Android 16 could still adopt iPhone-style notifications and quick settings — what we know
At first glance, the option isn't available in the current Android 16 QPR1 beta 1 release. However, Android Authority has discovered the feature hidden in the code of the recent beta during an APK teardown.
According to the report, code strings found in the beta's files indicate that Google plans to add a new 'Notifications & Quick Settings' option. This addition will allow users to switch the panel design from the current look, called 'Classic,' to the split panel design, which has been called 'Separate'.
The Classic design allows users to simply swipe down from anywhere on the top of the screen to see a merged list of Quick Settings and notifications. However, the Separate panel requires users to swipe down from the top right side of the screen to access Quick Settings, and from the top left to access notifications.
This isn't the first that we've seen Android try this, with split notifications first appearing last year in an Android 15 beta. The change was dropped when the OS launched, only to appear again in the early Android 16 betas. However, after The Android Show and the announcement of the new Material 3 Expressive design didn't feature the change, many thought it had been removed again.
While this code line indicates that this isn't entirely the case, there could be a slight caveat to which devices have access to the new notification/quick settings style. Android Authority found a menu footnote that only appears on foldable phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 6, which states that the Combined option is only available on the outer display. This could, in theory, mean that the Separate design is accordingly only available on the large inner screens of foldable phones, but there's no clear indication either way just yet.
Right now, there are still a fair number of unknowns about the feature, including when it will be launched. It's possible that it could launch as part of the Android 16 public release, which is expected to come in June. Alternatively, it could feature as part of a later update for Android 16, which is perhaps more likely considering its hidden current status.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
However, considering the negative feelings about the option, we want to hear your thoughts. Would you be switching to the Separate option, or will you stick with the Combined screen?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Want to move data between Apple and Google Maps? Try this workaround
In June, Google released its newest smartphone operating system, Android 16. The same month, Apple previewed its next smartphone operating system, iOS 26. The new OSes are packed with exciting features, yet each still fails to address a particular pain point that their users have had for years concerning two of the platforms' most-used apps: Apple Maps and Google Maps. 3% mortgage rates aren't dead—housing market sees 127% increase in buyers taking over old loans Psychologists now know exactly what makes someone cool. Turns out, the definitions are universal How to tell if the article you're reading was written by AI Specifically, there is still no easy way to transfer saved map data from one app to another. This ends up locking users into one mapping platform, which is good for the two tech giants involved, but bad for individuals who want more control over their data. However, all is not lost, and if you do wish to transfer your data between Apple Maps and Google Maps, there is a (time-consuming) way to do it. Here's what you need to know. I'm a big fan of both Apple Maps and Google Maps. Apple Maps has made significant progress in recent years to rise to the level of Google Maps, the current king. Google Maps still has better point-of-interest data (i.e., business information, such as live foot traffic data) and considerably more contextual data about a location, thanks to its crowd-sourced reviews and photos, but Apple Maps has surpassed Google Maps in several areas. Its strengths include a less cluttered interface and a more visually appealing map design than Google Maps's. The fact that each mapping app has different strengths is the reason that I, like many others, switch between them. However, unlike other competing apps the two companies make—email clients, photo apps, address books, and web browsers—I can't easily transfer the data I've created in Apple or Google Maps (in this case, hundreds of saved locations I've bookmarked over the years) to the competing app. I see no good reason for this lack of functionality, other than to bind a user to a specific mapping platform. After all, when you save a location in Apple Maps or Google Maps, you're simply telling the app to remember a location—an address. This address can be easily processed by any mapping platform. Indeed, it's what these platforms are designed to do. That's why it's so ridiculous that neither mapping app has the simple 'transfer your saved locations' feature that allows the porting of data from one to the other. Still, at least there is a workaround. If you do want to transfer your saved locations from Apple Maps to Google Maps, or vice versa, you can. It will just require some tedious manual labor on your part. Here's the best way I've found to transfer my saved locations from one mapping app to another. (Note: as always, before performing any kind of data transfer, you should always back up a copy of that data first for safekeeping.) From Google Maps to Apple Maps: Go to This is the Google tool that lets you download your Google data. Select 'Maps (your places)', then click 'Next Step', and then 'Create Export.' Google will email you a link when your saved places are ready to download. Open the downloaded 'takeout' ZIP file. Now, open the 'Saved file inside. Clicking on it should open the file in a web browser. Every saved location you created in Google Maps will appear in the JSON file, in a slightly