Top MoD civil servant to quit amid Afghan data leak fallout
David Williams has told staff at the department that he will quit in autumn, with the search for his successor now under way, The Times has learnt.
There has been growing pressure on the MoD over its handling of the data leak and the subsequent super-injunction that kept it secret for years. The damaging and potentially deadly military blunder, and the government's efforts to suppress it, only emerged after reporting restrictions were lifted last month.
People arrive at RAF Brize Norton after being evacuated from Afghanistan in 2021
CPL WILL DRUMMEE RAF/MOD/CROWN COPYRIGHT/PA
UK government officials were left exposed when in February 2022 a soldier inadvertently sent a list of tens of thousands of names to Afghans as he tried to help verify applications for sanctuary in Britain.
More than 100 British special forces troops, MI6 spies and military officers were named in the data leak along with the whereabouts of Afghans seeking sanctuary in the UK.
Some MPs have demanded accountability in the form of sackings, but John Healey, the defence secretary, refused to say last month whether anybody had lost their job.
A Whitehall source said the row had led to 'tensions' between Williams and Healey.
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the current head of the armed forces, John Healey and Williams
An MoD spokesman said: 'Permanent secretary David Williams will step down this autumn and the recruitment process for his successor is under way.
'Since 2021, David has led the department through a period of significant activity, and we thank him for his contribution.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands
The Government has said it is pushing forward with plans to look at removing 'discriminatory' age bands for the national minimum wage as it extended the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC). It said the advisory body will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, and the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers 21 years and older. The LPC will also be required to put forward 'recommendations on achieving a single adult rate in the years ahead'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'To ensure the right balance is struck between the needs of workers, business affordability and the wider economy, the LPC is being asked to consult on several issues before recommending the new rates.' Last year, Labour committed to removing these age bands to create a 'genuine' national living wage, as part of efforts to bolster employment rights. Currently, the national living wage for workers aged 21 and older is £12.21. Meanwhile, the minimum wage for workers aged between 18 and 20 is £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The Government said the change to the LPC remit will also ensure it actively considers the cost of living in its recommendations for changes to the minimum wage which are next applied from April 2026. The LPC, which was founded in 1997, provides recommendations to the Government each October regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Low pay drags down living standards for our workers and in turn hurts our high streets and local businesses. 'This Government's plan for change will put money back in people's pockets, with this new remit marking the next step in considering how we ensure a fair deal for our lowest-paid workers while maintaining a competitive economy that boosts businesses and their employees alike.' Baroness Philippa Stroud, chairwoman of the LPC, said: 'We are pleased to receive our remit from the Government. 'Already, since the beginning of the year, we have spent significant time speaking with workers and employers to understand the pressures in the economy and the effects of the most recent increases in the minimum wage. 'We have held a successful call for evidence and received detailed submissions from all sides.'
Times
42 minutes ago
- Times
Parents beat Labour's VAT on fees raid by paying £500m up front
Parents of children at Britain's leading private schools may have avoided Labour's tax raid by offering up fees in advance. Hundreds of millions of pounds in fees were paid upfront last year to avoid the 20 per cent VAT, which came into effect on January 1, analysis by the Daily Telegraph shows. Britain's top 50 independent schools received £515 million in advance fees last year, up from £121 million in 2023, according to research of the latest annual accounts at Companies House and the Charity Commission. • More than fifty UK private schools shut since Labour put VAT on fees By handing over school fees before Labour's deadline, wealthy parents may have avoided up to £103 million in VAT, with that sum expected to be even higher when taking into account all of the UK's 2,600 private schools. Parents at some schools tried paying up to five years' fees before the January deadline to dodge Labour's tax, the analysis shows. The large scale of advance payments could impact Labour's plan to raise revenue, tax experts have warned. However, the Treasury says that the Office for Budget Responsibility considered the use of prepayment schemes when making its forecasts for how much money would be raised by the VAT raid. Fees gathered from prepayment schemes, which are used to pay for one or more years of a pupil's education in advance, have risen across the UK's most expensive schools, including Brighton College, which recorded £50.1 million in total prepaid fees last year — an increase of £4.1 million from 2023. Only 86 of its pupils were covered by the school's prepayment scheme last year. That figure jumped to 819 last year as parents scrambled to beat the VAT deadline. Eton College collected £52.7 million in advance fee payments last year, up £16.6 million from 2023. At Winchester College, fees collected in advance rose from £4.4 million in 2023 to £19 million in 2024. Labour maintains that its tax raid is aimed at targeting Britain's wealthiest families and will raise more than £1.8 billion a year for state schools in ten years. However, with wealthy parents forking out large sums to Britain's most prestigious schools, it is the smaller private schools that are likely to be affected the most. The government predicts that 100 schools could shut over the next three years, with more than 50 independent schools already announcing their closures as a result of the policy, the Telegraph reports.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies. The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press. In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
