Biohack Your Memorial Day With These Smart Recovery Rituals
Memorial Day used to mean indulgence: grill smoke, pool floats, and enough rosé to make Tuesday hurt. But now, a growing number of wellness-minded Americans are flipping the script. The long weekend isn't about zoning out, it's a chance to recharge with intention.
Instead of hangovers, they're after better brain function. Instead of greasy brunches, they're experimenting with glymphatic drainage and gut-friendly snacks. It's part of a larger cultural shift: holidays aren't just time off, they're time to reset. That three-day weekend is prime for running your own personal experiment in recovery, sleep, and energy upgrades, basically, a DIY wellness retreat.
Biohacking retreats are popping up around every major holiday now. Instead of lazy poolside lounging, the itineraries lean into cryotherapy, red light facials, and intermittent fasting schedules. And brands are clearly paying attention: companies like Bon Charge and Skin Gym have dropped Memorial Day promos to highlight their red light masks and infrared wraps.
The trend has backup, too. A 2024 Sleep Health study found that just 15% of adults consistently get quality rest five nights a week. So a quiet, extended weekend free from daily chaos? That's a goldmine for nervous system recovery. Sleep debt remains a widespread issue, and new understandings of optimal sleep duration are helping people prioritize meaningful rest, especially when their calendar finally allows it.
Neuroscientist Andrew Huberman calls sleep, light, and cold exposure the most powerful ways to hit reset. That combo (easy to access, grounded in science) has become a foundation for how many people structure their long weekend.
Don't want to book a retreat? No problem. At-home biohacking is having a moment, and Memorial Day is a popular time to experiment. Cold plunges in the backyard. Face taping during Netflix marathons.
NAD+ therapy, once niche, is becoming more mainstream, especially among those looking to improve focus and energy without overhauling their entire routine. Suzie Pemdejian, head nurse practitioner at AlphaMan Clinic, says most report noticeable improvements in mental clarity, focus, and sustainable energy levels within just a few sessions.
Even food is getting a glow-up. Classic BBQs are swapping out coleslaw for fiber-packed greens and collagen-boosting drinks. Instead of beer, think nootropic-infused mocktails that promise energy without the crash.
This isn't about being rigid or obsessive. It's about choosing how to spend your rest. Memorial Day can still mean beach chairs and baked beans, and that's fine. But for others, it's become a window to turn down inflammation, get better sleep, or finally try out that bathhouse. There's also a rise in overnight recovery products designed to do their work while you sleep, supporting skin, hair, and stress recovery without adding steps to your day.
As the line between productivity and pleasure keeps blurring, this idea of the 'wellness weekend' feels more permanent than trendy.
Click here to learn more about AlphaMan Clinic
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Joe Wicks Teams Up With Hey Duggee Creators To Get Kids Moving
Five years after getting the nation's children moving during the first Covid-19 lockdown, Joe Wicks is at it again. The fitness guru has today launched a children's series on YouTube designed to help get kids stay active this summer, co-created by Studio AKA (the creators of Hey Duggee). The series, called Activate, features energetic five-minute episodes which combine fun animated characters with upbeat music and encourage children to enjoy short bursts of movement that easily fit into their day. Wicks said: 'Activate is the natural next step in everything I've worked towards over the past decade. From my early YouTube workouts, to 'PE with Joe' during the pandemic, my goal has always been to get children moving and feeling good – physically and mentally.' The Body Coach, who shares four children with his wife Rosie, said the project was inspired by his own childhood, where he discovered movement 'as a way to cope with the challenges of living with parents with drug addiction and mental health issues'. 'Activate is designed to make movement fun and inclusive for every child, with short, high-energy workouts that fit into everyday life – these can be enjoyed in the living room, the garden, in the classroom, or anywhere else,' he added. The first episode is now available on The Body Coach's YouTube channel, with further episodes set to be released weekly over the summer holidays. The government is backing the programme as part of its 10 Year Health Plan. Being physically active is good for physical and mental health and helps relieve pressure on the NHS, preventing an additional £10.5 billion worth of treatment a year. Despite that, inactivity levels remain high for both adults and children, with huge inequalities across the country. Wicks' new series hopes to tackle this issue. Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'Childhood obesity robs our young people of their future, and inactivity is one of the biggest culprits. That's why it's crucial to start building healthy habits from a young age.' He added: 'This initiative directly supports our focus on giving children the best start in life – a cornerstone of our Plan for Change. By investing in prevention today, we're building a healthier generation for tomorrow.' Watch the first episode on Joe Wicks' YouTube channel. 'There's No Right Or Wrong Way': Joe Swash Is Trying To Figure Out Parenting Just Like You I Was Stuck In A Fitness Rut – Until I Discovered the 'Tripod' Rule I'm A Fitness Expert – These Are The Best Exercises To Do By Age
Medscape
3 hours ago
- Medscape
Nicotine Pouch Ingestions Surge Among Young Children
