Europe court says France allowed to fine president portrait snatchers
But the ECHR found that France had not interfered with the activists expressing themselves, and that the judicial proceedings could in fact be considered "part of their communication strategy".
The suspended fines of 200 to 500 euros ($230 to $590) had been among the "most lenient sanctions possible" and therefore not disproportionate, the court based in the French city of Strasbourg added.
All town halls in France display the president's portrait, with Emmanuel Macron's showing him perched on the edge of his desk with two mobile phones and the memoirs of French resistance hero and post-war president Charles de Gaulle behind him.
The group behind the 2019 portrait thefts, Non-Violent Action COP21 (ANV-COP21), claimed some 130 pictures had been stolen across France that year.
They said it was their "moral duty" to act in the face of what they called the inaction of Macron's government on climate change.
The 11 plaintiffs in the ECHR case had exhausted all legal avenues in France, from lower courts to the supreme court, in three separate cases after stealing portraits in Paris and two other locations in eastern France.
France's highest court has since the 2019 incident however changed its position.
In 2023, it approved the acquittal of another group of activists over stealing the president's picture, arguing it had not been an attack on his dignity and that climate change was a subject of "general interest".
It added that the official images of Macron were only worth 8.90 euros ($10), frame not included.
Other defendants have since been acquitted in similar cases.
Critics had targeted Macron's portrait before 2019.
In October 2017, mayors in the central Creuse region turned his picture around so that Macron faced the wall, to protest cuts to local government budgets and job losses.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Equitorial Guinea sues France over luxury Paris mansion in international court
The west African nation asked the top United Nations court to issue emergency orders against France over a building seized after the conviction of Vice President Teodorin Obiang for corruption. It asked the court to order France not to sell the mansion, located on the upscale Avenue Foch near the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, over which the two countries have been squabbling for several years. French authorities seized the property, which boasts a cinema, hammam and marble and gold water taps, after convicting Obiang under a law targeting fortunes fraudulently amassed by foreign leaders. In 2021, France's top appeals court gave Obiang, the eldest son of the long-standing president of Equatorial Guinea, Teodoro Obiang, a three-year suspended sentence and €30 million in fines. France also confiscated assets, including the luxurious Avenue Foch building with an estimated value well above €100 million. In its latest complaint to the ICJ, dated Thursday, July 3 but published by the court on Friday, Equatorial Guinea says French police entered the property last month and changed the locks on several of the doors. Equatorial Guinea called on the court to order France to give it "immediate, complete and unhindered access" to the building. Embassy or luxury residence The mansion was also at the center of an earlier case filed by Equatorial Guinea in 2016 at the ICJ, which rules on disputes between UN member states. Equatorial Guinea argued the building served as the country's embassy in France and that France had broken the Vienna Convention, which safeguards diplomats from interference by host countries. But the UN court sided with France, which said the building was merely Teodorin Obiang's residence and served no diplomatic purpose. The ICJ upheld France's objections that Equatorial Guinea had only tried to designate it as such after the investigation began into Obiang, and that the country already had an embassy in Paris.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
World Immigration In France, asylum seekers navigate labyrinth of Europe's Dublin Regulation By Julia Pascual and Samuel Gratacap Published today at 8:30 pm (Paris) 7 min read Lire en français Subscribers only Share Share on Messenger Share on Facebook Share by email Share on Linkedin Copy link Investigation '2015-2025: Europe's migration crisis' (3/5). In the 1990s, the European Union established the Dublin Regulation, aiming to prevent asylum seekers from filing applications in multiple countries. The massive influx of refugees over the past 10 years has shattered the system, which is no longer implemented in all EU member states. source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-00-texts-en.txt source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-00-structure.txt source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-00-styles.txt source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-03-texts-en.txt source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-03-structure-en.txt source https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/doc_happens/asile/2506-asile-03-styles.txt style https://assets-decodeurs.lemonde.fr/redacweb/lm-styles/lm-styles.v1.0.1.css The plane touched down on the tarmac of Marignane airport, near the southern French city of Marseille. Around 30 plainclothes police officers stood on the runway, ready to board five men. Turks and Afghans, they were escorted one by one, their wrists bound by handcuffs, their heads buried in their shoulders. As one of them prepared to board, he collapsed on the tarmac. The officers, used to seeing this happen, were unfazed. Mechanically, they turned the man on his side and strapped one belt around his ankles, another around his knees. Bound, the man was carried horizontally into the cabin. Within a few hours, he would land in Zagreb. His offense: applying for asylum in France, while according to his fingerprints, he had entered the European Union (EU) via Croatia. Under the Dublin Regulation, asylum applications are to be examined in the country of first entry, or the member state in which an asylum seeker initially sets foot in the EU. A few hours earlier, another of the five escorted passengers, an Afghan, had fainted and collapsed in the parking lot next to the prefecture in Marseille. His eyes rolled back and his body went stiff. "Come on, breathe, it's going to be all right," assured one of the officers, all of whom requested anonymity. "It's the fear of leaving," another said empathetically. You have 87.11% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.
