Rare image of great white shark captured off the coast of Maine
As soon as National Geographic Explorer and photographer Brian Skerry locked eyes with the enormous animal, he knew immediately what was staring back at him. 'There's no mistaking that face,' he says.
A nearly 10-foot long great white shark was just four feet away.
Sharks tagged with tracking devices have been documented off the U.S. coast of Maine, but Skerry thinks this is the first underwater photo of one here. Skerry started diving in these waters around 50 years ago. Since then, he's spent more than 10,000 hours underwater , photographing marine animals from above and below the water.
Once rare, great whites are now flourishing in the Gulf of Maine, which stretches from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to Nova Scotia, Canada. While these growing numbers might make it easier to see or photograph a shark in nearby waters, experts say the risk of being bitten by a great white remains low.
Skerry's encounter on July 8 was fleeting. 'Maybe three minutes,' he says. 'Then she was gone, and we never saw her again.'
Luckily, his camera was ready. He snapped a photo of what he suspects is a juvenile, mouth slightly open and white belly glowing against the eerie green water. Her surface reflection hovered above her like a halo.
'White sharks have always been here,' says John Chisholm, a marine biologist at the New England Aquarium in Boston who says this is the first confirmed underwater photo of a great white shark he's seen in Maine.
In the Gulf of Maine, great whites have been recorded in historic fisheries data and 1,000-year-old teeth have been found in archaeological digs, but trophy fishing and commercial bycatch in the 1970s and 1980s may have caused populations to decline by around 73 percent.
In 1972, the Marine Mammal Protection Act created legal protections for seals and thereby protected one of the key prey species great whites feed on.
Over two decades later, in 1997, the National Marine Fisheries service began more tightly regulating and in some cases prohibiting shark fishing, a protective regulation Massachusetts strengthened in 2005 after the state banned the possession and sale of lucrative shark fins. They are now protected throughout their Northwest Atlantic range–it's illegal to catch, keep, or possess a white shark in U.S. waters.
This helped great white populations rebound. Scientists recorded over 100 individual great whites in Maine waters between 2012 and 2023.
'We started seeing both seals and white sharks in more and more numbers than we had ever seen in recent memory on the Cape,' says Camrin Braun, assistant scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution's marine predators group. Braun is also unaware of any previous such image of a great white in Maine.
A fatal shark bite in 2020, the first in the state's history, made the public aware that there were even white sharks off the coast, he adds.
Could warming sea surface temperatures be luring more sharks to Maine's coastline?
The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 97 percent of the world's oceans. 'It's one of the global epicenters for warming,' says Braun.
Warmer waters might allow juveniles to travel further north into waters that were once too cold for great whites, though Chisholm thinks an increase in shark numbers is more likely to result from conservation regulations.
More sightings might also be the result of more people on the water with a digital phone camera. Twenty years ago, it could take Chisholm days, weeks, or even years to confirm a sighting. Now he receives dozens a day through the Sharktivity app.
And while a new photo of a great white has now surfaced, it's no indication that New England beachgoers should now be more fearful of setting foot in the ocean.
There's a higher risk of being hurt while driving to the beach than getting bitten by a great white shark in the water, Chisholm says.
We can coexist with sharks if we are mindful 'in the way that somebody in Alaska walks in the woods knowing there might be a grizzly bear,' Skerry says. 'We can learn to appreciate these animals, even if we don't want to swim out and give them a hug.'
To be shark smart, don't swim alone, in murky water, or if you see seals or big schools of bait. Avoid swimming at dawn and dusk and don't 'make a commotion… That can attract a shark,' Chisholm says.
