Italy gets slap on the wrist over plans to deport asylum seekers to Albanian detention centres
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's plan to outsource processing of asylum seekers to a non-European Union country and speed up deportations has been closely scrutinised by others in the EU.
The costly scheme has been frozen for months by legal challenges.
Italian magistrates have cited the European court's decision that EU states cannot designate an entire country as 'safe' when certain regions are not.
In its ruling published today, the EU Court of Justice did not contest Italy's right to designate so-called 'safe countries of origin'.
'However, a Member State may not include a country in the list of safe countries of origin if that country does not offer adequate protection to its entire population,' it ruled.
It said the sources of information on which the government's 'safe country' designation is based should be accessible both to the defendant and to courts.
In the case considered by the court, two Bangladeshi nationals taken to an Albanian migrant centre were denied the possibility of 'challenging and reviewing the lawfulness of such a presumption of safety'.
'A member state may not designate as a 'safe' country of origin a third country which does not satisfy, for certain categories of persons, the material conditions for such a designation,' it said.
Advertisement
Italy's 'safe country' list included Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia, where human rights groups have documented abuses against minorities.
Italy's government said the court was 'claiming powers that do not belong do it, in the face of responsibilities that are political'.
Meloni and her Albanian counterpart Edi Rama signed the deal in November 2023.
Under the plan, Italy would finance and operate detention centres designed to fast-track the processing of asylum seekers from 'safe' countries, and therefore unlikely to be eligible for asylum.
Several people have been sent to the centres from October last year but they have been sent back to Italy after judges ruled they did not meet the criteria to be detained there.
Italy responded by modifying its 'safe' list but judges ruled twice more against subsequent detentions and referred the issue to the ECJ.
The court noted, however that European law will change in June 2026, allowing 'exceptions for such clearly identifiable categories of persons.'
© AFP 2025
Need more clarity and context on how migration is being discussed in Ireland? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online.
Visit Knowledge Bank
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
EU to appoint diplomat to help with efforts to free Gena Heraty
The EU will appoint a diplomat in Haiti to help in Irish efforts to free Gena Heraty and other hostages. It comes as the family of the kidnapped charity worker asked people to keep her in their hearts and pray for her safe and speedy return. Ms Heraty, from Westport, Co Mayo, was one of eight people seized from the Sainte-Hélène orphanage, about 10km from Port-au-Prince. As diplomatic efforts continue to secure her release, the Mayo woman's family issued a statement on Tuesday night through the Department of Foreign Affairs, saying they are still coming to terms with what has happened. 'We continue to work closely with Nos Petits Frères et Soeurs (NPFS) in Haiti and Ireland, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and international partners who have all assured us that everything possible is being done to get Gena, and those taken with her, safely released as soon as possible,' the family said. 'Gena is loved and respected by so many people, as is evident in the outpouring of concern, support and prayers from everyone near and far. "We are truly so grateful for all the messages of support we have received over the past few days," they added. Earlier, Tánaiste and foreign affairs minister Simon Harris held talks his Haitian counterpart, Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste, and said the minister assured him of his support in their work to ensure the safe release of Ms Heraty and all the hostages. Special point of contact Mr Harris has raised the case with the EU's high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Kaja Kallas. Ms Kallas supported the Tánaiste's request for the EU to designate a specific point of contact in Haiti, working directly with Ireland on the ongoing efforts to free Gena and the other hostages. The EU currently has a team of representatives based in Haiti. A spokesman said the Tánaiste has been in 'constant contact with the Heraty family, and updated them on these developments'. They also stated that 'different avenues at both political and diplomatic level continue to be exhausted as part of the ongoing efforts to secure Gena'. " The kidnapping of Gena Heraty, her co-workers, and a three-year-old child is utterly devastating,' Mr Harris said. 'This is a particularly difficult time for the Heraty family. My Department and I will continue to provide them whatever support they need. "I was glad to secure the full backing of the EU's high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Kaja Kallas. She has agreed to immediately put in place measures to support Ireland in relation to this case. "This is an important development, ensuring that this case is firmly on the agenda of the European Union and our EU colleagues," he added.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Russia issues missile warning to West ahead of US deadline for Ukraine ceasefire
The Kremlin has said it is no longer bound by any constraints on deploying short- and intermediate-range missiles near European Union and Nato states, as nuclear sabre-rattling escalated before a US deadline for Moscow to halt fighting with Ukraine . US president Donald Trump has threatened to impose 'severe' tariffs on imports from Russia and from countries – including China and India – that buy Moscow's oil, unless the Kremlin agrees to a ceasefire by Friday. Envoys for Mr Trump are expected in Moscow and Kyiv this week – Russian state media say Steve Witkoff will arrive on Wednesday, and Keith Kellogg is set to visit Ukraine – amid sharpening rhetoric between the White House and the Kremlin. After former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev warned that Mr Trump's 'ultimatum game' was stoking the risk of war between their countries, the US leader said last Friday that he was moving two nuclear-powered submarines to 'appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that'. READ MORE On the same day, Russia said it had