Dundee motorist who tried to hit police with BMW jailed for five years
George Drinnan, 39, repeatedly tried to strike PCs Matthew Rhind and Younis Yaqub at Americanmuir Road on February 6 2023.
The High Court in Edinburgh heard how, at the time, the repeat offender was disqualified from driving and had no insurance.
Drinnan – who was found guilty off the offences at proceedings at the High Court in Stirling earlier this year – appeared before judge Lady Tait on Friday.
She heard submissions from defence advocate George Gebbie, who told how his client's deafness will affect his ability to communicate with others while behind bars.
However, Lady Tait told Drinnan – who had the help of a British Sign Language interpreter to understand proceedings – he needed to go to prison for his crimes.
She said: 'The circumstances of these offences mean that the only appropriate sentence is a custodial one.
'The court must seek to deter such offending behaviour.'
Drinnan, from Dundee, was originally charged with attempted murder but was convicted of assault to danger of life following a trial.
At the start of the trial Drinnan's co-accused, 53-year-old Paul Coombs – also aided by a BSL interpreter – pled guilty to a dangerous driving offence committed during the same incident and driving without insurance and while disqualified.
He admitted reversing and striking a parked car, causing it to hit another vehicle, then driving at speed towards a parked police car.
Lady Tait previously banned Coombs from driving for a total of six years and imprisoned him for 18 months.
On Friday, the court heard Drinnan has previous convictions for dishonesty, driving without insurance and driving whilst disqualified.
Mr Gebbie told Lady Tait: 'He is unable to communicate with people who aren't skilled in sigh language.
'This will affect his ability to communicate with others, this will affect his ability to interact with others prisoners.'
Lady Tait also banned Drinnan from driving for seven years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Bayesian superyacht drowned victim Mike Lynch ordered to pay £700m in fraud case
The estate of British tech tycoon Mike Lynch - who drowned aboard his superyacht in a freak storm last year - is set to bankrupted after being ordered to pay hundreds of millions in a fraud case. A High Court judge ruled that Mr Lynch - and another former executive - should compensate US giant Hewlett Packard Enterprise £700million over the 2011 sale of the software company he co-founded, Autonomy. But given his death a year ago off the coast of Sicily, it is likely to fall on his estate to pay instead. Reports say Mr Lynch's estate is estimated to be worth around £500million so there would be nothing left to pass to Mr Lynch's wife, Angela Bacares, and his surviving daughter, unless they appeal. The outcome of the civil case comes after Mr Lynch, 59, was aboard his yacht, the Bayesian, celebrating his acquittal in the US on separate criminal charges that also related to the sale of his company to Hewlett Packard. The £700million compensation bill is, however, much less than HP was demanding. HP sued Mr Lynch and Autonomy's former chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain, in 2015. The US tech giant previously said that it planned to 'follow the proceedings through to their conclusion', meaning HP's case would proceed against Mr Lynch's estate. HP had accused Lynch and Hussain of masterminding an elaborate fraud to inflate the value of Autonomy, which HP bought for $11.1billion (£8.2billion) in 2011. The deal spectacularly unravelled, with HP writing down Autonomy's value by $8.8billion (£6.5billion) within a year before it brought a $5 billion lawsuit against Lynch and Hussain in London. A judge at the High Court ruled in HP's favour in 2022, though there have been long delays since in determining what damages should be awarded to HP. Mr Lynch, once hailed as Britain's answer to Bill Gates, had always maintained his innocence and blamed HP for failing to integrate Autonomy into the company. He was acquitted of criminal charges over the deal in the US and had intended to appeal the High Court's 2022 ruling, a process which has been on hold pending a decision on damages. Mr Lynch, his daughter Hannah, 18, an onboard cook and four guests - Morgan Stanley International Chairman Jonathan Bloomer, his wife Judith, lawyer Chris Morvillo and his wife Neda - died after his superyacht sank. Fifteen people, including Ms Bacares, survived. The couple's other daughter, Esme, 22, was not on the boat. Despite the ruling, Ms Bacares is said to have her own assets that were ring-fenced from her late husband's estate. She is, however, the sole