As apex predators, sharks play a vital role in keeping the ocean healthy, but they face more danger from us than we do from them. Humans kill over 100 million sharks each year, says Skerry: 'The only truly scary ocean would be one without sharks in it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
How DNA And Data Are Solving America's Coldest Cases
Across the United States, more than 50,000 people have died without a name. These are individuals who were never identified, never claimed and often never mourned. But thanks to forensic technology and the growing use of genetic genealogy, that's beginning to change. Naming the Dead, a six-part docuseries from National Geographic, brings this invisible crisis to light. The series follows the DNA Doe Project, a nonprofit using cutting-edge DNA analysis and open-source genealogy tools to solve some of the country's most confounding cold cases. It's a quiet revolution in forensics, powered by algorithms, datasets and persistence. From Data to Identity The process of forensic genetic genealogy begins by extracting DNA from unidentified remains. That data is then uploaded to public databases in search of distant relatives. It might sound simple, but it rarely is. Samples are often degraded, especially if they've been buried or exposed to the elements for years. Sequencing has to be precise. And even when a viable DNA profile is produced, the real challenge starts: building family trees from matches that might be third or fourth cousins, or even more distant. I recently spoke with Jennifer Randolph, director of the DNA Doe Project, about the objective of her and her team, and about this Nat Geo series. She described the work as 'a really large logic puzzle.' She added, 'Our genetic genealogy volunteers really like that kind of a challenge... you get pretty excited because it's that feeling of, you know, you're on the cusp of resolving this puzzle.' That excitement is balanced by the gravity of the work. 'It becomes very bittersweet,' she said. 'We know that some family is going to get a knock on the door and they're going to get not the news they hoped for.' It's resolution, not closure—but it's more than many of these families have had in decades. My Experience with Genetic Discovery A few years ago, I submitted a DNA test through It was mostly out of curiosity, but also with the hope of finding a missing uncle—my mother's brother—who was separated from the family while they were in foster care. We only have one photo of him as a toddler, and for most of my life, I've wondered where he ended up. I didn't find him. But I did find someone else. The results revealed that I had a half-brother I never knew existed. We've since connected. We've met. We've had the conversations you never expect to have in your 40s or 50s. The circumstances are complex, but that's the nature of family sometimes. What's important is that the technology gave us a way to discover one another. That experience helped me understand just how powerful this work can be—especially for families of the unidentified dead. It's not just about science. It's about being seen. It's about making the anonymous known. The Tech Making It Possible The show emphasizes how far the technology has come. Advances in next-generation sequencing have made it possible to work with even the most degraded samples—sometimes from cases that are 30 or 40 years old. That data is then uploaded to public databases like GEDmatch, FamilyTreeDNA and DNA Justice. While private services like AncestryDNA and 23andMe hold the largest databases, they don't allow uploads of profiles from unidentified remains. That limitation means the work of the DNA Doe Project depends on much smaller pools of data—typically between 1.5 and 2 million profiles. That makes each match even more critical. Randolph noted the impact of visibility and public education, saying, 'We've had more than one instance where someone learned about [this technique], had a missing person in their family and decided to upload to GEDmatch. And then—out of the blue—a high match, like a niece, appears. And once you have that, you know you're there.' In other words, awareness is its own kind of technology multiplier. Infrastructure for Justice Behind the breakthroughs is a growing ecosystem of cloud-based collaboration. Investigators, coroners, volunteers and data analysts work across states and time zones using shared digital tools. Case notes, DNA files and potential family trees are securely stored and accessed in real time. What used to be the work of entire agencies can now be supported by distributed teams using pro bono platforms. The DNA Doe Project itself operates as a nonprofit, often covering both the cost of lab work and the countless hours of volunteer research it takes to identify a single person. That's one of the reasons this show matters. Visibility attracts donations, but it also sparks interest from law enforcement. As Randolph explained, 'We want every Jane and John Doe to have the opportunity to be identified, no matter who they are or how tough the case might be. So we do try to get the word out at conferences... and then they learn about us through word of mouth.' Beyond the Lab Naming the Dead doesn't glamorize the work. There are dead ends. Cases stall. Some episodes end with possibilities, not certainty. But the emotional core is steady—this is about restoring dignity, not just solving puzzles. And the tech, as powerful as it is, still relies on human effort and intention. None of this happens without people willing to volunteer time, apply pressure and keep showing up for the forgotten. It's worth remembering that some families have waited 20 or 30 years for answers. That kind of silence can be corrosive. When resolution comes—whether through a second cousin match or a last-minute database upload—it opens the door to grief, remembrance and sometimes, healing. Naming the Dead premieres August 2 on National Geographic and streams the next day on Disney+ and Hulu. New episodes run through September 6.
National Geographic
5 days ago
- National Geographic
Are orange cats really the goofiest cats? Genetics may have an answer.
