Poilievre has to contend with Alberta separatists as he vies for a Commons seat
Poilievre, a Calgarian by birth who has lived away from Alberta for more than two decades, is running in the Aug. 18 byelection in Battle River-Crowfoot, a sprawling riding in the province's east where the oil and gas industry is a major employer. It includes the small town of Hardisty, which sits at the nexus of the North American oil pipeline system and is home to a huge petroleum tank farm.
The riding is easily one of the most Conservative in the country. In the last general election, nearly 83 per cent of voters there cast a ballot for Damien Kurek, who stepped aside to give Poilievre a chance to get back into Parliament after he lost his own Ontario seat to a Liberal. Only one other federal riding, Souris-Moose Mountain in Saskatchewan, delivered a higher share of the vote to a Conservative candidate.
Months after former prime minister Justin Trudeau resigned, homes and trucks still display "F--k Trudeau" signs, flags and decals — a testament to just how unpopular the last Liberal leader's environmental policies and COVID measures were among some in this riding.
While Poilievre faces only token partisan opposition in this byelection, there's another challenge: How he contends with an increasingly vocal separatist movement in the Conservative heartland.
Jeffrey Rath is a leader of the Alberta Prosperity Project. The group is trying to build support for an independent Alberta, which the province's premier says is at an all-time high. A recent poll found support at about 30 per cent.
In an interview with CBC News, Rath said the byelection outcome is not in doubt.
"People can't stomach voting for anyone else," he said.
Still, Rath said, independence-minded voters are looking for substantive answers from Poilievre on the issues they care about most, namely how Alberta can be better treated in a federation some feel isn't working for them anymore.
He predicts Poilievre will sidestep controversial issues and a close association with separatist voices so he can go back to Ottawa and vie for national power without any Alberta baggage.
"Poilievre ran in the last election against the end of equalization. The dairy cartel-mafia has gotten to him — he says he's not going to touch supply management," Rath said.
"He's pandering to Ontario and Quebec and I can tell you, a lot of Albertans, we're sick of it."
Rath, a First Nations rights lawyer who has floated the idea of Alberta joining the U.S., also objects to what he perceives as Poilievre's hostility toward President Donald Trump.
He said Poilievre should be looking to build bridges with Trump given the importance of the Canada-U.S. trading relationship.
"He's sycophantically following the Liberals, trying to beat them at their own game," Rath said. "People in Alberta aren't overly impressed with Pierre right now."
Rath wants a more aggressive stance on equalization in particular — long vilified in Alberta as sucking money out of the rich West.
The federal program is designed to ensure all parts of the country have roughly the same level of public services by transferring money to places determined to be "have-not" provinces.
Funded from the federal government's general revenues (such as federal income tax), provinces do not contribute to the program. Poilievre has promised not to make any "big changes" to the regime, if he forms a government.
"These places need to operate within their own means to stop bleeding Alberta dry. Those days are over," Rath said. "If you can't say you're going to fight against equalization then you don't belong in Alberta.
"Get the hell out. We don't want you anymore."
Rath also wants Poilievre to back Senate reform, saying it's unconscionable that Alberta, with some five million people, only has six seats in the Red Chamber while P.E.I. and its roughly 180,000 people are represented by four senators. This constitutional arrangement has been in place for more than a century to give smaller provinces a voice in Parliament.
"He could demonstrate that he's more than a one-trick pony stupidly repeating 'axe the tax,'" Rath said. "But, really, what Poilievre represents is a continuation of the status quo that all of us are fed up with."
Still, Poilievre has his supporters in the riding.
Drumheller Mayor Heather Colberg was by Poilievre's side as he took part in the town's Canada Day parade on Tuesday.
The town of about 8,000 people, situated roughly an hour and a half northeast of Calgary, is one of the riding's largest population centres. It's known as the "dinosaur capital of the world," because of its rich fossil deposits and the Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology.
Colberg said Poilievre isn't phoning it in — he's showing up to meet voters and hear their concerns, which she said are focused on fairness for Alberta.
In addition to Drumheller, Poilievre was also in Hanna, wearing a red and white "True North, strong and free" T-shirt for the nation's birthday, according to social media posts.
Even before the byelection was called, Poilievre was stumping for votes in Camrose, Hay Lakes, Hardisty and Wainwright, among other places.
"Mr. Poilievre seems very honest and genuine," Colberg said.
"And if Damien believes this is the right decision for our area, I trust Damien's choice," she said, referring to the outgoing MP.
Kurek said he wasn't available to speak but told CBC News in a message the "good people of Battle River-Crowfoot love Pierre Poilievre."
Poilievre's Alberta ties are what sold Colberg on his potential as an MP for the riding.
"If somebody came from the far east and never been part of Alberta, then that would be a bit different. He does have some roots," she said. "He understands rural Alberta. We are one of the bluest constituencies in Canada but he's not taking that lightly and that's huge."
With so many local jobs tied to the energy sector, Colberg said she wants Poilievre to fight for the oil and gas industry.
