logo
Never again: legislation aims to prevent another midair collision like the one that killed 67 people in January

Never again: legislation aims to prevent another midair collision like the one that killed 67 people in January

CNN4 days ago
A bill introduced Tuesday, exactly six-months after the fatal midair collision over the Potomac River, aims to fix aviation safety weaknesses exposed by the tragedy.
The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Ted Cruz, would require aircraft operators to install key anti-collision technology on all flights and require the Army to keep it turned on in almost every case.
Sixty-seven people died on January 29 when an Army Black Hawk helicopter on a training mission collided with an American Airlines regional jet coming in for a landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
The Rotor Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act, or ROTOR Act, would require aircraft to send and receive Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast signals. Planes equipped with so-called 'ADS-B out' send radio signals with GPS location, altitude, ground speed and other data once a second, independent of air traffic control. Most aircraft are required to transmit ADS-B information, but this new bill would require them to also have 'ADS-B in,' which displays information in the cockpit about surrounding aircraft.
The helicopter that hit the passenger plane in January was not broadcasting ADS-B data due to a rule that allowed the Army to fly with the system turned off.
Cruz, who heads the Senate committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, called ADS-B 'critical for aviation safety.' He's been sharply critical of Army practices, stating the military was given too much leeway by the FAA to operate without the equipment. 'It gives pilots and air traffic control a clear view of what's happening in the skies,' he said.
The new bill would require the FAA to grant permission for military flights without ADS-B only for 'sensitive government missions' like presidential transport when the airspace is already shut down to other traffic.
Cruz, along with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, National Transportation Safety Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford and family members of the victims of the crash backed the new bill at a news conference of Capitol Hill.
A 'myriad of midair collisions' prompted the NTSB to recommend the FAA require ADS-B In for flying more than 20 years ago, according to Homendy. The NTSB can recommend changes but does not have the authority to implement them.
'ADS-B In, and I can't stress this enough, is a game changer - a game changer when it comes to safety,' Homendy said.
On Wednesday, the NTSB will begin three days of investigative hearings regarding the collision.
American Airlines, whose regional jet was involved in the crash, applauded the bill in a statement.
'We continue to mourn the lives lost in the tragic accident involving Flight 5342 and we are grateful for Senator Cruz, Secretary Duffy, Members of Congress and everyone involved for their work to make aviation and our national airspace even safer. American Airlines stands in strong support of these efforts,' the airline said.
Under the bill, the FAA will also review helicopter routes near congested airports across the country and the Army inspector general would be required to audit their aviation safety practices.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In America's hardest-fought congressional district, voters agree: Release the Epstein files
In America's hardest-fought congressional district, voters agree: Release the Epstein files

Los Angeles Times

time9 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

In America's hardest-fought congressional district, voters agree: Release the Epstein files