The best science on ginger feline behavior hints, yeah, there might be something special about them. Orange cats are said to have goofy personalities. Is that really true? Photograph by Christina Gandolfo, Alamy Stock Photo Hanging from lamps, catapulting off countertops, tackling the dog, biting your legs unexpectedly—there are many wacky behaviors associated with orange cats, often captured on TikTok, whose owners swear are extra derpy, slapdash, and yet also friendly to a fault. But scientifically speaking, are orange cats actually any different than cats of other colors? For starters, orange cats are not a breed, like British shorthair or Siamese. Cats of many breeds, from Maine coons and munchkins to American bobtails and Siberians, can have orange colorations. Which perhaps makes it all the weirder that orange cat aficionados claim that orange cat behaviors transcend breed. Earlier this year scientists identified the gene responsible for the orange coat coloration found in cats. It's called ARHGAP36. But as to whether orange coloration also comes with a suite of behaviors or personality traits, much less is known. (Surprising things you never knew about your cat) In 2015, a small study published in the journal Anthrozoös used an anonymous online poll to find that people were at least more likely to attribute the trait 'friendliness' to orange cats than other cat colors. And a larger study published in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior in the same year also found some support to the idea that orange cats are distinct. 'We found that most of the differences are breed-related, but there were also some differences related to coat color,' says Carlo Siracusa, a clinical scientist at the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and senior author of the study. Lilac-colored cats, for instance, were found to be more playful and more likely to experience separation anxiety. Piebald cats, or those with white patches, had decreased vocalization scores. And cats with a tortoiseshell pattern were less aggressive toward dogs. But orange cats? 'It's interesting that you mention orange cats being more outgoing, more gregarious, because actually, we found the opposite,' says Siracusa. 'They were more likely to show fear-related aggressions towards unfamiliar people.' Orange cats were also linked to a heightened interest in prey. Digging into the science on orange cats While Siracusa's research may be some of the best we have when it comes to attributing any behavior to cat colors, he is quick to qualify the findings. 'Our assessment was done through questions sent to owners. It was not done via direct observation,' he says. 'Every time you use a questionnaire, you are assuming the risk of bias, because you are asking people what they think about something.' Therefore, it may just be that the idea of orange cats being extra sassy is so prominent, that bias is showing up in studies. Even with that knowledge though, Siracusa says biases are often grounded in experience. And as someone who handles cats on a regular basis, he has his own experience-based beliefs, such as male cats being more outgoing than females. 'My perception itself, at this point, is a bias,' he laughs. Orange cat behavior—what we do know Even without a slam-dunk study connecting a cat's orange-ness to its personality, there are hints at a biological link. Remember the ARHGAP36 gene that provides orange coloration? Well, it's linked to the X-chromosome. This explains why orange cats are more likely to be male, the authors report in the study published in Current Biology. Female cats have two X chromosomes. And that means they must possess two copies of the gene in order to produce orange coloration. But males, which have XY chromosomes, need just one copy of ARHGAP36, to develop orange colorations. Perhaps this is the real answer to orange cat quirkiness: Siracusa tends to think that, in general, male cats are more outgoing. But, here's where things get interesting. As scientists learn more about genes and how they influence development, they have learned that any given gene is often linked with a variety of downstream traits. For instance, people with red hair have a variant of the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene, which may also be linked to a higher tolerance of pain and reduced effectiveness of anesthesia. Now, in studies of humans and mice, the ARHGAP36 gene is expressed in the brain and hormonal glands. Even more interestingly, the cells that give fur or skin color, known as pigment cells, actually begin their development in the neural crest cells of an embryo. (Here's how your cat experiences the world) These cells can also 'differentiate into neurons and endocrine cells that produce catecholamines, which are known to control activity and excitability,' says Hiroyuki Sasaki, an emeritus professor and geneticist at Kyushu University in Japan, in an email. 'It thus seems possible that the DNA mutation in the gene could cause changes in temperaments and behaviors,' says Sasaki, who is senior author on the study. 'I should like to stress, however, that this is just a speculation.' Cats are individuals, too Even if there was some scientific underpinning for ginger cat behavior, the scientists stress, there would always likely be exceptions to the rules. 'This is what we see in the clinics every day,' says Siracusa, who says clients frequently tell him they selected a certain breed or color pet for its prescribed behavior. 'And then they have an animal that behaves in a completely opposite manner, and they are shocked,' he says. (How diverse personalities help animals survive) With nearly 74 million pet cats in the United States alone, you might wonder how it is that anything remains a mystery about the companion animals. But questions that are not linked to urgent human or animal health issues often go overlooked and underfunded, says Sasaki. 'Our world is still full of mystery, and there are so many unanswered questions around us, including those that may seem very simple,' says Sasaki.
