Germany denies plan to declare state of emergency to tackle migration
A spokesperson for the government cleared the rumours on Thursday, assuring the public that the special Brussels clause, Article 72 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, has not been triggered.
"The chancellor is not declaring a national emergency," said Stefan Kornelius, speaking to local media.
Earlier on Thursday, German media outlet, Die Welt, reported that the new federal government is planning to invoke the EU clause. If passed, national law would apply to border protection and internal security with immediate effect.
This would trigger extensive tightening of border controls, as well as result in the rejection of asylum applications.
It would also be the first time Germany, an EU founding member, attempted to suspend the bloc's law. However, Brussels would first have to decide on whether or not to approve the request.The same clause was invoked by Italy in 2023 to tackle what the government called an alarming immigration crisis.The report also claimed that ambassadors of countries neighbouring Germany were briefed by the Interior Ministry on the matter, but it wasn't made clear on when the national emergency will begin.Separately, German officials told Euronews that Merz wants to declare a national emergency to step up the increased deportations of people attempting to enter Germany illegally via a safe EU country.On Wednesday, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said he had instructed federal police to tighten border controls with the aim of turning back more irregular migrants, including those who intended to seek asylum.'We will control the borders more strictly...will also lead to a higher number of rejections,' Dobrindt said less than a day after being sworn into office.However, Dobrindt said that vulnerable people, including children and pregnant women, would not be turned away at the border.Those plans attracted criticism from both Poland and Austria, and their legality has been questioned by some experts. — Euronews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Fortress Europe's African victims
Europeans may be horrified by the new US administration's draconian immigration policies, which include snatching people off the streets and deporting them without due process. But the EU's decade-long crackdown on irregular African migration — targeting people who are fleeing conflict, climate disasters and poverty attempting to reach Europe by sea in flimsy boats — is equally appalling. Worse, the European Commission is seeking to double down on this approach: a leaked proposal for the next long-term budget cycle calls for conditioning development aid for African countries on meeting migration-reduction targets. Africans comprise a fairly large share of the EU's irregular migrants, with West and Central African countries accounting for about one-third of those arriving in the first half of 2024. At least 11 million African-born migrants reside in Europe — more than double the number living in Asia and North America — where they boost the labor force and ease the economic pressures caused by a rapidly aging local population. But many Europeans treat migrants who arrive in small boats as a security threat, criminalizing their entry and scapegoating them for broader societal problems. After millions of Syrian, Afghan and Iraqi refugees fled to the bloc in 2015-16, the EU began strengthening 'Fortress Europe.' Some countries, including Greece, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia, built external border fences, while others, like Germany and the Netherlands, have reintroduced border controls. Efforts to secure the bloc have included violent pushbacks against refugees and migrants at external borders — a violation of international human rights law — and partnerships with third countries to curb flows. According to Amnesty International, the EU's externalization policy, coupled with Italy and Malta's hostility to rescue ships, were responsible for 721 migrant deaths in the Mediterranean between June and July 2018. More recently, several European rescue organizations blamed the deaths of 3,000 people in the Mediterranean in 2023 partly on an EU decree enacted that year that severely restricted their response capacity. There is a stark divide between how European and African governments view this issue. From Sweden and Poland to Italy and Germany, far-right populist parties have surged in popularity by stoking anti-immigrant sentiment, which has pushed many mainstream European politicians to embrace xenophobic policies. By contrast, African governments largely oppose the EU's forced return of migrants, for both humanitarian and economic reasons. African migrants are a vital source of remittances, sending back $100 billion in 2022 — more than the continent received in official development assistance and foreign direct investment combined. These governments are also quick to note that they bear the brunt of African migration: of the more than 45 million people forcibly displaced in Africa last year, 34.5 million remained within their own countries. Of course, this does not absolve African governments of responsibility for their actions: poor governance, political exclusion and development failures have contributed to the migration surge. The lack of economic opportunities, in particular, has forced many young Africans — the continent has the world's youngest population, with 70 percent in sub-Saharan Africa under the age of 30 — to flee to wealthier countries. But instead of using its economic might to bolster growth and support job creation in Africa, the EU poured €500 million ($586 million) into its 2016 Migration Partnership Framework, a new way of engaging with source countries to reduce migration. The resulting partnerships with Ethiopia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria and Senegal subordinated development aid to migration goals. This heavy-handed approach, particularly the EU's obsession with negotiating the forced return of African migrants and pushing its own interests, failed to stem the flow of people, alienated African governments and undermined the bloc's human rights and development principles. Now, the Commission has its sights on hardening this negative-incentive structure and applying it more widely. To be sure, overall migrant arrivals in the EU declined by about 20 percent in the first five months of 2025. But this decline came after years of human rights abuses by the EU's third-country partners, which were effectively bribed to slow the movement of people. In 2024, the European Court of Auditors criticized the bloc's €5 billion Emergency Trust Fund for Africa for failing to address the human rights risks involved in subcontracting migration policy to autocratic regimes. That same year, more than 2,000 African migrants died while trying to reach Europe. The behavior of these regimes is reprehensible. But the cruelty on display within the bloc is no less shocking. Frontex, the EU's border control agency, was reportedly involved in covering up hundreds of illegal pushbacks in the Aegean Sea. Polish border guards forced migrants back into Belarus, where they were beaten and raped. Last year, three Egyptian teenagers froze to death after Bulgarian officers reportedly obstructed their rescue near the Turkish border. Many Sudanese asylum seekers continue to be held illegally in Greek prisons. Efforts to secure the bloc have included violent pushbacks against refugees and migrants at external borders. Adekeye Adebajo The EU's current approach is ineffective and inhumane; its proposal to use foreign aid as a stick is even more so. To address the source of African migration, European policymakers must understand why young people embark on this perilous journey. A 2019 report by the UN Development Programme, based on interviews with 1,970 African migrants from 39 nations, conducted across 13 EU member states, found that they were typically educated above the average levels in their home countries and had held steady jobs there. But only 38 percent said they had earned enough 'to get by.' Unable to fulfill their ambitions in Africa, and with many facing war and repression, these young people looked to Europe for opportunity and safety. Reducing migration from Africa requires contributing generously to its development, not funding third countries — many of them ruled by repressive regimes — to harden borders by any means. The EU has cynically chosen the latter approach, eroding its moral standing. If the bloc wants to portray itself as a global force for good following America's retreat from the world stage, it must pursue migration policies that reflect our shared humanity, rather than self-interest.