World Immigration In France, asylum seekers navigate labyrinth of Europe's Dublin Regulation By Julia Pascual and Samuel Gratacap Published today at 8:30 pm (Paris) 7 min read Lire en français Subscribers only Investigation'2015-2025: Europe's migration crisis' (3/5). In the 1990s, the European Union established the Dublin Regulation, aiming to prevent asylum seekers from filing applications in multiple countries. The massive influx of refugees over the past 10 years has shattered the system, which is no longer implemented in all EU member states. The plane touched down on the tarmac of Marignane airport, near the southern French city of Marseille. Around 30 plainclothes police officers stood on the runway, ready to board five men. Turks and Afghans, they were escorted one by one, their wrists bound by handcuffs, their heads buried in their shoulders. As one of them prepared to board, he collapsed on the tarmac. The officers, used to seeing this happen, were unfazed. Mechanically, they turned the man on his side and strapped one belt around his ankles, another around his knees. Bound, the man was carried horizontally into the cabin. Within a few hours, he would land in Zagreb. His offense: applying for asylum in France, while according to his fingerprints, he had entered the European Union (EU) via Croatia. Under the Dublin Regulation, asylum applications are to be examined in the country of first entry, or the member state in which an asylum seeker initially sets foot in the EU. A few hours earlier, another of the five escorted passengers, an Afghan, had fainted and collapsed in the parking lot next to the prefecture in Marseille. His eyes rolled back and his body went stiff. "Come on, breathe, it's going to be all right," assured one of the officers, all of whom requested anonymity. "It's the fear of leaving," another said empathetically. You have 87.11% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
Europe and US to seek to avoid return of steep tariffs in weekend of last-ditch trade talks
Seeking to stave off a damaging trade war, EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic held discussions in Washington this week with his US counterparts. The talks were described as productive, but neither side indicated how close they were to a deal. If the EU does not clinch an agreement with the US by Wednesday, higher levies will return and unleash economic pain on the bloc. The European Commission, which leads trade policy for the 27-country bloc, briefed EU ambassadors on Friday about how talks were going. During the meeting, a senior EU official told member states there was no deal yet but that talks would continue "likely over the weekend," an EU diplomat told AFP agency. "A first basic agreement until deadline isn't off the table. Things are still very much in flux," the diplomat said. Another European diplomat said it was not clear yet how US President Donald Trump would classify the status of negotiations with the EU when it addresses its trading partners early next week. Trump could keep the tariff suspension for partners where there is an agreement in principle, restore tariffs if there is no deal or reimpose levies where negotiations are going badly, the diplomat said. 'Imbalance' will remain If no deal is struck, the default levy on EU imports is set to double to 20% or even higher, with Trump having threatened at one point to slap 50% duties. EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said on Thursday that Brussels sought an agreement in principle, which would mean further talks would be necessary on the details. But the commission believes that whatever happens, an imbalance in trade measures between the EU and the US will remain. "This begs the question, asked by a number of ambassadors today, how we prepare to remedy that imbalance," the diplomat said. Some capitals appear to have reconciled with the prospect of the US keeping the current flat levy of 10% on EU exports, the challenge then being to negotiate carve-outs for key sectors, such as cars and aeronautics.
