logo
Senate vote-a-rama to pass Trump's $3.3 trillion bill extends into second day

Senate vote-a-rama to pass Trump's $3.3 trillion bill extends into second day

Reuters4 hours ago

WASHINGTON, July 1(Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans in the early hours of Tuesday morning were still trying to pass President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, despite divisions within the party about its expected $3.3 trillion hit to the nation's debt pile.
Senators were voting in a marathon session known as a "vote-a-rama," featuring a series of amendments by Republicans and the minority Democrats, part of the arcane process Republicans are using to bypass Senate rules that normally require 60 of the chamber's 100 members to agree on legislation.
Beginning on Monday and ongoing for over 16 hours, it was still unclear how long the voting would last. Lawmakers said the process had been held up partly by the need to determine whether amendments complied with special budgetary rules.
Shortly after midnight, Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters the vote-a-rama was "hopefully on the home stretch and then we'll see where the votes are."
Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes in either chamber to pass a bill the Democrats are united in opposition to.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its assessment on Sunday of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion U.S. debt pile. The Senate version is estimated to cost $3.3 trillion, $800 billion more than the version passed last month in the House of Representatives.
Many Republicans dispute that claim, contending that extending existing policy will not add to the debt. Nonetheless, international bond investors see incentives to diversify out of the U.S. Treasury market.
Democrats, meanwhile, hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress.
"This bill, as we have said for months, steals people's healthcare, jacks up their electricity bill to pay for tax breaks for billionaires," Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a speech to the Senate.
Thune countered that the tax cuts will help families and small businesses, as he defended spending reductions to social safety net programs.
He said Medicaid was growing at an unsustainable rate and there were some improvements and reforms to make it more efficient.
The Senate narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill.
Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday.
Amendments proposed by Democratic senators such as the proposed limiting cuts to Medicaid were rejected by the Republican majority.
Embedded in the Senate Republicans' bill are several hot-button political issues, like a prohibition of Medicaid funding for a list of almost 30 medical procedures related to gender transition, as well as an increase of immigration-related funding for criminal and gang checks for unaccompanied migrant children, including examinations of "gang-related tattoos" for children as young as 12 years old.
Early on Tuesday, Democrats and Republicans voted down an attempt by Republican Senator Susan Collins to cushion the impact of Medicaid cuts on rural health facilities by doubling federal support to $50 billion over five years and paying for the increase by raising the top federal tax rate. The measure still drew support from 18 Republicans.
Elon Musk, formerly appointed by Trump to spearhead his government cost-cutting plan before the pair had a public falling-out in June over the budget bill, threatened on Monday to target Republicans ahead of the 2026 mid-term election.
"Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!," Musk posted on X.
He also reiterated his interest in a new political party and accused lawmakers in both parties of belonging to the "porky pig party," a dig at government spending levels.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which says the majority of its members are small businesses, backs the bill.
However, John Arensmeyer, who represents more than 85,000 small enterprises at the Small Business Majority, cautioned that the business tax relief is currently skewed to the wealthiest, top 5% of small businesses.
The Republican measure contains a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase - $1 trillion more than the House's bill - but failure to pass some version would present lawmakers with a serious deadline later this summer, when the Treasury Department could come close to exhausting its borrowing authority and thus risk a devastating default.
The debt limit increase has caused Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky to come out in opposition to the bill, joining fellow Republican Tillis, who decried its cuts to Medicaid and clean energy initiatives.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Senate bill would result in about 11.8 million additional uninsured people, surpassing estimates for the House's version.
If the Senate succeeds in passing the bill, it will then go to the House, where members are also divided, with some angry about its cost and others worried about cuts to the Medicaid program.
The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security.
Senate Republicans, who reject the budget office's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts.
Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick."
Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta Super Intelligence Labs : Zuckerberg's Vision for the Future of AI
Meta Super Intelligence Labs : Zuckerberg's Vision for the Future of AI

Geeky Gadgets

time32 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Meta Super Intelligence Labs : Zuckerberg's Vision for the Future of AI

