Amazon Drops $54 Billion Bomb on UK -- What It Means for Jobs, Growth, and Global Power Plays
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with AMZN.
This investment program extends Amazon's ongoing presence in the UK, already its third-largest market after the U.S. and Germany. The company now employs 75,000 people across the country and spent over 12 billion in 2023 alone. Included in the new figure is part of the 8 billion previously announced by AWS for UK data centers through 2028, as well as salary costs. While the investment cadence is in line with recent years, the timing gives Prime Minister Keir Starmer's administration a narrative boost as it pushes to attract more global capital and revitalize Britain's long-stagnant economy.
Prime Minister Starmer called Amazon's plans a massive vote of confidence, and they could very well be seen that way. But the spotlight also brings scrutiny. Just days before the announcement, the UK's grocery regulator launched a probe into whether Amazon had breached supplier payment rules. That aside, the scale and visibility of this commitmentat a time when many global companies remain cautious on Europecould position Amazon as a long-term anchor investor in a country eager to rebuild growth momentum.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
5 minutes ago
- CNBC
Last week's big winners and losers reveal where the stock market is headed
You can learn an awful lot by looking at the list of stocks that made new highs last week — and the list of stocks that hit new lows. Foremost, they can tell you what is and isn't working in this market, especially during earnings season. We saw many groups roll over and only one, the data center, really advance. The combination of Friday's weak employment number , more discriminatory tariffs , and President Donald Trump's anger, brought out sellers after a very long run up. The selling is real and it will take an end to speculative excess and endless tariff news to get us to restart, and I don't see it happening. I hear the usual geniuses talk about how dip-buying is as stupid as ever, even as though it has been fabulous since 1982. I see a landscape that wants to go lower, but I also see earnings that don't justify big declines, just a drift until something great happens. And I don't mean Fed Chair Jerome Powell quitting. Let's start — and end — with some cracks in the Magnificent Seven. The growth in Microsoft's Azure cloud business and the breakout of Meta's multiple revenue streams explain the incredible gains of those two Club names — gains strong enough that they both made the list of new highs. The perceived weakness of Amazon's 17% gain in web services versus the whopping 39% gain in the smaller but all-powerful Azure certainly helped. Amazon put up $30.9 billion in revenues in its AWS cloud unit. That's obviously a ton of business, but it was flat with the previous quarter and only equal to the estimates. Microsoft's cloud acceleration in the quarter was jaw-dropping. The staggering distance between Azure's triumphant growth and Amazon's perceived slowing led to a rally in Microsoft's stock and a sell-off in Amazon shares — losses which triggered immense soul-searching. Was Microsoft real? Or was it inflated by its partnership with OpenAI and its ChatGPT function, which reigns supreme? The burgeoning ChatGPT roster was a big reason why OpenAI was able to raise $8.3 billion this week at a $300 billion valuation. That little-noticed fact should have turned more heads, and that alone could explain some of this week's craziness. After all, design software company Figma only raised $1.2 billion in its initial public offering Thursday, a puny deal, but it still managed to capture everyone's attention. (More on that later.) There was lots of grousing about Microsoft benefitting from the surge in OpenAI business. Some experts liken the partnership to that of Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and predict it too will soon flame out, meaning that huge stream of Open AI revenue could go away. But the amount of fear instilled by AWS critics was behind the huge sell-off in Amazon . As I made my calls to sources Friday, I kept hearing that AWS, built to sell product, isn't built to help create new businesses based on AI. There is some truth here. AWS has fallen behind Microsoft in the cloud. I also believe that it doesn't have enough Nvidia product and has too much of its own chips, which are considered inferior by the fresh-faced AI developers even as it regarded as darned good for DevOps. Amazon is underspending its competitors. That's highly unusual and not good, and it's all that people cared about last week. I wish it didn't matter, but after this quarter Amazon's status as one of the greatest companies on Earth is now going to be considered suspect. The conference call was dispiriting, with CEO Andy Jassy giving a long and unnecessary soul-searching answer to Morgan Stanley analyst Brian Nowak's question about Amazon falling behind in generative. A do-over on that question would help, but there are none. All of the great data about retail meant nothing. Sure, we own Meta and Microsoft, but the stock of Amazon now worries