logo
Spending review 2025: key points at a glance

Spending review 2025: key points at a glance

Yahoo19-06-2025

The chancellor talks up the government's economic record and the decisions made at the budget. She makes the obligatory mention of the Conservatives' '14 years of mismanagement and decline' and the supposed £22bn fiscal hole. 'We are renewing Britain,' she says – while accepting that many Britons 'have yet to feel it'. This spending review will change it, she says.
Reeves says the review is 'time for parties opposite to make their choices', adding that the spending and investment she will unveil is only possible because of tax choices in the autumn budget and the revised fiscal rules, which the Conservatives opposed. They must make 'an honest choice' on whether to support the extra money, she says.
Reeves says overall departmental spending will rise by 2.3% a year in real terms, contrasting her 'Labour choices' with what she calls the destructive legacy of austerity. That is the overall figure, but some departments will still feel a squeeze, even with what the chancellor says is an extra £190bn in day-to-day spending over the parliament.
Related: Rachel Reeves delivers spending review and says use of hotels for asylum seekers to end 'in this parliament'– UK politics live
On the first set of specifics, Reeves sets out already-announced details of increased spending on defence and security, making sure to stress the boost to jobs in the sector, particularly in Scotland.
Reeves says the new Border Security Command will receive up to £280m more a year by the end of the spending-review period. She also promises that all spending on hotels for asylum seekers waiting for their cases to be heard will stop by the end of this parliament.
In more 'news we have largely already been told', Reeves sets out what she says will be £30bn in investment in nuclear power, of which about half will go to the Sizewell C reactor. She also announced new money for small modular nuclear reactors, and for research into nuclear fusion. There is also confirmed funding for a carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire.
While this isn't necessarily an announcement, Reeves's long digression into the importance of steel made in the UK can be seen at least partly in the context of Nigel Farage's recent forays into pushing for reindustrialisation.
In a mixed bag of announcements, the chancellor says there will be £2bn more for investment in artificial intelligence; an increase in funding for the state-run British Business Bank; and up to £1.2bn a year by the end of the parliament for skills training for young people.
Now we get to the bigger news. As saved up for release the day before the spending review, Reeves sets out what she calls the 'biggest cash injection into social and affordable housing in 50 years', saying it is worth £39bn over the next decade.
Also partly briefed in advance, Reeves talks about investment in rail, airports and buses, including a boost to Northern Powerhouse Rail and East West Rail, and funding for the Midlands rail hub, as well as a £400m-plus investment in Welsh rail projects (the last not unconnected to next year's Senedd elections). She says she will provide a fourfold increase in local transport grants for areas outside London, and that Transport for London will get a four-year spending deal. Finally, she promises a change to Treasury rules to allow for more spending across the regions.
This involves £350m for facilities such as parks, libraries and swimming pools in a series of towns. Reeves lists a few, the bulk of which appear to be represented by Labour MPs.
The chancellor says she will increase police spending by 2.3% a year in real terms. This sounds reasonably significant, but police organisations seem likely to insist the increase will not properly help protect services, and it was the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, who had the longest and toughest pre-review fight with the Treasury. Reeves also mentions the previously announced £7bn to finance 14,000 new prison places.
Almost skated over in the address, Reeves confirms she will fully honour the Labour manifesto commitment of a £13.2bn fund to fix draughty homes and install heat pumps and solar panels. The chancellor does not mention this as an environmental measure, but as a way to, she says, save people an average of £600 a year in bills.
Also already announced, but in the absence of any plan to end the two-child benefit cap it gives Reeves the chance to talk about reducing child poverty. She also announces £370m for schools-based nurseries and £555m to stop children going into care when it can be prevented.
Reeves sets out what she says will be £2.3bn a year to fix and maintain existing schools, and £2.4bn on building new schools.
The chancellor saves this until last, bringing cheers from Labour MPs by promising a real-terms 3% a year addition to spending on the health services over the parliament, saying this will amount to an extra £29bn in spending overall.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer
Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Assura Group Rejects KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Takeover Bid in Favor of Competitor $2.4 Billion Offer

KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) one of the best stocks in a . An iconic financial building in the background, with silhouettes of busy bankers walking past in the foreground. Recently, on June 24, 2025, Assura Group, based in the UK, rejected KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR)'s final bid of $2.3 billion in favor of a competitive offer of $2.4 billion from Primary Health Properties (PHP). The decision materialized after months of competitive bidding, eventually leading to the Assura board's decision to take up PHP's offer, considering it more favorable for shareholders. KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE:KKR) was ultimately outbid, despite having previously secured a tentative agreement. This represents a significant setback for KKR in its efforts to acquire Assura. This decision is a reflection of the company's strategic ambition as well as industry competition. Regardless of the setback, analysts remain positive about KKR's fundamentals, given 12 'Buy' ratings and a consensus price target suggesting over 16% upside. The company is focused on targeted acquisitions and growth-inducing investments as a private equity and real estate investment firm, leading to a strong position in a growth stock portfolio. While we acknowledge the potential of KKR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 10 Best Marketing Stocks to Buy Right Now and 10 Best Cybersecurity Stocks to Invest in Under $20. Disclosure: None

Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant
Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant

Although Glastonbury and the BBC have condemned Bob Vylan's onstage comments at the England music festival, at least one Jewish human rights organization is not satisfied with the response. Jim Berk, CEO of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, called out both the festival and the network for providing a platform for the 'disgraceful' performance, in which Vylan led the crowd in chants of 'death to the IDF' and 'free Palestine.' More from Deadline Glastonbury Officials 'Appalled' By Bob Vylan's Anti-Israel 'Hate Speech' Chant From Stage BBC Slams 'Deeply Offensive' Glastonbury Set: 'We Have No Plans To Make It Available On Demand' BBC Avoids Kneecap But Live Streams Another Act Leading Crowd Chants Of "Death To The IDF" & "Free Palestine" 'It was sickening, dangerous and chillingly reminiscent of a modern-day Nazi rally,' said Berk, adding: 'It was public incitement, not performance. The explicit calls for violence against Jews, broadcast live by the BBC without interruption, literally gave hate a stage, a microphone, and the stamp of legitimacy of one of Britain's most respected public institutions.' Berk continued, 'And Glastonbury's bland response? Saying the chants merely 'crossed a line' and offering vague 'reminders' to artists is not accountability—it's cowardice. When confronted with explicit calls for violence against Jews, anything short of absolute condemnation and corrective action is complicity.' Referencing Hamas' October 2023 invasion of Israel's Nova music festival, where 378 were killed and 44 hostages were taken, Berk called the chants 'deeply re-traumatizing and terrifying.' 'This is a moment of reckoning. Festival organizers, media outlets, and artists must choose: will they be platforms for peace, or enablers of hate? Because silence is not neutrality, it is a green light for bigotry,' added Berk. 'Festivals must be prepared to halt performances that invoke hate; broadcasters must air festivals on deferred live and use their kill switch to take hate speech immediately off the air. Never again is not a slogan: It's a responsibility. And it's being betrayed on the world's biggest stages.' Following the performance, the BBC has decried the 'deeply offensive' set, which a spokesperson said they have 'no plans to make the performance available on demand.' A Glastonbury rep has said that organizers are 'appalled' by the chants, which 'very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More

Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant
Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Simon Wiesenthal Center Slams Glastonbury's 'Bland Response' To Bob Vylan's 'Death To The IDF' Chant

Although Glastonbury and the BBC have condemned Bob Vylan's onstage comments at the England music festival, at least one Jewish human rights organization is not satisfied with the response. Jim Berk, CEO of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, called out both the festival and the network for providing a platform for the 'disgraceful' performance, in which Vylan led the crowd in chants of 'death to the IDF' and 'free Palestine.' More from Deadline Glastonbury Officials 'Appalled' By Bob Vylan's Anti-Israel 'Hate Speech' Chant From Stage BBC Slams 'Deeply Offensive' Glastonbury Set: 'We Have No Plans To Make It Available On Demand' BBC Avoids Kneecap But Live Streams Another Act Leading Crowd Chants Of "Death To The IDF" & "Free Palestine" 'It was sickening, dangerous and chillingly reminiscent of a modern-day Nazi rally,' said Berk, adding: 'It was public incitement, not performance. The explicit calls for violence against Jews, broadcast live by the BBC without interruption, literally gave hate a stage, a microphone, and the stamp of legitimacy of one of Britain's most respected public institutions.' Berk continued, 'And Glastonbury's bland response? Saying the chants merely 'crossed a line' and offering vague 'reminders' to artists is not accountability—it's cowardice. When confronted with explicit calls for violence against Jews, anything short of absolute condemnation and corrective action is complicity.' Referencing Hamas' October 2023 invasion of Israel's Nova music festival, where 378 were killed and 44 hostages were taken, Berk called the chants 'deeply re-traumatizing and terrifying.' 'This is a moment of reckoning. Festival organizers, media outlets, and artists must choose: will they be platforms for peace, or enablers of hate? Because silence is not neutrality, it is a green light for bigotry,' added Berk. 'Festivals must be prepared to halt performances that invoke hate; broadcasters must air festivals on deferred live and use their kill switch to take hate speech immediately off the air. Never again is not a slogan: It's a responsibility. And it's being betrayed on the world's biggest stages.' Following the performance, the BBC has decried the 'deeply offensive' set, which a spokesperson said they have 'no plans to make the performance available on demand.' A Glastonbury rep has said that organizers are 'appalled' by the chants, which 'very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' Best of Deadline 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store