logo
EXCLUSIVE Attack of the megasheds: The homeowner who has lost more than half a million pounds as 1.17million sq ft warehouse for The Range ruins views of rolling farmland

EXCLUSIVE Attack of the megasheds: The homeowner who has lost more than half a million pounds as 1.17million sq ft warehouse for The Range ruins views of rolling farmland

Daily Mail​28-05-2025

A horrified grandfather says £600,000 has been wiped off the value of his home and rental properties after a massive warehouse used by The Range sprung up beside his land.
Ken Lungley enjoyed spectacular views over Suffolk countryside until work began on the 1.17 million sq ft 'megashed'.
Now the sprawling building used by the variety store and garden centre retailer 'blights' the area and has caused the value of his retirement investment to collapse from £1.5 million to just £900,000.
In a further blow, the local council has approved an even bigger warehouse beside the commercial site, which Mr Lungley, 79, fears will further slash what his nest egg is worth.
He is powerless to do anything about it and told the Mail: 'You can't stand in the way of progress - but not in my back garden.
'It was all nature. Now all I can see is the warehouse roof and a big sign that says 'The Range'.'
Divorcee Mr Lungley bought an acre of land with five barns in Creeting St Peter, near Stowmarket, in 1990 for £65,000 and converted four of them.
One became his four-bedroom home and another is now a four-bedroom holiday home which he rents out for £1,500 for three nights or £2,000 for a week.
The third structure houses a 28x14ft swimming pool that can be rented for £40 an hour and there is also a long-term rental property which brings in £1,150 per month.
The businessman, a father-of-two who ran a scaffolding company in London for 50 years, has sunk around £500,000 into the site over the years and intends passing it on to his family one day.
But the idyllic setting was changed forever when approval was given for the warehouse after a local farmer applied for permission.
'I have it valued every now and then because estate agents are always offering free valuations,' said Mr Lungley, who lives in his home with his two dogs.
'It went up and up and up [in value] and three years ago I had it valued and it was worth £1.5 million. Then when this building went up, I had it valued again and it was £1.2 million.
'Now it's gone down again. According to Zoopla it's worth £900,000. If they had built houses on it, it wouldn't be so bad on the eye.
'There are six or seven families in a little group here who complained about it [when the planning request was submitted] but that didn't get anywhere.
'I suppose it's a god send that it's only one warehouse, not ten or 11 little ones which we could have got.
The Range's warehouse is part of Gateway 14 Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mid Suffolk Council, which has permission for 2.36 million square-foot of floor space and is part of Freeport East, a set of low-tax, low-regulation zones given the green light in December 2021.
'But another one is going to go up on the other side of a road that runs through the site and it's even bigger. That's lots of warehouses and I think it's 156 acres.
'It used to be farmland. Certainly it's sad to have lost that view because there were deer and hares and everything over there.
'I could look into legal action about blight but I can't get the money.'
Noise pollution hadn't been an issue, he added, but lights were left on all night at the car park until he spoke to the council and enforcement officers were called in.
The land the warehouse is situated on was sold by a farmer and planning permission for a business park was granted in August 2021.
It is run by Gateway 14 Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mid Suffolk Council has permission for 2.36 million square-foot of floor space and is part of Freeport East, a set of low-tax, low-regulation zones given the green light in December 2021.
The Range secured its plot in June 2022 and planning approval for the warehouse was granted in October that year - despite objectors including Creeting St Peter Parish Council.
Parish councillors cited problems including traffic generation, lack of landscape details, noise problems and uncertainty over whether enough parking spaces are included in the plans.
The Range moved into the 'mega-shed' in November 2023.
In May last year, Mid Suffolk Council granted permission to add to the plot, which is the largest business park in East Anglia.
The council and The Range were contacted for comments.
In April, neighbours living in the 'warehouse capital of Britain' spoke of the nightmare of being forced to live in the shadow of massive buildings that they said is like being next to the 'Berlin Wall'.
Northamptonshire has more storage and distribution centres than anywhere else in the country, with massive developments 'constantly' popping up.
But homeowners in Corby had enough and said their lives have been ruined by the huge warehouses towering over their homes.
They compared it to living next to the 'Berlin Wall' or in a 'prison camp'.
Recruitment firm boss Georgie Wallis, 30, said: 'They have hit us with these legal bills despite a judge admitting the council were in the wrong'
The town is home to dozens of industrial units including Europa's HQ and Nike's logistics campus, which is currently under construction.
