What's happening between Pakistan and US? Days after Asim Munir's visit, Pakistan air force chief visits US for…
Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu's US visit marks a significant step in bolstering Pakistan-US defence cooperation, following a similar tour by the army chief.
By Nivedita Dash Edited by Nivedita Dash
Advertisement
What's happening between Pakistan and US? Days after Asim Munir's visit, Pakistan air force chief visits US for...
Days after Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir paid an official visit to United States, Pakistan Air Force chief Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu also visited the US. Interestingly he came to US after a 10-year hiatus, as military ties between the two countries are seen to be improving in recent weeks following Operation Sindoor. This was the first visit by a serving Pakistan air force (PAF) chief in over a decade
Pakistan's chief of air staff Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu paid an official visit to the US to further enhance bilateral defence cooperation after army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir recently undertook a similar tour.
Advertisement ===
What was the purpose of the visit?
A PAF statement said on Wednesday: 'This high-level visit is a strategic milestone in the Pak-US defence partnership. The visit will play a significant role in addressing key regional and global security issues as well as building institutional ties.' It further said Sidhu held several important meetings with the top military and political leadership of the country during the visit to the US.
Advertisement ===
At the Pentagon, he met US secretary of the air force for international affairs Kelly L Seybolt and air force chief of staff General David W Elon, where the two sides agreed to forge new avenues for bilateral military cooperation, mutual affairs, joint training and technology exchange. The PAF chief highlighted the historical and multi-faceted relations between Pakistan and the US, particularly in the defence sector.
Who all did Sidhu meet?
During his visit to the US state department, Sidhu met Brown L Stanley of the bureau of political and military affairs and Eric Meyer of the bureau of South and Central Asian affairs. The meetings highlighted Pakistan's constructive role in promoting regional stability, the statement said. During his visit to Capitol Hill, Sidhu held meetings with members of the US Congress, including Mike Turner, Rich McCormick, and Bill Heizenga. The visit comes weeks after President Donald Trump hosted Munir for lunch, followed by a detailed meeting between the two.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM Modi highlights govt's focus on generating jobs
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday emphasised his government's focus on generating employment in the public and private sectors, asserting that the country has progressed in every field in the past 11 years. In a virtual address after the distribution of over 51,000 appointment letters, he said his government's welfare schemes, be it building over 4 crore houses for the poor, distributing over 10 crore new LPG connections or the rooftop solar programme, have created lakhs of new employment opportunities. Noting that over 25 crore people were lifted out of poverty in the past 10 years, the prime minister said it would not have happened but for the employment and sources of income generated for them. These poor people used to have a difficult living and feared death but became so strong that they defeated poverty, he added. Modi said his government's focus on boosting manufacturing has paid off, saying electronic manufacturing has risen over five times in 11 years and mobile manufacturing units number nearly 300 from two to four earlier. Defence manufacturing is being discussed proudly after Operation Sindoor, he said in an apparent reference to India's indigenous military capability shown during the conflict with Pakistan.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
'Asim Munir has no such plans': Shehbaz Sharif denies military coup build-up in Pakistan
PM Shehbaz Sharif claimed Field Marshal Asim Munir has never expressed any desire to become the president, dismissing rumours of a potential change in the country's leadership read more Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, along with Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) of Pakistan Asim Munir, reviews the parade at the passing out ceremony of 151st Long Course at the Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) Kakul, Abbottabad, Pakistan, April 26, 2025. Press Information Department of Pakistan via Reuters Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has responded to rumours about a possible change in leadership, rejecting claims that President Asif Ali Zardari might step down or that Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir is aiming to take over the presidency. He spoke about this on Saturday (July 12) while discussing the recent four-day clash between India and Pakistan, during which he said 55 Pakistani citizens lost their lives. 'Field Marshal Asim Munir has never expressed any desire to become the president, nor is there any such plan in the offing," he said in an interview with The News. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi also criticised what he called a 'malicious campaign' targeting Pakistan's civilian and military leaders. In a post on X, Naqvi suggested that foreign groups were behind the dissemination of these rumours and said the government knows who is responsible for pushing this narrative. Asim Munir, who became army chief in 2022, had his original three-year term extended by two years. However, he later promoted himself to the rank of field marshal after the conflict with Pakistan, signalling his intent to strengthen his grip on power. On a potential nuclear exchange with India Sharif also rejected suggestions that the recent conflict with India could lead to a nuclear exchange. He said Pakistan's nuclear weapons are meant only for peaceful purposes and self-defence, ' not for aggression'. When asked about the use of nuclear weapons, Sharif stressed, 'Pakistan's nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes and national defence, not for aggression.' The conflict began after a terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, which killed 26 civilians. In response, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. On May 7, Indian forces carried out strikes on nine terror sites, including Bahawalpur, known as a stronghold of the Jaish-e-Mohammad terror group. These strikes were part of the retaliation for the Pahalgam attack.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump backs crypto, Pakistan embraces it. How long must India wait?