unusual format. Each entry will list the coordinates, Google Map URL, address, country code, and name of the establishment. Now comes the tedious part. Open up Apple Maps and either copy the name of the establishment or its address into the search field in the Apple Maps app. Now, click the + button in the address or business listing in Apple Maps to save the location in the app. Repeat this process for every saved listing in the JSON file. Be aware that it could take hours, or even days, depending on the number of saved places you have. From Apple Maps to Google Maps: Unfortunately, porting your saved locations from Apple Maps to Google Maps is a bit harder because there is no way that I've found to generate a list of all your saved places. That means you're facing even more manual work if you want to move your data from Apple Maps to Google Maps. Open Apple Maps. Tap your profile photo. Tap Library. Tap Places. Tap on a saved location. On the location's information sheet, scroll down and copy the location's address. Alternately, copy down the location's name. Now open the Google Maps app and paste the copied address or the location's name in the search field. When you find the location in Google Maps, tap on its listing and then tap the Save button. Tedious, right? Pro tip: After completing either one of these manual saved location transfers, it's probably a good idea to get in the habit of bookmarking a saved location in the other mapping app when you save it in one. I asked both Google and Apple why they don't allow users to easily export their saved locations from their respective mapping apps into a competitor's, and why they don't permit users to import a list of saved locations into their mapping apps. Neither provided an answer. Apple simply confirmed that users cannot export their saved places in Apple Maps, and mentioned that users can share individual saved locations with others. Google directed me to its Takeout feature and explained that users can import locations saved from other apps into a 'Google My Maps' layer, which isn't part of the main Google Maps app that users see when they open the app. In other words, Google allows users to import saved locations into a new layer, but those locations won't appear on the default map they use every day. It's absurd in 2025 that there's still no simple way to share saved locations between the world's two biggest mapping platforms. Switching from one mapping service to another should be as straightforward as changing web browsers. Just like I can easily export bookmarks from Safari and import them into Chrome, I should be able to do the same with my saved maps data. Hopefully, both Apple and Google will fix this issue in the future. Until then, adventurous users with time on their hands can try the manual steps outlined above. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter:
Android Authority
9 hours ago
- Android Authority
I prefer Signal but use WhatsApp for this simple reason
Robert Triggs / Android Authority When WhatsApp changed its terms in 2021, I was one of the many users who looked for alternative messaging apps for Android. While I had heard about Signal before, the controversial move by WhatsApp prompted me to actually try the app out. I loved it then and I still love it now. But over all these years, I barely use Signal even though I prefer it greatly over WhatsApp. And that's because of a major advantage WhatsApp has over the privacy-focused messaging app. Which messaging app do you prefer? 0 votes WhatsApp. NaN % Signal. NaN % Telegram. NaN % Google Messages. NaN % Another app (let us know in the comments). NaN % There's a lot to love about Signal Robert Triggs / Android Authority You don't have to be someone who lives off-grid in the woods to appreciate Signal. The messaging app balances great privacy features with a sleek UI and plenty of useful features. It includes end-to-end encryption for your messages and calls by default. Even your profile is end-to-end encrypted and data collection is minimized. If you've tried other privacy-focused services, you'll know that there's usually a trade-off when it comes to features. But Signal has a great feature set, with certain tools even outpacing WhatsApp. In fact, Signal allows you to schedule messages — a feature that WhatsApp doesn't currently offer. Signal has a great feature set, with certain tools even outpacing WhatsApp. Signal also allows you to add contacts using a username, with the option to not share your number automatically when added. There's also the ability to set chat colors and wallpapers, meaning you can customize the appearance of the app. Essentials, such as video and voice calls, are well covered, and the app can be used on a desktop. Signal even has a Stories feature, though I never touch it. Overall, Signal is a feature-rich messaging app, in addition to its privacy features. As a result, I greatly prefer the experience over WhatsApp. WhatsApp has become a bloated nightmare Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority WhatsApp has added plenty of features over the years — but I don't use many of them. I miss the WhatsApp of yesteryear, when it was simpler. Statuses, Communities, and Channels all feel like they just add to the bloat and noise when using WhatsApp. I've also tried my best to ignore Meta AI, since I don't bother with generative AI on my smartphone, but WhatsApp just keeps making it more prominent. Above the new chat icon, there's now a Meta AI button. Meanwhile, the search bar you use to filter through your chats is now also filled with recommended prompts for the chatbot. You can mute Meta AI, but you can't actually remove it from WhatsApp. WhatsApp also has a spam and scam problem. While it's not as bad as you might find on social media platforms, I still receive far too many unsolicited messages from businesses and scammers. I receive far too many unsolicited messages from businesses and scammers. Finally, WhatsApp's plan to add adverts to the