logo
Delhi HC issues notice on plea of Leena Paulose for medical treatment at hospital of her choice

Delhi HC issues notice on plea of Leena Paulose for medical treatment at hospital of her choice

India Gazette25-06-2025
New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notice on the plea of Leena Paulose, the wife of Sukesh Chandrasekhar, seeking a direction to authorities for treatment and diagnosis at a hospital of her choice. She has been diagnosed with tuberculosis.
Justice Renu Bhatnagar issued notice to the Prosecution agencies and listed the matter for hearing on July 2. Her regular bail plea has also already been fixed for that date.
Leena has moved the applications seeking directions to avail herself of the best possible in-custody private medical treatment and diagnosis at a hospital of her own choice, as the same is not feasible or adequately available within the confines of the jail premises or government hospitals.
Advocate Anant Malik, alongwith Paul John Edison and Tanya Sharma, appeared for Leena.
It is submitted that she is a 42-year-old woman who has recently been diagnosed with Tuberculosis, a serious communicable disease requiring immediate and continuous medical attention.
It is also submitted that the continued incarceration of the Applicant under such medical conditions, without proper diagnosis and effective treatment, poses a grave and imminent threat to her life and health, thereby violating her basic human rights and Fundamental Rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
She was arrested in September 2021. Her bail application is also pending before the High Court.
Her earlier bail application was rejected on 19 May 2023. At the time, arguements on charge were going on. Still, arguements on charges are going on behalf of accused persons, nothing has changed.
It is submitted that a Woman is entitled to special treatment while considering the bail of a woman under PMLA, the counsel added. (ANI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WHO extends global travel restrictions on Pakistan for 3 months to counter spread of Polio
WHO extends global travel restrictions on Pakistan for 3 months to counter spread of Polio

The Print

timea day ago

  • The Print

WHO extends global travel restrictions on Pakistan for 3 months to counter spread of Polio

The WHO expressed concern over continued WPV1 transmission through cross-border movement, especially in regions such as southern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Quetta Block, southern Afghanistan, Karachi, and Peshawar — areas where the virus remains prevalent. The decision was made during the 42nd meeting of the WHO Emergency Committee for Polio, held virtually on June 18. The meeting included officials from polio-affected nations and focused on the global spread of WPV1, particularly in Pakistan and Afghanistan, which were identified as ongoing international transmission risks, ARY News stated. Islamabad: The World Health Organization (WHO) has extended conditional international travel restrictions on Pakistan for another three months, citing persistent concerns about the transmission of wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1), ARY News reported. According to ARY News, the WHO noted that 'the spread of WPV1 is facilitated by cross-border travel and the movement of displaced populations,' and highlighted the rise in polio-positive sewage samples across Pakistan. Sensitive areas including KP, Sindh, Balochistan, and central parts of the country remain polio hotspots, with Karachi, Peshawar, and Quetta Block serving as strongholds for the virus. The committee also raised concerns about a new polio case reported in Gilgit-Baltistan and the growing number of children missing vaccinations, which further complicates eradication efforts. While acknowledging that the 2025 polio eradication target is unlikely to be met under current conditions, the WHO commended Pakistan's ongoing efforts. 'The organization expressed satisfaction with Pakistan's polio eradication efforts and confidence in the quality of its vaccination campaigns,' ARY News reported. Pakistan's Prime Minister and his team were praised for their commitment, with effective provincial and regional campaigns underway. The WHO urged continued bilateral cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan to combat the virus, calling for sustained joint vaccination drives and stronger surveillance systems. Pakistan's polio surveillance will continue for another three months, during which mandatory vaccinations will remain in place for all outbound travelers. The WHO will reassess the situation and review Pakistan's progress in polio eradication at the end of this period, according to ARY News. (ANI) This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. Also read: WHO warns of cross-border transmission as polio cases spike in Afghanistan, Pakistan

Mumbai civic body can file FIRs against those feeding pigeons despite ban, says HC
Mumbai civic body can file FIRs against those feeding pigeons despite ban, says HC

Scroll.in

time2 days ago

  • Scroll.in

Mumbai civic body can file FIRs against those feeding pigeons despite ban, says HC

