Trump says Israel has agreed to Gaza ceasefire as White House cuts supplies to Ukraine
Loading
Qatar and Egypt, the official said, will make it clearer to Hamas that talks during the truce would be aimed at ending the war. The official said Israel is likely to send a delegation to negotiations expected to be held either in Cairo or Doha in the coming week.
Netanyahu recently stated that Israel's key concern is to return the remaining hostages in Gaza, a shift from previous statements that the war's two aims are co-equal – the destruction of Hamas and the return of the captives.
Israel's military chief, Eyal Zamir, said that expanding the assault on Hamas would endanger the remaining hostages and described Hamas as a 'dead organisation', according to Israeli media reports.
Far-right Israeli ministers expressed anger at those statements and are pushing for the defeat of Hamas to remain at the top of the agenda. That complicates Netanyahu's position. Still, if negotiations last through July, when parliament goes into recess until mid-October, it will be much harder for those ministers to bring down the government.
Trump last week said he thought a ceasefire in Gaza could be 'close'. But he didn't provide further details. The war began with Hamas' assault on Israel on October 7, 2023, which killed 1200 people and saw about 250 abducted.
Of those, about 50 hostages are still in Gaza, with roughly 20 thought by Israel to be alive.
Talks have stalled since the last ceasefire ended in March. During that roughly two-month truce, tens of hostages were released.
International pressure to halt the war has grown with aid agencies saying the 2 million residents of Gaza are at risk of famine. More than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israel's military campaign, according to the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza.
Though Hamas has lost most of its key leaders and stockpile of missiles in the war, now almost 21 months old, it remains a threat to Israeli forces. Last month was the deadliest for the Israel Defence Forces in Gaza since the start of the year, with about 20 soldiers dying.
Israel's attacks continue to kill large numbers of people, with at least 74 killed in strikes on Monday, including 30 at a seaside cafe, the Associated Press reported, citing witnesses and health officials in Gaza.
In late May, Israel said it had accepted a US ceasefire proposal for Gaza that included a 60-day pause in the fighting, the restoration of United Nations-led food distribution and Hamas releasing some hostages. A counter-offer from Hamas, which wanted a guarantee that Israeli troops would withdraw, was rejected by Trump's main Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.
It is unclear if the conditions Trump said Israel accepted are the same as those in the earlier truce proposal.
While Trump is one of Netanyahu's closest allies on the world stage, the US president has urged him to end the war and secure the release of the remaining hostages.
On Tuesday, Trump said he would be 'very firm' with Netanyahu in a bid to get a ceasefire.
Ukraine arms halted
As the White House pressed for a Middle East ceasefire, in a separate development, it confirmed it had stopped the transfer of artillery rounds and air defences to Ukraine amid falling US stockpiles, as Ukraine endures stepped-up missile and drone attacks in its war with Russia.
The decision comes as Ukraine struggles to repel large-scale Russian missile and drone strikes.
On Sunday, Ukraine said Russia fired a record 537 missiles and drones in 'massive' overnight attacks. Russia has intensified its attacks in recent weeks as President Vladimir Putin defies US and European calls to accept a ceasefire to allow for peace talks.
Loading
American news website Politico first reported that the US had stopped sending some supplies to Kyiv after a review of US munitions stockpiles amid concerns that the stockpiles had got too low.
Politico reported the move was spearheaded by Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, who has long argued that the US is overextended abroad.