TOPLINE: Researchers analyzed 134,663 nicotine ingestions among children younger than 6 years, finding that nicotine pouch ingestions increased by more than 760% from 2020 to 2023. Nicotine pouches were 1.5 times more likely to cause serious medical outcomes and twice as likely to require medical admission than with other nicotine formulations. METHODOLOGY: Analysis included unintentional, single-substance nicotine ingestions among children younger than 6 years reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS) from 2010 to 2023. Data collection encompassed 134,663 cases, with most occurring among children younger than 2 years (76.2%), boys (55.5%), and at residences (98.5%). Researchers examined various nicotine product formulations, including gum/lozenges, liquids, pouches, powder/granules, and tablets/capsules/caplets, and tracked medical outcomes ranging from no effect to death. TAKEAWAY: The rate of nicotine ingestions increased by 59.4% from 2010 to 2015 (P < .001) before decreasing by 34.1% from 2015 to 2023 (P < .001), primarily driven by liquid nicotine ingestion rates. Nicotine pouches were associated with higher odds for serious medical outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% CI, 1.10-2.13) and medical admission (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.31-3.15) compared with other formulations. Most ingestions resulted in no effect (36.8%) or minor effect (19.6%), while 1.2% had moderate effects, with 39 cases of major effects and 2 fatalities reported. The rate of nicotine pouch ingestions increased by 763.1% from 2020 to 2023 (P < .001), contrasting with declining rates for other nicotine formulations during this period. IN PRACTICE: 'Study findings, including the emergence and comparative severity of nicotine pouch ingestions, support the need for ongoing surveillance and increased efforts to prevent nicotine ingestions among young children,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Madelyn Olivas, MHA, Center for Injury Research and Policy, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. It was published online in Pediatrics. LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, the NPDS is a passive surveillance system that underestimates the true number of nicotine ingestions among children younger than 6 years. The data were self-reported and cannot be completely verified by Poison Centers or America's Poison Centers. The increase in nicotine pouch ingestions may be partially attributable to the increased use of new NPDS product codes for these products. DISCLOSURES: Olivas reported receiving a student research scholarship from the Child Injury Prevention Alliance. The funding organization did not have any involvement in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or publication decisions. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The megabill's Medicaid cuts shocked hospitals, but they may never happen
And 2028 is not only an election year, but a presidential one. 'Are they really going to want to cut rural hospitals in an election?' asked Chris Mitchell, head of the Iowa Hospital Association. 'We're going to talk to our delegation early and often about the impact of these cuts and how looming cuts down the road impact how hospitals run in the interim.' Heartening for hospital executives is a now-long history of Congress delaying or repealing the painful parts of major legislation. Congress, for example, never allowed a tax on high-end 'Cadillac' insurance plans in 2010's Affordable Care Act to take effect, and rescinded a tax on medical devices. 'We saw it with the Affordable Care Act, and we will certainly see it with this bill,' predicted Ben Klein, a former Democratic Senate aide and founding partner of Red+Blue Strategies, a lobbying firm that counts major hospital groups and systems among its clients. Congress' habit of revisiting painful cuts also guarantees a multiyear windfall for K Street, the Washington corridor where many lobbyists have their shops. Lobbyists with ties to Trump or Republicans in Congress have already seen a surge in revenue this year. Several state-based hospital associations say they will ramp up meetings with lawmakers to stress the need for an off-ramp before the 2028 elections. Even before the megabill's enactment, some Republicans in competitive districts were suggesting Congress may need to tweak a provision restricting states' ability to extract more money from the Treasury if it causes problems for hospitals. 'If it looks like we have issues and we're not comfortable, we can change it,' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) said before the House voted to pass the bill last week. 'Things are subject to change. We're going to have different members of Congress. We're going to have a new president. Things are going to be different.' If the lobbyists are successful in undoing the cuts — which mostly target Medicaid, the state-federal insurance program for low-income people — it'll mean the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will be even more expensive than the Congressional Budget Office expects: $3.4 trillion in deficit spending over a decade. That will have ramifications across the U.S. economy, exposing Americans to higher interest rates and slower economic growth, budget experts warn. 