
Sophie reveals her emotions on taking Duchess of Edinburgh title, as she pays tribute to late Queen Elizabeth II - and opens up on being seen as Royal Family's 'secret weapon'
Speaking during her visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina this week, the duchess said her change in title in 2023 'felt like quite a big moment'.
Sophie was formerly the Countess of Wessex, but became the Duchess of Edinburgh after the King handed her husband Edward, Charles' youngest brother, their late father's title on his 59th birthday.
This was in keeping with his parents' wishes and in recognition of Edward's commitment to the Duke of Edinburgh 's Award youth scheme.
Sophie said in an interview with The Mirror: 'First of all it was quite large shoes to fill because not as many of the population alive today will remember but the Queen was Duchess of Edinburgh for the first few years when she and my father-in-law first married.
'For me, it was quite an emotional thing to sort of step into her shoes [as being Duchess of Edinburgh], it felt like quite a big moment.'
She explained, however, that in practical terms her and her husband's role is to support the King as it was to support the Queen.
In her interview, Sophie also opened up on what it is like being seen as the Royal Family's 'secret weapon'.
She explained that she doesn't see herself as being in a 'front and centre' role, which allows her more time to pursue her own interests.
Sophie said: 'I like to fly under the radar. It's all very well being a secret weapon but if no one knows, maybe it's too secret.'
'I suppose I should take it as a backhanded compliment,' she added.
Sophie has this week been in Bosnia and Herzegovina for a three-day trip to mark the 30th anniversary of the Srebrenica Genocide.
During the visit, Sophie has met mothers of victims of the genocide and delivered a message from the King.
King Charles said he was 'greatly saddened' not to be there in person, adding that he is 'most touched and grateful to be able to share these words as we pay our respects'.
He said: 'I have spoken before about the terrible events of thirty years ago, confirmed as genocide by international courts.
'Many of the individuals responsible are now rightly facing justice, but this does not absolve the rest of us of our duties: both to acknowledge the international community's failure to prevent the horror, and to do all we can to ensure it never happens again.
'I humbly salute the Mothers of Srebrenica, and all who do so much, despite their continuing anguish, to preserve the memory of those who died.
'It has meant a very great deal to me, in past years, to have met survivors, mothers and family members of the missing, for whom I have such admiration.
'Their extraordinary courage, compassion and dignity are a lesson to us all, and it is my hope that we may all take inspiration from their incredible resilience under such unbearable circumstances.'
Charles also spoke of taking inspiration from 'those who bravely speak out in pursuit of justice and those who dedicate their lives to rebuilding trust between communities for the sake of a better, shared future'.
He said: 'These praiseworthy individuals can be found from all walks of life, and from across all ethnic groups, in Bosnia and Herzegovina and around the world.
'But there can be no shared future when the events of the past are denied or forgotten.
'Only by learning from the past does it become possible to share in each other's loss and look together to the future.
'Only by working together to find the missing can there be closure for those still seeking answers.
'Three decades on, it is ever more important to remember all those who suffered, and to redouble our efforts to ensure a peaceful, stable future for all the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina.'
He concluded his message by saying: 'Today, as we remember the victims, those who so tragically died and those who were left behind, let us honour their memory by standing alongside each and every one of those who work so tirelessly to promote understanding and tolerance between all peoples, of all faiths, nationalities and ethnicities, in the ongoing pursuit of a just and brighter future.'
More than 8,000 men and boys were killed on July 11, 1995 by Bosnian Serb forces amid the break-up of the former Yugoslavia.
