
The Afghan schoolgirls forced to return to repression by Iran
This is the reality for tens of thousands of Afghan girls in Iran who are now being deported to a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, where their right to education has been systematically destroyed.
Iran's interior ministry said it will offer online education to Afghan schoolgirls who the Islamic Regime are forcing to leave the country with their families by the end of this month.
Nader Yarahmadi, the head of the ministry's immigration office, said Iran can only enrol students with ID numbers and residency documents in its school – something that some Afghans refugees do not have.
But families facing deportation told The Telegraph the government's promise of online education is a baseless claim to justify their deportation.
The measures are part of a broader crackdown by Iran that uses spying accusations as a pretext for mass arrests and deportations following its recent conflict with Israel.
Since early June, nearly 450,000 Afghan refugees, many who arrived after the Taliban returned to power in 2021, have been deported and 5,000 children separated from their parents, according to UN agencies.
Afghans in Iran have long been blamed for the economic problems, but the crackdown has become much harsher since the recent conflict with Israel.
During its 12-day war, daily deportations jumped from 2,000 to over 30,000 as Iranian authorities turned public anger toward the vulnerable minority.
Some 50 kilometres north of Tehran, in Karaj, nine-year-old Nafas and her family have already received a deportation order.
They've packed their belongings and are set to leave for Afghanistan next week. The family fled to Iran after the fall of Kabul, as her father's job with the Western-backed government put them at risk under the Taliban.
Farhad, Nafas's father, said: 'She and her sister used to memorise poems, record themselves reciting them, and send the videos to their teacher.
'But now they're both depressed. They hardly eat and cry themselves to sleep every night.'
Nafas was set to start third grade (the equivalent to the UK's Year Four) this September, and her 12-year-old sister Neda was entering fifth grade. They had been looking forward to a school trip with their teacher and classmates later this month.
'They went to their school the other day to say goodbye to their teachers. It was heartbreaking. I couldn't bear to watch and had to walk away,' said Farhad.
'This is not what human dignity should look like. I no longer worry about my own safety in Afghanistan, I worry about what will happen to my children.'
He said the girls are now on school holidays, but Nafas still walks to school and stands outside, tears in her eyes.
'She doesn't want to leave her friends, and neither does her sister,' her father said. 'They're so innocent. I feel deeply guilty that I can't give them even the most basic right: education and a chance at happiness. A nine and 12-year-old shouldn't be crying over school. They should be learning, not longing to learn.'
Schoolgirls returning to Afghanistan are increasingly facing child marriage, driven by traditional rural beliefs and financial hardship.
Afsaneh, 15, was forced to return to Afghanistan two months ago. Now, her family is arranging her marriage.
Firouz, her brother, said Afsaneh had been doing well in school and wanted to continue her studies. Now, their father wants to marry her off to a man in his 20s.
'I've tried to stop him,' he said. 'But I have no say in the matter... Now she cries all the time.'
Their father insists that in their village, if a girl is not married by her age, 'people start talking badly about her'.
The girls in Iran are trapped in limbo and are struggling with the prospect of leaving their education and friends behind.
Mahnaz, 17, not her real name, has considered suicide rather than face deportation.
'I've thought about killing myself,' she said. 'Dying. It's better than going to Afghanistan and falling into the Taliban's hands and with no school.'
Mahnaz was born and raised in Iran and had legal documents, like her mother's family. But her life fell apart eight years ago when her father's severe drug addiction broke up the family.
'My father became severely addicted and it was very difficult,' she said. 'He beat all of us. He beat my mum. He beat me. He intentionally burned my hand when he was using drugs. The mark is still there.'
Mahnaz's father attempted suicide and her mother later filed for divorce after years of abuse. But without the male head of household, their residency documents expired and became invalid.
In Iran, if the father of a refugee family loses his documents, the whole family risks losing theirs. Mahnaz's father disappeared and with him, their legal status.
