Donald Trump's top advisor makes BIG statement against India, accuses it of funding the Ukraine War, warns 100 percent Tariff along…, PM Modi now plans to…
Washington: After over nearly two decades of steady progress, India-US relations may, quite abruptly, be at an inflection point with President Donald Trump and his team making hostile remarks against India. After Trump's slew of statements on social media targeting India, one of his top advisors at the White House, Stephen Miller, has launched a scathing attack on India. Miller has accused India of funding the war in Ukraine. The remarks made by Miller on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, suggest a hardening stance from Washington towards New Delhi, despite India being a key Indo-Pacific partner of the US.
Miller said, 'It is unacceptable for India to continue funding this war by buying oil from Russia.' He further stated that the figures are 'shocking.' He further claimed that in terms of purchasing Russian oil, India is now almost on par with China — a comparison that could surprise both Washington and New Delhi.
He said, 'People would be shocked to learn that India is essentially on par with China when it comes to buying Russian oil. That is a startling fact.' It is important to note that the statement made by Miller comes just days after the US imposed a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods. Along with this tariff, Trump also mentioned the possibility of imposing penalties on India for purchasing Russian oil and weapons. However, it is currently unclear how large those penalties might be. Does the US want to punish India?
Experts are of the opinion that imposing penalties on India for purchasing Russian oil would be a direct violation of India's sovereignty. They argue that the United States has no authority to dictate how India should manage its international relationships. Although the US continues to increase pressure, a report by news agency Reuters states that the Indian government has made it clear that it will not alter its energy strategy.
India maintains that buying oil from Russia is linked to its strategic autonomy and economic needs. Meanwhile, the Indian Embassy in Washington has not yet issued an official response to Miller's remarks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
India, New Zealand Unlock New Chapter In Defence Ties, Strategic Dialogue Gains Momentum In New Delhi
New Delhi: India and New Zealand are moving to strengthen their defence partnership, adding fresh momentum to a long-standing relationship that continues to strengthen across strategic and economic fronts. On August 4, Union Minister of State for Defence Sanjay Seth hosted Kathleen Pearce, head of the International Branch at New Zealand's Ministry of Defence, in New Delhi. The two sides reiterated their shared commitment to scaling up collaboration in defence and other sectors. 'Ms Kathleen Pearce, Head of International Branch, Ministry of Defence, New Zealand and Mr Patrick John Rata, NZ high commissioner, called on Raksha Rajya Mantri @SethSanjayMP today. The meeting reaffirmed strong defence ties & commitment to deepen cooperation across key strategic domains,' the Ministry of Defence posted on X. Ms Kathleen Pearce, Head of International Branch, Ministry of Defence, New Zealand and Mr Patrick John Rata, NZ High Commissioner called on Raksha Rajya Mantri @SethSanjayMP today. The meeting reaffirmed strong defence ties & commitment to deepen cooperation across key strategic… — Ministry of Defence, Government of India (@SpokespersonMoD) August 4, 2025 Later that day, India's Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh also met Pearce and Rata. The discussions culminated in the formal launch of a new strategic defence dialogue between the two nations. 'Defence Secretary Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh met Ms Kathleen Pearce, Head of International Branch, Ministry of Defence, New Zealand and NZ High Commissioner Mr Patrick John Rata in New Delhi today. Both sides welcomed the launch of strategic dialogue & agreed to deepen #defenceties,' the MoD said in another post. Defence Secretary Shri Rajesh Kumar Singh met Ms Kathleen Pearce, Head of International Branch, Ministry of Defence, New Zealand and NZ High Commissioner Mr Patrick John Rata in New Delhi today. Both sides welcomed the launch of strategic dialogue & agreed to deepen #defenceties.… — Ministry of Defence, Government of India (@SpokespersonMoD) August 4, 2025 These high-level meetings follow the recent completion of the second round of negotiations for the India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which wrapped up in New Delhi on July 25. The talks covered wide-ranging issues, from trade in goods and services to investment, rules of origin, customs processes, technical barriers and sanitary measures. According to the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, both delegations expressed strong interest in reaching early convergence on several points and reiterated their aim to finalise a balanced and future-ready trade agreement. The Ministry of External Affairs highlighted that India and New Zealand have long shared close and friendly relations. Their common ground includes a shared Commonwealth legacy, similar legal systems and democratic governance structures. Both countries also aim to promote economic growth and inclusive prosperity across diverse societies, an alignment that now extends to strategic cooperation. With defence ties being actively upgraded and economic negotiations progressing in tandem, the India-New Zealand partnership is entering a more mature and multifaceted phase.
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says
By Daphne Psaledakis Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says WASHINGTON -The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to accept up to 250 migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump's administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration. The agreement, first reported by Reuters, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted. "Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation," said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo. "Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade." The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect basic human rights. In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States. The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public. Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. US TO PROVIDE GRANT TO RWANDA Rwanda will be paid by the United States in the form of a grant, the official said, adding that the grant letter was finalized in July. The official declined to say how much the grant was for. The U.S. and Rwanda could extend the agreement beyond 250 people by mutual consent, the official said, adding that those deported to Rwanda do not have to stay in the country and can leave anytime they choose. Kigali will only accept those whose prison terms are complete or who have no criminal case against them, as there is no agreement with Washington that would allow people to serve out their U.S. sentence in Rwanda, the official said. No child sex offenders will be accepted. The Trump administration has pressed other countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Western and regional leaders have praised President Paul Kagame for transforming Rwanda from the ruins of the 1994 genocide that killed more than 1 million people into a thriving economy. Rights groups have accused him of abuses and of supporting rebels in neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo, accusations that he denies. Rwanda has also engaged in peace talks led by the Trump administration to bring an end to fighting in eastern Congo. The two African nations signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement in Washington in June, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year. The agreement to accept migrants deported from the U.S. is not the first such agreement Rwanda has reached. Kigali signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. reverses pledge to link disaster funds to Israel boycott stance
The Trump administration on Monday (August 4, 2025) reversed course on requiring U.S. cities and States to rebuke boycotts of Israeli companies in order to receive disaster funds, according to a statement, and deleted the earlier policy from its website. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed its statement that said States must certify they will not sever 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to qualify for the funding. Reuters reported on Monday that the language applied to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems, among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. This is a shift for the administration of President Donald Trump, which has previously tried to penalise institutions that don't align with its views on Israel or antisemitism. Economic pressure on Israel The disaster funding requirement took aim at the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests,' said DHS Spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement on Monday afternoon. DHS oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA in grant notices posted on Friday said states must follow its 'terms and conditions' to qualify for disaster preparation funding. Those conditions required that they not support what the agency called a 'discriminatory prohibited boycott,' a term defined as refusing to deal with 'companies doing business in or with Israel.' The new terms, posted later on Monday, do not include that language.
