Britain says EU is removing tariffs on steel under quota
In May, Britain agreed the most significant reset of defence and trade ties with the European Union since Brexit, which included a 'bespoke arrangement' to protect UK steel exports from new EU rules and tariffs.
Britain had said the European Commission would restore its country-specific steel quota to pre-2022 levels, but had not previously specified when this would take effect.
Trade minister Jonathan Reynolds said the removal of tariffs was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' after the government intervened to save jobs at British Steel and struck a deal to avoid the highest US steel tariffs.
'Restoring our steel quota helps give producers the certainty they need to compete, grow, and maintain vital export relationships,' he said.
Britain said it could export up to 27,000 tonnes of steel to the EU each quarter without paying an extra tariff under the arrangement.
Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, said the restoration of the quota was 'excellent news', adding companies had been 'plagued by problems' shipping items like support beams.
Britain is yet to conclude negotiations with the United States after both sides agreed in May to work to eliminate steel tariffs on exports from Britain.
British steel exports to the US face tariffs of 25 per cent, and avoided an increase to 50 per cent thanks to its US agreement, but talks to remove the tariffs have stalled due to discussions over supply chains and where British steel is 'melted and poured'. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
As Trump's tariffs bite, investors should ensure the companies they own have strong fundamentals
[SINGAPORE] It seemed like Groundhog Day again when US President Donald Trump unveiled revised reciprocal tariffs on imports from dozens of countries last Thursday (Jul 31). The adjusted rates came just one day before the previously announced reciprocal tariffs were due to kick in; the new duties will take effect only on Aug 7. To me, it initially appeared that Trump was once again delaying the full implementation of his tariffs while maintaining pressure on America's trading partners to open their markets. Some observers think Trump might be reaching his endgame on the country-specific tariffs, though. This could be good news. The revised tariff rates for many countries are, with a few notable exceptions, below the rates announced on Apr 2. For instance, the reciprocal tariffs on the European Union, Japan and South Korea are now all down to 15 per cent, from 20 per cent, 24 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively. India is down to 25 per cent from 26 per cent. Closer to home, reciprocal tariffs on Cambodia, Indonesia and Malaysia are now all down to 19 per cent, from 49 per cent, 32 per cent, 24 per cent, respectively. The reciprocal tariff on the Philippines is now also 19 per cent, although this is up from the 17 per cent announced on Apr 2. Vietnam is down to 20 per cent, from 46 per cent previously. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The bad news, however, is that these revised tariffs would still add to the squeeze on global trade when they are implemented. By some estimates , the revised tariffs will push the average US tariff rate up to 15.2 per cent – from 13.3 per cent currently, and from only 2.3 per cent back before Trump took office. The economic impact of higher tariffs was blunted in the first half of 2025 by US importers front-loading their orders. Market sentiment has also been buoyed by massive investment in the artificial intelligence field. The remaining months of the year will probably be tougher for investors. Trump's tariffs are likely to create a demand shock in Asia, resulting in slower growth and deflation. On the other hand, the US could suffer a supply shock that results in slower growth as well as higher inflation – leading to politically charged policy dilemmas. Politics and policymaking Last week, Trump ramped up his campaign to oust Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell for refusing to cut rates, insinuating during a visit to the Fed's headquarters that the cost of renovating its buildings was out of control. Trump also fired the commissioner of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) last week, after US job numbers for July came in weaker than expected . The BLS said on Aug 1 that total nonfarm payroll employment increased by only 73,000 last month. Adjustments for the previous two months were also larger than normal. Revised data showed US employers added only 19,000 jobs in May and 14,000 jobs in June, versus the previously reported 144,000 jobs and 147,000 jobs, respectively, for the two months. These political overtones could make it all the more complicated for investors to navigate the markets in the months ahead, as the full impact of Trump's tariffs is felt on growth, inflation and corporate earnings. At its policy meeting on Jul 29-30, the Fed decided to hold the target range for the federal funds rates unchanged, at between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent. Two members of the 12-person rate-setting committee – Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller – preferred a 25-basis-point cut and voted against the decision. This was reportedly the first time since 1993 that two members dissented at a single meeting. A third member, Adriana Kugler, was absent and did not vote. On Aug 1, the Fed said Kugler had submitted her letter of resignation to Trump and would step down on Aug 8. She has served as a governor of the Fed since 2023. Tariff impact in 'early days' Powell said during the post-meeting press conference that the impact of the tariffs on inflation is not only uncertain, but is probably still in its 'early days'. 