One 60ft high 'monster' warehouse - called Rockingham 161 - was even built without locals' knowledge due to a council error.
The site of the former Weetabix plant still lies empty a year after being constructed, but looms over nearby homes in Hooke Close.
Embarrassingly, council workers mistakenly consulted people living on the wrong road to ask for their thoughts on the enormous development.
It was only when residents contacted the council to ask why they hadn't been informed that they found officials had mixed up the street with one half a mile away.
Locals who opposed to the warehouse were recently refused a judicial review and even slapped with a £5,000 legal bill.
This was despite a judge saying the council had 'fallen well below the standard expected' by failing to consult residents properly.
Recruitment firm boss Georgie Wallis, 30, said: 'They have hit us with these legal bills despite a judge admitting the council were in the wrong.
Mr Cruz said: 'We feel like we're living by the Berlin Wall, that's the most accurate way to describe it, and I don't even think the Berlin Wall was as big as this'
'It was because we didn't submit it on time, so on a technicality, really, I'm just exhausted with it all, but we will keep fighting.
'We have got to pay up this money while this giant eyesore lies empty - who knows what life will be like once people are in there with the pollution and traffic.
'I look out of my garden and all I can see is this big, grey and black daunting building which looms over our home.'
Portuguese-born Jose Cruz, 65, and his wife Olga, 60, moved into their two-bedroom semi-detached home in 2011.
He says they live constantly in a shadow and that the building blocks about 80 per cent of the sunlight into his home.
Mr Cruz went on: said: 'Nobody wanted the warehouse here and nobody even consulted us about it, it has been a crazy situation from day one.
'We feel like we're living by the Berlin Wall, that's the most accurate way to describe it, and I don't even think the Berlin Wall was as big as this.
'I have lived in four different countries and I have never known anything like this.
He says they live constantly in a shadow and that the building blocks about 80 per cent of the sunlight into his home
'The UK is not short of space - why erect these warehouses in between people's homes? It's just unbelievable.
'I'm afraid to have an estate agent round as who knows how much money has been wiped off the value of our property.
'It's terrible and we're very angry we weren't consulted about it.
'I just don't understand this country. The people here are the most wonderful but the one per cent making these decisions, I just do not get.'
Council officers mistakenly consulted people living on Hubble Road instead of Hooke Close to ask their opinions about the massive 160,800 sq ft development.
Another resident, who did not want to be named, said it felt like they were now living by 'a prison camp'.
She added: 'It has just been horrifying, we have been left with this monstrous eyesore towering above us.
'They have planted some little trees but that's not going to make a difference. We feel like we're living by a prison camp.
'They are constantly being built in other areas too - the town is becoming a gigantic industrial estate. It's a daily nightmare.'
Near to Magma Park where Europa's HQ and the Nike campus will be built, residents were also critical of the developments.
One local, who did not want to be named, added: 'They are throwing up all these giant warehouses and loads of them just lie empty.
'You hear about redundancies being made instead, so who is going to fill them all?
'They are in the wrong place and I'm not sure they are even needed - it feels like there's more warehouses than residential areas.'
Clare Bottle, chief executive of the UK Warehousing Association, said they were an 'important engine of growth in our supply chains.'
She said: 'As supply chains become longer and face uncertainty due to world events, consumers and businesses alike are increasingly relying on warehouses to store and distribute the goods we need.
'Furthermore, activities which used to take place on the high street and in factories are being shifted into warehouse facilities, along with the processing of returns, recycling and even product repairs, which all underpin the circular economy.'
A spokesperson for North Northamptonshire Council said at the time: 'Following the court's decision to refuse the claimant's application for judicial review on this case, the claimant then appealed the decision, and this appeal was then refused by the court in late March 2024.
'Due to the ongoing legal conversations around costs, it's not possible to comment any further at this stage.'
However, for those thinking this can't get any worse, a real estate expert warned the UK will need around 2,000 football pitches worth of extra warehouse space in order to meet house-building targets and the growth of online retail, the BBC reports.
Will Laing, a research analyst at Newmark Group, said: 'Given the government's target to build 1.5 million homes in the next five years, coupled with the continued shift to online retail, we estimate 150,000,000 sq ft (13,935,456 sq m) of extra warehousing will be needed over the next 10 years.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I thought I knew what Keir Starmer believed – now, it's anyone's guess
I thought I knew what Keir Starmer believed – now, it's anyone's guess

