
US' 'Covert' Operations In Pak, And Why They Should Surprise No One
Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister, Ishaq Dar, later confirmed that his country requested a ceasefire following attacks on Nur Khan and other key air bases during the operations.
The strike on Nur Khan airbase in Chaklala, near the garrison town of Rawalpindi - the city housing Pakistan's military headquarters - was a blow too big for Pakistan to cope with. About a month after India's conditional ceasefire, a senior journalist in Pakistan revealed how Americans run the Nur Khan air base.
'Not Authorised To Know'
In a podcast, author Imtiaz Gul had claimed that even the Pakistan army was not allowed to interfere in operations at the base. He revealed how once, when a Pakistan Air Force officer repeatedly sought to know what cargo American aircraft carried at the base, he was told at gunpoint that he was not authorised to know these details. It obviously created a flutter since the disclosure embarrassed both Islamabad and Rawalpindi.
Even as the controversy was on, an old interview of a senior army officer on a private channel further reddened the faces of Pakistan's powers that be. The interview was hosted by Hamid Mir, a veteran journalist credited to have also conducted the last official interview of Osama bin Laden.
Incidentally, Mir has had a difficult relationship with the political and military leaders in Pakistan due to his outspoken and often critical views towards the administration.
In the old clip that went viral towards the end of June, Lt Gen (Retd) Shahid Azeez is heard saying that Pakistani troops were not even allowed to enter the Jacobabad and Pasni bases. He alleged these were under US control during its post-9/11 war on terror. He further claimed that the then-President, Pervez Musharraf, had told army commanders that he had already promised the US access to Pakistani bases. The decision was taken despite the protests of top army officers.
Pak Is A Resourceful Ally
Pakistan is no stranger to such clandestine operations. The army has always been in control of such covert exercises, with or without the nod of political administrators - except when an army chief, like Musharraf, assumed power. In cases like these, the army chief is all-powerful, and Islamabad and Rawalpindi would come together despite the 15-km distance the two power bases share.
The US has considered Pakistan an ally - a friend who will be of use, sometimes with a carrot, or else, with a slap on the wrist. Geographically, Pakistan shares its boundary in the west with Iran and in the north with Afghanistan. Politically, governments have mostly been financially and morally bankrupt. Thus, the country has been ductile and malleable for most deals.
In fact, the revelation that the US controls Pakistani bases, like the one in Chaklala, as well as Karachi port, came in the nineties. The bases were extensively used during the Cold War, with the exercise gaining pace and intensity during the occupation of Afghanistan by the erstwhile Soviet Union.
'Doing America's Dirty Work...'
Perhaps it is this history that made Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif recently admit to funding and backing terror for over three decades. In a video clip that went viral, he says, "We have been doing this dirty work for the United States for about three decades...'
This history is also chronicled well in a firsthand account by a general. Brigadier Mohammad Yousaf, who headed the Afghan bureau of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) between 1983 and 1987, wrote about the operative tactics and coordination in his book The Bear Trap. The tell-all book on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and ISI's collaboration, co-authored by Major Mark Adkin of Britain, was published in 1992. 'It was always during darkness that the aircraft arrived. Usually at around 9.00 p.m. or just before dawn, General Akhtar and I, along with the local CIA staff, would be waiting at Chaklala Air Base for the huge black C-141 Starlifter to taxi up to a secluded part of the terminal,' the authors write in a chapter.
Dinners To Distract
Then comes the description of how secretive each of these runs was: 'No US Embassy personnel were ever present, either at the planes' arrival or departure. In order to distract attention, it was normal practice on these occasions for the ambassador to arrange a diplomatic dinner at the embassy. Although the control tower guided the aircraft in, no Air Force personnel were involved with its reception on the ground. None of the passengers would be subjected to any form of immigration or customs formalities; even the baggage would be handled entirely by the Americans.'
According to another reference, the CIA would provide specific weapons and ammunition as listed by the ISI. The former would 'purchase all the items and get them by ship to Karachi or, for a small proportion, by air to Islamabad', the book says. Thus, a 'small proportion of arms arrived by air at Rawalpindi (Chaklala Air Base)'.
That Infamous Lunch
Therefore, covert operations have been conducted in Pakistan for decades now. No wonder then that the current US President, Donald Trump, recently invited Pakistan's army chief and Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch at the White House - the first such meeting between a US President and a Pakistani army boss not heading a government.
It's not improbable that the menu included more than Balochistan's rich mineral deposits. The lunch had come, after all, just days before the US bombed Iran's nuclear projects with bunker buster bombs. Earlier, an Iranian official had even declared that Pakistan would launch a nuclear attack on Israel if the latter resorted to the use of such weapons. Islamabad quickly denied the Iranian claim. In fact, early last year, Pakistan and Iran exchanged strikes against each other.
Both countries are involved in skirmishes, with Baloch rebels demanding an independent country. The two are involved in sporadic violence along their respective borders, with a restive Afghanistan ruled by the Taliban. Balochistan is again along the Pakistan border here.
