Trump sues California over transgender athletes in girls' school sports
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles, claims that California's policies violate Title IX, which affords legal protection against sex discrimination.
Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, in a statement took aim at Gavin Newsom, California's governor and a Trump antagonist seen as a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2028. Newsom in a March podcast interview with right-wing activist Charlie Kirk called transgender participation in girls' sports 'deeply unfair'.
'Not only is it 'deeply unfair,' it is also illegal under federal law,' Bondi said in a statement. 'This Department of Justice will continue its fight to protect equal opportunities for women and girls in sports.'
A spokesperson for Newsom did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump, a Republican, has signed a series of executive orders restricting transgender rights, including a February directive to strip federal funding for any school that allows transgender women or girls to compete in female sports.
The justice department under Trump has already filed a similar lawsuit against Maine and has made challenging transgender rights a major civil rights priority. The lawsuit alleges that state policies 'ignore undeniable biological differences between boys and girls' and diminish the integrity of girls' sports. Advocates for LGBTQ+ rights have said transgender athletes comprise a small minority of all school athletes and bans on their participation further stigmatize a vulnerable population.
California's policies drew national attention earlier this year when a transgender girl competing in the state track and field championship won the high jump and triple jump and finished second in the long jump, an episode cited in the justice department's complaint. The lawsuit cites five alleged instances of transgender athletes taking part in girls' school sporting events in a state with nearly 6 million public school students, according to state data.
It seeks a court order barring any school under the California Interscholastic Federation from allowing transgender athletes to take part in girls' sports competitions and to establish a process to compensate female athletes it alleges have been harmed by the state's policy.
Newsom has repeatedly clashed with Trump, most recently over the president's decision to deploy national guard troops to Los Angeles, California's largest city, to quell anti-deportation protests that erupted after the Trump administration carried out workplace raids in the city.
The feud has prompted several legal battles between the Trump administration and the largest US state. The justice department under Trump has already launched an investigation into hiring practices at the University of California system and has sued Los Angeles over policies restricting the city's cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
Newsom sued the Trump administration over the national guard deployment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's DOJ urges Supreme Court to reject appeal from Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell
President Donald Trump 's Justice Department has urged the Supreme Court to reject an appeal from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. More than two years after Epstein died by suicide in a New York City jail, Maxwell was found guilty in December 2021 of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, among other charges, related to her role in a scheme to abuse minor girls with the wealthy financier for a decade. Maxwell, now 63, was subsequently sentenced to 20 years in prison. Still, her lawyers have been trying to get her out of prison by appealing her case, arguing she was exempt from prosecution under a clause in Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution agreement. Years before Epstein died in jail while on federal charges related to the sexual abuse of dozens of minor girls, he was accused of almost identical allegations in a Florida case. He was able to cut a deal in June 2008, where he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. This deal allowed him to avoid a possible life sentence and he instead served 13 months in a work-release program. There was a co-conspirator clause in the deal that stated if 'Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to" four of the financier's assistants, ABC News reported. Maxwell was not included on the list of assistants, but her lawyers are now arguing the 'plain language' of the deal shows she should not have been prosecuted in Manhattan. "Despite the existence of a non-prosecution agreement promising in plain language that the United States would not prosecute any co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein, the United States in fact prosecuted Ghislaine Maxwell as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein,' her lawyers wrote the Supreme Court in April. Maxwell's lawyers had already tried and failed to get lower courts to side with them. The Justice Department argued in a new filing to the Supreme Court on Monday that Maxwell 'was not a party to the relevant agreement,' and there is 'no evidence that the parties to the NPA intended for the coconspirators clause to benefit' her. 'The government was not even aware of [Maxwell's] role in Epstein's scheme at that time,' the filing read. The Justice Department also contended, citing its policy at the time the deal was made, a U.S. Attorney's Office could only bind other districts in an NPA if it obtained approval of the districts or the department's Criminal Division. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said in a statement circulated by multiple outlets Monday, "I'd be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the government break a deal,' adding, 'He's the ultimate dealmaker.' 'I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it. With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the government made and broke,' Markus added. Trump has been accused of being on Epstein's client list by tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose relationship with the president turned sour after his short stint at the White House leading the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk did not provide any evidence to prove Trump was on any suspected list. The president's Justice Department and FBI made waves among his Make America Great Again base when they said earlier this month there was never any client list of high-profile names associated with Epstein. The feds also confirmed he died by suicide following years of conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein's death. Sigrid McCawley, a lawyer who has represented hundreds of clients who have claimed to be Epstein's victims, told ABC News, "After two-plus decades of recruiting and abusing young girls trapped in Jeffrey Epstein's sex-trafficking enterprise, Ghislaine Maxwell has again attempted to escape accountability by trying to hide behind the non-prosecution agreement. 'Maxwell does not deserve any protection, and she should remain in prison for the horrific crimes she committed.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Colorado prosecutors to lay out evidence in firebomb attack on demonstration for Israeli hostages