Saudi Gazette
12 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
UK and Turkey sign deal for Eurofighter jets as Ankara aims to upgrade air force
ISTANBUL — The UK and Turkey signed a preliminary agreement on Wednesday for the sale of Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jets to Turkey, marking a significant step in Ankara's efforts to modernise its air fleet. Turkish Defence Minister Yaşar Güler and his British counterpart, John Healey, inked a memorandum of understanding during a defence industry fair in Istanbul, Turkey's Ministry of National Defence said. NATO member Turkey has long aimed to buy 40 Eurofighter jets, which are built by a consortium of British, German and Italian companies. Germany reportedly initially opposed the sale but later reversed its position. Britain led negotiations on behalf of the consortium. A Turkish defence ministry statement said the memorandum takes the two countries "one step closer to a full agreement on the Typhoon." "Both Ministers welcome signature as a positive step towards bringing Turkey into the Typhoon club and share a mutual ambition to conclude the necessary arrangements as soon as possible," it added. Turkish officials have said that they are still negotiating over pricing and technical terms, saying that they have received an initial offer and expect to submit a counter-proposal. Turkey is also seeking to return to the US-led F-35 fighter jet programme, from which the country was ousted in 2019 following its purchase of Russian-made S-400 missile defence systems. The US said the systems were incompatible with NATO tech and posed a risk to the F-35s. Turkey is also developing a domestic fifth-generation fighter jet, the KAAN, which is slated to be operational in 2028. — Euronews
Saudi Gazette
16 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Protests in Ukraine as Zelensky signs bill targeting anti-corruption bodies
KYIV — President Volodymyr Zelensky has signed a bill that critics say weakens the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies, sparking protests in several cities and drawing international criticism. The new law grants the prosecutor general control of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo), and critics say it undermines their authority. In an address on Wednesday, Zelensky said both agencies would still "work" but needed to be cleared of "Russian influence". After the bill passed, hundreds of people gathered in Kyiv for the biggest anti-government protest since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Demonstrations were also seen in the cities of Lviv, Dnipro and Odesa. "We chose Europe, not autocracy," said a poster held by one demonstrator. "My father did not die for this," said another. Ukraine's chief prosecutor, Zelensky loyalist Ruslan Kravchenko, will now be able to reassign corruption probes to potentially more pliant investigators, and even to close them. In his overnight address, Zelensky criticised the efficiency of Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure, saying cases had been "lying dormant". "There is no rational explanation for why criminal proceedings worth billions have been 'hanging' for years," he said. He added that the prosecutor general would ensure "the inevitability of punishment" for those who broke the law. To critics of the legislation, this is at odds with more than a decade of pro-democracy and anti-corruption efforts. It is such aspirations that led to the Euromaidan uprising and the downfall of pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, followed by Russia's invasion and the deaths of hundreds of thousands people. The Ukrainian government has cited Russian influence for curtailing Nabu's powers. The day before the controversial law was passed, Ukraine's Security Service and the prosecutor general's office carried out searches and arrests targeting alleged Russian spies at Nabu. The move has sparked concern among Ukraine's Western allies. The Ukrainian independent anti-corruption system was set up at their insistence and under their supervision 10 years ago. It was a key precondition for their aid and stronger ties as Ukraine declared a pro-democracy course amid Russia's initial invasion of 2014. "The European Union is concerned about Ukraine's recent actions with regard to its anti-corruption institutions," says European Commission spokesperson Guillaume Mercier. "The EU provides significant financial assistance to Ukraine, conditional on progress in transparency, judicial reform, and democratic governance." Stamping out corruption is also a key requirement for Ukraine's application to join the EU. The European commissioner for enlargement, Marta Kos, criticised the bill's adoption. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting Nabu's independence is a serious step back," Kos wrote on social media, saying the two bodies were "essential" for Ukraine's EU path. Ukraine's deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration, Taras Kachka, said he had assured Marta Kos there would be no compromise on anti-corruption, and that "all core functions remain intact". Dmytro Kuleba, who stood down as foreign minister last year, said it was a "bad day for Ukraine" and that the president had a choice — either to stand on the side of the people or not. Ambassadors from the G7 group of nations have said they would like to discuss the pressure on Nabu and Sapo with the Ukrainian leadership. However, Ukraine's allies would be extremely reluctant to roll back the aid and co-operation at a time when its troops are struggling on the frontline. — BBC