shareholder of Revtom, the corporate entity that owned the Bayesian. The wreckage of the Bayesian superyacht has been raised from the sea bed in a bid to find any more clues about the disaster. High Court judge Mr Justice Hildyard ruled that HPE suffered losses amounting to £697,876,753 through the purchasing of Autonomy, some of which is set to be paid by Mr Lynch's estate. He also ruled that Mr Lynch's estate is liable to pay part of around £35million in damages. Some of the money is due to be paid by Mr Hussain, Autonomy's former chief financial officer, who was also sued. A further hearing to deal with matters including interest, currency conversion and whether Mr Lynch's estate can appeal against the decision is set to be held in November. Handing down his ruling, Mr Justice Hildyard expressed his 'great sympathy' for Mr Lynch's family, calling his death a 'tragedy'. He said: 'It is a source of anxiety to me that I have to deliver a judgment that will inevitably cause further stress on those involved.' In the 197-page ruling, he said he considered that HPE's claim 'was always substantially exaggerated' and that the $5billion claimed 'was not based on detailed analysis'. A spokesperson for HPE said: 'We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute. We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined.' Jeremy Sandelson, who was appointed by the court as administrator of Mr Lynch's estate, said he would be 'examining the judgment carefully', including whether to appeal both the 2022 ruling and the latest judgment.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Mike Lynch's estate faces bankruptcy over £700m fraud ruling
Mike Lynch 's estate has been effectively bankrupted after being ordered to pay £700m in a fraud case over the late British tycoon's business dealings. A High Court judge ruled that Lynch should compensate Hewlett Packard (HP) over the fraudulent sale of his software business Autonomy in 2011. The ruling comes 11 months after Lynch and his daughter Hannah died in a freak storm that sank his Bayesian superyacht. The decision means the software boss would be expected to pass nothing to his widow and surviving daughter, unless the ruling is appealed. His wife, Angela Bacares, has her own assets that are legally separate from her late husband's estate and will not be affected by the ruling. Ms Bacares's stake in technology company Darktrace was worth more than £300m before the business's sale last year. Lynch sold Autonomy to HP for £7bn in what was the biggest ever acquisition of a British technology company, but the Silicon Valley giant later accused him of fraud and sued him in the High Court. He was found liable in 2022 but the long-running case was thrown into limbo by his death off the coast of Sicily in August last year. Lynch, 59, and his daughter were among seven who died when the Bayesian capsized. The software entrepreneur had been on holiday to celebrate his acquittal in a criminal trial linked to the disastrous sale of Autonomy. US prosecutors had accused Lynch of masterminding a criminal scheme to defraud investors by artificially boosting Autonomy's revenues using accounting tricks and 'round-trip' transactions, but a jury cleared the entrepreneur after an 11-week trial. Lynch, who had faced a long spell in prison if convicted, said he had been granted a 'second life' after the verdict. Lynch's net worth had been estimated at $450m (£333m) in the separate US legal proceedings. On Tuesday, Mr Justice Hildyard said HP suffered a loss of around £646.2m related to misleading accounting and a further £51.7m related to Lynch's representation, in addition to further costs. However, the damages are far less than HP had been seeking, and substantially less than the $8.8bn that the company wrote off Autonomy's value when it accused Lynch of improper accounting. In a posthumous statement written before his death, Lynch said: 'Today's High Court ruling reflects that HP's original $5bn damages claim was not just a wild overstatement – misleading shareholders – but it was off the mark by 80pc. 'HP acquired Autonomy for $11.6bn and today's judgment is a view that Autonomy's actual value was not even 10pc below the price HP paid. This result exposes HP's failure and makes clear that the immense damage to Autonomy was down to HP's own errors and actions. 'An appeal process will be considered later this year. The English civil case included hearsay evidence from the US, and we were never able to question or cross-examine those witnesses. 