'What we're seeing now is substantial amounts of tariff revenue being collected, on the order of US$30 billion a month,' he said, adding that most of this is currently being paid by companies that are 'upstream from the consumer'. Powell went on to say that many companies have indicated their intention to eventually push the cost of the tariffs onto their customers. 'But, you know, the truth is they may not be able to in many cases.' The state of the US labour market is also something of a puzzle. While the pace of job creation has been weakening, the unemployment rate in July was little changed from previous months, at 4.2 per cent. 'What that's telling you is that demand for workers is slowing, but so is the supply,' Powell said. He added, 'Because of immigration policy, really, the flow into our labour force is just a great deal slower.' This suggests underlying weakness in the seemingly robust US economy. 'I think you've got downside risks in a world where unemployment is being held down because both demand and supply are declining. And, I think that it's worth paying close attention to it,' Powell said. Less forgiving markets These macro concerns do not appear to be hurting the US corporate earnings for now, though. On Aug 1, financial data provider FactSet said 82 per cent of the S&P 500 companies that have reported their results for Q2 2025 delivered positive earnings-per-share (EPS) surprises. Also, 79 per cent achieved positive revenue surprises. The market is, however, rewarding positive surprises slightly less than it has in the past, and punishing negative surprises more severely. S&P 500 companies that have reported positive earnings surprises for Q2 2025 have seen an average stock price increase of 0.9 per cent over the period spanning two days before their earnings release and two days after. This is below the five-year average of a 1 per cent increase. On the other hand, S&P 500 companies that reported negative earnings surprises for Q2 2025 have seen an average price decrease of 5.6 per cent – versus a five-year average price decline of 2.4 per cent. Among the notable losers last week was Apple, which saw its shares tumble 5.4 per cent despite reporting financial numbers that topped expectations . The S&P 500 ended last week 2.4 per cent lower. The Nasdaq 100 was down 2.2 per cent. The Singapore market was equally unforgiving last week, with the Straits Times Index suffering a 2.5 per decline. Among the notable losers was Seatrium – which ended last week 5.4 per cent lower, despite reporting sharply higher revenue and earnings for H1 2025 and drawing a line under its past involvement in a corruption scandal in Brazil. Singapore Airlines fell 9.9 per cent during the week, after reporting a steep slump in earnings for the quarter to Jun 30 that seemed to catch analysts off-guard and sparked a wave of 'sell' recommendations . Then, there was OCBC – the first of the three local banks to report financial numbers for H1 2025 – which suffered narrower net interest margins as interest rates sank. OCBC ended last week 2.3 per cent lower. DBS and UOB, which are both scheduled to report their H1 2025 numbers on Aug 7, ended last week down 3 per cent and 2.9 per cent, respectively. As Trump's tariffs begin to bite, investors should carefully parse the financial statements of companies in their portfolios to ensure their micro fundamentals are strong enough to weather the tough months ahead.
International Business Times
8 hours ago
- International Business Times
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt Buys LA Mansion Bigger Than the White House for $110M
Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, has hit the headlines by purchasing a mansion bigger than the White House and one of the seven wonders of the world, the Taj Mahal, in California, USA, for the price of $110 million. The sprawling property, located in the Holmby Hills neighborhood, covers 56,500 square feet and sits on nearly five acres of land. The property was originally built by television producer Aaron Spelling in 1990. X The mansion has had several owners one after another after that, with Schmidt as the most recent one. The recent sale has been one of the most expensive real estate deals in the US this year. Drew Fenton, CEO of Beverly Hills-based Carolwood Estates, represented the seller and broke the news on social media. Fenton also stated that this is the priciest market deal, along with one more Bel-Air property, this year. Eric Schmidt, who was Google's CEO from 2001 to 2011 and executive chairman from 2011 to 2015, has an estimated net worth of $25.5 billion. He and his wife plan to rename the estate "594," which refers to its address, Drew Fenton, CEO of Beverly Hills-based Carolwood Estates. The property was earlier known as Drew Fenton, CEO of Beverly Hills-based Carolwood Estates. While the price of the mansion sounds to be too high, the Schmidts have got it on a discounted rate, as it was once listed for $137.5 million after a long time on the market. In 2019 British heiress Petra Ecclestone, daughter of Formula One's Bernie Ecclestone, had purchased it for $120 million. The property has 14 bedrooms and 27 bathrooms, along with luxurious amenities like a two-lane bowling alley, a large wine cellar, a beauty salon with massage and tanning rooms, and a 20-seat screening room with massage and tanning rooms. It also has a 20-seat screening room with a 60-foot screen that retracts into the floor. It also includes a tennis court and a swimming pool built with 170,000 individual glass tiles. Schmidt and his wife plan to use the mansion for non-profit events and social gatherings linked to Los Angeles' cultural and charitable institutions. The couple also plans to renovate the property to make it more energy efficient. The home was constructed at the peak of Aaron Spelling's career when he produced hit TV shows like Charlie's Angels, Beverly Hills 90210, and Charmed. Now, in the hands of a tech billionaire, it differs and moves into another era: a mash-up of its glamorous past and vision for something very modern.
