One Question to focus on school finance
Panelists include Ector County ISD Superintendent designate Keeley Boyer, Midland ISD Superintendent Stephanie Howard, Midland Council of PTAs President, Amber Davidson and Amy Dodson, Senior Regional Advocacy Director — West and Central Texas.
Becky Ferguson is hosting.
Ferguson asked the superintendents to talk about where they are financially.
Dodson will offer some history on how we got here.
During the last legislative session, school finance was "held hostage" by Educational Savings Accounts and districts have not received any additional money for six years, Ferguson said.
Meanwhile, prices have continued climbing.
"Basically, the purpose of the show was to just let citizens know where the school districts are, where our local school districts are, where the state school districts are, what it is our superintendents are hoping will happen, what Raise Your Hand Texas is hoping will happen," Ferguson said.
"One of the things that that they're hoping for is to change the way schools are reimbursed. Now they're reimbursed based on average daily attendance as opposed to average daily enrollment, and it makes a big difference. If you have a class of 30 and only 20 show up, the teacher doesn't get to go home for a third of the day, so they think that that's very important. Of course, we talk a lot about vouchers, and Raise Your Hand Texas feels that talked about how they don't think vouchers will serve Texas. Ninety percent (90%) of students in Texas and in the Permian Basin go to public schools so that's where Raise Your Hand Texas feels that public money should go," Ferguson said.
One of Raise Your Hand Texas' goals is to change the way students are tested rather than focusing on the STAAR test.
"Our goal always here at Basin PBS is to just give people the information that they need to make good decisions. As you have mentioned, public school finance is very complicated, so most people's eyes glaze over before they get an understanding of it. But basically, I think if somebody were to watch the program, what they would come away with is both our school districts are operating at deficits, and that means cutting positions. Every school district in Texas has been affected because there's been no additional money in six years," Ferguson said.
People know their costs have gone up for food, fuel and everything else people buy. Costs also have risen for public schools.
Ferguson said it's crucial that people tune in to the program.
"Ninety percent (90%) of students in Midland and Odessa are in public schools, so I think it's important that people understand that our school districts are in a pickle financially, and how that might or might not change with the current legislative session. I'm hoping that we're arming people with information that will help them understand what's going on," she added.
Howard said she mainly spoke about MISD's $42.5 million deficit, about $35 million of which is due to loss of Formula Transition
Grant funding.
"FTG is the Formula Transition Grant that we've been receiving since 2019. When the school finance system changes, there are districts that may stand to benefit significantly and districts that the new formulas/system will cause to lose significant amounts. MISD would have been one of the big losers with the changes in 2019. We have been one of the biggest recipients of that Formula Transition Grant. It went away this year — we did not receive those funds, so while about 60% of districts are running deficit budgets, ours is further complicated with those funds going away. We are working to make cuts and become more efficient to get back to expenses in line with revenue with the loss of FTG," Howard said in an email.
Like other districts, MISD is facing a 23 percent spike in inflation and no increase in the basic allotment since 2019. The basic allotment is the minimum amount the state gives to each school district to fund public education.
Howard said MISD is working with legislators to fully fund prekindergarten. The state funds only half a day and it costs MISD about $2.7 million to provide full-day preK over what is allocated.
On safety and security, MISD is having to subsidize about $3 million to cover the cost of the requirement to have an officer at every campus that passed in the last session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
21-07-2025
- Business Journals
What to know about the Texas Legislature's special session
The Texas Legislature's special session officially begins at noon on Monday, July 21. It features a sweeping 18-item agenda that includes flood recovery efforts, property tax cuts, the elimination of the STAAR tests, THC and much more. "There is more work to be done, particularly in the aftermath of the devastating floods in the Texas Hill Country," Gov. Greg Abbott said when announcing the special session earlier this month. "We must ensure better preparation for such events in the future." GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY Find Local Events Near You Connect with a community of local professionals. Explore All Events Related: Why Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed SB 3, and what's next for Houston's consumable hemp industry KHOU 11 will have complete coverage of the special session. Reporter Victor Jacobo will be in Austin starting Sunday night. Flood recovery and preparedness among top priorities In direct response to the catastrophic Hill Country floods over the Fourth of July weekend, several legislative items focus on helping communities better prepare for and recover from natural disasters: Flood warning systems: Improve early alerts and preparedness infrastructure in flood-prone areas. Emergency communications: Strengthen communication networks during major storm events. Hill Country flood relief funding: Support jurisdictions impacted by the July 2025 floods, including FEMA match funding. Natural disaster regulation reform: Streamline policies to accelerate recovery timelines. This story excerpt is courtesy of our partners at KHOU 11. Click here for KHOU's full story, including the highlights of several other issues on the agenda and how special sessions work.