LOS BANOS, Calif. — When it comes to President Trump, Angie Zamora and Phaidra Medeiros agree on very little. Zamora, a 36-year-old Army veteran, has nothing good to say. 'The laws. All the rights taken away from women. The stuff with ICE,' Zamora said, ticking off her frustrations as she stopped outside the post office in the Central Valley community of Los Banos. 'Why are they going after people working on farms when they're supposed to be chasing violent criminals?' Medeiros, by contrast, is delighted Trump replaced Joe Biden. 'He wasn't mentally fit,' Medeiros said of the elderly ex-president. 'There was something wrong with him from the very beginning.' Despite all that, the two do share one belief: Both say the government should cough up every last bit of information it has on Jeffrey Epstein, his sordid misdeeds and the powerful associates who moved in his aberrant orbit. Trump 'did his whole campaign on releasing the Epstein files,' Zamora said. 'And now he's trying to change the subject. 'Oh, it's a 'hoax' ... 'Oh, you guys are still talking about that creep?' And yet there's pictures throughout the years of him with that creep.' Medeiros, 56, echoed the sentiment. Trump and his fellow Republicans 'put themselves into this predicament because they kept talking constantly' about the urgency of unsealing records in Epstein's sex-trafficking case — until they took control of the Justice Department and the rest of Washington. 'Now,' she said, 'they're backpedaling.' Medeiros paused outside the engineering firm where she works in the Central Valley, in Newman, on a tree-lined street adorned with star-spangled banners honoring local servicemen and women. 'Obviously there were minors involved' in Epstein's crimes, she said, and if Trump is somehow implicated 'then he needs to go down as well.' Years after being found dead in a Manhattan prison cell — killed by his own hand, according to authorities — Epstein appears to have done the near-impossible in this deeply riven nation. He's united Democrats, Republicans and independents around a call to reveal, once and for all, everything that's known about his case. 'He's dead now, but if people were involved they should be prosecuted,' said Joe Toscano, a 69-year-old Los Banos retiree and unaffiliated voter who last year supported Trump's return to the White House. 'Bring it all out there. Make it public.' California's 13th Congressional District, where Zamora, Medeiros and Toscano all live, is arguably the most closely fought political terrain in America. Sprawling through California's midriff, from the far reaches of the San Francisco Bay Area to the southern edge of the San Joaquin Valley, it's farm country: Flat, fertile and crossed-hatched with canals, rail lines and thruways with utilitarian names such as Road No. 32 and Avenue 18½. The myriad small towns are brief interludes amid the dairy and poultry farms and lush carpeting of vegetables, fruit and nut trees that stretch to the hazy-brown horizon. The most populous city, Merced, has fewer than 100,000 residents. (Modesto, with a population of around 220,000, is split between the 5th and 13th districts.) Democratic Rep. Adam Gray was elected in November in the closest House race in the country, beating the Republican incumbent, John Duarte, by 187 votes out of nearly 211,000 cast. The squeaker was a rematch and nearly a rerun. Two years prior, Duarte defeated Gray by fewer than 600 votes out of nearly 134,000 cast. Not surprisingly, both parties have made the 13th District a top target in 2026; handicappers rate the contest a toss-up, even as the field sorts itself out. (Duarte has said he would not run again.) The midterm election is a long way off, so it's impossible to say how the Epstein controversy will play out politically. But there is, at the least, a baseline expectation of transparency, a view that was repeatedly expressed in conversations with three dozen voters across the district. Zachery Ramos, a 25-year-old independent, is the founder of the Gustine Traveling Library, which promotes learning and literacy throughout the Central Valley. Its storefront, painted with polka dots and decorated with giant butterflies, sits like a cheery oasis in Gustine's four-block downtown, a riot of green spilling from the planter boxes out front. Inside, the walls were filled with commendations and newspaper clippings celebrating Ramos' good works. As a nonprofit, he said, 'we have to have everything out there. All the books. Everything.' Epstein, he suggested, should be treated no differently. 'When it comes to something as serious as that, with what may or may not have taken place on his private island, with his girlfriend' — convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell — 'I do think it should all be out in the open,' Ramos said. 'If you're not afraid of your name being in [the files], especially when you're dealing with minors being assaulted, it should 100% be made public.' Ed, a 42-year-old Democrat who manages a warehouse operation in Patterson, noted that Trump released the government's long-secret files on the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., even though King's family objected. (Like several of those interviewed, he declined to give his last name, to avoid being hassled by readers who don't like what he had to say.) Why, Ed wondered, shouldn't the Epstein files come to light? 'It wasn't just Trump,' he said. 'It was a lot of Republicans in Congress that said, 'Hey, we want to get these files out there.' And I believe if Kamala [Harris] had won, they would be beating her down, demanding she do so.' He smacked a fist in his palm, to emphasize the point. Sue, a Madera Republican and no fan of Trump, expressed her feelings in staccato bursts of fury. 'Apparently the women years ago said who was doing what, but nobody listens to the women,' said the 75-year-old retiree. 'Release it all! Absolutely! You play, you pay, buddy.' Even those who dismissed the importance of Epstein and his crimes said the government should hold nothing back — if only to erase doubts and lay the issue to rest. Epstein 'is gone and I don't really care if they release the files or not,' said Diane Nunes, a 74-year-old Republican who keeps the books for her family farm, which lies halfway between Los Banos and Gustine. 'But they probably should, because a lot of people are waiting for that.' Patrick, a construction contractor, was more worked up about 'pretty boy' Gavin Newsom and 'Nazi Pelosi' — 'yes, that's what I call her' — than anything that might be lurking in the Epstein files. 'When the cat is dead, you don't pick it up and pet it. Right?' He motioned to the pavement, baking as the temperature in Patterson climbed into the low 90s. 'It's over with,' the 61-year-old Republican said of Epstein and his villainy. 'Move on.' At least, that would be his preference. But to 'shut everybody up, absolutely, yeah, they should release them,' Patrick said. 'Otherwise, we're all going to be speculating forever.' Or at least until the polls close in November 2026.

Canada fixed its air traffic control decades ago. Why can't America?
Canada fixed its air traffic control decades ago. Why can't America?