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

I thought I knew what Keir Starmer believed – now, it's anyone's guess

Harriet Harman once described a politician's waking nightmare. As social security secretary in the New Labour government, she was delivering her first speech to the party conference in October 1997. 'All these unfamiliar words started coming up on the autocue. I couldn't go back to my notes, and just had to carry on. I realised that Gordon Brown had made the changes to delete all my references to spending plans.' Something similar happened to Keir Starmer in May, as he read a speech on immigration from the prompter in Downing Street. He told Tom Baldwin, his biographer, in an interview published on Friday, that when the unfamiliar phrase 'an island of strangers' scrolled up on the glass screens, he just read it out. 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as an echo of [Enoch] Powell,' he told Baldwin. 'I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either.' Starmer had arrived back from a three-day trip to Ukraine the night before, and learned that morning that his former home in Kentish Town had been firebombed in the small hours. His sister-in-law was living there and called the fire brigade: no one was hurt, but Starmer was 'really shaken up'. He said, 'It's fair to say I wasn't in the best state to make a big speech,' and that he almost cancelled it. Baldwin wrote: 'Emphasising he is not using the firebomb attack as an excuse and doesn't blame his advisers or anyone else except himself for these mistakes, Starmer says he should have read through the speech properly and 'held it up to the light a bit more'.' Now, a month and a half later, he said: 'That particular phrase – no – it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth: I deeply regret using it.' Both parts of his confession to Baldwin were unwise in the extreme. It was unwise to admit that he doesn't always read his speeches before he delivers them – or that he doesn't always read them 'properly', which is the same thing. The pressures on a prime minister's time are intense, and any prime minister has to rely on speechwriters they can trust to produce most of the words that have to be pumped out. But a politician should never admit that their words are not their own, or blame their speechwriters while insisting that they are not blaming them. Especially not one, such as Starmer, who already has a reputation for being the puppet of Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff, who saw him as the figurehead for his bid to take the Labour Party back from the Corbynites five years ago. But this confession was particularly unwise because it suggests that Starmer's critics were right to detect the echo of Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech in the prime minister's words. The message of the speech was entirely different. Powell complained that the effect of immigration was that the existing population 'found themselves made strangers in their own country'. Starmer's speechwriters, by contrast, were making the point that 'fair rules' hold a country together. 'In a diverse nation like ours – and I celebrate that – these rules become even more important. Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.' The sentiment is worthy and uncontroversial, even if the phrasing is a bit poetic. But the meaning was completely clear in the next paragraph: 'So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse … you're actually contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart.' I don't know who would actually disagree with that – apart from Enoch Powell, who didn't want any immigration at all. Some of Starmer's critics have also seized on his comment – in the foreword to the immigration white paper, so he presumably did hold these words 'up to the light' – that the 'damage done to our country' by the Conservative 'experiment in open borders' is 'incalculable'. But again, it is hard to disagree: the writer of Starmer's foreword is not saying that immigration is damaging, but that quadrupling it when you promised to reduce it is. Even those who think the UK can easily absorb a net immigration of 906,000 in a 12-month period have to accept that the Tory failure to control immigration has, as the foreword's author said, opened a wound in 'trust in politics'. So Starmer should have defended 'his' words to Baldwin. The message was the right message: that there should be fair rules for immigration, and that immigration has been too high. Now we just do not know what the prime minister thinks. Is the real Starmer the liberal lefty human rights lawyer who implied to Baldwin that he thinks that any attempt to control immigration is Powellism? Or is it the man reading McSweeney's words off the autocue, saying, as he did just before he got to the 'island of strangers' paragraph: 'I know, on a day like today, people who like politics will try to make this all about politics, about this or that strategy, targeting these voters, responding to that party. No. I am doing this because it is right, because it is fair, and because it is what I believe in.' What does he believe in? I thought I knew, but now that he has given that self-pitying interview to his biographer, I am not so sure.