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation can register first information reports against those who continue to feed pigeons despite directives against it. A bench of Justices G S Kulkarni and Arif Doctor, in response to petitions by animal welfare activists, said that the subject at hand was that of a public health hazard affecting children and the elderly. The High Court allowed the municipal corporation to file cases against those feeding pigeons under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to public nuisance, negligent acts likely to spread infectious diseases and malignant acts likely to spread life-threatening diseases. Play The court took note of news reports and photographs of the Dadar kabootarkhana, or pigeon feeding spot, and said that they were quite 'telling' that the matter needed immediate action. The counsel for the municipal corporation also said that in some cases, pigeon feeders were refusing to pay fines when caught by civic officials. The court said this showed that merely filing non-cognisable reports against violators was not sufficient. 'This is now compounded with an emerging situation of utter disregard for law, by those who defiantly continue to feed pigeons in the teeth of our earlier order rejecting pleas supporting any such feeding and congregation of pigeons and now obstruction to civic officials from discharging their duties in this regard,' the bench said. In addition to allowing the municipal corporation to file FIRs against violators, the court told the civic body to install closed-circuit television cameras at places where pigeon feeding was still taking place. The bench verbally said that if pigeon feeders 'don't want to follow the rule of law, then the law should catch up with them', The Indian Express reported. The case will be heard further on August 7. On July 3, the Maharashtra government told the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to begin the process of shutting down pigeon feeding points in the city. The High Court, however, told the civic body not to demolish heritage kabootarkhanas.

‘Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning
‘Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning

News18

time2 days ago

  • News18

‘Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning

Last Updated: The minor, aged 17 and a half, had approached the court through her father, seeking medical termination of pregnancy resulting from sexual assault Despite a medical board's caution that terminating a 31-week pregnancy could endanger both mother and foetus, the Allahabad High Court has allowed a minor rape survivor to undergo the procedure, underscoring that her consent and reproductive autonomy are constitutionally protected. The minor, aged 17 and a half, had approached the court through her father, seeking medical termination of pregnancy resulting from sexual assault. A case under the POCSO Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita is already underway. Earlier, the girl had approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Agra, who referred the matter to a medical board. The board, after two rounds of examination, concluded that the pregnancy was well past 29 weeks and that abortion posed a threat to both mother and unborn child. By the time the matter came up before the High Court, the foetus was approximately 31 weeks old. But the court wasn't persuaded by medical caution alone. During a special hearing, Justices Manoj Kumar Gupta and Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra noted that the girl had been through trauma and her mental and physical condition was 'precarious". Counselling sessions conducted by a psychiatrist and clinical psychologist revealed that the minor and her family were fully aware of the risks but remained determined to terminate the pregnancy. In a sealed report submitted to the court, the counsellors wrote that the petitioner and her family understood all options, yet did not want to carry the pregnancy to term under any circumstance, citing emotional distress, social stigma, and economic hardship. The state's counsel, Rajiv Gupta, confirmed that the medical college had tried to dissuade the girl, but the team could not alter her decision. 'She is not in a stable mental state and is dealing with deep trauma," he submitted. Weighing the circumstances, the court relied heavily on recent Supreme Court rulings, including A (Mother of X) v State of Maharashtra (2024) and XYZ v State of Gujarat (2023), where it was held that the right to abortion is part of the fundamental right to dignity, privacy, and bodily autonomy. 'Consent of a pregnant person in decisions of reproductive autonomy and termination of pregnancy is paramount," the Allahabad High Court observed, adding that denial of termination in cases of rape, especially involving minors, may be arbitrary and unreasonable. Calling it a 'difficult but necessary" decision, the court allowed the termination and directed the principal of SN Medical College, Agra, to form a team of specialists to perform the procedure without delay. It further directed the District Magistrate to ensure all medical and travel expenses of the petitioner are covered by the state. The aborted foetus is to be preserved for forensic examination. Confidentiality of the victim was ordered to be strictly maintained, and the court acknowledged the medical team's support in handling the sensitive case. First Published: News india 'Consent Paramount': Allahabad HC Clears 31-Week Abortion For Minor Rape Survivor Despite Medical Board Warning Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store