Democratic lawmakers travel to El Salvador to support return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Four Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Rep. Maxwell Frost, traveled to El Salvador to visit a deported man accused of MS-13 ties.
The Supreme Court had ordered Kilmar Abrego Garcia's return, but the Trump-era deportation remains in dispute.
Republicans criticized the trip, while Frost said constituents fear similar actions could affect them.
ORLANDO, Fla. - Four more Democratic lawmakers, including a Florida Congressman, traveled to El Salvador to visit an illegal immigrant and suspected MS-13 gang member deported by President Donald Trump's administration.
What we know
Four Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Rep. Maxwell Frost, traveled to El Salvador on Monday to meet with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man deported during the Trump administration who has been accused of gang affiliation. The lawmakers say Garcia, who had been living in Maryland, held protected legal status and was unlawfully removed from the U.S. despite a Supreme Court order calling for his return.
The delegation included Reps. Robert Garcia of California, Yassamin Ansari of Arizona, and Maxine Dexter of Oregon. Their visit was self-funded after the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform denied the travel request.
What we don't know
It remains unclear whether the Trump administration will ultimately comply with the Supreme Court's directive to facilitate Garcia's return. The specific grounds of the legal protections Garcia allegedly held have not been publicly disclosed, nor have the full details of the gang accusations levied against him by Maryland police. Additionally, the extent to which Garcia's deportation process followed standard procedures remains in question.
The backstory
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, originally from El Salvador, had been living in Maryland before he was deported under the Trump administration. Officials at the time cited an accusation from Maryland law enforcement that linked Garcia to MS-13, a notorious criminal gang. Garcia has denied any gang affiliation. The deportation took place despite what the visiting lawmakers say was his eligibility for legal protection within the U.S.
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government must "facilitate" Garcia's return. However, administration officials have doubled down on their previous position, maintaining that Garcia poses a security threat due to alleged gang ties.
Big picture view
The controversy strikes at the heart of ongoing debates over immigration policy, judicial authority, and political optics. For Democrats, the case serves as a symbol of what they view as overreach and injustice under Trump-era immigration enforcement. For Republicans, it raises concerns about national security and questions the priorities of Democratic lawmakers amid global and domestic crises.
Florida, which has a significant immigrant population, has emerged as a flashpoint in the dispute.
What they're saying
Congressman Frost said in an interview on Monday with FOX News that he was getting calls from his constituents asking him to go because they are worried the same thing could happen to them.
"I represent a lot of immigrants, I represent a lot of people who see themselves represented in this situation. They're saying, 'Congressman, do what you can now, because it's him today and it can be one of us tomorrow,'" explained Rep. Frost.
Meanwhile, some Florida Republicans say it would be absurd to bring him back to the U.S.
"Why would you bring him back? He's not from here. They sent him home to El Salvador. He wasn't supposed to be in the United States," said Republican Congressman Randy Fine. "These congressmen could have spent the last year and a half going to Israel to try to bring back Americans who are held hostage. Instead, they go to El Salvador to meet with an illegal immigrant gang member who beat his wife. I don't know what's wrong with these people, but they need their heads examined," he continued.
After the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform denied the request for the trip, Frost said he ended up paying for it out-of-pocket.
