bit of research on artists and artworks before visiting a gallery or museum. Or when viewing a painting with a figure, try to place yourself inside the frame with them and think about the painting from their perspective. Wandering the virtual halls of a museum may have an impact on well-being and art appreciation, too. The Louvre, the Met, the Tate, and many more museums offer digital access to their collections.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Netflix's ‘NASA Live' will show spacewalks, rocket launches
NASA and Netflix have announced a partnership to stream NASA+'s live programming for all subscribers. With NASA+, Netflix users can see views of Earth from the International Space Station (ISS), astronaut spacewalks and rocket launches. Rebecca Sirmons, the general manager of NASA+, said, 'Our Space Act of 1958 calls on us to share our story of space exploration with the broadest possible audience.' 'Together, we're committed to a Golden Age of Innovation and Exploration — inspiring new generations — right from the comfort of their couch or in the palm of their hand from their phone,' she added. Starting this summer, there will be NASA+ live feeds that are available on Netflix's homepage. If you don't have Netflix, you can still watch the stream on the NASA app and The point of this partnership is to give viewers another way to watch these live feeds. NASA+ also has a partnership with Amazon Prime Video, according to The Hollywood Reporter. It was originally launched in 2023 and streams rocket launches, mission coverage, spacewalks and live footage of the Earth, among other programming. More detailed schedules for NASA+ on Netflix will be released closer to launch day.


Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Netflix is adding the NASA channel featuring live space missions — and my inner space nerd has never been happier
If you're dialled into the space race, then catching a live rocket launch or watching a spacewalk in real time is just as exhilarating as the latest sci-fi show. And it's about to get a whole lot easier to satisfy your inner space nerd. Netflix is teaming up with NASA to bring its dedicated live channel to the streaming platform starting this summer. This new feature will give Netflix's millions of subscribers front-row access to live space missions, including rocket launches, spacewalks, and incredible views from the International Space Station. The partnership offers a chance for NASA to reach a much wider, more diverse audience and inspire curiosity about space exploration on a global scale. While NASA Plus has always been available for free through its own app and website, this collaboration means you won't need to switch platforms or download anything extra to enjoy the cosmic magic. For Netflix, this move is part of an ongoing expansion of its live programming lineup, which already includes sports, comedy specials, and awards shows. The partnership offers a chance for NASA to reach a much wider, more diverse audience and inspire curiosity about space exploration on a global scale, considering Netflix reaches more than 700 million people worldwide. I'm someone who's always been fascinated by space, and I've lost count of how many documentaries and YouTube videos I've devoured on the subject. Considering 'Alien' is my favorite movie franchise of all time, I think that says everything you need to know about my love for anything sci-fi. So I'll definitely be tuning in. NASA Plus is a free, ad-free streaming service created by NASA to give the public easy access to its live coverage, original series, and educational content. Until now, it's only been available through the website, mobile apps, and select streaming devices. But starting this summer, the space agency's dedicated live channel will officially become part of Netflix's growing lineup of live content. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. This means Netflix users will be able to stream real-time rocket launches, astronaut spacewalks, Earth views from the ISS, and other key NASA events directly within the platform. No separate app or sign-in required. It's expected to appear as a live channel tile, similar to how Netflix hosts live sporting events or comedy specials. Together, we're committed to a Golden Age of Innovation and Exploration — inspiring new generations — right from the comfort of their couch or in the palm of their hand from their phone Rebecca Sirmons, general manager of NASA Plus, said: 'Our Space Act of 1958 calls on us to share our story of space exploration with the broadest possible audience. Together, we're committed to a Golden Age of Innovation and Exploration — inspiring new generations — right from the comfort of their couch or in the palm of their hand from their phone.' You can also expect multiple live streams running simultaneously, complete with countdowns and HD coverage. While Netflix hasn't confirmed the exact launch date of the NASA Plus channel, they've hinted that more programming details will be 'revealed at Tudum in the coming weeks.' I think this is such a cool and genuinely exciting move for both NASA and Netflix. For NASA, it's a brilliant way to bring space exploration to a much wider audience, especially people who might not go out of their way to download a separate app or follow mission updates online. For the streaming giant, it's a smart step forward as they build out their live programming. Space content is stunning, and so I'm confident it will bring something completely different to the usual lineup. This unique collaboration aims to bring the wonders of space exploration directly to your screen, no spacesuit required.