Baltic states' ‘visceral fear' of Russian invasion ‘almost impossible' for Irish to understand, says ex-MEP
triple-lock
on sending Irish soldiers abroad while other European Union states fear invasion by
Russia
, former Green Party MEP
Ciarán Cuffe
has declared.
[
'Hands off Ireland's neutrality': Government warned changes to triple-lock system will be fought
Opens in new window
]
The 'visceral fear' felt by
Estonia
,
Latvia
and
Lithuania
that Russian leader
Vladmir Putin
could order the invasion of their countries is 'almost impossible to understand' for an Irish audience, he said.
Speaking at the Patrick MacGill summer school in Glenties, Co Donegal, Mr Cuffe, who is now the co-chair of the European Green Party, said the Baltic states are
debating whether to pull out
of an international agreement banning landmines.
'Why? Because these countries want to have a belt of landmines ready if Putin comes across the border. We can have an esoteric discussion of the triple lock. But in those countries, it's what might happen tomorrow or the next day,' he said.
READ MORE
[
Poll shows Ireland's attachment to neutrality is strong but nuanced
Opens in new window
]
Eastern European EU states worry about mobilising soldiers in 24 hours: 'It's a debate we're not even thinking about here. We're still wrestling with [a report] that said our army, our
defence forces
are 40 years out of date. I think we have to come to grips with that.'
Former MEP Ciarán Cuffe at Patrick MacGill Summer School on Saturday
Speaking on the Gaza crisis and Ireland's stand on the issue, Mr Cuffe urged an Irish audience to remember that 'the legacy of the Holocaust casts a very long shadow over central Europe.
'When I talk to my colleagues in Germany or Austria, they are so hard-wired into protecting the state of Israel, they find it incredibly difficult to recognise the magnitude of human slaughter of Palestinian people that is occurring.
'However, public opinion is changing in Germany,' he said, adding that the European Green Party now favours the suspension of parts of the EU-Israel association agreement that do not require all EU states to agree.
Ireland's focus on the Gaza crisis is understandable given our history as a postcolonial country: 'We do find it so strong and so close to our own history. So, we have to act on that,' he said,
Meanwhile, Dr Eoin Drea, senior researcher at the Brussels-based Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, warned that Ireland's positions on neutrality and defence spending have damaged the country's standing.
'I always get anxious talking about Ukraine in Ireland because I really want Irish people to know that in Brussels, Ireland is not viewed as a credible voice, as a serious voice on security and defence,' he said.
Ireland is talking about buying a towed sonar array to track Russian submarines 'interfering with our undersea cables, but on some days, we don't have enough sailors even to put a ship to sea. So, what are we going to tow this sonar array with?'
Before the Ukraine crisis, few other EU states took any notice of Ireland's attitudes on defence and neutrality, he said: 'There was a lot of ignorance about the Irish situation before Ukraine. We were out on the western seaboard, we didn't matter.'
Since then, however, it has become clear to other EU states that the United Kingdom 'takes care' of Ireland's security and defence: 'If there's a Russian fighter that buzzes by Irish airspace, it's RAF jets that are scrambled to meet them,' he said.
[
Who protects Irish skies? The secret air defence deal that dates back to the cold war
Opens in new window
]
Meanwhile, trust in democracy has fallen significantly over the last 25 years across western countries because of voters' 'lack of faith' in traditional political parties' ability to tackle problems, former minister for Europe
Lucinda Creighton
said.
Scandals in nearly all western countries have led to 'an erosion of trust in the consensus around the political order', the former Fine Gael TD said.
Traditional centre-left and centre-right political parties have 'struggled to capture the attention of younger voters' and have been unable to use social media tools to connect with them, unlike populist parties.
Blue-collar and middle-class workers 'just don't have the same hope and positivity and sense of opportunity that they might have done in the past', leading to a lack of faith in the liberal order, she went on.