Business Times
13 hours ago
- Business Times
Bank of England rate cuts deliver £11 billion hit to households
[LONDON] Exactly one year since the Bank of England (BOE) started to cut interest rates, the pressure on households from the highest borrowing costs in a generation is still building. Bloomberg analysis of BOE savings and mortgage data shows that Britons in aggregate are an annual £11 billion (S$18.8 billion) worse off than in July last year, despite four interest-rate cuts since then and the prospect of more to come. Those reductions hit savers hard as banks and building societies were quick to respond by lowering rates paid on customer deposits. But homeowners are yet to benefit as many wait for mortgage deals locked in at higher rates to expire. The findings underscore the challenge facing policymakers to ease financial conditions for households and revive Britain's tepid growth rates as they gradually lower rates that stood at 5.25 per cent just a year ago, the highest since the onset of the global credit crunch. Recovery hinges heavily on consumers, who contribute about 60 per cent of the British economy. Yet many still seem more inclined to hoard money than spend it due to fears of more tax hikes in the autumn. A savings index compiled by GfK surged in July to the highest level since 2007. 'The implication is that the impact of rate cuts is going to be very gradual, amplified by the fact that the pace of cuts is also pretty glacial,' said James Smith, developed markets economist at ING. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The UK central bank is widely expected to deliver a fifth quarter-point rate reduction to 4 per cent on Thursday amid signs that the labour market is weakening in response to Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' April tax hikes and global trade tensions. But with inflation at a 17-month high, and hotter than the BOE projected in May, governor Andrew Bailey is likely to re-emphasise the need for caution over the pace of future easing. While the uptick has been driven by energy bills and other one-off factors, policymakers worry that workers may respond by bidding up wages to protect their purchasing power with knock-on effects on prices. Falling rates have cost households almost £5 billion in lost earnings on savings, including tax-free Individual Savings Accounts and time and sight deposits, according to calculations derived from the outstanding stock of cash deposits and effective interest rates over the past year. At the same time, interest costs on mortgages and unsecured debt, such as credit cards, are £6 billion a year higher than 12 months ago. The BOE says that the roll-off onto higher mortgage rates has further to run, with a typical borrower facing an additional £1,300 in annual home-loan payments in the next two years. Around 1 million are currently fixed above prevailing rates, meaning they will have to wait to reap the benefits of cheaper borrowing costs. The effective rate on Britain's £1.7 trillion mortgage stock has risen by almost 0.2 of a percentage point since July 2024, just before the first BOE cut. However, the rate on time deposits has fallen by 0.4 and by 0.2 on sight deposits, reducing returns on a combined £1.8 trillion of savings. Economists and traders expect the BOE to keep to its once-a-quarter easing cycle, putting rates on track to settle at around 3.5 per cent by next spring. That would still leave benchmark borrowing costs well above the sub-1 per cent levels seen in early 2022 before inflation took off into double digits. 'Alongside softer real pay growth and tighter fiscal policy, the lagged impact of past rate hikes on mortgagors will continue to weigh on consumer spending,' said Edward Allenby, UK economist at Oxford Economics. 'The BOE's rate-cutting cycle is unlikely to provide much of a tailwind for business investment and consumer spending over the next couple of years.' BLOOMBERG
