From Synthesizers to EVs: Teenage Engineering Launches Its First EPA-1 Electric Moped
Teenage Engineering, known for its innovative musical instruments and audio equipment, is venturing into the realm of urban mobility through a new collaboration with fellow Swedish brand,Vässla. Bridging the gap between industrial design and transportation, the partnership introduces the EPA-1 — Teenage Engineering's first-ever electric moped and a striking synthesis of form and function.
Short for En Passar Alla ('One Fits All'), the EPA-1 reflects both brands' shared commitment to modularity, innovation, and user-centered design. With a minimalist profile and a customizable frame, the moped features 11 reinforced mounting points designed to accommodate an array of accessories, including cargo baskets, helmet boxes, and passenger seats, allowing riders to tailor the vehicle to their lifestyle.
Available in Class 1 (2,600W, 45 km/h) and Class 2 (1,000W, 25 km/h) variants, the EPA-1 offers two battery options: a 30Ah unit with up to 60 km of range and a 50Ah version extending to 100+ km. Both batteries utilize LiFePO₄ chemistry for enhanced safety and longevity, and can be charged on or off the bike. Additional features include NFC keyless start, a theft alarm with automatic wheel lock, LED lighting and both USB-A and USB-C ports.
Launching in matte black with more colorways to follow, the EPA-1 is priced from 19,990 SEK (approx. $2,096 USD). For more information, head over to Vässla's officialwebsite.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Nvidia Stock Roars Past $3.9 Trillion as Huang Declares Robotics as the 'Largest Industry Ever'
Nvidia's (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang has always had a knack for spotting the next big thing, and this time, it's humanoid robots. Last month, Nvidia revealed AEON, a full-stack humanoid built with Swedish industrial tech firm Hexagon (HXGBY). This wasn't a concept sketch or hype slide—this was a hardware-software fusion built for real-world deployment. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. At the VivaTech conference in Paris, Huang declared robotics would 'potentially be one of the largest industries ever.' Wall Street is listening. Forecasts show Nvidia's robotics and automotive division could balloon from $1.7 billion in Fiscal 2024 to $7.55 billion by the early 2030s. And if AEON or its successors gain commercial traction, those numbers could be conservative. Nvidia's market cap already sits near $3.9 trillion, and with robotics layered onto AI and datacenter dominance, it may not be done rewriting valuation records. The Tariff Turbulence Has Passed, and Nvidia Is Back on Offense Earlier this year, Nvidia stock wobbled. U.S. restrictions on chip exports to China caused real concerns. But the market has largely digested the implications—and Nvidia hasn't slowed down. The stock is now up 19% year-to-date. Even more impressive, it reclaimed its crown as the world's most valuable company, overtaking tech titans and then some. Additionally, Nvidia's historical trading behavior suggests a third-quarter lull, averaging just 4% gains. But the fourth quarter is where things get explosive—23% average returns, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That's the kind of tailwind bulls like to ride. Could Robotics Be the Catalyst That Puts Nvidia Over the Top? The AI server boom got Nvidia to the top of the mountain. Robotics might be what pushes it beyond the summit. Unlike many megacap tech names that are scraping the ceiling of their growth potential, Nvidia still has multiple addressable markets to conquer. If Huang's robot moonshot pays off, $4 trillion won't be a ceiling, it'll be a milestone on the way to $5 trillion. Nvidia's stock is no longer just about GPUs or AI chips. It's now a narrative about dominance, one that's hurtling toward a historic milestone. As of this week, Nvidia sitsH at a staggering $3.89 trillion market capitalization. That puts it just shy of Microsoft's (MSFT) all-time peak valuation of $3.94 trillion. Is Nvidia a Buy, Sell, or Hold? According to TipRanks, Nvidia carries a resounding 'Strong Buy' rating, backed by 40 Wall Street analysts in the past three months. Of these, 35 call it a 'Buy,' with just four 'Hold' recommendations and one lone 'Sell.' That kind of consensus is rare at this scale. The average 12-month NVDA price target sits at $175.69, representing a 10.3% upside from the current price.