'When they expired, me and my mum were left alone,' Mahnaz said. 'We wanted to go to school. To study. Go to a clinic. Go to a hospital. But they wanted documents. We were stuck.'
Eventually, they received new census forms, allowing Mahnaz to enroll in high school and her younger brother to continue their education.
But with the census, the Islamic Republic can easily find the refugees whose legal status remains uncertain and deport them. Those fully documented by the UN for decades cannot be easily sent back.
'They gave census holders exit forms,' she said. 'We have about 20 days to see what happens to our situation.'
The deadline is the end of July for the schoolgirls to leave the country, according to Iranian media. After that, families like Mahnaz face deportation to a country where the Taliban has banned girls from attending school beyond primary grades and barred women from most jobs.
At the Afghanistan border, aid workers witness the daily reality of forced returns.
Faraidoon Osmani, who works for the Mercy Corps humanitarian NGO at the Herat border crossing, said between 24,000 to 30,000 people arrive daily from Iran.
'The situation is very bad,' Mr Osmani said. 'The people who come, almost all of them, were forcibly expelled.'
Families are being torn apart in the deportation process. 'You will see a lot of children unaccompanied at the border,' Mr Osmani said. 'Half the family stayed in Iran, half the family came to the border. Some children who are under 18 years old were also expelled.'
Mr Osmani also believes that Iran's promise of online tuition is unrealistic for most returnees.
'The majority of our people live in villages and remote areas,' he said. 'Many people don't have mobile phones, let alone having the internet.'
Since taking power in August 2021, the Taliban has severely limited women's rights in Afghanistan.
Women now face rules that control nearly every part of their lives; from being forced to cover their faces and banned from driving, to not being allowed to talk to men or choose how they dress.
In the small town outside Tehran, Mahnaz works from 9 am until 11 pm, constantly checking on their legal status while trying to support her family.
She dreams of university, of helping others, of a future that seems increasingly impossible.
'I really want to continue my studies and go to university,' she said. 'I want to reach somewhere so that I can help others.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
12 minutes ago
- Metro
Afghan veteran warns data breach poses shadow threat ‘for years to come'
A former British Paratrooper who spent more than a decade serving in numerous operations across Afghanistan has warned that the data breach will pose a security threat for years to come. Ahmad Fahim said maintaining cover 'is part of staying alive' after it emerged that more than 100 British personnel — including members of the SAS and SBS — have been compromised. The personal information relating to serving and former members of the special forces and spies was emailed out in error, it emerged yesterday, after it was earlier revealed earlier in the week that thousands of Afghans had been put at risk by the error. Fahim, who often worked alongside US Special Forces in the country, warned that this type of data could be traded or passed on to other groups with greater capabilities than the Taliban. The spreadsheet sent out in February 2022 by a defence official was first revealed to have included the personal information of 18,714 Afghans before it emerged that members of MI6 and British special forces were also among those compromised. Fahim said: 'As a former British Paratrooper who served in numerous operations across Afghanistan for over a decade, often alongside US Special Forces, this is a story I take seriously on both a personal and professional level. 'The leak of personal data, including the identities of over 100 British officials, some from specialist units, is more than just a serious administrative failure. 'Once information like that is exposed beyond secure systems, it becomes impossible to contain. 'Whether it's picked up by Taliban-linked networks, traded to proxy groups, or passed on to actors with broader capabilities, the long-term consequences are real.' Fahim, who worked across Afghanistan for more than a decade, assesses that the Taliban and their affiliates have become more sophisticated in how they deal with sensitive material. He raised the prospect that the information may have been traded or passed on to nefarious actors with greater capabilities than the Islamic militants — including foreign intelligence services. Red flags that have already emerged include one person named in the dataset threatening to post it in a Facebook group. The data is also understood to have exchanged hands in the UK for a large sum of money, according to The Times. 'The Taliban and their affiliates have become far more structured in how they gather and move sensitive material,' Fahim said. 'What starts as a local breach can quickly become global. 'Data like this can be sold or traded through shadow networks, shared with foreign intelligence services, or used for cyber-tracking, impersonation, mapping patterns of life, or even targeting contacts abroad. 