Boston Globe

time12 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Canada fixed its air traffic control decades ago. Why can't America?

Some of these tragedies and alarming incidents are Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up There is no mystery about what ails air traffic control in this country: It is run by the government, which is ill-suited to the task. Worse yet, the agency that's in charge of providing air traffic control, the Federal Aviation Administration, is also the agency that regulates it — an inherent conflict of interest. As journalist John Tierney put it in Advertisement That's only part of the problem. Because the FAA is an arm of the government, its operations, including air traffic control, are inevitably politicized. Since the agency has to be reauthorized annually, its funding is tied not to market forces but to the priorities of politicians, lobbyists, and interest groups. That chronic Happily, there is a straightforward solution: Get the federal government out of the air traffic control business. 'Countless studies have shown that other countries' ATC systems are better-managed, better-funded, and better-supplied with advanced technology,' Robert Poole, the Reason Foundation's director of transportation policy, Advertisement Not much has changed since Our neighbor to the north long ago made the leap to nongovernmental air traffic control. In 1996, Canada created Nav Canada, a not-for-profit corporation that is fully funded by users of the system — that is, airlines and other aircraft operators — and thus doesn't cost taxpayers a cent. The results have been almost uniformly positive. Nav Canada funds its own modernization and operates on a solid financial footing. The company has Canada boasts state-of-the-art satellite navigation systems. Almost 10 years ago, The Wall Street Journal's aviation columnist, Scott McCartney, In Canadian ATC towers, there are no strips of paper to shuffle. Instead, controllers update information about each flight on touch screens and pass the information to one another electronically. 'Requests for altitude changes are automatically checked for conflicts before they even pop up on controllers' screens,' McCartney wrote. 'Computers look 20 minutes ahead for any planes potentially getting too close to each other. Flights are monitored by a system more accurate than radar, allowing them to be safely spaced closer together to add capacity and reduce delays.' Advertisement The FAA, meanwhile, has been working on upgrading its technology for more than 20 years, but its efforts, as the trade group Airlines for America America's antiquated air traffic control system is both embarrassing and unnecessary. The wheel doesn't need to be reinvented. In 2017, legislation to privatize ATC operations along the lines of the Canadian model This would be a fine time to revive that legislation. Is it naive to imagine that fixing air traffic control is one way to 'make America great again' that doesn't have to involve polarizing rhetoric or angry culture wars? The formula is clear: Carve air traffic control out of the FAA, move it to an independent, user-funded corporation, and let market needs — not politics — dictate priorities. Under such a 'separation of ATC and state,' safety oversight would remain with the FAA, but the era of paper strips and floppy disks would finally end. Advertisement Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

FAA planning more helicopter route changes after fatal collision
FAA planning more helicopter route changes after fatal collision

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

FAA planning more helicopter route changes after fatal collision

By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Aviation Administration said on Friday it is planning additional helicopter route changes near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport after the January 29 mid-air collision of an American Airlines regional jet and an Army helicopter that killed 67 people. FAA official Nick Fuller said at a National Transportation Safety Board investigative hearing that an agency work group is planning changes on a key helicopter route near Reagan after imposing permanent restrictions on non-essential helicopter operations in March and further restricting where they could operate in June. NTSB officials at the hearing expressed concerns about a "disconnect" between front-line air traffic controllers and agency leaders and raised other questions about FAA actions before the fatal collision, including why earlier reports of close call incidents did not prompt safety improvements. Board members have also raised concerns about the failure of the FAA to turn over documents in a timely fashion during the investigation of the January collision. The NTSB received details on staffing levels at the time of the January 29 crash "after considerable confusion and a series of corrections and updates from the FAA," a board report said. The hearing has run more than 30 hours over three days and raised a series of troubling questions, including about the failure of the primary controller on duty to issue an alert to the American regional jet and the actions of an assistant controller who was supposed to assist the primary controller. "That did not occur and we're trying to understand why. And no one has been able to tell us what the individual was doing during that time," NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said. Homendy said earlier this week the FAA had ignored warnings about serious safety issues. "Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you," Homendy said. "You transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem ... Fix it. Do better." FAA officials at the hearing vowed to work more collaboratively and address concerns. Senator Tim Kaine on Friday also cited concerns raised by an FAA manager about the volume of flights at the airport before the collision and the decision by Congress last year to add five additional daily flights to Reagan. "Congress must act to reduce dangerous congestion by removing flights into and out of (Reagan National)," Kaine said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store