It was Europe's worst atrocity since the Second World War.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Queen Camilla's amusing reaction to her former status as the 'black sheep' of the family revealed on PALACE CONFIDENTIAL
If there's one member of the Royal Family who knows how it feels to be disliked by the general public it is Queen Camilla. Indeed, for much of her time as a member of the family Camilla faced hostility from Brits due to the notorious role she played in the breakdown of King Charles ' marriage to Diana. Now though the Queen Consort is a hard-working and much-loved member of the Firm. Speaking about Camilla, in the latest episode of Palace Confidential, the Daily Mail's Royal Editor Rebecca English revealed that the Queen can now look back at that period of her life with some amusement. During this week's installment, the Mail's royal experts answered viewers most pressing questions about the Royal Family in a special Q&A episode. One viewer asked the panel about how shielded the royals are from gossip and stories featured in the press. In response to the question, Rebecca spoke about how different members of the Firm tackle the media. Speaking about Camilla, Rebecca spoke about an 'interesting anecdote' the Queen Consort said that has also been used by Gary Goldsmith - the Princess of Wales' uncle. 'It was very illuminating. He [Gary] was talking about being at a palace function, I think probably in the run-up to the wedding and feeling slightly like a fish out of water,' Rebecca said. 'Camilla, the then Duchess of Cornwall, came up to talk to him. And he kind of said words to the effect of "Well, I'm not sure you want to be seen talking to me because I'm the black sheep of the family". 'She kind of smiled and laughed and went: "Oh don't worry, so have I been over the years, you know, you just roll with, it's fine. '"We'll be kind of two black sheep together!".' Rebecca added: 'I thought that showed her quite amusing reaction to someone who has definitely been on the receiving end of her fair share of brickbats over the years.' Gary found himself at the centre of a press frenzy in July 2009 when The News Of The World printed a shocking photo of Kate's uncle - Gary Goldsmith - seemingly preparing to snort cocaine on their front page. Gary had unwittingly invited two journalists from the paper into his £5million villa in Ibiza where he also shared stories about Kate and Wills time at his home - dubiously named La Maison de Bang Bang - including a tale of how William broke his ornamental pyramids. Meanwhile, Camilla's status as the so-called black sheep of the family came about in the 1990s when she first became a household name. At the time she was seen as the usurper of the much-beloved Princess Diana which led the public to dislike her so much. Journalist Tina Brown wrote: 'And the press went after her with such viciousness. I mean, the really appalling sexist comments about Camilla - I mean, they used to call her, you know, old bag, old trout.' She added that Camilla would sign her letters to Charles 'your devoted old bag', as she been been labelled as such so often. Charles then launched a large-scale PR campaign with Mark Bolland at the helm. During the spin doctor's reign in the late 1990s and early 2000s he performed something of a miracle, taking Charles's own popularity rating from 20 per cent after Diana's death to 75 per cent. Bolland also orchestrated the media coverage of the prince's first photographed public appearance with Camilla at the Ritz Hotel in January 1999 - dubbed 'Operation Ritz'. Charles also faced the task of gathering support for Camilla from his family. Queen Elizabeth II was one such hurdle. She reportedly described Camilla as 'that wicked woman' on one occasion. Her support for their marriage was crucial so that Charles was not removed from the line of succession. By 2000, the Queen indicated her tacit approval of their relationship when she attended a lunch with the pair. With the late Queen's approval they married in 2005. One issue that lingered over Camilla's head was what would be her title upon Charles' ascension to the throne. Palace guidance said she would only ever be known as 'Princess Consort' - until Queen Elizabeth II ended years of uncertainty over the issue by assuring Camilla's future status in an historic Platinum Jubilee statement. In her surprise announcement in February 2022, Her late Majesty declared it was her 'sincere wish' for her daughter-in-law to be fully acknowledged upon Charles becoming King. Since Charles became King, following the death of his mother in September 8 2022, the now Queen Camilla is one of the most prominent members of the Royal Family. And since she became Queen her popularity with the public has soared to a high of 55 per cent in September 2022. In the wake of Charles's cancer diagnosis in February 2024, Camilla took on more engagements and has only seen her support grow. And Queen Camilla is now an integral and accepted part of the Royal Family. Rebecca and the Mail's Diary Editor Richard Eden also shared how other members of the Royal Family cope with gossip. According to Rebecca, the late Queen would read the newspapers 'by choice most days' but when it came to gossip within the household she was 'very attuned' with her 'ear to the ground on that'. Meanwhile, Camilla's husband King Charles III before he ascended to the throne would only read cuttings 'carefully curated' for him. Harry on the other hand, would 'read everything' according to Rebecca. 'Prince Harry did say to me once that he would read everything that was written about himself even the supermarket magazines and the comments under the stories online. 'He actually joked that I've got a notebook and I will make a note of whose written what story and I will take it up with them!'


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Prince Harry issued stark warning about King Charles reconcilation amid peace summit
Hopes for a reconciliation between Prince Harry and his father King Charles have been raised after it emerged several of their aides had a 'peace summit' - but one expert has warned caution should be exercised Prince Harry could be on the road to reconciliation with his father, the King - but he will always be on the sidelines, even if they do reunite, an expert has warned. Father and son have long had a fractured relationship, with Harry admitting in a bombshell TV interview earlier this year after losing his security case that his dad is no longer speaking to him. However, sources have now told the Mirror that the King would welcome a royal reunion with Harry - but only if he scales back his public attacks on the family and stops the "endless" interviews. It comes after it emerged that Meredith Maines, Harry's chief communications officer, and Liam Maguire, who runs Harry and Meghan's UK public relations team, met the King's communications secretary Tobyn Andreae at the Royal Over-Seas League in London last week. The private members' club is located right by Clarence House, Charles's London residence. According to royal