It has been seen earlier how the US is suspicious of governments in both Iran and Afghanistan. In both cases, there have been direct confrontations. Thus, Pakistan provides the ideal listening post, as well as a quick launch pad. Even though the Soviet Bear exists no more, the 'great game' continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Trump calls 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' a win for Americans after Senate nod
After the US Senate passed the bill with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie, Trump urged lawmakers to present it to his desk before Independence Day New Delhi US President Donald Trump has called the passage of the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' a 'major policy win', declaring that the biggest beneficiary would be the American people. Posting on Truth Social after the US Senate cleared the bill in a 51–50 vote—with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote—Trump wrote: 'Almost all of our Great Republicans in the United States Senate have passed our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'. It is no longer a 'House Bill' or a 'Senate Bill'. It is everyone's Bill. There is so much to be proud of, and EVERYONE got a major Policy WIN — But, the Biggest Winner of them all will be the American People, who will have Permanently Lower Taxes, Higher Wages and Take Home Pay, Secure Borders, and a Stronger and More Powerful Military (sic).' Trump defends social programmes in bill Trump further added that the bill strengthens rather than cuts core social programmes. 'Additionally, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security Benefits are not being cut, but are being STRENGTHENED and PROTECTED from the Radical and Destructive Democrats by eliminating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse from those Programs (sic),' he said. House vote awaited ahead of July 4 The legislation now moves to the House of Representatives, where it faces a tougher path. Trump urged lawmakers to present the bill to his desk before the US Independence Day on July 4. In his post, Trump claimed the bill would usher in a new economic era. 'The country is going to explode with massive growth,' he said. 'Even more than it already has since I was re-elected.' He added that the bill would put the US on a fiscal path by 'greatly reducing the federal deficit, and setting the country on a course for enormous prosperity in the new and wonderful Golden Age of America.' Senate vote follows intense negotiations The Senate passed the bill after days of negotiations, culminating in a 27-hour marathon of amendment votes aimed at winning over dissenting Republicans. Despite its Senate clearance, the bill faces opposition in the House, where at least six Republican lawmakers have voiced concerns over proposed Medicaid cuts and changes to clean energy incentives.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Rajnath appreciates US for backing India's fight against terror
NEW DELHI: Defence minister Rajnath Singh on Tuesday conveyed India's appreciation to the US for its unwavering support to New Delhi in its fight against terrorism in the backdrop of Operation Sindoor, in a telephonic conversation with his American counterpart Pete Hegseth. Rajnath appreciates US for backing India's fight against terror This was their first conversation after India launched Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, New Delhi's direct military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror strike. Singh also told Hegseth that India reserves the right to respond to cross-border terrorism. 'Glad to speak with the US @SecDef Mr. @PeteHegseth today. Excellent discussion to review the ongoing and new initiatives to further deepen India-US defence partnership and strengthen cooperation in capacity building. Conveyed my deep appreciation for the unwavering support extended by the US to India in its fight against terrorism. Looking forward to meeting him at an early date,' Singh wrote on X after the conversation. Speaking on Operation Sindoor, Singh said India reserves the right to respond to and defend against terrorism and pre-empt as well as deter any further cross-border attacks, people aware of the matter said on condition of anonymity. He also told Hegseth that India's actions during the four-day clash were measured, non-escalatory, proportionate and focused on disabling terrorist infrastructure, the people added. The two leaders had last spoken on May 1 when Singh told Hegseth that the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed had exposed Pakistan as a rogue state that is destabilising the region and the world can no longer turn a blind eye to terrorism. India launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7 and struck terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following the Pahalgam terror strike. It triggered a four-day military confrontation with Pakistan involving fighter jets, missiles, drones, long-range weapons and heavy artillery before the two sides reached an understanding on stopping all military action on May 10. The two leaders also discussed a wide canvas of issues ranging from long-term cooperation in the defence sector, including training and military exchanges, to expanding the industry collaboration, the defence ministry said on Tuesday. 'They agreed to further build upon the momentum of this critical and mutually beneficial partnership across all its pillars such as interoperability, integration of defence industrial supply chains, logistics sharing, increased joint military exercises and cooperation with other like-minded partners,' it said. Hegseth invited Singh to the US for talks to take the bilateral defence partnership forward. Between the launch of the operation in the early hours of May 7 and the ceasefire on May 10 evening, Indian forces bombed nine terror camps in Pakistan and PoK and killed at least 100 terrorists. The Indian Air Force (IAF) struck two terror sites at Markaz Subhanallah in Bahawalpur and Markaz Taiba near Muridke, both in Pakistan's Punjab province, while the army hit targets at seven places, including Mehmoona Joya in Sialkot, Sawai Nala and Syed Na Bilal in Muzaffarabad, Gulpur and Abbas in Kotli, Barnala in Bhimber, and Sarjal. On May 9-10, the IAF struck military targets in