Forbes
25-07-2025
- Forbes
Rewriting The Narrative Of Hurricane Katrina
A police car drives through the empty streets of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. (Neil ... More Alexander) On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans. The storm itself was devastating—but what followed was far worse. The real disaster, many experts argue, wasn't the wind or water, but the collapse of infrastructure, communication and trust in government. Now, two decades later, National Geographic's Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time revisits the catastrophe with the benefit of hindsight and the tools of modern technology. Directed by Traci A. Curry and produced by Proximity Media and Lightbox, the 5-part series is a digitally reconstructed case study in systemic failure—an attempt to rebuild not just the timeline, but the public memory of what actually happened. Technology as a Truth-Telling Tool I had an opportunity to connect with Ivor van Heerden, the former deputy director of Louisiana State University's Hurricane Center. Ivor is the 'Cassandra' of the Katrina tragedy—he predicted Hurricane Katrina and the catastrophic impact in 2004, only to be ignored. 'This is definitely not a story about a storm,' said van Heerden. 'The trigger, if you will, was a storm—but it was man's folly that led to the catastrophe.' LSU Hurricane Center Co-founder Ivor Van Heerden discusses events surrounding Hurricane Katrina and ... More other hurricanes during an interview for National Geographic's Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time. Van Heerden is known for his criticism of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), attributing the 2005 levee failures in New Orleans to their faulty design and execution. With emotional accounts of survivors and immersive archival footage, the series reveals Hurricane Katrina as a disaster that was anything but natural. (National Geographic) At the time of Katrina, social media was in its infancy. Most people didn't have smartphones. Surveillance footage was grainy or missing altogether. And the digital infrastructure needed to coordinate a large-scale emergency response simply didn't exist. Fast-forward to 2025, and the tools for documentation and storytelling have changed dramatically. The production team behind Race Against Time used AI-enhanced video restoration, satellite overlays, GIS modeling and high-resolution archival footage to create a real-time, moment-by-moment reconstruction of the disaster's timeline. 'They were banging on my door fairly often,' van Heerden recalled, 'for computer model simulations, data, photographs, my own video imagery.' Those simulations—many developed two decades ago—have taken on new life in the series, contextualizing the levee breaches and helping viewers visualize the scale of the flood. This technical precision is what transforms the docuseries from reflection to re-examination. Overlaying personal stories with geospatial data and timestamped visuals, the series makes a compelling case: the devastation wasn't random—it was predictable, and preventable. The Failure Wasn't Just Physical. It Was Digital. The documentary also highlights how poor coordination and digital blind spots worsened the crisis. Government systems failed to track where people were sheltered. Communications systems collapsed. Rescue missions turned around because of misinformation—such as unconfirmed reports of violence or looting. 'People were told to go to the Superdome and wait for help,' van Heerden said. 'Then the damn roof blew off. And the cavalry didn't come. And the cavalry didn't come. And the cavalry didn't come.' In one scene, the series deconstructs how the sound of gunfire—interpreted as aggression—was actually a signal for help. 'The SOS signal for a hunter is three shots fired. Boom, boom, boom,' van Heerden explained. 'You want to make a noise so you can be heard. But instead, those shots were misunderstood, and buses turned around.' It's a stark reminder that signal, context and interpretation are everything—especially in crisis response. It's not enough to have data; you need to understand it, respond to it and trust the systems delivering it. A Warning for the Future As we face a new era of climate-driven 'storms on steroids,' van Heerden cautions that Katrina should not be viewed as an isolated failure, but as a warning. 'We need to better understand how hurricanes are going to change given these warm oceans and the warm air,' he said. 'And then the last thing is, it's pretty hard to predict sometimes these storms... we need a lot more research into that.' That research depends on technology. From atmospheric sensors to predictive modeling, modern science is built on data. And yet, as van Heerden pointed out, the very agencies responsible for this work—like NOAA—are facing cuts. 'You ignore the science at your folly,' he warned. 'Science is a quest for the truth. If you ignore the science, then you won't know the truth—and the folly is yours.' Beyond Commemoration Race Against Time is a digital act of reckoning. By combining technology, testimony and survivor narratives, the series offers a framework for how we can revisit past crises—and build more resilient systems for the future. What Katrina exposed was not just vulnerability to weather, but vulnerability to misinformation, miscommunication and outdated infrastructure. If there's a tech lesson in this story, it's that no amount of forecasting matters if you can't translate data into action—and no tool can replace accountability. Hurricane Katrina: Race Against Time premiers on National Geographic on July 27. All episodes will be available to stream July 28 on Disney+ and Hulu.