Equally, populist or right-wing parties in Poland, Germany, France and elsewhere have successfully 'adopted quite radical left-wing policies, but coupled them with some right-wing narratives', she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Minister wants to see 9% Vat rate on energy maintained in budget
The lower 9% Vat rate on gas and electricity should be retained in the upcoming budget to avoid further hiking energy prices for consumers, energy minister Darragh O'Brien has said. The lower rate was originally introduced in 2022 as part of a major cost-of-living package from the Government, with Vat falling from 13.5% to 9%. Speaking yesterday, Mr O'Brien said the reduction in the Vat rate was a 'very important' measure on affordability, and he wanted to see it extended into 2026. However, he said any decision to retain the rate would be made as part of the budget process. The Tax Strategy Group has estimated the total cost of retaining the lower Vat rate is €193.3m — €58.2m for gas and €140.1m for electricity. In previous years, the cut has been extended six months at a time, with the most recent extension coming in April. Each six-month extension has provided estimated savings of €26.60 on electricity and €20.28 on gas for consumers for the duration of the period. Price increases The modest savings have been dwarfed, however, by price increases introduced by the major utility companies. A number of energy providers have again opted to increase their rates in recent months, with Flogas confirming a hike in variable electricity charges by 7% from next month. This is expected to increase bills for Flogas electricity customers by €126 annually. In April, SSE Airtricity hiked electricity bills by 10.5% and gas bills by 8.4%, the latest in a spate of increases since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Mr O'Brien said the prices for energy have 'levelled off' after a spate of surges in recent years, but conceded that Ireland's energy costs remain too high. Households here pay nearly 30% more for electricity than the EU average, costing approximately €350 more annually. Gas prices are approximately 10% above the EU average. Irish householders are paying the third-most expensive prices for electricity in Europe, behind only Germany and Denmark. The Dáil has heard that there are more than 300,000 people in arrears on their electricity bills, while more than 175,000 are in arrears on their gas bills. The minister for energy said this increase was a matter for concern, and anyone in arrears should enter into an arrangement with their provider. Energy Affordability Taskforce Mr O'Brien met with the recently-established Energy Affordability Taskforce on Thursday, and said an interim report would be provided to the Cabinet ahead of the budget in October. However, he ruled out the prospect of energy credits making a return, saying there was a very significant cost associated with the measure. 'That was €3.5bn and that was in the teeth of the cost-of-living crisis, particularly post the outbreak of the war in Ukraine,' Mr O'Brien said. He said the costs for one-off payments were very significant, and reduced the amount of money the Government could funnel into medium- and long-term measures to make energy more affordable.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Reducing Vat rate a blunt and costly policy instrument for hospitality
Less than a week on from its publication, one of the fundamental assumptions underpinning the summer economic statement has changed with the agreement of the EU-US trade deal. This will have implications for October's budget and a potential reduction in the overall budgetary package outlined by the Government just a week ago. Of the total budget package detailed in the summer economic statement, €1.5bn has been allocated to a "tax package". The Government identifies the narrowness of Ireland's tax base as a cause of concern in the summer economic statement, noting that income tax, corporation tax, and revenue make up the bulk of Ireland's tax base. At a time of heightened global economic uncertainty, increased tariffs for Irish exporters, a growing and ageing population, increasing demand for and pressure on services, a further narrowing of Ireland's tax base in the budget would seem at odds with the programme for government commitment to maintain a broad tax base "to guard against the need for counter-cyclical fiscal policy in the event of a downturn" and prepare for demographic change. Much of the subsequent discussion on the so-called "tax package" has been the commitment in the programme for government to support the hospitality sector through changes to Vat and its implications in terms of the space available for any income tax changes in the budget. According to the Department of Finance, a reduction in the Vat rate for the hospitality sector to 9% would cost almost €900m a year This discussion fails to look at the broader context, the impact to date of "tax packages" introduced by the previous government from 2020-2025, and the precariousness of Ireland's tax base. Looking at budgetary policy of the last government, income gaps have opened up between working households, and the gap between people and households at the bottom and middle of the income distribution and those at the top has grown. This has been driven by the skewed nature of income tax reduction choices which prioritised higher earners and provided relatively little to low income workers paying income tax at the standard rate. This was further compounded by the concentration of temporary cost-of-living measures among lower income households, supports that will fade away. The tax packages contained in those budgets are permanent, costly, and have not reached those working households who have been most impacted by rising costs. Ireland's tax base is narrow, dominated