Axios
20-07-2025
- Axios
Atlanta public housing rent hike "pause" could shock Section 8 stock
Atlanta Housing is telling Section 8 landlords to pause plans for rent increases as federal funding uncertainty spreads to local governments. Why it matters: Roughly 11,000 Atlanta households will receive Housing Choice vouchers this fiscal year, according to the housing authority's budget. The vouchers help eligible residents spend no more than 30% of their income on rent and play a vital role in keeping tens of thousands of Atlantans in their homes. Between the lines: The rent hike pause could push some landlords to switch to market-rate tenants, short-term rentals or sales — shrinking Atlanta's supply of affordable housing and creating housing instability. The latest: In a July 15 message to landlords, Alan Ferguson, AH's chief housing and real estate officer, said the authority would not process rent increase requests for Housing Choice Voucher Program participants with contracts renewing on and after July 1 of this year. AH could "reconsider and reinstate" increases if Congress approves new funding or federal officials offer new guidance, Ferguson wrote in the message obtained by Axios. Context: Public housing authorities have been put on notice to expect funding cuts after President Trump called for sweeping changes to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including a two-year limit on housing aid, according to the Associated Press. AH's 2026 fiscal year budget approved in early July is roughly $80 million less than the previous years' spending plan, WSB reports. The Housing Choice Voucher Program bore the brunt of those cuts; its funding dropped from $389.7 million to $338.58 million. Yes, but: Authority officials said their "goal is to keep our residents housed." They declined to immediately say whether funding earmarked for rent increases would fund other AH programs or operations. Stunning stat: Roughly 20% of Atlanta's multi-family rental housing is supported by AH assistance programs, Ferguson said. What they're saying: Dan Immergluck, a Georgia State University professor emeritus who's studied Atlanta's affordable housing crisis for nearly two decades, told Axios the pause would make it more difficult to find landlords to accept vouchers.
Los Angeles Times
11-07-2025
- Los Angeles Times
How Big Business killed the ‘click-to-cancel' FTC rule, which would have saved consumers billions
When consumers are asked to identify their most frustrating interaction with businesses, the obstacles to canceling an automatically-renewing service invariably rank high. Some companies require cancellations to be done by phone, or even in person. Even finding a cancellation option on a merchant's website can be daunting. Cancellation can require multiple steps online, or waiting for hours on hold — before a call just gets dropped without warning. Millions of consumers have ended up paying unwittingly for services or goods they no longer want or need, sometimes for years. So unsurprisingly, the Federal Trade Commission last year finalized a 'click to cancel' rule, requiring that it be as easy to cancel a recurrent subscription as it is to sign up. Also unsurprisingly, the rule came under immediate attack from Big Business, via a federal lawsuit filed last year by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business lobbies. Possibly most unsurprisingly, a three-judge appeals court panel in St. Louis (two appointed by Trump and one by George H.W. Bush) threw out the rule on Tuesday — less than a week before it was to take effect and after more than five years of painstaking administrative and regulatory work — on a legal technicality. Whether the rule will be resurrected by today's FTC is unclear; the commission told me by email it's still 'considering our options.' The FTC's two GOP commissioners — including Andrew Ferguson, who was elevated to the chairmanship by Donald Trump in January — dissented in the 3-2 vote last year to make the rule final. Ferguson succeeded Biden appointee Lina Khan, who told podcaster Pablo Torre last month that the rule had 'enormous support' from the public. The commission has sued several companies over their automatically-renewing subscription services, including Amazon, Adobe and Uber, which it sued as recently as April. Those cases are pending. In announcing the Uber lawsuit, Ferguson observed that 'Americans are tired of getting signed up for unwanted subscriptions that seem impossible to cancel' and said the commission 'is fighting back on behalf of the American people.' Before delving more deeply into the court's ruling, here's some background on why the rule was drafted in the first place. Its target was 'negative option' programs, in which businesses assume customers have consented for automatic renewals unless the customers explicitly cancel. These programs were pioneered by book-of-the-month clubs and similar others, which delivered merchandise to members unless the members told them to skip their monthly offerings. When the FTC first moved against this practice with a 1973 rule, its quarries were 72 book clubs and four record clubs. The practice mushroomed, especially during the pandemic, when people signed up for automatic deliveries of goods or streamed entertainment so they wouldn't have to leave the house. By 2022, businesses were making a mint from auto-renewals, relying on 'lapses in consumer memory and on a lack of fluency with technology,' as 11 law professors told the appeals judges in a friend-of-the-court brief. Seniors who forget what they have signed up for and can't easily navigate online procedures and parents of young children who get snared into signing up for subscriptions tend to be the most common victims. Opinion polls revealed that more than half of all consumers had faced unwanted charges at some point from these programs. Almost three-quarters of respondents to a survey by JPMorgan Chase said they were wasting more than $50 a month on automatic payments for goods or services they no longer needed. A cottage industry of firms purporting to help consumers track down their forgotten subscriptions sprung