What if the future of artificial intelligence wasn't just about smarter chatbots or faster algorithms, but a bold leap toward creating machines that could think, reason, and innovate beyond human capabilities? This isn't a sci-fi fantasy—it's the audacious vision Mark Zuckerberg has set in motion with Meta's latest initiative. With the establishment of Meta Super Intelligence Labs (MSL), Zuckerberg is betting big on achieving 'super intelligence,' a level of AI that could redefine industries, reshape economies, and challenge the very fabric of human ingenuity. But this isn't just another tech announcement—it's a high-stakes power play in a fiercely competitive race, where the rewards are immense, and the risks are equally staggering. Matthew Berman takes you through how Meta plans to outpace rivals like OpenAI and Google by assembling a dream team of AI pioneers, using billion-dollar acquisitions, and pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve. From the recruitment of Alexander Wang, a visionary leader in AI infrastructure, to the strategic acquisition of Scale AI, Meta's moves are as calculated as they are disruptive. But what does this mean for the future of AI—and for us? As the race for super intelligence heats up, the implications go far beyond technology, touching on ethics, societal impact, and the balance of power in the tech world. Prepare to explore the strategies, stakes, and seismic shifts that could define the next era of innovation. Meta's Race for AI Supremacy Meta Super Intelligence Labs: A New Frontier in AI Development Meta Super Intelligence Labs (MSL) represents a pivotal step in Meta's pursuit of AI excellence. This division is tasked with developing advanced AI models and multimodal systems designed to push the limits of current technology. The goal is to create systems that can seamlessly integrate and process diverse types of data, such as text, images, and video, to deliver new applications. To lead this initiative, Meta appointed Alexander Wang, the former CEO of Scale AI, as Chief AI Officer. Wang's extensive expertise in large-scale AI systems and data infrastructure positions him as a key figure in Meta's strategy. His leadership is expected to accelerate the development of next-generation AI technologies, solidifying Meta's position as a leader in the field. By focusing on innovative research and innovation, MSL aims to set new benchmarks for AI capabilities. Recruiting Top Talent: Meta's Competitive Edge Meta has adopted an aggressive approach to attract the brightest minds in AI. The company is actively targeting researchers and engineers from competitors such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. Reports indicate that Meta has offered highly competitive compensation packages, including signing bonuses reaching up to $100 million, to secure top-tier talent. This strategy underscores Meta's commitment to assembling a world-class team capable of driving innovation. The recruitment efforts focus on experts who have contributed to significant advancements in AI, such as the development of GPT models and multimodal systems. By bringing these individuals on board, Meta aims to accelerate its progress toward achieving super intelligence. This talent acquisition strategy not only strengthens Meta's internal capabilities but also disrupts the competitive landscape by drawing expertise away from rival organizations. Mark Zuckerbergs Super Intelligence Master Plan Watch this video on YouTube. Here is a selection of other guides from our extensive library of content you may find of interest on super intelligence. Strategic Acquisition of Scale AI A cornerstone of Meta's strategy is its acquisition of a 49% stake in Scale AI for $14 billion. This investment provides Meta with access to Scale AI's advanced data infrastructure and engineering expertise, which are critical for developing sophisticated AI systems. The partnership also assists the integration of Scale AI's resources into Meta's broader AI initiatives, enhancing its ability to process and analyze vast amounts of data efficiently. Alexander Wang's transition from Scale AI to lead Meta Super Intelligence Labs highlights the strategic importance of this acquisition. His dual role as a former leader of Scale AI and current Chief AI Officer at Meta ensures a seamless collaboration between the two entities. This synergy is expected to accelerate the development of innovative AI solutions, positioning Meta as a frontrunner in the race for super intelligence. OpenAI's Response to Meta's Aggression Meta's assertive recruitment and strategic moves have posed significant challenges for OpenAI. In response, OpenAI has implemented measures to retain its talent pool, including enhanced compensation packages and initiatives aimed at boosting employee morale. These efforts reflect the growing competition for expertise in the AI sector, where retaining top talent is critical to maintaining a competitive edge. Additionally, OpenAI's leadership is reevaluating its long-term strategies to adapt to the rapidly evolving landscape. This includes exploring new partnerships, optimizing resource allocation, and prioritizing projects that align with its mission. The rivalry between Meta and OpenAI underscores the high stakes involved in the development of advanced AI technologies and their potential impact on society. Meta's Vision and the Broader Implications Meta's ultimate goal is to achieve super intelligence, a level of AI capability that surpasses human intelligence across multiple domains. To realize this vision, the company is using its vast financial resources, strategic acquisitions, and aggressive recruitment tactics. This approach contrasts with OpenAI's more constrained operations as a private entity, highlighting the advantages of scale and funding in the race for AI dominance. The competition between Meta and OpenAI is emblematic of the broader struggle among tech giants to lead the AI revolution. As Meta accelerates its efforts, the implications for AI development extend beyond technological advancements. The pursuit of super intelligence raises critical questions about ethics, societal impact, and the balance of power in the tech industry. These considerations will shape not only the future of AI but also its role in addressing global challenges and opportunities. The Stakes for the Future of AI Mark Zuckerberg's initiative to establish Meta as a leader in super intelligence represents a fantastic moment in the AI industry. Through the creation of Meta Super Intelligence Labs, the acquisition of Scale AI, and the recruitment of top talent, Meta is positioning itself as a formidable competitor in the race for AI supremacy. The outcomes of this initiative will influence the trajectory of AI development, shaping its applications in areas such as healthcare, education, and business. As the competition intensifies, the broader implications for society become increasingly significant. The strategies employed by Meta and its rivals will determine how AI evolves, who controls its development, and how its benefits are distributed. This dynamic underscores the importance of balancing innovation with ethical considerations, making sure that the advancements in AI serve the greater good while addressing potential risks and challenges. Media Credit: Matthew Berman Filed Under: AI, Technology News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights
Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights

