Dropping ABA requirement for lawyers is bad idea, law school association says
The AALS warned in an open letter, opens new tab on Tuesday that eliminating state ABA accreditation rules would weaken public protections and limit law student and lawyer mobility.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
The letter from the AALS, which represents nearly all of the 197 ABA-accredited law schools, comes as the Supreme Courts of Florida and Texas are exploring whether to drop their longstanding ABA requirements for lawyer admission. Florida has the third-largest number of annual bar exam takers, followed by Texas in fourth. Those two states are home to a combined 22 ABA-accredited law schools.
'Ending or eliminating reliance on national accreditation and returning to the parochial approaches the legal profession took in the 1800s would harm our nation's law schools and the broader legal profession,' reads the letter from the association's executive committee, which notes that the ABA first adopted law school accreditation standards in 1921.
The ABA faces mounting pressure from the Trump administration and other Republicans to end its diversity and inclusion requirement for law schools. The ABA has also earned the White House's ire for issuing public statements that Trump is threatening the rule of law and for condemning government officials' attacks on judges and law firms. All of the Texas and Florida Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican governors.
Spokespeople for both courts did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday, nor did an ABA spokesperson. The ABA's managing director of accreditation and legal education, Jenn Rosato Perea, previously said the ABA aims to contribute "meaningfully to the production of effective and ethical lawyers."
The Texas high court did not say why it is reviewing its ABA requirement when it called for public comment on the matter on Friday, but the Florida Supreme Court cited both, the diversity standard and the 'ABA's active political engagement,' as reasons for its inquiry.
The arm of the ABA that accredits law schools operates separately and independently from the larger ABA, the AALS letter reads. Thus, references to the organization's 'political engagement' may stem from a misunderstanding, it said.
Having one national law school accreditor makes it easy for law students to attend schools in states where they don't intend to practice, and for lawyers to easily move between states.
Florida and Texas' attorneys general and solicitors general went to law schools outside of those states, as did the majority of the Supreme Court justices in both states, the AALS' letter notes.
'Having a national accreditor is critical,' the letter reads. 'National accreditation ensures a minimum baseline of quality in legal education and practice that protects the public against inadequately prepared lawyers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
10 minutes ago
- ITV News
Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved near Russia over 'foolish and inflammatory statements'
Donald Trump has ordered two nuclear submarines to be strategically positioned over what he described as " inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. It comes amid a war of words between the pair that started after the US president set a '10 or 12 day' deadline for Russia to agree on a ceasefire with Ukraine during his meeting with Sir Keir Starmer in Scotland on Monday. Writing on his Truth Social platform on Friday evening, Trump said: "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" It comes after former Russian president Medvedev, Vladimir Putin's right-hand-man, warned Trump against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' following his shortened deadline. 'Russia isn't Israel or even Iran,' Medvedev, wrote on X. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' Medvedev said. After Trump responded on his Truth Social platform by telling Medvedev, "the failed former president of Russia, who thinks he's still president" to "watch his words", Medvedev reminded Trump of Moscow's Soviet-era automatic, retaliatory nuclear strike capabilities.
Daily Mirror
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines closer to Russia in power-play with Putin
Donald Trump has threatened higher tariffs and has vowed to use American nuclear submarines in order to protect itself following statements made by Dmitry Medvedev Donald Trump has ordered nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia in response to threats made by the country's former president. In a post shared to his Truth Social, Mr Trump called out ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev following statements that he made. The US President said in response he would move nuclear submarines "appropriate regions" closer to Russia. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Mr Trump said. It comes after Donald Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Mr Trump and Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after the Republican said on Tuesday that Russia had 10 days from today" to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil, with higher tariffs. Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and said Russia still possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities after the Republican told the former president to "watch his words." The battle of words emerged after Mr Trump reportedly undid months of denying or limiting aid to Ukraine as he aimed to broker a peace between Kyiv and Moscow. Mr Trump agreed to send more lethal aid to Ukraine, sparking fury in Moscow where Putin and his allies had relished the US President's previous unwillingness to support Kyiv as much as his predecessor Joe Biden. Medvedev meanwhile has emerged as one of the Kremlin's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since Russia sent tens of thousands of its troops into Ukraine. Kremlin critics slammed him as an irresponsible loose cannon, though some Western diplomats have said his statements underscore the thinking in the Kremlin. Experts have warned Russia is pursuing its ambition to rebuild its influence and recreate a relevance not seen since its Soviet and imperial eras. Multiple foreign policy analysts have raised the alarm that Putin could pursue a war with NATO by targeting the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The countries were once member states of both the Russian Empire and, following brief inter-war periods of independence, the Soviet Union.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Brazil's Justice Moraes ignores US sanctions, says he will continue doing his job
SAO PAULO, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing a criminal case against an ally of President Donald Trump, told a court session on Friday that he will continue to do his job and "ignore the sanctions" imposed by the United States that effectively block him from the country's wide-reaching financial system. On Wednesday, the U.S. imposed sanctions on Moraes for overseeing the trial of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, accusing the judge of authorizing arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppressing freedom of expression. Justice Moraes has presided over the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup to overturn Brazil's 2022 presidential election after his supporters violently stormed government buildings following the election victory of leftist Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The U.S. sanctions were accompanied by an executive order imposing a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods, which was also tied to the case Moraes is overseeing against Bolsonaro, an unwavering supporter of the U.S. president. Bolsonaro, a far-right former army captain, and several of his closest allies were charged with plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral loss, in a case that was in many ways similar to accusations against Trump. Moraes said the court would not submit itself to foreign coercion or what he likened to new coup attempts by Bolsonaro's allies. Moraes said the Federal Supreme Court will continue to exercise its role as guardian of the Constitution. "It will continue to exercise its role in criminal proceedings so that it can provide a final answer to all Brazilian society regarding who was truly responsible" for the attempted coup, he said, adding that there will be due process of law with no internal or external interference. Congressman Eduardo Bolsonaro, a son of the former president who moved to the U.S. to persuade the White House to intervene in his father's favor, has claimed credit for Trump's policies on Brazil. "This criminal organization's insistence on implementing measures harmful to Brazil, by encouraging the imposition of these tariffs and making spurious and illegal attacks against Brazilian public officials, is aimed at creating a severe economic crisis in the country," he said. "But to the dismay of these traitorous Brazilians, that crisis will not happen." Moraes added that the court would conclude the trial of those accused of attempting a coup d'état before the end of the year.