'These aren't far-fetched scenarios, they're the kinds of risks that follow people for years, especially those who've served in classified or high-threat roles. Operational security isn't just about what happens in theatre, it's about protecting our people long after the mission ends. 'Many of those named in this leak worked in roles where staying off the radar wasn't optional, it was part of staying alive and keeping others safe. 'That line's now been crossed.' A secret programme to relocate Afghans named in the dataset to the UK took place while the details of the breach were kept secret. The largest covert evacuation mission in British peacetime history could end up costing billions of pounds. As a decorated veteran who encountered the Taliban firsthand and saw the chaos and death of the UK's mass evacuation from Kabul airport in 2021, Fahim believes a threat remains to those still in the country. He now works in the security industry after a military career which began when he served as an interpreter for US Special Forces in Afghanistan, where he was born, before joining the Paras. 'The threat to Afghan nationals still inside the country is even more immediate,' Fahim said. 'Many have no cover, no fallback. The fact that both British and Afghan individuals were exposed shows the scale of this failure. The least we owe these people is honesty and protection.' The breach took place when the official trying to verify Afghan applications to come to the UK erroneously sent out a large database. A super-injunction, meaning even the secrecy order itself could be reported, prevented the blunder being made public. In the meantime, the largest covert evacuation in peacetime British history was launched to get Afghans out of the country. Entitled the Afghanistan Response Route, the programme has cost around £400 million so far and could amount to £850 million by the time it ends. 'Mistakes happen, but what makes this worse is how long it was kept quiet, not just ignored but actively hidden under an injunction,' Fahim said. 'When something this serious goes wrong, leadership isn't about silence, it's about taking responsibility, fixing it, and ensuring it never happens again. If we say we stand by those who stood by us, then we've got to do better than this.' The latest revelations can be reported after a High Court hearing yesterday, which enabled some of the spreadsheet contents to be reported. In a statement to parliament on Tuesday, Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'My first concern has been to notify as many people as possible who are affected by the data incident and to provide them with further advice.' More Trending Mr Healey continued that it had not been possible to contact everyone affected as he outlined how anyone concerned about the breach can seek further security advice, including through a 'self-checker tool'. A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'It's a longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on Special Forces. 'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.' Do you have a story you would like to share? Contact MORE: British spies and SAS soldiers' personal details leaked in Afghan data breach MORE: Roll call of nameless Afghans killed in action while serving the UK MORE: Paratrooper tells how race out of Afghanistan left devastating toll


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israeli settlers accused of killing 117 sheep in West Bank attack
JORDAN VALLEY, West Bank, July 18 (Reuters) - Palestinian Bedouins accused Israeli settlers on Friday of killing 117 sheep in an overnight attack and stealing hundreds of others in an apparent effort to chase farmers off their land in the occupied West Bank. The incident comes amid what the United Nations described this week as intensifying attacks by Jewish settlers and security forces against Palestinians in the West Bank and record mass displacements. The Israeli army did not respond to a request for comment about the mass slaughter of the animals belonging to the Arab al-Kaabaneh Bedouin community, in the Jordan Valley. Veterinarians were called in to treat a handful of sheep which had survived the knife and gun attack, some of the animals shaking uncontrollably and in apparent shock. Salem Salman Mujahed, a resident of Arab al-Kaabaneh, said multiple groups of settlers working in coordination had orchestrated the assault, and accused the army of standing by. "(Settlers) came near the houses. I asked them what are you doing here then we started fighting with each other," he said. "The army detained me, and they handcuffed me." He said other groups of settlers then attacked the sheep, which are vital to his community's survival. Reuters was unable to independently verify who was responsible for the attack. Palestinian Minister Moayad Shaaban condemned the incident, calling it part of a broader strategy to displace Palestinians from the region. "These sheep and animals were slaughtered and shot at," he told Reuters. "They are using these tools to terrify these people to leave these areas, which have been inhabited for dozens of years." The attack prompted at least one family to begin relocating. Bedouin Tareq Kaabaneh said he could no longer withstand what he called settler intimidation. "They were armed, they steal donkeys and sheep. In the night they come here and start shooting toward us," Kaabaneh said. "I am moving now from here, I want to