up — typically operating on the same subscription model. Think all this was accidental? Think again. When the FTC started investigating negative option programs, 'we were stunned to see just how deliberate a business strategy it is,' Khan, who oversaw the regulation's development, told Torre. In 2019, the FTC began working on expanding its 1973 regulation of book clubs to cover all forms of negative option marketing and published a final rule last November. The rule required businesses to clearly disclose all costs and terms of their programs, to obtain explicit enrollment consent from customers and to provide a means of cancellation that is 'at least as easy to use' as signing up. In other words, if it took two clicks to sign up, it would have to take no more than two to cancel. In a parallel effort, in 2023, the FTC sued Amazon over the enrollment and cancellation procedures for its Prime memberships, which afford enrollees discounted shipping fees and access to Amazon's video and music streaming services for annual or monthly fees. The agency asserted that the giant online retailer had 'knowingly duped millions of consumers into unknowingly enrolling in Amazon Prime' and 'knowingly complicated the cancellation process for Prime subscribers who sought to end their membership.' Amazon enticed nonmember customers into signing up for Prime by showering them with repeated come-ons while they tried to finalize a purchase, the FTC said. Some of these messages, the FTC said, obscured that customers who responded to seemingly free offers were actually signing up for Prime. After the FTC told Amazon it was investigating its approach, the company made the signup process more transparent. The agency asserted, however, that even after internal analyses showed Amazon executives that having customers 'sign up without knowing they did' was a major 'customer problem,' higher-ups pushed back against efforts to clarify the sign-up process online. The reason, the agency said, is that the 'clarity improvements' drove subscription numbers down. Prime executives ultimately 'pulled the plug' on the changes, the FTC said. Perhaps more frustrating for consumers was what the FTC labeled the 'labyrinthine' procedure to cancel Prime memberships. This was known inside Amazon, the FTC said, as the 'Iliad flow,' a term that evokes the seemingly endless Trojan War as described in Homer's epic. It was, as the agency laid it out, a 'four-page, six-click, fifteen option' cancellation process. Amazon pared down the process in early 2023, shortly before the FTC filed its lawsuit but after the agency sent it civil investigative demands — a form of subpoena — related to the signup and cancellation processes. In its answer to the lawsuit, Amazon said that its signup and cancellation procedures complied with federal law by 'prominently and repeatedly disclosing key terms, obtaining express informed consent from consumers, and offering a simple cancellation method.' The company also disputed the FTC's 'characterization' of its enrollment and cancellation practices. The claims in the FTC lawsuit, the company said, are 'factually unsupported, legally unprecedented, and wholly antithetical to the FTC's mission of protecting consumers.' It said that it had established an internal team to analyze customer complaints, and that although the team's studies arose from 'anecdotal feedback expressed from a relatively small number of customers,' it 'took that feedback seriously' and made efforts to address the concerns. The FTC lawsuit is currently scheduled to go to trial in Seattle on Sept. 22. Businesses that fear the sting of the FTC's crackdown maintained that the agency had been trying to stamp out a consumer benefit. Auto-renew terms, argued purveyors of home service contracts in a friend-of-the-court brief, appreciate automatic renewals 'because they take one thing off their plate given busy workdays, hectic family schedules, or other demanding circumstances.' The appeals judges expressed some empathy with the victims of marketing scams. 'We certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing,' they wrote. But they subjected the commission's rulemaking procedure to pitiless quibbling. The commission had failed at one point to issue a 'preliminary' regulatory analysis of its proposed rule, as required by law in some cases. But the FTC did issue a 'final' analysis, which was available for public comment. Yet there could be little in a preliminary analysis that the final analysis wouldn't cover, and businesses had every opportunity to pick it apart (as they did). Nevertheless, because of the FTC's shortcut, the judges said, the business community 'lost a notable opportunity to dissuade the FTC' from issuing the rule. Is that plausible? Industry could hardly be unaware that the rule was under consideration; businesses had mobilized to protect negative option marketing starting at least in 2019, and they hardly lacked for resources to 'dissuade' the commission. This ruling looks more like a reflection of the observation of Dickens' Mr. Bumble in Oliver Twist: 'The law is a ass.' The rule addressed a known consumer abuse that had received bipartisan condemnation in Congress over the years. In developing the rule, the FTC solicited public comment at virtually every stage. Moreover, the rule addressed a marketing process that is destined to keep mushrooming. Companies that used to market their products on a buy-once, use-forever basis have turned to subscription models that allow them to collect fees once a month or annually into the limitless future. If buyers forget that they subscribed and don't notice the regular charges on their credit card or bank statements, so much the better. 'Everything wants to be a subscription now,' Khan told Torre. 'Firms have identified this as a key revenue source, and they've noted that to fully monetize that, they need to make it as easy to sign up and as difficult to cancel' as they can. So they implemented 'explicit strategies to make that happen.' Three conservative judges have given those strategies new life. It's up to the FTC to make its chairman's promise a reality.