Rafiqui, Murid, Chaklala, Rahim Yar Khan, Sukkur, Chunian, Pasrur, Sialkot, Skardu, Sargodha, Jacobabad, Bholari and Malir Cantt in Karachi. Later it emerged that India's targeting of locations within Pakistan during the May 7-10 clash was more extensive than was previously known, with a Pakistani document acknowledging that Indian drones had struck locations ranging from Peshawar in the northwest to Hyderabad in the south. The graphics in the May 18 Pakistani document detailing India's drone strikes on May 8, 9 and 10 listed seven locations --- Peshawar in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, Attock, Bahawalnagar, Gujrat and Jhang in Punjab province, and Chhor and Hyderabad in Sindh province --- that were not acknowledged as targets by Indian officials at any briefings held during or after the hostilities. Pakistan's Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos, which was mounted in response to Operation Sindoor, 'folded in eight hours' on May 10 belying Islamabad's ambitious target of bringing India to its knees in 48 hours, chief of defence staff General Anil Chauhan said on June 3.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Talks on India-U.S. trade pact enter 6th day; India pushes for duty cuts for labour-intensive sectors
Hectic negotiations between India and the U.S. enter the sixth day on Tuesday (July 1, 2025) in Washington, with the talks reaching a crucial stage and New Delhi demanding greater market access for its labour-intensive goods, an official said. The Indian team, headed by Special Secretary in the Department of Commerce Rajesh Agrawal, is in Washington for negotiations on an interim trade agreement with the U.S. The stay of the Indian officials has been extended. Initially, the delegation was scheduled to stay for two days, with the talks having commenced on June 26. These talks are also important as the suspension date of Mr. Trump's reciprocal tariffs is approaching. It will end on July 9. The two sides are looking at finalising the talks before that, the official said. India has hardened its position on giving duty concessions to American farm products. It is seeking duty concessions for its labour-intensive goods such as textiles, engineering, leather, gems and jewellery. "If the proposed trade talks fail, the 26% tariffs will come into force again," the official added. On April 2, the U.S. imposed an additional 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian goods but suspended it for 90 days. However, the 10% baseline tariff imposed by America remains in place. India is seeking full exemption from the additional 26% tariff. The U.S. is demanding duty concessions in both the agriculture and dairy sectors. But these segments are difficult and challenging areas for India to give duty concessions to the U.S. as Indian farmers are into sustenance farming and have small land holdings. Therefore, these sectors are politically very sensitive. India has not opened up the dairy sector for any of its trading partners in free trade pacts the country has signed so far. The U.S. wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, dairy, and agricultural items like apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops. India is seeking duty concessions for labour-intensive sectors like textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas in the proposed trade pact. The two countries are also looking to conclude talks for the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) this year. The pact is aimed at more than doubling bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 from the current $191 billion. Before the first tranche, they are trying for an interim trade pact. The U.S. team was here from June 5 to June 11 for the talks. The negotiations will continue both virtually and physically in the days to come. India's merchandise exports to the U.S. rose by 21.78% to $17.25 billion in April-May this fiscal, while imports rose by 25.8% to $8.87 billion. Commenting on India's demand, think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said that as talks for the pact reaching a critical stage, India is pushing hard for full tariff elimination on high-employment exports such as garments, footwear, carpets, and leather goods. Without this relief, the deal will be politically unsellable at home, GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said, adding Washington appears unwilling to scrap high MFN (most favoured nation) tariffs or country-specific duties. Under current proposals, Indian goods could face a 10% surcharge on top of MFN rates, eroding competitiveness and effectively reversing market access gains, he said. Merchandise exports to the U.S. rose to $86.5 billion in FY25, up 11.6% from $77.5 billion in FY24. Industrial goods account for the bulk of this trade, with labour-intensive exports forming a significant share. "However, without fast-track trade authority, Washington is unable to cut its MFN [Most Favoured Nation] tariffs across the board. Worse still, U.S. appears to be in no mood to exempt country specific tariffs and just bring it down to 10%," Mr. Srivastava said. This risk, he said, is particularly acute for high labour-intensity sectors, which contributed over $14.3 billion to India's exports to the U.S. in FY25. These include garments ($5.33 billion), textiles and carpets ($2.38 billion), made-ups and worn clothing ($2.95 billion), leather ($795 million), footwear ($461 million), ceramics and stoneware ($1.55 billion), and wood and paper articles ($823 million). These sectors are dominated by small and medium enterprises and are major employment generators in Indian states such as Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, and West Bengal. Yet, they face some of the steepest U.S. tariffs — often ranging between 8 and 20%, especially for garments and footwear. He added that India's demand is clear that the U.S. must remove all tariffs — both MFN and country-specific — on high and medium labour-intensive goods. He added that these sectors employ millions, particularly in rural and semi-urban regions, and are crucial to India's goals of job creation, MSME growth, and women's economic participation. "Without meaningful tariff relief for these products, Indian negotiators warn, the FTA will be viewed as lopsided and politically untenable," Mr. Srivastava said.