me, even though I would never count these guys out in a gunfight. My work says it will all sort out itself and Amazon will reaccelerate, if not this quarter then this year and those who sell will regret it. Amazon will get the Nvidia's next generation "Rubin" chips, and swallow the damned pride of making its own chips. We just want Amazon to be the fastest and the best. How the company hasn't bought AI start-up Anthropic is downright perplexing, to use the word of the day. Oracle , of course, is a state of the art, Rent The Runway style data center that is now loved, and its build out has been nothing short of amazing. Yes, it rankles me because we owned it and lost it on account of two misses on its way to greatness. GE Vernova and Constellation Energy show up on the highs list because all of the hyperscalers admit to being power-constrained, with Amazon emphasizing the need more than the others. Constellation has nuclear, Vernova has the more practical natural gas turbines, along with nuclear. They can keep going higher, even as the bears consider them meme stocks. They are most decidedly not. Caterpillar reports next week and it will be considered part data center, part reshoring and part Biden infrastructure. All of those themes work until someone decides they don't work well enough. Eaton is a better analogue. DoorDash and Roblox make the list because there are always a couple of companies that amaze and can't be denied. Doordash caught some upgrades. Roblox has accelerating revenue. Both are awful shorts. (Reddit will have a similar trajectory when it eventually gets added to the S & P 500.) S & P Global is a pure play on offerings, something that we can all agree to are about to heat up based on Circle and Figma. And Altria ? Its basic business repels managers even as it enthralls users. I want to break down and buy Altria, which happens to be the greatest stock of all time. No kidding. Even better than Nvidia because: 1) it has been around for 100 years; and 2) the power of compounding. Then there's Figma, the spawn of CoreWeave and Circle. It looks like those who embrace meme stocks and those who love the tightly controlled bitcoin have fallen in love with the IPO process and the lack of float. Coreweave, an almost busted deal, cut the size of its initial public offering (IPO) to $1.5 billion: 37.5 million shares at $40 per share, down from its previous plan of 49 million shares at $47–55 per share. It worked and the stock exploded higher. Figma also had heavy demand and light supply, as only $1.2 billion went to the company and the rest went to selling shareholders. Strange ratio there: 12.4 million shares raised by the company and 24 million shares raised by selling shareholders. I can't blame the bankers for low-balling Circle after Coreweave. But there was no excuse for the underpricing of Figma; even the gents putting up the signs in front of the New York Stock Exchange knew it would be a smash. Anyway, it's too bad because it devolved into rank speculation as the buyers, sensing there could be no more new shares trading for six months, decided to play bitcoin and generate an increase on the second day of trading that was childish. Palantir reports results on Monday, and I am expecting another home run, which will ignite even more speculation. Friday's losers were far more varied and deep. First, can we dispense with the idea that the employment number, as weak as it was, caused the sell-off? The classic recession stocks fared miserably: Procter & Gamble , Bristol Myers , Colgate , McCormick all landed on the new-low list. (Bristol was good, but without a hit in Cobenfy, its drug to treat schizophrenia , we will never make money in it.) These stocks would be on the list of new highs if a recession was the real story. Plus, with bonds soaring and yields plunging, you would think someone would want that P & G yield. You also would have thought that Baxter would be on the new highs list in a recession, but all I can say is have no idea what's happening there. But it isn't good. If you cut your dividend (as in the case of Dow ) or if the dividend is doubted (think UPS ), you end up on the list of new lows. Both of those stocks deserve that fate. Old Dominion is a legit recession story if you want to frame it that way. Carmax , too, except the incredible move in Carvana makes that reasoning suspect. The food group is just so bad: General Mills and Conagra pop up; the latter lives on this low list. Then there are a couple of oddballs. Accenture had been on a multiyear consulting tear. That's over. It didn't take long for Otis after myriad good quarters to land on this ignoble list. Two yesteryear faves, Chipotle and Lululemon , are a reminder that this market has little enthusiasm for high-multiple disappointments. Both need huge upside surprises to change their direction. I don't see any coming. And then there's UnitedHealth , the much beloved UnitedHealth. What a death rattle feel for that Dow stock. It's a wide and varied list for the new lows. But it's not the kind of list you get when people think there is a recession coming soon. Instead, it says there is considerable rot underneath that we might not have known