logo
A book prescription for mental health?

A book prescription for mental health?

CBC05-06-2025
On the surface, it may seem that bibliotherapy is another personal wellness trend. The practice promotes books and literature as touchstones, to aid mental health and healing.
While it's true that anyone can offer book recommendations, there is evidence in the scientific literature to support its clinical use by mental health practitioners.
"It's recommended in the Canadian guidelines for treatment of depression and anxiety," said Victoria-based psychiatrist Martina Scholtens.
Bibliotherapy is one of the mental health approaches that she makes use of in her private practice, for certain patients. She might prescribe poetry or a memoir, a novel or workbook.
"I want the prescription to be evidence-based and tailored to the recipient of the book and their very particular circumstances," she said.
Dr. Scholtens, who is a clinical assistant professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia, put together a list of recommended titles, based on evidence.
"I wanted to make book prescriptions more accessible to patients and their caregivers by reviewing, organizing, and disseminating recommended reading lists."
She first published the extensively-researched list as an academic paper in 2024, but has now created a website for it, divided by diagnosis, at bibliotherapy.ca.
Bibliotherapy as an art
Bibliotherapy can range from a science-based approach, to one that is primarily literary.
Brooklyn journalist Cody Delistraty sought out an arts-based bibliotherapist when researching ways to address the prolonged grief he felt after the death of his mother.
Then in his early 20s, Delistraty undertook a number of experiments and therapies.
"I love to read, I love to write. So [bibliotherapy] made sense for me to dive into," said the author of The Grief Cure: Looking for the End of Loss.
After an "odd, not-your-usual therapy session" and an intensive reading questionnaire, English bibliotherapist Ella Berthoud furnished him with an annotated and personalized list of international fiction.
He particularly resonated with Sum, a collection of surreal and witty short stories by neuroscientist David Eagleman.
"Grief can feel so sacred and so scary," said Delistraty.
"To realize that it's just part of the wildness and the absurdity of life had the peculiar effect of helping me to really see the world through a new lens."
Literary caregiving
A Hundred Years of Bibliotherapy: Healing Through Books, is a new essay collection edited by three researchers from the UK's Open University. It takes a historical survey of the practice.
"The term bibliotherapy was coined by an American Unitarian minister called Samuel McChord Crothers in 1916," said 20th-century literature professor Sara Haslam.
"The First World War is certainly a key inflection point."
America's institutionally-backed Library War Service set up military camp libraries at the start of the First World War. At U.S. military hospitals, books were prescribed and dispensed to wounded soldiers by uniformed librarians.
The British version of bibliotherapy was somewhat less prescriptive and medicalized.
Sara Haslam calls it "literary caregiving."
In places like the female-run Endell Street Military Hospital, "it wasn't about medicalizing books as part of soldiers' recovery. It was about freeing wounded and sick soldiers to identify the kind of reading that they wanted to do."
Haslam discovered archival proof that a substantial UK war library was amassed by 1917, spearheaded by one woman. Donations poured in from the public after May Gaskell's emotional call-out asking for meaningful books for soldiers.
"I see these books as invested with caregiving from the donating public. They gave things that were precious, that they loved. So it went a long way to meeting the need that was being expressed by those who were fighting."
Reading in a digital era
A hundred years later, it seems that bibliotherapy has been experiencing a renaissance.
Two more new books about bibliotherapy are being published this spring: one by bibliotherapist Bijal Shah, and another from social worker Emely Rumble.
Edmund King, a co-editor of A Hundred Years of Bibliotherapy, is a historian of reading. He has a theory for the resurgence.
"I think the reason that we're so obsessed now with the idea that books can heal, or are good for us, is because we also fear the end of reading."
Despite the rise of BookTok, the books community populated by users of TikTok, King worries about the decline of time young people spend with books.
"The literary culture that we value so much might be coming to an end."
Yet throughout the history of reading, he says, it has been imbued with "this great power to change people's minds, change the way we see the world, transfer thoughts from one mind to another, preserve ideas, transmit ideas to different times and different contexts."
For Sara Haslam, books remain powerful. In her view, opening a book is always surprising, and inherently conducive to mental health.
"It's a moment when you are in the present. You have slowed down," she said. "I think it's fair to say that there is a wide readership of all ages who still recognize that that moment in engagement with a book is irreplaceable.
"And long may that continue."
*Written and produced by Lisa Godfrey.
Guests in this episode:
Martina Scholtens is a psychiatrist in Victoria, and a clinical assistant professor at UBC Faculty of Medicine. She is the author of Your Heart Is the Size of Your Fist: A Doctor Reflects on Ten Years at a Refugee Clinic.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?
Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada is hosting the world's biggest dementia conference for the first time in a decade. What's changed since then?