protect my kids and my sheep, my livelihood ... yesterday I was safe, but I don't know what will happen to me tomorrow," he added. The United Nations reported this week that mass displacements in the West Bank had reached levels unprecedented since Israel first took military control of the territory nearly six decades ago. The U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva also said there had been 757 settler attacks on Palestinians or their properties since January - a 13% increase from the same period last year. At least 964 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces and settlers in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. Over the same period, 53 Israelis have been killed in attacks by Palestinians or in armed clashes. The U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee demanded this week a full investigation into the killing of a Palestinian American who was beaten to death by settlers in the West Bank on July 11, describing it as a "criminal and terrorist act". The United Nations' highest court said last year that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories, including the West Bank, was illegal and should end as soon as possible. Israel disputes this, citing security needs as well as historical and biblical ties to the land, which it captured in the 1967 Middle East war. The West Bank is among the territories Palestinians seek for an independent state.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
John Healey ‘misled' Parliament over Afghan data leak
John Healey has been accused of misleading Parliament over the Afghan data breach. Three days ago, the Defence Secretary told MPs that no serving member of the Armed Forces had been put at risk by the leak. However, it emerged on Thursday that the identities of more than 100 British officials, including members of the special forces and MI6, had been compromised. Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader, demanded Mr Healey come before the House of Commons to face questions on whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public. 'Three days ago, John Healey claimed no one serving in the Armed Forces was put at risk by the data breach,' he said. 'Today, we found out that appears to be false. 'We need to know if any serving members of the armed forces were impacted, and the Defence Secretary must urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.' The information about the effect of the data breach on UK personnel was kept secret by an super-injunction until Thursday, when the order was lifted in part by a High Court judge. It allowed media organisations to reveal that detailed case notes in the database contained personal data of special forces and spies. The Government had already admitted on Tuesday that the data of nearly 19,000 Afghans who worked with the British during the 20-year war in Afghanistan and applied to resettle in the UK had been inadvertently leaked. Many were judged to be at risk of serious harm or even death as the Taliban sought retribution against those who had worked with the British government during the conflict. The data breach occurred in February 2022 but was not discovered by the government until August 2023, when someone in Afghanistan obtained the data and posted part of it on Facebook. The data on UK personnel that was leaked involved their names, but there were no contact details such as addresses, telephone numbers or email addresses. It comes after Sir Grant Shapps, who was defence secretary when the injunction was first put in place, said he would 'do the same thing all over again'. He added: 'You simply can't release everything and this was one of those times where, faced with a decision of protecting lives, both Brits and Afghanis, I would do the same thing all over again.' Mr Healey made his comment in the Commons in response to a question from Ian Roome, a Lib Dem MP and member of the defence select committee. He said: 'To the best of my knowledge and belief, no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk by the data loss.' Speaking on Friday morning, Mr Roome said: 'The Defence Secretary gave me his assurances just three days ago that no serving members of our Armed Forces were put at risk by this appalling data breach. I am very concerned to find out that this appears not to have been correct. 'It is really important to restore public trust, and he now clarifies his remarks. It is the least that our brave armed forces personnel, along with the thousands of Afghans impacted, deserve.' Downing Street said the Defence Secretary's statement to the Commons that 'no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk' by the Afghan data leak was 'accurate' despite Sir Ed's accusations to the contrary. Asked if Mr Healey misled the House, a No 10 spokesman said: 'The Defence Secretary's statement to the House… I believe it was an accurate statement.' He said the Government is 'committed to transparency', adding: 'In terms of security of our personnel, we take that extremely seriously, particularly those in sensitive positions. 'We always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.' A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'It's long-standing policy of successive governments to not comment on special forces. 'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'