started regular production of a new nuclear-capable, intermediate-range ballistic missile called Oreshnik, and would deploy it this year in neighbouring Belarus, which borders Ukraine and EU and Nato members Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed on Tuesday that Moscow now felt free to deploy short- and mid-range missiles wherever it liked, in response to what it claims are US plans to deploy such missiles in areas of Europe and Asia that would threaten Russia. [ Opinion: Trump's threats against Russia are a charade meant to buy Putin time Opens in new window ] 'Russia no longer has any constraints in this regard. Russia no longer considers itself to be limited in any way. Russia considers itself to have the right, if necessary, to take appropriate measures,' he said. During Mr Trump's first term as president in 2019, the US withdrew from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), which banned missiles with a range of 500-5,500km. Russia denied US claims at the time that it was secretly developing such weapons, but said it would not deploy anything that had been banned under the INF for as long as the US and its allies did the same. 'Our repeated warnings on this account have been ignored, and US-made ground-based INF systems are being deployed in Europe and the Asia-Pacific,' the Russian foreign ministry said on Monday. 'In this regard, [Russia] states that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar systems have ceased to exist. We are authorised to declare that the Russian Federation no longer considers itself bound by the previously adopted self-imposed restrictions.' Moscow claimed that some versions of the US-made Himars rocket system – which Ukraine uses to powerful effect against Russia's invasion force – could fire further than 500km and so fall 'into the category of ground-launched INF-range missile systems'. Mr Trump reiterated on Tuesday that he would raise tariffs on India 'very substantially' due to what he considers to be New Delhi's unfair trade rules and because it is 'fuelling the war machine' by buying Russian oil. [ The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop Opens in new window ] He also claimed that lower world energy prices would force Russian president Vladimir Putin to end his invasion of Ukraine. 'If energy goes down enough, Putin is going to stop killing people,' Mr Trump told US television. 'If you get energy down, another $10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.' Mr Peskov said US threats to impose financial penalties on Russia's trading partners were 'illegal'. Sweden, Norway and Denmark announced that they would contribute about $500 million (€433 million) to a new plan for Nato members in Europe to buy US arms for Ukraine. The Netherlands said on Monday it would put €500 million into the scheme.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend
An Oireachtas committee has recommended the Government lobby other EU states to change rules that stop the Irish Central Bank from refusing to act as a competent authority in Europe for Israeli war bonds. Third-country issuers, such as Israel, can choose any EU state as their home member state and competent authority. That authority reviews its bond prospectus and, in this case, authorises Israel to sell bonds in the EU market. Before 2021, the UK was the EU home member state under the regulation for the state of Israel. Ireland was chosen as the new home member state following the UK's departure from the EU after Brexit in 2016. Politicians from all parties have expressed concern that Ireland is the competent authority that gives authority to Israel to sell bonds in the EU market, including what Israel markets as 'war bonds'. However, the committee has been told by the Central Bank that it is powerless to refuse to act as the competent authority under current rules. The rules and criteria that determine approval of the prospectus do not cover Israel's continuing military activities in Gaza , but rather include risk rules based on financial and fiscal criteria. The governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, told the Oireachtas Committee on Finance in June that Ireland had no power to unilaterally remove itself from being the competent authority. Any decision to change that situation, he said, would be made by the third country, in this case Israel, and by that third country alone. The committee, chaired by Sinn Féin TD Mairéad Farrell , published a report on Tuesday, the main recommendation of which was that the Government engage at EU level with a 'view to amending the EU Prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a Competent Authority'. It has also recommended that the Central Bank conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus. It said that review should determine whether it is in compliance with the levels of disclosure, accuracy and transparency required by the EU Prospectus. At the meeting in June, committee members expressed concern that the continuing destruction and deaths in Gaza were not being taken into consideration in determining the right of Israel to sell bonds, which several committee members pointed out were being openly marketed as 'war bonds'. The report states: 'In response to questions around whether enhanced scrutiny is applied to sovereign bond issuers involved in armed conflict or under international investigation, representatives of the Central Bank told the Committee that a judgement is made as to whether a prospectus is particularly complex and if there are issues that are challenging to articulate. 'Ultimately, however, the judgement rests on whether the disclosure is appropriate to the financial risk.' At the meeting, members expressed concern with regard to both the exposure of the EU financially to Israel and the current situation in Israel. 'Members further described the prospectus regulatory regime as 'narrow and arguably amoral ... Jesuitical in the way that it is interpreted and applied, which is mindful of only its basic, legalistic obligations in satisfying the regulatory framework in place', the report stated. Amid cross-party opposition to the Central Bank continuing in that role, the committee has also recommended that any future review of its role as the competent authority by the regulator should take into account the nature of the case taken by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention and the interim findings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in that regard. It also said the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories should also be taken into account.