Kneecap rapper wears Palestine Action ‘terror group' T-shirt ahead of controversial Glasto set that BBC WON'T show live
Kneecap rapper wears Palestine Action ‘terror group' T-shirt ahead of controversial Glasto set that BBC WON'T show live

The Sun

time15 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Kneecap rapper wears Palestine Action ‘terror group' T-shirt ahead of controversial Glasto set that BBC WON'T show live

CONTROVERSIAL hip hop group Kneecap have shared an image of one of its members wearing a "We Are All Palestine Action" ahead of their Glastonbury set. JJ O Dochartaigh - who often wears a balaclava in public - was seen in the snap wearing the top on X, with the caption reading: "1 hour to go..." 1 They are due to perform at 4pm on the West Holts stage. It comes after the BBC confirmed it will not be broadcasting the Irish trio's performance live following Sir Keir Starmer saying they should be banned from appearing altogether. Festival bosses, meanwhile, have already warned part of the grounds could be locked down during the group's performance this afternoon due to crowd surge concerns. Frontman Liam Og O hAnnaidh was charged under the Terrorism Act after allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist group Hezbollah while saying "up Hamas, up Hezbollah" during a gig in November in Kentish Town, north London. A BBC spokesperson said: 'As the broadcast partner, the BBC is bringing audiences extensive music coverage from Glastonbury, with artists booked by the festival organisers. "Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans ensure that our programming meets our editorial guidelines. "We don't always live stream every act from the main stages and look to make an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on our digital platforms, alongside more than 90 other sets." The band themselves addressed a post on X to "a chairde Gael" - which means "Gaelic friends" in which they said they'd been contacted by the "propaganda wing of the regime". The post added: "They WILL put our set from Glastonbury today on the I-player later this evening for your viewing pleasure. "The crowd expected today is far greater than West Holts capacity so you'll need to be very early to catch us EARLY". A festival statement released today warns: "Kneecap will draw a large audience for their 4pm West Holts show. "If you're not planning to see them, please plan alternative routes around that area. "If you do plan to attend, listen to stewards, and please have some other entertainment options in mind in case the field reaches capacity and we need to close it as part of our crowd planning measures." Earlier this month the rapper - who performs under the stage name Mo Chara - and bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and O Dochartaigh were mobbed by hundreds of fans outside Westminster Magistrates' Court. He was released on unconditional bail - and is due at the same court on August 20 for the next hearing. The group's much-anticipated appearance at Glastonbury has been criticised by PM Sir Keir Starmer and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. Mr Starmer said this week it is "not appropriate" for the group to perform at the festival, which started on Thursday. Asked by The Sun on Sunday if he thinks Kneecap should play, the PM said: 'No I don't. 'I think we need to come down really clearly on this. I won't say too much, because there's a court case on, but I don't think that's appropriate.' Ms Badenoch also said the BBC "should not be showing" the band's set in a post on social media. Her post said: "The BBC should not be showing Kneecap propaganda. "One Kneecap band member is currently on bail, charged under the Terrorism Act. "As a publicly funded platform, the BBC should not be rewarding extremism." The band are not currently listed for live broadcast. Avon and Somerset Police said: "Ticket-holders can once again expect to see uniformed officers on site at Glastonbury Festival 24/7 throughout the festival as part of our extensive policing operation ensuring it is safe for everyone attending, as well as those who live nearby." In response to the charge, Kneecap said in a post: '14,000 babies are about to die of starvation in Gaza, with food sent by the world sitting on the other side of a wall, and once again the British establishment is focused on us... 'Instead of defending innocent people, or the principles of international law they claim to uphold, the powerful in Britain have abetted slaughter and famine in Gaza, just as they did in Ireland for centuries. Then, like now, they claim justification. 'The IDF units they arm and fly spy plane missions for are the real terrorists, the whole world can see it.' Hezbollah - founded in 1982 - is an Iran-backed Shiite militia. The Lebanese terrorist organisation voiced support for the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7 2023 before launching guided rockets and artillery shells at Israeli-occupied positions the following day. Israel has retaliated with strikes on Gaza - and the conflict remains ongoing, with thousands of people, including civilian children, killed. Kneecap has said they "do not, and have never, supported Hamas or Hezbollah", condemned all attacks on civilians, and alleged footage was "deliberately taken out of all context" as part of a "coordinated smear campaign" over their criticism of "the ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people".

