
Shiv Sena (UBT) mounts pressure on Fadnavis govt to sack controversial ministers
The demand features prominently in Tuesday's editorial of the party mouthpiece 'Saamana', which claims Union Home Minister Amit Shah has directed decisive action over these ethical breaches.
The editorial mentions multiple allegations against cabinet members: one minister reportedly played rummy during legislative proceedings, another allegedly flaunted cash-filled bags while smoking publicly, and a third is accused of involvement in a girlfriend's murder. It further references the Nashik honey-trap scandal implicating 'fourth and fifth ministers,' asserting that such conduct violates the government's professed Hindutva principles.
Specifically named ministers facing calls for expulsion include Sanjay Shirsat, Yogesh Kadam, Manik Kokate, Dada Bhuse, and Sanjay Rathod—alongside unnamed figures linked to the Nashik case. The Thackeray faction contends that these names dominate political discourse, with Shah having "issued clear instructions" for their removal.
The editorial mocks the cabinet's spiritual pretensions, noting some ministers performed 'Aghori puja' at Assam's Kamakhya temple before taking office but "misjudged their timing" given current controversies. It alleges BJP ministers' involvement in honey-trap operations despite Fadnavis' recent Assembly denial of such schemes, claiming police seek hidden pen drives containing "government ministers' secrets" related to the case.
NI AAA AAB

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why NIA court acquitted Pragya Thakur, other accused in Malegaon blast case: 'Can't convict anyone merely on perception'
A special National Investigation Agency court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, including former Bharatiya Janata Party MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and lieutenant colonel Prasad Purohit, citing lack of direct evidence and procedural lapses in invoking terror charges. Former Bharatiya Janata Party MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and lieutenant colonel Prasad Purohit.(PTI File) Delivering the much-awaited verdict nearly 17 years after the blast that killed six people and injured dozens in the communally sensitive town of Malegaon in Maharashtra, the NIA court observed that "Terrorism has no religion because no religion can advocate violence. The court cannot convict anyone merely on perception and moral evidence; there has to be cogent evidence," news agency ANI reported. The court ruled that the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) could not be applied in the case as the sanction for prosecution was not obtained in accordance with legal requirements. "The UAPA will not be invoked in this case as sanction was not taken as per rules. Both the sanction orders of the UAPA in the case are defective," ANI quoted the court as saying. The court also highlighted inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence. While it acknowledged that a blast indeed took place, the court said the prosecution failed to conclusively link the motorcycle found at the site to an explosive device. "Prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon, but failed to prove that a bomb was placed in that motorcycle," the court stated. The court further noted discrepancies in the number of victims, concluding that "the injured people were not 101 but 95 only, and there was manipulation in some medical certificates." On the alleged role of the Hindutva group Abhinav Bharat, the court found no material evidence to support the prosecution's claim. "Abhinav Bharat organisation was used as a common reference by the prosecution. There is no evidence that the money of the Abhinav Bharat was used for terror activities," it noted. As part of its order, the court directed that the families of all six deceased victims be paid ₹2 lakh each, while each injured person is to receive ₹50,000 as compensation.


Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Bhagwa has won': Pragya Thakur after acquittal in 2008 Malegaon blast case
Sadhvi Pragya Singh on Thursday reacted to her acquittal, saying, 'They defamed Bhagwa through a conspiracy," adding "Bhagwa has won today." New Delhi, India - July 18, 2022: BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur casts her vote for the presidential election, at Parliament House, in New Delhi, India, on Monday, July 18, 2022. (Photo by Arvind Yadav/ Hindustan Times)(Hindustan Times) The former BJP MP said that the case 'ruined her life' and she was made accused as 'people tried to defame Bhagwa through a conspiracy.' 'I said this from the very beginning that those who are called for investigation there should be a basis behind that. I was called by them for investigation and was arrested and tortured. This ruined my whole life,' Sadhvi Pragya said. 'I was living a sage's life, but I was made and accused, and no one was willingly standing beside us. I am alive because I am a Sanyasi. They defamed Bhagwa through a conspiracy. Today, Bhagwa has won, and Hindutva has won, and God will punish those who are guilty. However, those who defamed India and Bhagwa have not been proved wrong by you,' she added.


News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
Malegaon Blast Case: Shiv Sena MP Mhaske Welcomes Acquittal, Owaisi Expresses Disappointment
A NIA special court in Mumbai acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including Pragya Singh Thakur. The blast killed six and injured over 100. Malegaon Blast Case: A NIA special court in Mumbai on Thursday acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit. The incident killed six people and left more than 100 injured in Maharashtra's communally sensitive Malegaon town. Shiv Sena MP Naresh Mhaske welcomes the verdict in the Malegaon blast case, saying that today, it has been proven that the action the Congress government took was false. 'The truth has won. The case had been going on for the last 17 years. Many army officers claimed that they had made certain statements under pressure from the ATS. But today, everything is out in the open. The Congress government took action to spread the misunderstanding among the people in the name of Hindu terror. Today, it has been proven that the action they took was false," news agency ANI quoted Mhaske as saying. Former Chief Minister of Maharashtra Sushil Kumar Shinde refused to comment on the NIA verdict, acquitting all seven accused. Sandhvi Pragya Singh said that she had maintained her innocence from the beginning and was subjected to 'torture during her investigation". She said that 'Bhagwa has won, and Hindutva has won, and God will punish those who are guilty". 'I said this from the very beginning that those who are called for investigation there should be a basis behind that. I was called by them for investigation and was arrested and tortured. This ruined my whole life. I was living a sage's life, but I was made and accused, and no one was willingly standing beside us. I am alive because I am a Sanyasi. They defamed Bhagwa through a conspiracy. However, those who defamed India and Bhagwa have not been proved wrong by you," she told ANI. All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) president Asaduddin Owaisi said that the verdict is 'disappointing", adding that a shoddy investigation/prosecution is responsible for the acquittal. 'The Malegaon blast case verdict is disappointing. Six namazis were killed in the blast and nearly 100 were injured. They were targeted for their religion," he wrote on X. Congress leader Kamal Nath said that if it's the court's order, then it should be acceptable to all. 'If it's the court's order, then what can we comment on this. It should be acceptable to all. Why are we discussing this?" he said after the Special NIA court acquitted all 7 accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. Seven people, including BJP leader and former MP Pragya Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, faced trial in the case for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code. Major (retired) Ramesh Upadhyay, Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni were the other accused in the case. In its final argument, the NIA submitted that the blast in Malegaon — a town with a sizable Muslim population — was orchestrated by the conspirators to terrorise a section of the Muslim community, disrupt essential services, create communal tensions, and threaten the state's internal security. The NIA has said that based on 'relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proved evidence", it 'conclusively and cogently" established the crucial circumstances to form a complete chain of events. The NIA has said that based on 'relevant, admissible, cogent, trustworthy, wholly reliable and proved evidence", it 'conclusively and cogently" established the crucial circumstances to form a complete chain of events. The case was initially probed by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) before being transferred to the NIA in 2011. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.