This week, researchers from around the globe are descending upon downtown Toronto to attend the Alzheimer's Association International Conference, the world's biggest and most influential meeting for dementia research. The gathering is a chance for the international dementia community to discuss the latest research in the field; it's also where significant breakthroughs are often unveiled. At a related event on Saturday, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) – Canada's health research funding agency – announced $44.8-million in new funding for dementia and aging-related research initiatives, including the creation of 16 teams that will study everything from Alzheimer's biomarkers to dementia in Indigenous populations. To set the stage for this year's conference, The Globe and Mail checked in with Jane Rylett, a professor at Western University and scientific director at the CIHR Institute of Aging, which hosted Saturday's event. The last time this global conference was held in Canada was in 2016, nearly a decade ago. How has the dementia research landscape changed since then? This is a really important inflection point. There is a new class of drugs, the antibody therapy, that came into the market within the last three or four years; they probably will be approved in Canada in the coming years. But while there's huge hope around it . . . right now, there's a lot of debate around if they're really beneficial. For certain people, they don't work at all; other people have negative side effects by creating inflammation in the brain. And the benefit-to-risk ratio is not great. So I think at this year's conference, it's going to be really important to hear about new findings with that. Something that's really gained momentum over the last few years is stepping back from the pharmacological approach to treatment and saying, 'What else can we do that will reduce the risk of developing dementia?' Health system urged to brace for major shift in dementia demographics The other thing that's changed is there's always been an 'amyloid hypothesis' of Alzheimer's disease, based on these toxic peptides that get made in the brain and clearly have a role in brain health and development of dementia. But during these nine years, there's been a much greater move towards understanding the role of those and recognizing that while they're still important, they're not the whole story. Now there's more openness to looking at other hypotheses about how brain health can be impacted during the life course and can lead to dementia. How should people feel about this present moment? Thinking back to 2012, the United States' health department set an ambitious goal to prevent and effectively treat Alzheimer's disease by 2025. But here we are today and that goal is far from met. When people or groups make those kinds of statements, it doesn't necessarily mesh with the complication of the thing. And then what happens is people see [the missed deadline] and think, well, it didn't happen. That's always the danger of doing something like that. The brain is a complex thing, it really is. The problem with something like Alzheimer's disease is it's so multi-faceted and it's a spectrum. There's so many areas of the brain that are impacted and the clinical presentation can look similar for people but what's happening in their brain, and where the degeneration is initiated, can be quite different. There's no one pill that you're going to have that's going to be able to change the course or alleviate the symptoms. So was it realistic to say in 2012 that this could be cured by 2025? Probably not. But it stimulated a lot of activity. We understand much more about the underlying pathology and the pathogenesis of the disease. And stepping back was an important thing, saying what can we do that is not a pharmaceutical or a pill? What are the life, behavioural and other things that we can do? Canada has a chance to change the Alzheimer's experience - let's not squander it There's been a lot of focus on the funding cuts in the U.S. that are under way right now, including to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). How has that affected things? is it looming over the conference this year? Yes. A number of Canadian researchers also have been funded by NIH, either in their own right or as subcontracts on larger studies within the U.S., and for the most part, that has been ended, which is very problematic. So we have a number of very good Canadian researchers in all fields that have lost substantial funding, and we don't have the resources in Canada to replace that. One of the big question marks is the impact it's going to have on the number of Americans that are going to be able to attend the conference. And I don't know the answer to that yet. Let's talk about Canadian researchers. What role are they playing within the broader effort? Canadian researchers are leaders internationally in these fields of study. There's really significant work being done by Canadians in the biomarkers area, so the diagnostic area. We have a lot of expertise around how to develop and promote new methods for supporting caregivers and persons with dementia. Alzheimer's trial brings at-risk patients hope for the future, but new doubts in the present We've got outstanding Indigenous cognitive health researchers that are developing new culturally safe and appropriate diagnostic and caregiving methods. And we do have some very good work going on around pathogenesis, looking at changes in the brain during aging and how that may lead to loss of cognition. That's important because you really need to understand where those earliest changes come from. Those are the targets where you need to develop drugs and therapies. This interview has been edited and condensed.

W.E. Care for Kids makes generous donation to Windsor hospital
W.E. Care for Kids makes generous donation to Windsor hospital

CTV News

time2 hours ago

  • CTV News

W.E. Care for Kids makes generous donation to Windsor hospital

W.E. Care for Kids donated $127,935.00 to Windsor Regional Hospital on July 22, 2025. (Source: W.E. Care for Kids) W.E. Care for Kids has donated $127,935.00 to Windsor Regional Hospital to support paediatric care for kids and their families. According to the organization, these funds will be used to purchase two Glidescope Core Intubation Systems for the paediatric operating room, along with vital equipment needed in the NICU, Family Birthing Unit and paediatric floor. 'This donation is a reflection of our ongoing mission to ensure children in Windsor-Essex receive the care they need right here at home,' said Viki Grado, executive director of W.E. Care for Kids. 'Keeping kids close to their families during medical treatment is not just about convenience – it's about giving every child the chance to heal and the best environment possible surrounded by the people who love them most.' To date, W.E. Care for Kids has raised over $10 million to improve health care services across Windsor Essex.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store