Hamilton Spectator
15 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
EPA says Trump's big bill should help in its fight to take back billions in green bank funds
WASHINGTON (AP) — The sprawling tax and policy bill that passed Congress repeals a multibillion-dollar green bank for financing climate-friendly projects, and the Trump administration should be allowed to freeze its funding and cancel related contracts with nonprofits, federal officials said in a court filing. Climate United Fund and other nonprofits in March sued the Environmental Protection Agency, its administrator Lee Zeldin and Citibank, which held the program's money. The lawsuit argued the defendants had illegally denied the groups access to billions awarded last year through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, commonly referred to as a 'green bank.' The program was created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. But the bill that passed Congress on Thursday would repeal the part of the 2022 law that established the green bank and rescind money that hadn't already been obligated to its recipients. The EPA said the bill should hand them a victory in their court fight that is being heard by a federal appeals court in Washington. Now that Congress has rescinded funding, an earlier federal judge's decision forcing the EPA to release money to the groups should be reversed, the agency said in its Thursday court filing. Climate United Fund disagrees. It acknowledges that the bill in Congress is a 'significant policy setback' but argues that most of the money had been disbursed and is unaffected by the bill. And if the EPA wanted to take the money back, there's a different process the agency would need to follow. 'Our funds have already been obligated and disbursed. Any effort to claim otherwise is simply a lie to justify illegal attempts to claw back funds intended to benefit communities across the country,' CEO Beth Bafford said in a statement. According to the EPA, when the agency terminated the grants the funds 'became unobligated.' 'Grantees have desperately performed legal gymnastics to hold tens of billions of taxpayer dollars hostage. In the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, Congress made their intent crystal clear in repealing the program entirely and returning those billions in unobligated funds to the U.S. Treasury,' EPA spokesperson Brigit Hirsch said in a statement. The green bank's goals run counter to the Trump administration's opposition to policies that address climate change and its embrace of fossil fuels . Zeldin quickly made the bank a target, characterizing the $20 billion in grants as a scheme marred by conflicts of interest and potential fraud. In February, Zeldin told Fox News that he suspected the green bank 'was a clear cut case of waste and abuse' that 'in my opinion, is criminal.' The following month, Zeldin terminated the grants. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has previously said that when the federal government was asked for evidence of fraud, the agency didn't provide it and shifted its position. Chutkan decided the government can't terminate the contracts and that the groups should have access to some of their frozen money. That order was put on hold during the EPA's appeal. The agency argues the nonprofits are making constitutional and statutory arguments that don't apply in what it sees as a simple contract fight. If the government successfully argues the case is a contract dispute, then the EPA says it should be heard by a different court that can only award a lump sum – not force the government to keep the grants in place. Federal officials argue there is no law or provision in the Constitution that compels the EPA to make these grants to these groups. In its court filing, the EPA also pointed to comments by Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, chair of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, as supportive of the agency's position. Capito said previously the bill intended to rescind billions in funding that had been frozen. 'This action reflects not only Congress's deep concern with reducing the deficit, but EPA's administration of the (green bank) under the Biden administration, the agency's selection of grant recipients, and the absence of meaningful program oversight,' the agency quotes the senator as saying. ___ The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit
Chicago Tribune
16 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
EPA says President Donald Trump's big bill should help in its fight to take back billions in green bank funds
WASHINGTON — The sprawling tax and policy bill that passed Congress repeals a multibillion-dollar green bank for financing climate-friendly projects, and the Trump administration should be allowed to freeze its funding and cancel related contracts with nonprofits, federal officials said in a court filing. Climate United Fund and other nonprofits in March sued the Environmental Protection Agency, its administrator Lee Zeldin and Citibank, which held the program's money. The lawsuit argued the defendants had illegally denied the groups access to billions awarded last year through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, commonly referred to as a 'green bank.' The program was created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. But the bill that passed Congress on Thursday would repeal the part of the 2022 law that established the green bank and rescind money that hadn't already been obligated to its recipients. The EPA said the bill should hand them a victory in their court fight that is being heard by a federal appeals court in Washington. Now that Congress has rescinded funding, an earlier federal judge's decision forcing the EPA to release money to the groups should be reversed, the agency said in its Thursday court filing. Climate United Fund disagrees. It acknowledges that the bill in Congress is a 'significant policy setback' but argues that most of the money had been disbursed and is unaffected by the bill. And if the EPA wanted to take the money back, there's a different process the agency would need to follow. 'Our funds have already been obligated and disbursed. Any effort to claim otherwise is simply a lie to justify illegal attempts to claw back funds intended to benefit communities across the country,' CEO Beth Bafford said in a statement. According to the EPA, when the agency terminated the grants the funds 'became unobligated.' 'Grantees have desperately performed legal gymnastics to hold tens of billions of taxpayer dollars hostage. In the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, Congress made their intent crystal clear in repealing the program entirely and returning those billions in unobligated funds to the U.S. Treasury,' EPA spokesperson Brigit Hirsch said in a statement. The green bank's goals run counter to the Trump administration's opposition to policies that address climate change and its embrace of fossil fuels. Zeldin quickly made the bank a target, characterizing the $20 billion in grants as a scheme marred by conflicts of interest and potential fraud. In February, Zeldin told Fox News that he suspected the green bank 'was a clear cut case of waste and abuse' that 'in my opinion, is criminal.' The following month, Zeldin terminated the grants. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has previously said that when the federal government was asked for evidence of fraud, the agency didn't provide it and shifted its position. Chutkan decided the government can't terminate the contracts and that the groups should have access to some of their frozen money. That order was put on hold during the EPA's appeal. The agency argues the nonprofits are making constitutional and statutory arguments that don't apply in what it sees as a simple contract fight. If the government successfully argues the case is a contract dispute, then the EPA says it should be heard by a different court that can only award a lump sum – not force the government to keep the grants in place. Federal officials argue there is no law or provision in the Constitution that compels the EPA to make these grants to these groups. In its court filing, the EPA also pointed to comments by Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, chair of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, as supportive of the agency's position. Capito said previously the bill intended to rescind billions in funding that had been frozen. 'This action reflects not only Congress's deep concern with reducing the deficit, but EPA's administration of the (green bank) under the Biden administration, the agency's selection of grant recipients, and the absence of meaningful program oversight,' the agency quotes the senator as saying.