otherwise when we look at all of the deals and IPOs and SPACs that are being priced. Although the latter spells trouble, too — way too speculative. So where do I come out? We just had a huge move that was decapitated by Trump's tariff sword once again. To me, it was a depressing week because the speculation emanating from Figma, the endless bitcoin derivatives, and the Palantirs and next Palantirs are signs that nothing good is about to happen. We need Figma and Ciricle to be crushed if we are going to go anywhere. We need the fascination with stocks as crypto champs to die down. We need a return to the financials as leaders and techs as consolidators. Yes, we need to see consolidation in tech (and many other industries) to get things back on track. There is no sign of a pulse at the Justice Department or the Federal Trade Commission, so the time is right. Which leads me back to the Magnificent Seven and Apple . The quarter was good . Double-digit growth in revenue and earnings per share. Most encouraging: When I spoke to CEO Tim Cook, the need to put big deals on the radar screen was clear. The idea of something major in a finance vertical, now that the Goldman Sachs credit card deal is unraveling, is downright exciting. But the fact that this stock went down last week? Downright depressing. How bad? If it goes down big Monday, we're going to have to some major resetting of what works around here and it won't be good. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons Meta Platforms Stock Has Looked Unstoppable, but Can It Stay That Way?
Key Points Meta has been experiencing incredible growth outside of North America. Its margins have been improving and it has also continued to grow its user count. A possible breakup of the company, however, could adversely impact its growth potential. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) stock has been jumping after the company reported earnings recently. It's now trading at all-time highs as the social media giant has continually impressed investors over the past couple of years. It has been showing strong growth on multiple fronts and has looked downright unstoppable. But whether it can continue to be a hot buy is by no means a sure thing, as there are many question marks around the company. Here's a look at what's been behind the stock's impressive performance of late, and also what risks investors should consider before buying shares of Meta Platforms. 1. Revenue has been rising fast outside of North America The headline from Meta's second-quarter earnings performance was that the company beat expectations as sales rose by 22%, totaling $47.5 billion, and they beat expectations of $44.8 billion. Earnings per share of $7.14 also came in far better than the $5.92 analysts were expecting. But what was particularly surprising and impressive was where the company's growth has been coming from. Over the past two years, advertising revenue from the U.S. and Canada has grown by a little under 42%. In other markets, the growth rate has been much higher. In Europe, revenue has risen by 56% over a two-year period and it's up 64% in Meta's rest of the world segment. Asia-Pacific growth of just over 42% was also slightly higher than the growth Meta experienced in the U.S. and Canada market. Overall, there looks to still be considerable growth potential for Meta when looking at international markets, which is an encouraging sign for growth investors. 2. Meta is becoming much more efficient Another great sign for investors is that Meta's business is doing more with less. Its expenses as a percentage of revenue have been coming down sharply in the past couple of years. Its operating margin this past quarter was 43%, versus 38% in the prior-year period. Meta has been utilizing artificial intelligence to make its operations more efficient and as it continues to do that, this trend may continue. Furthermore, if its margins expand, its bottom line can look even more impressive, making the social media stock appear cheaper in the future. 3. Number of daily active people continues to rise Back in 2022, there were concerns that Meta Platforms' business was in trouble as Facebook experienced its first-ever decline in daily users. But those fears look to be long gone as the company has now been steadily growing its user count. With close to 3.5 billion daily active people who are using one of its apps (Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, or WhatsApp), it's little wonder why the company is a top choice for marketers and ad spend. While it's not easy to continually add users when the numbers get this high, Meta has been able to do just that, demonstrating how truly unstoppable its business has been in recent years, or so it may seem. Risks investors can't afford to ignore Meta's business has looked unstoppable but that doesn't mean it doesn't come with risks. There is still an antitrust battle looming over the business that could result in the loss of two of its most highly prized assets: Instagram and WhatsApp. They are particularly popular among younger audiences and if a breakup occurs, that could be a big loss for Meta's business. And right now, investors don't appear