Major DIY retailer offering free car air con checks as temperatures set to reach 34C
Major DIY retailer offering free car air con checks as temperatures set to reach 34C

The Sun

time15 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Major DIY retailer offering free car air con checks as temperatures set to reach 34C

A MAJOR DIY retailer is offering motorists free car air con checks as temperatures are set to reach 34C. Halfords customers can get gas and refrigerant levels on their vehicle air conditioning units checked to make sure they're in working order. 1 It comes as temperatures are expected to reach as high as 34C in parts of the UK by Monday. Halfords lets shoppers book their free air con check on its website via You enter your postcode and vehicle registration and it tells you the nearest branch you can get it done. However, you may be charged based on where you live and the type of vehicle. The retailer hasn't said if the free appointments are available all the time, but we checked based on a North-East London location and there were slots until as far away as July 6. Halfords says if the check reveals you need to top up your car air conditioning unit's gas or refrigerant levels, you can buy the products to do this yourself in its stores. However, the RAC says this is usually a job for the specialists. You can also book in for an air con recharge service at Halfords from £65. Checkatrade says having this service done normally costs between £65 and £130, so Halfords is at the cheaper end of the scale. Halfords is not the only place you can have a free air con check carried out though - Kwik Fit also offers a free checking service. Urgent warning over easy nighttime driving mistake that could see you fined £5,000 - but the fix is free You can find out more via However, the cost of getting your air con unit recharged at Kwik Fit is £72.95 or more - more expensive than Halfords. Hot weather car mistakes that can cost you £1,000s Driving in the wrong footwear Swapping trainers for flip flops while driving during bouts of hot weather might seem practical, but it can land you with a big fine. Any shoes which could limit your ability to put pressure on the pedals breaks the Highway Code. If you are found to be ' driving without due care and attention ', you face a £100 fine and three points added to your licence. If the matter escalates to court, you could face fines of up to £5,000. Drinking water while driving If you get distracted and are not considered to be in proper control of your car while drinking water, you could face a fine. If you're involved in an accident as a result of a lapse in concentration, it could see you slapped with a £2,500 bill. The same rules apply to eating behind the wheel, so think again if you're considering diving into an ice cream while driving. Keeping your windows closed and A/C off It might be tempting to save some pennies by closing windows and keeping the AC off during hotter weather. But this can breach Highway Code rule 237, which states that a car must be kept 'well ventilated' in hot weather to reduce drowsiness. Not doing this and being caught could result in a £5,000 fine. How to save money on summer essentials SUNNIER days and warmer weather will leave many of us wanting to kit out gardens and outdoor areas. Sun Savers Editor Lana Clements explains how to get a great deal on summer essentials… It pays to know how to bag big savings on the likes of hot tubs paddling pools, egg chairs and outside bars. Many retailers have flash sales across entire ranges – often this ties into payday at the end of the month or Bank Holiday weekends. Sign up to the mailing lists of your favourite brands and you'll be first to know of special offers. It can be worth following retailers on social media too. Keep a close eye on the specialbuys at Aldi and middle of Lidl drops which drop a couple of times a week and usually mean great value seasonal items such as beach gear and paddling pools. If you are not in a hurry to buy an item, try adding it to the shopping cart and leaving it for a couple of days. Sometimes big brands will try to tempt you into the sale by offering you a discount. Always check if you can get cashback before paying. It's especially worth using sites such as Topcashback, Quidco and app Jamdoughnut when buying bigger ticket items such as garden furniture as you'll get a nice kickback.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store