'If they are successful in getting these reductions delayed, modified, scaled back, … it will be a tax on future generations,' said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and longtime GOP Senate budget aide. But that's a deal hospital executives — who have predicted the cuts could threaten some facilities' survival — are willing to take. Delays and cuts States use two tools to get higher Medicaid payments from the federal government. The first is a tax on hospitals and other providers. States use the tax revenue to pay their share of Medicaid, which offers insurance to more than 70 million low-income Americans. Hospitals don't mind because states cover the tax with bigger Medicaid payments. Conservative advocates of reining in the practice say it amounts to 'money laundering' because states with bigger Medicaid budgets qualify for larger federal contributions. That can also free up money in state budgets to pay for other things, like coverage for undocumented immigrants. But states and hospitals say the tax is vital because Medicaid reimbursements don't cover the true costs of care. The megabill incrementally lowers the rate states can levy from 6 percent of patient revenue to 3.5 percent. In 2028, the cuts start to phase in at 0.5 percent and continue for several years until reaching 3.5 percent. The new law permits the 10 red states that have chosen not to take advantage of a provision in Obamacare encouraging them to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people to keep their taxes but not increase them. Restricting the provider taxes will hit hospitals that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients hard, their advocates say. Second, the bill targets a wonky financial tool states use to boost hospitals' Medicaid revenue called state-directed payments. The tool enables states to boost the rates privately run managed care plans, which contract with states to cover Medicaid patients, reimburse providers. States have ordered higher rates for chronically underfunded hospitals and facilities. In some cases, states have required the plans to pay providers at commercial rates, which are much higher than those paid by Medicaid and Medicare, the federal health insurance program for elderly people. Overall the bill will cut more than $1 trillion in health spending over the next decade, with the majority coming from Medicaid. This includes not just the state cuts but also the effects of other provisions, such as new rules requiring some Medicaid recipients to work, volunteer or attend school. Hospitals are trying to figure out how to make up funding gaps that could reach billions of dollars — and warning their representatives and senators of what's ahead. States could raise income taxes or find ways to shed Medicaid enrollment to help contain costs, hospital executives said. In West Virginia, facilities may delay construction projects or cut services, said Jim Kaufman, president and CEO of the West Virginia Hospital Association. Some areas that could be targeted are obstetrics or pediatric care, which are already in short supply in rural areas. 'One out of every two births is covered by Medicaid,' he said. Getting grandfathered Lawmakers are likely to hear more in the coming months about the impacts on their local hospitals. The industry has always been a powerful one in Washington since hospitals care for lawmakers' constituents and also employ many of them. The Iowa Hospital Association's Mitchell said lawmakers may think twice once they see the consequences of the cuts. 'We won't be talking theoretically,' he said. 'Unless there's intervention, we know how things will shake out.' Republicans did include a $50 billion relief fund for rural hospitals to stretch out over five years. Details on how that money will be distributed remain scant as states await guidance from the Trump administration. But it is unlikely to fully offset the losses, several hospital groups said. That's because rural hospitals serve mostly Medicare and Medicaid patients and the rates the government pays are usually far less than what private insurers do. In Virginia, large hospital systems in urban areas might get a sixth of their revenue from state-directed payments. For rural facilities, it is closer to a third, said Julian Walker, vice president of communications for the Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association. Advocates for rural hospitals, as well as urban ones that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients, are highlighting their vulnerability. Larry Bucshon, a Republican lobbyist and former heart and lung surgeon who served seven terms representing an Indiana House district, said he expects Congress will have to do more to help them. 'There is going to have to be some work done to say, 'Well, we need to have more grandfathering,'' he said. Still, lobbyists for hospitals said they aren't taking that for granted. They point out that the Paragon Health Institute, a Trump-aligned think tank, made the case for changes to provider taxes and state-directed payments and that many Republicans believe strongly that Medicaid costs have grown too rapidly and that some states provide benefits to people who don't need them. That threatens the program's stability, Republicans said during the megabill debate. 'They may not be as from the Paragon Institute work inside the White House and have been pushing for these changes that have now become enshrined in law,' a lobbyist for multiple hospitals, granted anonymity to speak freely on the situation, said. At the same time, any changes going forward will likely need bipartisan support and Democrats might not be eager to help Republicans out of a jam if the GOP finds itself trying to stop unpopular provisions from taking effect in an election year. 'I don't want to hear Jeff Van Drew, or any Republican from New Jersey, or any Republican in this House telling me that they're going to correct bad things that they did today,' said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) after the final megabill House vote last week. Still, Pallone, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he wants to reverse the Medicaid cuts. 'I'm determined to ultimately reverse all the terrible things they've done to Medicaid, to the ACA, to make health care less affordable, more costly,' Pallone said.