to be pricing in that risk. Another issue is that while user count has been rising, a report from The Wall Street Journal earlier this year found the company took a lax approach to getting scammers off its platforms, and that it has effectively become a hub for fraudsters. According to an analysis from 2022, as much as 70% of new advertisers were either promoting scams or selling illegal or low-quality goods. These are potentially serious concerns that investors shouldn't overlook. While the business is doing incredibly well, if its numbers are being inflated due to bad actors on its platforms, then that could lead to significant issues down the road. Should you buy Meta Platforms' stock today? As of Thursday's close, Meta's stock has risen by 32% since the start of the year. It's trading at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 28, based on analyst estimates. Its incredible profit growth is impressive and is a big reason why the stock continually looks cheap. But I wouldn't rush to buy the stock, at least not until there's more clarity about what happens with Instagram and WhatsApp, and if a breakup ends up taking place. And I'm also wary about its user growth, and whether scams and fake accounts could be contributing significantly to its growth. As good as Meta's results have looked in recent quarters, I'm not convinced the business is as unstoppable as it appears to be, as there could be trouble ahead. Should you invest $1,000 in Meta Platforms right now? Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons Meta Platforms Stock Has Looked Unstoppable, but Can It Stay That Way? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Watch These Amazon Stock Price Levels After Post-Earnings Tumble
Key Takeaways Amazon shares are in focus to start the week after plunging Friday as quarterly results from the e-commerce and cloud provider failed to impress investors. The stock price fell below the lower trendline of a rising wedge pattern on Friday, potentially laying the groundwork for further earnings-related selling. Investors should watch key support levels on Amazon's chart around $199, $190 and $175, while also monitoring a major overhead area near $ (AMZN) shares are in focus to start the week after plunging Friday as quarterly results from the e-commerce and cloud provider failed to impress investors. While the company posted growth in its Amazon Web Services business, investors may have expected more after rivals Microsoft (MSFT) and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) recently reported strong results in their cloud units. The company's AWS revenue grew 17.5% in its latest quarter, well below Microsoft's Azure growth of 39% and trailing the 32% sales increase in Google Cloud Platform. Following the results, analysts at Jefferies said that AWS growth was 'disappointing given big momentum at Azure and GPC.' Amazon shares fell 8% to just close Friday's session at just below $215, pushing the stock into negative territory for the year. Some analysts raised their price targets on Amazon following the earnings report, with those at JPMorgan analysts saying they 'would buy the pullback.' Below, we take a closer look at Amazon's chart and apply technical analysis to point out key post-earnings price levels that investors will likely be watching. Rising Wedge Breakdown Since setting their early-April low, Amazon shares had trended higher within a rising wedge, a move that coincided with the 50-day moving average (MA) recently crossing above the 200-day MA to form a bullish golden cross. However, the stock's upward momentum ended abruptly Friday, with the price closing below the rising wedge pattern's lower trendline, potentially laying the groundwork for further selling. Let's identify key support levels on Amazon's chart to watch and also point out a major overhead area worth monitoring during potential recovery efforts. Key Support Levels to Watch The first support level to watch sits around $199. The shares may find support in this location near last July's peak, which also closely aligns with troughs that formed on the chart in November and May. A decisive close below this level could see the stock revisit support at $190. Investors may look to accumulate shares in this region around a multi-month horizontal line that connects a range of corresponding price action on the chart extending back to April last year. A deeper retracement opens the door for the shares revisiting lower support at the $175 level. This area could attract buying interest near a series of trading activity on the chart stretching from February last year to April this year. Major Overhead Area Worth Monitoring During potential recovery efforts in Amazon's stock, it's worth monitoring how the price responds to the $233 level. This area on the chart could provide selling pressure near the rising wedge pattern's peak and the December swing high. The comments, opinions, and analyses expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read our warranty and liability disclaimer for more info. As of the date this article was written, the author does not own any of the above securities. Read the original article on Investopedia