app has just soured my experience further. While I avoid the Updates tab as much as possible, and will likely not see any of these ads, it further highlights Meta's determination to monetize its apps as much as possible. It also incentivizes more data collection and sharing. Messages on the platform are end-to-end encrypted, but there's plenty that companies can determine from metadata. There's also no guarantee that Meta won't push ads to other parts of the app, since being a profitable company has never stopped it from pushing even more ads on its apps before. But WhatsApp has one major advantage Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority My distaste for WhatsApp is palpable, so why do I use it when I don't like the experience? It boils down to one simple consideration — most of my contacts use WhatsApp. In fact, I was surprised when I found out that WhatsApp is not as popular in the US as it is in other countries. WhatsApp is home to most of my chats with contacts and all of my groups. It's how PR companies often reach out to me. It's also how I reach certain businesses, like when I order a repeat of my cat's medication from my vet. It's truly rare to find someone who doesn't use WhatsApp here. While Signal also has group chats, the lack of contacts who use it means it's not a viable option for my community groups that include safety information and incident reports. I don't even have enough contacts who use Signal to create a casual group chat, since none of them know each other. It's also a hard sell to tell someone to switch over to Signal, since they'll encounter the same problem when they move over. I'm a tech journalist, so I should arguably have more contacts that use niche, security-focused apps. But I have 20 total contacts on Signal, in contrast to the 200+ I have on WhatsApp. It's a hard sell to get someone to switch over to Signal, since they'll encounter a lack of contacts too. It's the same reason that my colleagues can't leave WhatsApp despite the ads. But the biggest problem with messaging apps is that they require other people to use them, by definition. The messaging app we use depends on what everyone else around us uses, so it's essentially chosen for us by others. But that won't stop me from hoping that Signal emerges as a viable alternative to WhatsApp. The app has great features without the baggage of Meta-owned products. WhatsApp has been ordered by the European Union to allow interoperability with other encrypted messaging apps and progress is being made towards that goal. Hopefully more countries will add pressure to expand this feature to other regions. After all, we deserve to be able to choose which messaging app we use, since it plays such an important role in our daily lives.
Android Authority
10 hours ago
- Android Authority
Pixel 10 Pro's new display tackles eye strain, but it's not the leap I wanted
Robert Triggs / Android Authority Google Pixel 10 rumors are coming thick and fast these days as we close in on the launch date in just a few months. Last week, we learned the upcoming phone's Pro models will likely ship with a 480Hz PWM display — a first for the Pixel series. High PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation) rates aren't new to smartphone displays; we've already seen phones boasting thousands of Hz. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra offers a 1,920Hz PWM rate, the OnePlus 13 clocks in at 2,160Hz, and the HONOR Magic 7 Pro tops out at a whopping 4,320Hz PWM. Even the budget-friendly Nothing Phone 3a manages 2,160Hz PWM. Is high display PWM important when buying a phone? 0 votes Yes, I want high PWM. NaN % No, it doesn't matter. NaN % It matters, but it's not the deciding factor. NaN % Not sure, I'd never thought about it. NaN % The Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL won't match these heavyweights, but a bump to 480Hz will at least put them on par with the brand's closest rivals in the US, Apple and Samsung. In that sense, it's a significant move — but what does all this PWM stuff even mean, and should you actually care? What does PWM have to do with displays? C. Scott Brown / Android Authority If you know a bit about displays, you've likely come across Hz and refresh rate, which measures how many times per second (in Hz) the screen updates. 120Hz looks smoother than 60Hz, for example. PWM is also measured in Hz, but it's unrelated to how quickly your content refreshes. Instead, the PWM rate controls the brightness of the thousands of individual LEDs lighting up your fancy OLED display. Going back to some basic electronics: applying 0 V turns an LED off, while applying the maximum allowed voltage makes it shine at full brightness. There are two ways to achieve a brightness that isn't zero or full. The most intuitive is to scale the voltage somewhere between off and max. However, this isn't always practical for mobile displays, due to the LEDs' temperamental on-threshold voltage, the wasted power from maintaining an intermediate DC level, and the complexity of managing precise voltages across millions of sub-pixels. This isn't a problem for older LCD-type displays, where direct current dimming can easily control the entire backlight in one go. Kamila Wojciechowska / Android Authority Instead, displays control LED brightness using rapid on–off pulses. Each LED toggles hundreds or thousands of times per second, so quickly that your eye perceives a steady brightness rather than flicker. This is achieved efficiently with a clock driver embedded in the display controller, and it's far more power-friendly since little energy is wasted — crucial for mobile devices. The end result is equivalent from a brightness perspective, as the average output of these on–off pulses matches what a constant dimmed level would produce. If you're curious, recording slow-motion video on your phone camera can often reveal PWM flicker, appearing as rolling bands across the screen. That said, several phones now use a hybrid approach