A couple of weeks before the Pahalgam attack, something strange happened in Islamabad. Changpeng Zhao, the Chinese-born Canadian businessman and founder of Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, agreed to be an advisor to the Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) in early April. PCC, freshly minted in March, was cobbled together to create a framework for crypto in a country that had until then been notoriously suspicious of digital currencies. At the time, many wondered what Pakistan's motivation was in welcoming crypto, which officials maintained was a tool to attract foreign investment. In the subsequent months and during Operation Sindoor, it became clear that the move had a strategic angle as well. Pakistan, having signed up with World Liberty Financial (WLF), a crypto company linked to US President Donald Trump's family, was also using crypto to gain currency with the White House. That, along with carrots like a Nobel peace prize nomination for Trump , may have influenced the US's tepid pushback on Pakistan during the conflict. On July 9, Pakistan went all in with President Asif Ali Zardari signing an ordinance establishing the Pakistan Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (PVARA), 'an autonomous federal body empowered to license, regulate and supervise entities dealing in virtual assets (VA)'. That is quite a move for a struggling economy desperate for bailouts from the International Monetary Front (IMF), but the reality is that Pakistan is not alone in embracing crypto. The US is racing to legitimise stablecoins—a type of cryptocurrency pegged to stable assets. Almost 98% of stablecoins are tied to the dollar. India 's neighbour Bhutan has quietly built bitcoin reserves worth $1.3 billion or roughly 40% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP), according to the Wall Street Journal . Countries like Russia, Iran and North Korea have been using it to conduct business, beyond the reach of the international sanctions regime. For countries with a clear agenda—from attracting investment, to sidestepping sanctions, or even currying favour with the world's elite—crypto is becoming a legit play. That has meant that from US to UAE, Singapore to Bhutan, countries have made crypto a part of their foreign and economic policy playbook. The big question: where is India in all of this? A CONSERVATIVE PLAY 'Why does the Centre not come out with a clearcut policy on regulating cryptocurrency?' The Supreme Court's pointed question to Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati during a May 19 hearing encapsulates India's prolonged struggle with digital assets. The bench, hearing a bail plea in an illegal bitcoin trade case, stated: 'There is a parallel under-market for it and it can affect the economy. By regulating the cryptocurrency, you can keep an eye on the trade.' This wasn't the first judicial nudge. In February 2022, the apex court had similarly pressed the central government to clarify whether cryptocurrency trading was legal in India. The repeated queries highlight a regulatory vacuum that continues to perplex the courts. India's crypto landscape remains in what experts describe as a 'state of flux' where lawsuits involving fraud get dismissed due to 'a lack of legal status for cryptocurrencies in India'. The Reserve Bank of India's concerns about financial stability continue to shape the government's cautious approach. The central bank fears that cryptocurrencies could undermine its control over money supply and pose risks to financial and monetary stability. This, even as the market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has reportedly recommended that several regulators oversee trade in cryptocurrencies. The Centre has to take a clear stance, backed by a well-defined policy vision, at a time when the technology is increasingly exploited by hostile actors. Currently, the regulatory framework consists of a flat 30% tax on capital gains and 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on transactions above Rs 10,000, introduced in 2022. In March 2023, the finance ministry mandated all crypto exchanges operating in India to register with the Financial Intelligence Unit–India (FIU–IND). There have been news reports that India is reconsidering its stance amid growing global acceptance, but a promised discussion paper outlining policy framework options for crypto assets —scheduled for June—has still not been floated. Meanwhile, the use of virtual assets for terror financing has been 'overall on the increase', according to a report by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an intergovernmental body tracking financial crime, released this week. A country with a history of terror financing that can easily weaponise crypto against India is plunging headlong into it. How long must India wait? PAKISTAN'S PLANS Pakistan's strategy extends beyond partnerships, with the country exploring bitcoin mining using surplus energy to create a strategic bitcoin reserve. 'Crypto is becoming a channel for strategic financial flows for Pakistan,' says Anirudh Suri, MD, India Internet Fund. 