He has joined Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in repeatedly saying that European allies should assume greater responsibility for the continent's security, including the defence of Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
24 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Donald Trump demands the resignation of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell
US President Donald Trump has demanded that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell 'resign immediately'. Mr Trump appointed Mr Powell, who leads America's equivalent of our Reserve Bank, during his first term, but has since soured on him. He's repeatedly expressed frustration at the Federal Reserve for not cutting interest rates. In remarks at a conference in Portugal this week, Mr Powell suggested Mr Trump's own policies had influenced the Fed's decisions. 'I think that's right,' he said when asked whether the President's tariffs were to blame. 'In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the tariffs, and essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs.' Mr Trump continues to insist the tariffs are not inflationary. Having stated yesterday that 'anybody would be better' as Fed Chairman than Mr Powell, now the President has escalated the (mostly one-way) feud further. Posting on social media, Mr Trump shared an article from Bloomberg, which reported on an accusation that Mr Powell lied to Congress during a Senate committee hearing last week. Bill Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finanace Agency, called Mr Powell's testimony about expensive renovations to the Fed's headquarters in Washington D.C. 'deceptive'. 'This is nothing short of malfeasance,' said Mr Pulte, adding that Mr Powell should be fired. 'Too Late, should resign immediately!!!' Mr Trump commented while sharing the story. Earlier in the week, during one of her media briefings, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt read out a note the President had written to Mr Powell. The message was written on a list of the lowest central bank rates around the world. 'Jerome. You are, as usual, Too Late'. You have cost the US a fortune – and continue to do so – you should lower the rate – by a lot!' Mr Trump had scrawled using his usual Sharpie. 'Hundreds of billions of dollars being lost! No inflation.' At the aforementioned conference in Portugal, an annual forum hosted by the European Central Bank, Mr Powell said a US rate cut in July was neither 'on or off the table'. 'July will depend on the data. We will go meeting by meeting,' he stressed, adding that the Fed makes its decisions 'in a completely non-political way'. 'We are carefully watching the labour market ... I have a little more than ten months in office. All I want to deliver is an economy with price stability, maximum employment and financial stability. That is what keeps me awake at night. I want to hand over, to my successor, an economy in good shape. Mr Powell's term ends next year. Clearly, however, Mr Trump wants him gone sooner. Congress ponders Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Meanwhile, tensions are simmering within MrTrump's Republican Party as he lobbies members of Congress to pass his much-hyped, and contentious, 'Big Beautiful Bill'. The massive piece of budget legislation includes multiple elements of Mr Trump's domestic political agenda, including the extension of tax cuts, funding for immigration enforcement, and cuts to Medicaid, the government program that provides health insurance to lower-income Americans. It has already passed through the Senate, and is now being considered by the House of Representatives. Mr Trump's party controls both chambers. Yet the legislation's passage is no sure thing. Multiple Republicans have expressed opposition to it, citing forecasts that it will swell America's already considerable national debt by trillions more dollars. The President, supported by Vice President J.D. Vance, spent a chunk of his day today personally lobbying members of Congress to vote for it. 'He's been working the phones pretty consistently,' an administration official told Politico. 'He is going to get it over the finish line.' The stakes are high, and so are the tensions, as evidenced by some rather bad-tempered remarks from multiple members of Congress. Exhibit A: Republican Congressman Derrick Van Orden, who represents a district in Wisconsin. He took umbrage at the suggestion, from a reporter, that House Republicans were being 'led by the nose' by Mr Trump. 'The President of the United States didn't give us an assignment,' Mr Van Orden said. 'We're not a bunch of little b**ches around here, OK? I'm a member of Congress. I represent almost 800,000 Wisconsinites.' That said, Mr Van Orden's office later issued a statement stressing that 'President Trump is the leader of the GOP', and the Congressman 'looks forward to passing' the bill. Exhibit B: Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a MAGA favourite, who described the efforts to pass the 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a 's***show' and predicted there was 'no way' it would get enough votes. 'It is really a dire situation,' Ms Greene told the podcast War Room, hosted by Mr Trump's former senior White House adviser Steve Bannon. 'We're on a time clock that's been really set on us, so we have a lot of pressure. 'And then also, given the fact that there's 435 members of Congress and it's hard for us to get to an agreement on anything. So this whole thing is – I don't know what to call it. It's a s***show. And I'm sorry for saying that. I know we're not supposed to say that on the air, but that's truly what it is.' Mr Trump wants the bill to be passed before the symbolic date of America's Independence Day, which falls on Friday. He will need almost universal support from the Republican caucus, given the Democratic Party's seemingly unshiftable stance. 'This bill is a deal with the devil,' one of the opposition party's loudest voices, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, said on the floor of the House. 'It explodes our national debt. It militarises our entire economy. And it strips away health care and basic dignity of the American people. For what? To give Elon Musk a tax break. 'We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it. You should be ashamed.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Third-tier alliance partner': Australia's relationship with US in ‘shabby' condition says foreign affairs expert as rift deepens