to dimming. For example, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Xiaomi 14T Pro offer 'DC dimming' at high brightness levels well above the on-threshold, then switch back to PWM at lower brightness settings. Here, DC dimming really means dropping the drive current in one shot rather than true per-pixel scaling. Display PWM rates tell you how fast the OLED lights flicker on and off. OK, so now this begs the question: why do different smartphones have different PWM rates? Well, each display panel comes paired with its own driver IC. Higher‑end panels often include driver chips capable of much higher PWM frequencies right out of the factory, but even high-end panels don't always race to the biggest possible numbers. Even with the same display driver chip, manufacturers can tweak their PWM clock settings in firmware to hit specific targets — trading off PWM rate against overall power draw (including switching losses vs peak brightness), regulator overhead, BOM cost, and sometimes the precision of contrast and gamma control. Very high PWM frequencies, for example, can reduce the number of available brightness steps, slightly affecting smooth gradients and tonal transitions. These trade-offs are balanced differently depending on each brand's priorities for battery life, display quality, and eye comfort. Why do PWM refresh rates matter? Robert Triggs / Android Authority Here's the catch: what if your eyes or brain can actually detect that flicker from a low PWM rate? Well, this is very much a real issue, often called PWM sensitivity. It affects everyone differently — some people not at all, others might eventually feel eye fatigue, and the unlucky can end up with migraines or nausea. If you're susceptible, PWM sensitivity is most often noticed when viewing a device in a dark environment at low display brightness. That's because at lower brightness levels, PWM dimming runs at a low duty cycle: the LEDs spend most of their time turned off, only pulsing on for brief moments to emit just enough light. Combined with a dimly lit room, these short bursts might not register as visible flicker, but the nerves in your eyes — and ultimately your brain — can still pick up on them. PWM flicker can cause eye fatigue, headaches, and even nausea in some people. There's no exact science on the ideal PWM frequency, partly because there are so many variables when it comes to individual sensitivity, environment, and how any modulation is implemented. For many people, 480Hz doesn't cause any noticeable issues, and phones have been getting away with 240Hz without triggering a wave of returns. However, a growing body of research suggests that these comparatively low values can still trigger unwanted physiological responses in a sizable portion of the population. As such, opting for a 1,000Hz or 2,000Hz display generally pushes you further away from potential harm, and these phones are obviously the better choice for anyone who has experienced fatigue or worse from their devices. But do sufferers continue to benefit from ever-higher values like 4,000Hz? That's less certain, as there's bound to be a law of diminishing returns. Even so, bigger numbers are generally 'safer' from an eye health perspective, and there are no real downsides from the standpoint of display quality. PWM speed is important, but it's not the only thing to considder. As with most things, there are additional nuances at play. PWM display waveforms don't have to be sharp on–off pulses; advanced driver ICs can shape the modulation to ease eye strain. Gradual ramping up and down (like a sawtooth or triangle wave) is an effective alternative that aims to reduce PWM's adverse effects without simply cranking up the frequency. Likewise, most smartphones use multi-phase PWM, ensuring the entire display isn't off at the same time to help average out the luminance your eyes detect. Then there are the aforementioned DC-dimming firmware tricks that let brands advertise 'flicker-free' or 'low-flicker' modes for enhanced eye comfort, even though they still rely on PWM at low brightness. Of course, the best solution is probably to have a bit of everything. Just keep in mind it's not always a clear-cut case of bigger numbers being better — though it certainly doesn't hurt to have a higher PWM display in your next phone. Whether the Pixel 10 Pro's new display does enough here is still very much up for debate. Pixel takes yet another half measure Paul Jones / Android Authority PWM rate certainly isn't the be-all and end-all of what makes a great display, but for some consumers, it's a hugely important buying factor. While eye-fatigue features are staple technologies across the industry, some major manufacturers still fall short when it comes to tackling the specific discomfort caused by low-frequency PWM at dim brightness levels. Historically, Google's Pixel series has made no meaningful strides to address these concerns. Thankfully, the Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL look set to offer a slight reprieve with their jump to 480Hz — a welcome improvement that finally starts to close the gap. Still, it's hard to ignore that this advance only brings Google in line with what's already become a baseline elsewhere, and remains far from the highest standards now possible. The Pixel 10's 480Hz upgrade would be welcome, but is still behind the curve. Perhaps more frustrating is that this upgraded display is expected to be exclusive to the Pro-tier models, meaning anyone eyeing the standard Pixel 10 — or a future Pixel 10a — will be left waiting yet again. For many, this won't be a dealbreaker. But for those sensitive to display flicker or simply hoping to minimize long-term eye strain, Google's cautious step forward may feel like too little, too late. In the end, it's a positive move, but one that highlights how much more could still be done. Here's hoping it won't take another generation or two before these improvements become standard across the entire Pixel lineup.