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 35 ORLANDO:
Download the FOX Local app for breaking news alerts, the latest news headlines
Download the FOX 35 Storm Team Weather app for weather alerts & radar
Sign up for FOX 35's daily newsletter for the latest morning headlines
FOX Local:Stream FOX 35 newscasts, FOX 35 News+, Central Florida Eats on your smart TV
The Source
This story was written based on information shared by Fox News, Reps. Maxwell Frost and Randy Fine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Virginia Giuffre's family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein 'stole' her
The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was among Jeffrey Epstein's most well-known sex trafficking accusers, said that it was shocking to hear President Donald Trump say the disgraced financier 'stole' Giuffre from him and urged that Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell remain in prison. Giuffre, who had accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. She died by suicide this year. Her family's statement is the latest development involving Epstein, who took his own life in a New York jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges, and the Republican president, who was his one-time friend. Trump denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and said he cut off their relationship years ago, but he still faces questions about the case. Trump, responding to a reporter's question on Tuesday, said that he got upset with Epstein over his poaching of workers and that Epstein had stolen Giuffre from his Palm Beach, Florida, club. 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' the family's statement said. 'We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this,' it continued. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt noted the president was responding to a reporter's question and didn't bring up Giuffre himself. 'The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,' she said. The family's statement comes shortly after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell in a Florida courthouse, though details about what she said haven't become public. Maxwell's lawyers have said she testified truthfully and answered questions 'about 100 different people." They have said she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions. A message seeking comment about the Giuffre family's statement was sent to Maxwell's attorney Thursday. A Trump administration official said the president is not considering clemency action for Maxwell. Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates. Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old. The men, including Andrew, denied it and assailed Giuffre's credibility. She acknowledged changing some key details of her account. The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a 'substantial donation' to her survivors' organization. The American-born Giuffre lived in Australia for years and became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors after emerging as a central figure in Epstein's prolonged downfall. Her family's statement said she endured death threats and financial ruin over her cooperation with authorities against Epstein and Maxwell.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration cancels plans to develop new offshore wind projects
The Trump administration is canceling plans to use large areas of federal waters for new offshore wind development, the latest step to suppress the industry in the United States. More than 3.5 million acres had been designated wind energy areas, the offshore locations deemed most suitable for wind energy development. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is now rescinding all designated wind energy areas in federal waters, announcing on Wednesday an end to setting aside large areas for 'speculative wind development." Offshore wind lease sales were anticipated off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Maine, New York, California and Oregon, as well as in the central Atlantic. The Biden administration last year had announced a five-year schedule to lease federal offshore tracts for wind energy production. Trump began reversing the country's energy policies after taking office in January. A series of executive orders took aim at increasing oil, gas and coal production. The Republican president has been hostile to renewable energy, particularly offshore wind. One early executive order temporarily halted offshore wind lease sales in federal waters and paused the issuance of approvals, permits and loans for all wind projects. In trying to make a case against wind energy, he has relied on false and misleading claims about the use of wind power in the U.S. and around the world. The bureau said it was acting in accordance with Trump's action and an order by his interior secretary this week to end any preferential treatment toward wind and solar facilities, which were described as unreliable, foreign-controlled energy sources. Robin Shaffer, president of Protect Our Coast New Jersey, applauded the administration for its actions and said they were long overdue. Opponents of offshore wind projects are particularly vocal and well-organized in New Jersey. 'It's hard to believe these projects ever got this far because of the immensity, scale, scope and expense, compared to relatively cheap and reliable forms of onshore power,' he said Thursday. 'We're nearly there, but we haven't reached the finish line yet.' Attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia are suing in federal court to challenge Trump's executive order halting leasing and permitting for wind energy projects. His administration had also halted work on a major offshore wind project for New York, but allowed it to resume in May. The nation's first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, a 12-turbine wind farm called South Fork, opened last year east of Montauk Point, New York. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Jennifer Mcdermott, The Associated Press
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lula's approval rises amid tariff dispute with Trump, poll shows
By Isabel Teles SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Approval for Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva exceeded disapproval for the first time in nine months, a poll showed on Thursday, against a backdrop of a growing dispute with Washington. Earlier in July, U.S. President Donald Trump said he would slap 50% tariffs on Brazilian exports to fight what he has called a "witch hunt" against Lula's right-wing rival, former President Jair Bolsonaro. Those tariffs were formalized on Thursday, albeit with some key sector exemptions. The Trump administration has also imposed sanctions and visa restrictions on the judge overseeing Bolsonaro's trial on charges of plotting a coup. Lula's government has pushed back, calling Trump an unwanted "emperor" and the sanctions "unacceptable." The AtlasIntel/Bloomberg poll showed 50.2% approval of Lula's performance, up from 49.7% in the previous poll two weeks ago and marking the first time he has scored greater approval than disapproval since October. The new poll adds to evidence that Trump's tactics may be backfiring in Brazil, rallying public support behind a defiant leftist government. The proportion of respondents who consider Lula's government good or great has also improved, now at 46.6% from 43.4%, although that is still below the 48.2% who consider it bad or awful. If a replay of the 2022 presidential election in Brazil was held this week, 47.8% of those surveyed would vote for Lula and 44.2% for Bolsonaro. Despite being barred from holding public office until 2030, Bolsonaro insists he could run again, while Lula has hinted that he could run for reelection. The poll surveyed 7,334 Brazilian adults online between July 25 and July 28. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus one percentage point.