The Trump administration has concluded that Harvard University violated federal civil rights law in its handling of Jewish and Israeli students, and it threatened the school with a potential 'loss of all federal financial resources' as a result, according to the Wall Street Journal. In a Monday letter addressed to the Harvard president, Alan Garber, administration attorneys stated that the university was aware Jewish and Israeli students felt unsafe on campus but failed to take meaningful action. The letter, obtained by the Journal, accused Harvard of 'deliberate indifference' toward those concerns. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' the letter warned. The reported letter marks the latest move in the Trump administration's broader effort to target elite academic institutions it says have ignored antisemitism and pushed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at the expense of student safety. Harvard, the oldest university in the US, has become a central focus of this campaign. Typically, a formal notice of civil-rights violations can precede legal action by the US justice department or end in a negotiated settlement. Previous administrations often opted for voluntary resolution agreements rather than pursuing lawsuits in similar cases. According to the letter, the university stood by for two years while Jewish and Israeli students were 'assaulted and spit on', leading many to hide their identities out of fear. The letter also says that antisemitic imagery, including a dollar sign inside a Star of David, circulated on campus – and that antisemitic vandalism included an Israeli flag defaced with a swastika replacing the Star of David. In April, Harvard released internal reviews that described a campus disunited by tensions after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel. The reports acknowledged that both Jewish and Muslim students felt threatened and outlined steps the university had taken or planned to take to address campus bias. Trump has made several previous moves against Harvard, including trying to block the university's ability to admit international students and threatening its tax-exempt status. In response, Harvard has filed a lawsuit accusing the administration of violating its constitutional free speech and due-process rights. Despite the conflict, Trump recently suggested progress had been made. Earlier in June, he wrote on social media: 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so. They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations and appear to be committed to doing what is right.' Trump has also launched ongoing attacks against other universities, among the University of Virginia (UVA), which recently received 'explicit' notification from the Trump administration that the school would endure cuts to university jobs, research funding and student aid as well as visas if the institution's president, Jim Ryan, did not resign, according to the US senator Mark Warner. Ryan resigned from his position on Friday.

EU wants upfront relief for key sectors in any US trade deal, sources say
EU wants upfront relief for key sectors in any US trade deal, sources say

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

EU wants upfront relief for key sectors in any US trade deal, sources say

BRUSSELS, July 1 (Reuters) - The European Union wants immediate relief from tariffs in key sectors as part of any trade deal with the United States due by a July 9 deadline, but the bloc expects even a best-case deal to include a degree of asymmetry, EU diplomats told Reuters. The European Commission, which coordinates EU trade policy, is pushing three key points in Washington this week even as it accepts the U.S. baseline tariff of 10% as unavoidable. Both sides are working towards an agreement in principle, with the final details to be ironed out later. In a short negotiation document Washington sent last week, the Trump administration only presented what it expects from Brussels without any concessions of its own, EU diplomats briefed on the matter said. For any deal, Brussels wants in return a reduction of baseline tariffs to pre-Trump levels or a zero-for-zero tariff in cases when it existed. That means specifically lower tariffs for alcoholic beverages and medical technology, on which the U.S. applies its 10% tariff. The EU also wants a deal to cover commercial aircraft and parts, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, sectors the U.S. is investigating, but has not yet imposed extra duties on. Trump said in June the pharma duties would be announced "very soon". Secondly, the EU wants a concession from U.S. President Donald Trump on the 25% tariff on cars and car parts, the diplomats said, and an immediate lowering of U.S. steel and aluminium import tariffs, which Trump hiked to 50% in June. One diplomat said cars were a "red line" for the bloc. However, Brussels and Washington have conflicting goals as Trump wants to revive U.S. auto production while Brussels wants open markets for its sector, which is struggling with high energy costs and competition from China. Thirdly, the EU wants tariff relief to start as soon as an initial agreement is reached, rather than waiting weeks or months for a final accord. A number of EU members said a deal without this would be unacceptable, the sources said. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic and the European Commission president's head of cabinet Bjoern Seibert head to Washington later this week hoping to reach a deal. Trump has suspended higher tariffs until July 9 in order to strike deals with global trade partners. He has said countries without deals will see 10% U.S. baseline tariffs on goods jack up to rates of as much as 50%. For the EU, that rate is 20%, although Trump has also threatened a 50% duty on all EU imports. A week before the deadline, the Commission told its 27 member states all outcomes were still possible, from a successful framework agreement to higher U.S. tariffs covering additional sectors, the diplomats said. If its goal of upfront tariff relief fails to materialise, Brussels will have to choose between accepting significant imbalances or responding with countermeasures. Another scenario could be a deadline extension. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday any extension would be Trump's decision, with deals to be wrapped up by September 1.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store