She also expects Poilievre to help tell Alberta's story to the rest of the country to try and tamp down regional resentment, saying she's a proud Canadian who just wants Confederation to work better for her province.
"We gotta remember how blessed we are with all of these resources. We have the ability to use them to help us all, not just in Alberta," she said.
"I love Canada and I don't want to see it split. But at the same time there has to be somebody at the top who understands Alberta."
Poilievre says he's that somebody — telling reporters recently he's against Alberta separation but understands Albertans have "a lot of legitimate grievances."
The last Liberal government's decision to kill one major pipeline, Northern Gateway, and tie up another, Energy East, in red tape before its eventual cancellation, plus the federal emissions cap and the industrial carbon price are the root causes of the Alberta independence movement, Poilievre said.
"Frankly, Albertans have the right to be frustrated," he said. "They deserve to be honoured for the immense contributions they make to this country. I will be a unifier."
A spokesperson for Poilievre did not respond to a request for a comment for this story.
WATCH | Poilievre says Albertans 'have a right to be frustrated':
Michael Solberg, a past political staffer and campaigner for conservative parties in Alberta and elsewhere, said the separatist movement won't be much of a factor in Poilievre's race.
Pointing to the recent provincial byelection in rural Olds-Didsbury-Three Hills where the separatist candidate got 18 per cent of the vote and placed third behind the NDP, Solberg said the independence movement is "far more bark than bite."
Plus, with dozens or potentially hundreds of candidates expected on the byelection ballot as part of an electoral reform protest, anti-Poilievre choices could split the vote and dilute the power of separatists, he said.
"I've seen no evidence that indicates western or Alberta separation will be a hurdle for the Conservative movement here," he said.
But Poilievre will be forced to address the core issue of the separatists, Solberg said, which is "ensuring Alberta gets a fair shake from Ottawa."
And that's something Poilievre can do, he said, pointing to the leader's past ties to the Reform Party, which had "the West wants in" as its mantra in the 1990s.
"Pierre is certainly no stranger to speaking to the issues that folks care about in a riding that's the beating heart of Conservatism," Solberg said.
"I think this is a cakewalk scenario for him. He's going to win in a landslide."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Canada's civil service needs more 'plumbers' and fewer 'poets'
Donald J. Savoie has spent decades studying the inner workings of Canada's federal bureaucracy. He's watched Ottawa grow more centralized and more crowded with what he calls 'poets,' policy thinkers and advisers, while the 'plumbers,' the front-line workers delivering services to Canadians, have not been prioritized. In an interview with National Post about the concept, as discussed in his recent book Speaking Truth to Canadians About Their Public Service, Savoie explains why that imbalance matters. Savoie is Canada Research Chair in Public Administration and Governance at Université de Moncton. Please briefly define what you mean by 'plumbers and poets' when it comes to the civil service. Thank you for the question, that's a good one. A lot of times I've been interviewed about the book, and not many have caught on to the poets and the plumbers, and I think it's key. Poets are people mostly in Ottawa, that are part of the government who work on policy issues, who work on liaison, on coordination or dealing with media or dealing with ministers so they define policy. Plumbers are the ones delivering services to Canadians. Plumbers are the ones you applied to for a passport, plumbers are the ones you applied to for old age pension or whatever program that you want to access; they're the ones that deliver programs and services to Canadians. So the differences between poets to plumbers is fairly pronounced. How much has the federal civil service grown in the last decade or so? It's grown by leaps and bounds over the past 10 years. In 2014 it was 340,000, in 2025 we're up to 445,000, so you can see the difference there. It's over 100,000 more. How has that growth affected the ratio of plumbers to poets, and what's the correct ratio? The growth has clearly favoured the poets. And the reason I say that is just the sheer numbers of public servants in Ottawa — the number has grown. And it has not grown anywhere near the same amount in local and regional offices. What's the right number? What's the right percentage? Frankly, it's difficult to answer that. I would remind you that 40 years ago about 25 per cent of federal public servants were in Ottawa, and 75 per cent out in the regions, and that sounded like a proper number. So my view is that we should strive towards that. I can tell you that in France, England, and the United States, the number of public servants in the national capital, whether in London, or Washington, or Paris, is nowhere near the percentage we have in Canada. Is there any government, in Canada or elsewhere, getting this right? In the U.K. for example, I'm taking a stab here, but like 75 per cent of public servants are outside of London, and the government over the past several years has made a deliberate attempt to move more and more public servants outside of London. No country in the western world has concentrated as many employees in the national capital region as has Canada. You are an academic, which is to some extent the domain of poets and not plumbers, should we be surprised by your position? Don't we still need people thinking big thoughts in a country of our size? There's no shortage of people in Ottawa trying to think big thoughts. I think if there's a problem it's at the service delivery. It's people trying to call Revenue Canada to get answers about income tax, and it's having issues with supplying passports. So, big thoughts, there's thousands of them in Ottawa paid to have big thoughts. I don't think there's a lack of big thoughts, there's a lack of people delivering services to Canadians. You don't need an army of people to come up with big thoughts. Do you think there are any lessons in