expert and historian Dr Tessa Dunlop, it could be Harry's wife, Meghan, forging ahead in her own career that has prompted Harry to take action when it comes to reconciling with his family. She told the Mirror: "Love her or loathe her, Meghan has found her happy place and it has nothing to do with the Royal Family. As Ever, raspberry jam, beige ensembles and over-emotive podcasts might not be your thing, but they are working for California's Princess. "And before any bilious naysayers butt in, this is good news for a future rapprochement between Harry and the King. The two men have a chance to work things through. And surely everybody wants that? "That leaves only one option – reconciliation. The big question is when? And courtesy of a meeting between the two royal camps on a prominent London balcony, it looks like that 'when' will be sooner rather than later." "Never work-shy, five years after exiting Britain's Royal Family, the Duchess of Sussex is making waves as an product-cum-life style influencer, and crucially this new identity does not depend on attacking the House of Windsor for revenue. "Which leaves Harry space to explore and repair the sorry state of relations with his father. Something he has long said he wants to address. It will not be easy, and nor should we expect immediate results, but that meeting of assistants in London last week is a harbinger of things to come." Harry claimed in his controversial memoir, Spare, his brother, Prince William, had physically attacked him and that the King put his own interests above Harry's and was jealous of Meghan. His level of security changed in 2020 when he and Meghan stepped down as working royals and moved to California for financial and personal freedom, and he suggested the royal family and officials hoped his realisation of the increased safety risk "would force us to come back". In a BBC television interview after losing the latest round in his court battle over his security, Harry claimed the King will not speak to him and he does not know "how much longer my father has" as he spoke of his hopes for a 'reconciliation' with his family. And Tessa says even if 'miracles' happen and Harry and his dad reunite, it still won't be straightforward. She added: "Harry's warring in (His Majesty's) courts has come to a close, the paperbacks of Spare are no longer headline news, and both Charles and his second son know that time is not on their side. Watch this space, but please don't expect miracles. "As Harry pertinently observed in his biography, Charles always gave 'an air of being not quite ready for parenthood', and bearing in mind the onerous duties of kingship, it is unlikely Charles has any more spare time now than he did then. Reconciled or not, Harry will always be on the sidelines."


The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
We spent £10k on a dream Maldives honeymoon but left early – we were so disappointed & fled to Dubai instead
MANY people dream of flying to the Maldives for a picture-perfect honeymoon - but one couple claim they were left "disappointed" by their £10,000 trip. Newly married Sophie and her husband jetted on what they thought would be a trip of a lifetime, but decided to leave early when it didn't live up to expectations. 5 5 In a clip which has racked up over a million views, Sophie shared exactly why they didn't love the Maldives. On her @sophiegrace_24 account, she shared how she had forked out over £10,000 for an 11-night stay, but left after a few days. She had known it would be expensive but it had been somewhere they had always wanted to go and she used a 'well-known travel provider in the UK.' The newlyweds were told about a new island that was opening in March, ahead of their July honeymoon, and there was an introductory offer they could snap up. They were sold, given it had seven restaurants and two islands joined with a walkway. Sophie added that she had checked in April that all the facilities would be open and construction would have finished. She claims she was told that due to a delay, it would be opening on July 1, just ahead of their July 8 arrival, but that everything would be ready for their arrival. However, this is when things went downhill for her. In her video, she explained: 'So we turn up and the island's absolutely beautiful. Staff are there to welcome us. Everything you expect as you pull up to your island in the Maldives. 'And then we found out we were the only people staying on the second island, the first and only people to have ever moved in.' Love Island's Chloe Burrows goes Instagram official with new boyfriend on romantic Maldives holiday At first, they thought it would be great to have what felt like a 'private island' - but they soon changed their minds. She explained: 'On our first night, we decided to go to the buffet restaurant. And on our walk there, there was just so much construction work going on around us. Lots of noise, lots of people. Wasn't great.' When they arrived at the buffet, this had been cancelled due to not enough people being on the island, and they were given a set menu. Four of the restaurants were also not open, and the ones that were had reduced menus. 5 Sophie said the lack of guests also meant that service was over-bearing - although the staff were friendly. She added: 'This is a really weird one, but the staff were too attentive. And I think that's because there wasn't enough people on the island. And they were new to their job on the island. 'I just felt like every time we sat down to eat, we were being watched. Luke was carrying two glasses of water to our table at breakfast. And they stopped him two metres from the table, took them off him and said, 'oh, let me carry those for you.'' She reasoned that some people may like that type of service but they wanted to be 'left alone a bit.' DUBAI PIVOT The couple decided to leave after just four days to fly to Dubai instead - and got refunded for the seven days they didn't stay there. This follows Molly Mae's sister Zoe Rae cutting her honeymoon in Bali short after 48 hours to fly to Dubai instead, as things didn't feel 'quite right.' 5 5 Understandably, when you go on your honeymoon, you want it to be your dream trip and to get your money's worth, and Sophie said this was why they made the switch, Sophie explained: 'When you are expecting a certain thing and you have paid for that, to turn up and not have it, we just felt like it was disappointment after disappointment. 'But it was our honeymoon. And I didn't want that to be our experience of the Maldives. We like Dubai. We've been to Dubai plenty of times before.' SOCIAL REACTION Many people supported her in the comments, with one saying: 'The construction work would tip me over.' Another added: 'Ah this is sad sorry you didn't get the experience you paid for!' However, one pointed out: 'Madam, you need to be grateful for being able to afford an expensive journey to Maldives and shouldn't complain about little negative stuff. 'Do you know that 90% of the world will never be able to go to Maldives.' A second added: 'Leaving Maldives for Dubai is wild.'