'This is in direct contrast to the rights of defendants in the US legal system. When in the US criminal trial we were able to cross-examine the relevant witnesses, a very different story emerged. Why is the English legal system so trusting?' HP sued Lynch and Autonomy's chief financial officer Sushovan Hussain in 2015 seeking $5bn. In 2022, Mr Justice Hildyard sided with the company, saying the pair had been 'dishonest' and 'obsessed' with propping up Autonomy's share price. Mr Hussain settled privately with the company, now known as HPE, earlier this year. HPE had pressed ahead with the lawsuit after Lynch's death, saying it was 'in the best interest of shareholders'. Jeremy Sandelson, a lawyer who is managing Lynch's estate, said he would consider whether to appeal. 'This detailed judgment awards substantial damages to HP. As administrator it is now my duty to consider the interests of all parties with a stake in Dr Lynch's estate, including HP and Dr Lynch's widow,' he said. 'I will now be examining the judgment carefully and assessing the appropriate next steps, including whether to appeal both the original 2022 finding of civil liability against the late Dr Lynch and the damages awarded today.' A further hearing will follow in November to determine details of the settlement and a potential appeal. An HPE spokesman said: 'We are pleased that this decision brings us a step closer to the resolution of this dispute. We look forward to the further hearing at which the final amount of HPE's damages will be determined.'
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
£2m bill for legal battle between Earl Spencer's ex-wife and girlfriend
The legal battle between Earl Spencer's estranged wife and his new girlfriend is set to cost more than £2m, a court has heard. Cat Jarman, who has been dating the brother of Diana, Princess of Wales, for almost a year, is suing his third wife after accusing her of sharing private medical information. The Norwegian archaeologist, 43, lodged a High Court claim against Countess Karen Spencer, the Earl's wife of 13 years, last October. She has since alleged that she was forced to reveal her multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in a high-profile newspaper interview to end gossip online. On Monday, Master Mark Gidden heard that both parties had reached an agreement on future estimated legal costs amounting to more than £2.2m. Kirsten Sjovoll, for Jarman, told the judge the overall agreed future costs for the claimant stood at £1,217,880, while the defendant's legal costs were £1,000,087. The court did not hear how much Jarman is suing the Countess for. The barrister claimed the defendant's legal costs were 'excessively high', noting that Countess Spencer's tally was already exceeding more than half a million. Master Gidden disagreed, noting: 'To my mind, they are costs falling within a range that is to be expected.' Speaking about the apparent discrepancy in spending, Clara Hamer, for Countess Spencer, said: 'Just on the big picture point…when you're dealing with a case of this magnitude and the issues involved that's not such a great gulf.' She claimed Countess Spencer's legal costs so far amounted to £511,404, while Jarman's were £329,365. 'The court is not a slave to comparison,' she went on, adding: 'Similar work in the hands of different legal teams may result in different costs.' Jarman previously revealed she had 'worked very hard indeed' to keep her MS diagnosis hidden from many people she knew, including the Earl, 61, in the early days of their relationship. When she lodged the court case in Autumn last year, the details of her diagnosis remained confidential. She later gave an interview to MailOnline in which she revealed she had the condition, and said in court documents that she was concerned about her 'loss of autonomy and control' over her own medical information. Countess Spencer, meanwhile, accused her estranged husband and Jarman of attempting to 'garner publicity for their relationship' in the press. She said Jarman's decision to give an interview to MailOnline in which she revealed her diagnosis was 'hopelessly inconsistent' with her legal case. 'Deliberately disclosing the fact that she has MS to the world in a manner calculated to give it maximum publicity is not only entirely inconsistent with any claim to privacy, but it also nullifies the ostensible purpose of these proceedings,' the defence reads. The Countess, who was married to the Earl for 13 years and shares a daughter with him, has robustly defended herself against Jarman's allegations. She and the Earl are in the midst of divorce proceedings. The Earl confirmed he was in a relationship with Jarman live on ITV's Good Morning Britain in October last year. The couple later gave an interview about their relationship in November, during which he said she 'brings out the best in me'.