your theory for the private sector? I think the private sector has no choice (but) to get it right, has no choice to strike a proper balance, because if a large private-sector firm doesn't strike a proper balance, the market will tell it to strike the proper balance. The competition will tell it to strike the proper balance. There is a natural equilibrium in the private sector that happens just because there's competition, there's market forces, there's all kinds of forces that dictate how important it is to run an efficient operation; those forces are not present in the public sector. The Carney government has announced 15 per cent budget cuts across the board. Does this address your issue? What I can say is that I wish them well. I think a better solution would be, we have nearly 300 federal organizations, we have 100 federal government programs, I think a better solution would be for the federal government to take a strong look at all its organizations and all its programs and see which ones have long passed their best-by date. See which programs no longer resonate like they did when they were first established. I think there's a lot of pruning of organizations and programs that could take place. The 15 per cent cuts sends a message that every program, every organization holds the same priority, just squeeze 15 per cent. I would've thought a better solution was to see that we have programs that don't fit our agenda. We have organizations that don't serve the purpose that they were initially set up for so why don't we look at that once we've cleaned that up then maybe we can look at the 15 per cent. Are there any obvious markers as to a civil service job's usefulness? There are some, not many, I'll give you an example. If you hire an auditor at Revenue Canada, every auditor you hire can generate X amount of revenue. So you hire an auditor and you can expect a return. But for most cases, at least for poets, how do you assess the performance of a poet? That's in the eye of the beholder. The poet can have 101 reasons why things don't work. Fault the politicians, it's the media, not enough resources, there's all kinds of reasons you can grab. You can find markers that work on the delivery side, you don't find markers that work on the poet side. This is the latest in a National Post series on How Canada Wins. Public sector union warns Carney against reducing government staff to cut spending Tens of thousands of federal public service jobs should be eliminated, think tank says Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Drivers vs. Cyclists: A Battle For the Streets in Canada's Largest City
After years of close calls with unruly drivers, streets with no bike lanes and tending to friends injured in collisions, Melanie Ng was optimistic that cycling in Toronto was getting easier. Toronto's bike lanes had undergone a significant growth spurt since the pandemic, carving out safer spaces for cyclists. 'The city was finally making strides,' Ms. Ng, a doctoral student in history, said after cycling onto the leafy downtown campus of the University of Toronto. Then came the backlash. Some of the most popular bike lanes were making Toronto's notorious traffic worse, according to the provincial government. So Doug Ford, Ontario's premier, passed a law to rip out 14 miles of the lanes from three major streets that serve the core of the city. Toronto's mayor, Olivia Chow, arrived for her first day in office two years ago riding a bike. She was not pleased with the law, arguing that the city had sole discretion to decide street rules. Ms. Chow did not respond to a request to comment. But in public remarks, she has since softened her tone, suggesting it was possible to have a 'win-win solution' by relocating some bike lanes or keeping them in place while adding more driving lanes. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tenants of Quebec public lands call proposed rent increases 'unacceptable and indefensible'
A group representing tenants of public lands in Quebec is speaking out against the province's plan to increase the rent for many of its members, describing the proposal as "unacceptable and indefensible." The province rents out public land, mostly in wooded areas and near bodies of water, to Quebecers who can use them as camp sites, hunting camps or to build cottages. Under the Natural Resources and Forestry Ministry's proposal, people with vacation lots would see their minimum rent go up by 46 per cent, meaning it would go from $343 to $500. For those with rough shelters, the hike would be 52 per cent, going from $198 to $300 per year. The new prices, outlined in Quebec's Official Gazette, would take effect next January. The Regroupement des locataires des terres publiques du Québec said the increase would affect about 26,000 members in total. "We understand that it has to increase, but why so much?" said Bertrand Grenier, an administrator of the association who has rented his own public land lot near Chibougamau since 1981. The Ministry said in a statement to Radio-Canada that the rents hadn't been revised in 15 years, and that "it's only fair to update the rates to better reflect the fair value of the land." But Grenier says that the rates have been increasing steadily for years, with his own lot going from 263$ a year in 2010 to 577$ in 2024. His own rent would be raised by less than 46 or 52 per cent because he pays more than the minimum fee, but he is speaking out on behalf of those affected by the steep increases, he said. He added that the association have known of the proposed increases since the winter, and had been in negotiations with the Ministry. "The rent of the land is one thing, but we pay municipal taxes," he said. "And we also, believe it or not, we also pay school taxes." He added that the high demand for the land allows the government to increase prices to their liking. In 2021, over 28,000 people signed up to access the 189 lots made available that year, according to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. The province uses a lottery system to give out these lands. Grenier says the association hopes to put enough pressure on the government to accept their proposal to spread the increases over five years. In a statement, the ministry wrote that "draft regulations are currently under consultation, and we are listening to all stakeholders."