'For countries like Pakistan, aligning crypto policy with US frameworks isn't just diplomacy, it's a transactional pipe to stay useful to America's geopolitical interests.' Suri points out that's not positive for India by any measure: 'India is trying to choke financial flows to terror groups via FATF and IMF diplomacy, and crypto could reopen that tap.' Subimal Bhattacharjee, an independent adviser and consultant on cybersecurity, defence and technology policy, warns of the implications: 'What are the impacts of rogue elements using it? How do we guard our people against that? The answer to everything is in a coherent and clear crypto policy. To put it simply, we have to make it a regulated entity.' Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India's FIU instructed crypto exchanges to closely monitor transactions, specifically from Jammu and Kashmir and other border regions. Exchanges were directed to scrutinise private wallets and private coins used for person-to-person transfers without blockchain visibility. Suri notes that there may be arms within Pakistan's government or military establishment that like open crypto channels—enabling a continued flow of funds. 'For a country like Pakistan, maintaining a fluid stance on crypto allows them to either attract financial flows or pursue other strategic objectives,' he says. BHUTAN MODEL While Pakistan's approach raises security concerns, Bhutan presents a different model. The Himalayan kingdom has been quietly mining bitcoin since 2020, using abundant hydropower, accumulating enormous reserves of it. The country is integrating crypto into tourism and its upcoming smart city project, and views Bitcoin not merely as a store of value but as a tool to diversify its economy. Aditya Gowdara Shivamurthy, an associate fellow with the strategic studies programme at the think tank Observer Research Foundation, says Bhutan's foray into bitcoin mining is driven largely by domestic economic necessity, to diversify beyond tourism and hydropower, and is meant to curb brain drain. Revenues from mining have already helped them shore up foreign reserves and fund public spending—including significant salary hikes for civil servants. While India recognises Bhutan's sovereign right to diversify its economy, there are worries, particularly around reduced hydropower exports, and imports of Chinese bitcoin mining equipment. Meanwhile, companies like Adani have shown interest in setting up data centres there, and how those moves unfold could shape the long-term relationship. GENIUS MOVES OF US The GENIUS (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins) Act—currently pending a vote in the US House of Representatives, expected in the week of July 14—aims to set a regulatory framework for stablecoins in the country. But there are plenty of worries. Notably, the US president made nearly $57.4 million in 2024 from his cryptocurrency company, World Liberty Financial, according to the latest disclosures. This is before Trump became president for the second time. The company has floated its own stablecoin, USD1. There are allegations that the GENIUS law would provide even more opportunities to reward buyers of Trump's coin with favours, including tariff exemptions, pardons and government appointments. A case in point — before the US president's visit to West Asia, MGX, a fund backed by Abu Dhabi, said it would make a $2 billion investment using USD1 into Binance, triggering allegations of conflict of interest. 'I wouldn't be surprised if other countries now try to exploit this pathway to gain access or soften the stance of the US administration. Under Trump, the line between strict adherence to global norms and personal or commercial interests appears to have blurred,' says Bhattacharjee. All of this should worry India. Observers believe US may leverage its influence within FATF to promote GENIUS, with all its loopholes, as the new global standard for crypto regulation. It is a move especially significant for Pakistan, a country previously flagged for terror financing, which could take a leaf out of the GENIUS law. WHAT INDIA SHOULD DO Ananya Kumar, deputy director for future of money at the GeoEconomics Center of Atlantic Council, says the biggest challenge going forward is fragmented regulation. 'Crypto doesn't really listen to borders. So it's not really a domestic problem, it's an international problem that everyone needs to come together on.' But clarity in policy in India would help resolve the current uncertainty, which often undermines consumer protection, and allows legit crypto entrepreneurs—many of whom have moved operations abroad, or shut down—to work within a well-defined framework. 'Virtual digital assets or crypto assets have not been defined outside of income tax and anti-money laundering laws in India. The lack of classification under foreign exchange laws, securities laws, payments laws and goods and services tax creates critical ambiguities. This leads to uncertainty for both businesses and consumers,' says Jaideep Reddy, partner at Trilegal. 'India needs regulation around the treatment of US dollar-denominated stablecoins, because it's also a concern of capital flight—money flowing into dollars instead of rupees,' says Kumar. 'India would likely want to create some sort of threshold.' As India's neighbours forge ahead with comprehensive crypto strategies, the question posed by the Supreme Court becomes increasingly pressing. The choice is no longer between embracing or rejecting crypto.