Colorado prosecutors are set to lay out their evidence Tuesday against a man charged with murder, attempted murder and other crimes in a firebomb attack on demonstrators showing their support for Israeli hostages in Gaza. Investigators say Mohamed Sabry Soliman told them he intended to kill the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration on Boulder's Pearl Street pedestrian mall on June 1. But he threw just two of more than two dozen Molotov cocktails he had with him while yelling, 'Free Palestine!" Police said he told them he got scared because he had never hurt anyone before. Federal authorities say Soliman, an Egyptian national, had been living in the U.S. illegally with his family. The purpose of Tuesday's preliminary hearing in state court in Boulder is for District Judge Nancy Woodruff Salomone to determine if there's enough evidence for Soliman to go on trial there. Soliman already faced dozens of charges in state court as well as hate crime charges in federal court when state prosecutors added murder charges following the death of an 82-year-old woman who was injured in the attack died as the result of her injuries. Karen Diamond helped at her synagogue and volunteered for several local groups, including the University of Colorado University Women's Club and a local music festival. Last week, Assistant U.S. Attorney Laura Cramer-Babycz told U.S. District Judge John L. Kane that federal prosecutors have not decided yet whether to file additional charges against Soliman related to Diamond's death. Federal prosecutors allege the victims were targeted because of their perceived or actual connection to Israel. But Soliman's federal defense lawyers say he should not have been charged with hate crimes because the evidence shows he was motivated by opposition to Zionism, the political movement to establish and sustain a Jewish state in Israel. An attack motivated by someone's political views is not considered a hate crime under federal law. Soliman has pleaded not guilty to the hate crime charges. He has not been asked to enter a plea to the state charges yet. State prosecutors have identified 29 people who are considered victims of the attack, including 13 who were physically injured. The others were nearby and are considered victims because they could have been hurt. A dog was also injured in the attack, so Soliman has also been charged with animal cruelty. Tuesday's hearing was set to move ahead over the objections of Soliman's state public defenders, who asked to delay it after Diamond died and Soliman was charged with murder. In a court filing last week, they said they were not aware of an autopsy report being done for Diamond yet and asked to delay the hearing until October so they would be be able to review 'significant medical records' in advance.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Immigration agents demand tenant information from landlords, stirring questions and confusion
Immigration authorities are demanding that landlords turn over leases, rental applications, forwarding addresses, identification cards and other information on their tenants, a sign that the Trump administration is targeting them to assist in its drive for mass deportations. Eric Teusink, an Atlanta-area real estate attorney, said several clients recently received subpoenas asking for entire files on tenants. A rental application can include work history, marital status and family relationships. The two-page 'information enforcement subpoena,' which Teusink shared exclusively with The Associated Press, also asks for information on other people who lived with the tenant. One, dated May 1, is signed by an officer for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ' anti-fraud unit. However, it is not signed by a judge. It is unclear how widely the subpoenas were issued, but they could signal a new front in the administration's efforts to locate people who are in the country illegally, many of whom were required to give authorities their U.S. addresses as a condition for initially entering the country without a visa. President Donald Trump largely ended temporary status for people who were allowed in the country under his predecessor, Joe Biden. Some legal experts and property managers say the demands pose serious legal questions because they are not signed by a judge and that, if landlords comply, they might risk violating the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. Critics also say landlords are likely to feel intimidated into complying with something that a judge hasn't ordered, all while the person whose information is being requested may never know that their private records are in the hands of immigration authorities. 'The danger here is overcompliance," said Stacy Seicshnaydre, a Tulane University law professor who studies housing law. "Just because a landlord gets a subpoena, doesn't mean it's a legitimate request.' ICE officers have long used subpoenas signed by an agency supervisor to try to enter homes. Advocacy groups have mounted 'Know Your Rights' campaign urging people to refuse entry if they are not signed by a judge. The subpoena reviewed by the AP is from USCIS' fraud detection and national security directorate, which, like ICE, is part of The Department of Homeland Security. Although it isn't signed by a judge, it threatens that a judge may hold a landlord in contempt of court for failure to comply. Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokeswoman, defended the use of subpoenas against landlords without confirming if they are being issued. 'We are not going to comment on law enforcement's tactics surrounding ongoing investigations," McLaughlin said. 'However, it is false to say that subpoenas from ICE can simply be ignored. ICE is authorized to obtain records or testimony through specific administrative subpoena authorities. Failure to comply with an ICE-issued administrative subpoena may result in serious legal penalties. The media needs to stop spreading these lies.' These requests are new to many landlords Teusink said many of his clients oversee multifamily properties and are used to getting subpoenas for other reasons, such as requests to hand over surveillance footage or give local police access to a property as part of an investigation. But, he said, those requests are signed by a judge. Teusink said his clients were confused by the latest subpoenas. After consulting with immigration attorneys, he concluded that compliance is optional. Unless signed by a judge, the letters are essentially just an officer making a request. 'It seemed like they were on a fishing expedition,' Teusink said. Boston real estate attorney Jordana Roubicek Greenman said a landlord client of his received a vague voicemail from an ICE official last month requesting information about a tenant. Other local attorneys told her that their clients had received similar messages. She told her client not to call back. Anthony Luna, the CEO of Coastline Equity, a commercial and multifamily property management company that oversees about 1,000 units in the Los Angeles area, said property managers started contacting him a few weeks ago about concerns from tenants who heard rumors about the ICE subpoenas. Most do not plan to comply if they receive them. 'If they're going after criminals, why aren't they going through court documents?' Luna said. 'Why do they need housing provider files?' ICE subpoenas preceded Trump's first term in office, though they saw a significant uptick under him, according to Lindsay Nash, a law professor at Yeshiva University's Cardozo School of Law in New York who has spent years tracking them. Landlords rarely got them, though. State and local police were the most common recipients. ICE can enforce the subpoenas, but it would first have to file a lawsuit in federal court and get a judge to sign off on its enforcement — a step that would allow the subpoena's recipient to push back, Nash said. She said recipients often comply without telling the person whose records are being divulged. "Many people see these subpoenas, think that they look official, think that some of the language in them sounds threatening, and therefore respond, even when, from what I can tell, it looks like some of these subpoenas have been overbroad,' she said.