Australia is taking all the wrong steps to revitalise its strategic relationship with the US according to a leading foreign affairs expert as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese plays down concerns of a deepening rift between the two nations. Foreign Minister Penny Wong met with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday in Washington DC in addition to other Quad partners including India and Japan. Ms Wong conveyed confidence in the strength of Australia's alliance with the United States and said that Mr Rubio had 'expressed his regret' after Mr Albanese's meeting with the US President at the G7 summit abruptly fell through. She also acknowledged the government's 'differences with the Trump administration,' while Mr Albanese dismissed reports of an emerging rift and said he and the President had a 'respectful' relationship. However, the foreign editor of The Australian newspaper Greg Sheridan blasted the Prime Minister for downplaying the severity of the situation and said that Australia's place as a core ally and strategic partner of the United States had all but vanished. 'We've moved from being a first-tier alliance partner to a third-tier Alliance partner,' Mr Sheridan told Sky News host Steve Price. 'So Trump has been elected for eight months, and Albanese hasn't seen him. Albanese was stupid not to go there before the inauguration because everything with Trump is a personal relationship.' Despite stating that the alliance was in the interest of both countries, Mr Sheridan reiterated that the US President's decision to meet with a litany of other global leaders apart from Mr Albanese was calculated and spurred by actions made by the Albanese government. 'You can be sure that the Americans know just what they're doing in the way they're snubbing Albanese. And Albanese has nothing of interest to say to them.' Mr Sheridan said Australia's refusal to increase its lagging defence budget, a decision to seek legal advice on the US strikes against Iran and its move to sanction hardline Israeli ministers among other factors had damaged Australia's reputation in Washington DC. 'We've got an anaemic, hopeless, pitiful defence budget. We got an economy that's going backwards, negative productivity, negative per capita living standards growth.' 'We have got the smallest manufacturing sector in the OECD, the least complex economy and Albanese is a man from the left who channels every bit of politics that Trump hates. So, there's no positive agenda there.' The international relations specialist also said defence spending was a significant point of tension in the feud and stated that Australia should follow in the direction of NATO member states and bolster its defence capacities in line with the expectations of the US. 'It's just a joke. Every European NATO partner has agreed to spend three and a half percent of their GDP on defence. We spend just over two percent. It was two percent when Albanese first came into office, it's still two percent.' 'They tell us we're facing the most dangerous strategic circumstances since World War Two. Now the Americans won't cut us adrift simply because our geography is very useful, but we are contributing nothing to the Alliance. They contribute... Everything to the alliance.' With the US recently launching a review into the landmark AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, Mr Sheridan cast serious doubt over the tenability of the agreement and said there were no concrete assurances for the Americans to follow through on their commitments. 'We're giving them 800 million and are going to give them $5bn Australian, $3bn US over several years and this is designed to get them keeping talking nice to us.' 'That's to allegedly to enhance their industrial capacity so they'll build subs more quickly. But the agreement says not until 2031 does a President have to decide whether he actually sells one to us.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Democrats call payout a ‘bribe in plain sight' as Paramount settles lawsuit while seeking government approval for mega-merger
Paramount Global, the parent company of US broadcaster CBS, has agreed to pay US President Donald Trump $US16 million (over $24 million) to settle a lawsuit over an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris, aired on its flagship program 60 Minutes. The settlement has reignited accusations of political interference, with senior Democrats making wild calls for federal investigators to probe whether the payout amounts to a 'bribe'. Mr Trump sued CBS in October, alleging that the Harris interview had been deceptively edited to favour the Democratic Party ahead of the 2024 presidential election. The network aired two versions of the interview in which Ms Harris appeared to give conflicting responses to a question on the Israel–Hamas war. CBS and several industry groups defended the edit as standard television practice. Paramount said the settlement would be allocated to Mr Trump's future presidential library. 'The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret,' the company said. However, Mr Trump's legal team declared the outcome a success. 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people,' a spokesperson said. The fallout was immediate. Shares in Paramount dropped 1.2 per cent on Wednesday, and the political reaction was swift and severe. Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren raised the alarm over potential corruption. 'With Paramount folding to Donald Trump at the same time the company needs his administration's approval for its billion-dollar merger, this could be bribery in plain sight,' she said. 'Paramount has refused to provide answers to a congressional inquiry, so I'm calling for a full investigation into whether or not any anti-bribery laws were broken.' She also announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at restricting donations to sitting presidents' libraries. Senator Ron Wyden said: 'Paramount just paid Trump a bribe for merger approval. State prosecutors should make the corporate execs who sold out our democracy answer in court, today.' FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, said the lawsuit was 'entirely meritless' and condemned Paramount's decision to settle. 'It casts a long shadow over the integrity of the transaction pending before the FCC and marks a dangerous precedent for the First Amendment,' she said. Senator Bernie Sanders warned: 'Paramount's decision will only embolden Trump to continue attacking, suing and intimidating the media which he has labelled 'the enemy of the people.'' Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks addressed the matter at the company's annual shareholders meeting, explaining the reasons for the settlement. He cited the 'somewhat unpredictable cost' of mounting a legal defence, the potential for 'significant financial as well as reputational damage' and the 'disruption of an ongoing legal battle'. The case entered mediation in April, after Mr Trump increased his damages claim to $20 billion in February. As part of the settlement, 60 Minutes agreed to release transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates once aired, subject to redactions for legal or national security reasons. The lawsuit, filed under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, is part of a broader pattern of legal challenges Mr Trump has launched against the media. In recent months, ABC News settled a separate case by donating $15 million to Mr Trump's presidential library and issuing a public apology over inaccurate on-air statements. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, paid $25 million to settle a lawsuit related to suspending Mr Trump's accounts following the January 6 Capitol riot.