by three revenue streams, and our over exposure in terms of corporation tax is a major concern Rather than looking at how to build a broad and sustainable tax base, recent discussion has focused on the "tax package", the cost of the aforementioned Vat reduction for the hospitality sector, which would narrow Ireland's tax base further, and how much this would leave for an "income tax package" which — if modelled on previous budgetary policy — will see the income gaps between working households grow further. Softening demand Looking at Vat, it accounted for 23% of Ireland's total tax revenue last year. At present, the hospitality sector is subject to the reduced 13.5% Vat rate. The sector was subject to the lower rate of 9% from 2011 to 2018, and again from late 2020 to mid-2023 at an estimated cost of €3.6bn. The sector has identified high energy costs, softening demand, labour market challenges, increased cost of inputs, and a lack of hotel capacity as the main challenges facing the industry and the rationale for a return to the 9% VAT rate. However, a recent Department of Finance examination of the Vat reduction for the hospitality sector since 2011 concluded that the reduction was not always passed on to customers in the form of lower prices, it was highly regressive in that it benefitted higher income households more than lower income households, and it was very costly. It is clear that parts of the hospitality sector are under significant pressure, but other parts of it are doing very well Reducing the Vat rate is a very blunt and costly policy instrument. It will not lower energy costs, it will not increase demand, nor will it address the challenge of full employment or produce more hotel capacity — the very issues that the sector itself has identified as major challenges. The Government and the sector must look at other available sustainable measures to support the industry, including measures used in other EU member states to support hospitality and tourism. Calls for new tax breaks, or the return of old ones, are a feature of most periods of economic and social recovery. However, their provision involves great cost to the State and the unequal allocation of these resources to small groups of beneficiaries. Few of these initiatives have proven to be worthwhile in the past — in particular the opportunity cost of using the revenue in a better way is frequently overlooked. As the first of the kites are flown in advance of Budget 2026, the Government should turn its attention to those who have been most impacted by persistent rising prices, and use the resources available to ensure that vulnerable households are protected and supported through adequate social welfare rates, and that growing income gaps between working households are closed. It must deliver on the commitment to progressive budgets and build a broad and sustainable revenue base that can meet the needs of a growing and ageing population This requires developing progressive policies and measures in a fair taxation system, and working with the hospitality sector to identify sustainable ways to fund the maintenance of the hospitality and tourism industry. A reduction in Vat for the hospitality sector is costly and it won't address the challenges the sector faces. It didn't address these core issues in the 124 months that it was applied between 2011 and 2023, and there is no evidence to suggest that it will do so if applied again in Budget 2026. Michelle Murphy is a research and policy analyst at Social Justice Ireland
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, August 1st: On asylum, Spotify and the arms trade, and tariffs
Sir, – In Michael McDowell's article, ' Whatever about his tariffs, Trump's 'helpful advice' to the EU is on the money, ' July 30th, the Senator refers to a 'racket' involving people seeking asylum who are, in his view, simply migrants. The data does not support this claim. So far this year, 40 per cent of asylum applications have been successful. What about the other 60 per cent? Some applicants may not meet the strict legal definition of a refugee; others may lack the documentation to substantiate their claim. That does not mean they applied in bad faith or without genuine belief in their need for protection. The Senator also refers to a 'racket' of spending on asylum accommodation. One-off, dead-end spending on substandard accommodation benefits no one – least of all the people living in it. However, responsibility for this lies with successive governments' failure to invest in State-owned accommodation. The Senator himself served as minister for justice for five years and it's hard to recall significant progress on this issue during his tenure. READ MORE He then repeats the mistake made by Minister for Justice Jim O' Callaghan several weeks ago on the forthcoming decision of the Court of Justice of the EU. It is troubling that both have publicly commented on the case but appear to have not understood the Advocate General's opinion or its legal significance. The court is not poised to order the Irish State to compensate homeless asylum seekers imminently. The issue before the court is whether 'force majeure' is a valid defence to a damages claim for breach of an EU obligation that stems from the fundamental right to human dignity under Article 1 of the Charter. An important but relatively technical question of EU law. The Senator's only solution on this issue is for asylum policy to go back to member states. This would result in chaos and a race to the bottom with a domino effect caused by member states rushing to have little or no asylum policies and those that do shouldering the burden. As for the Senator's comments that there is a 'veritable domestic Irish legal industry involved in securing EU-guaranteed Irish residence for asylum seekers and their family dependants', this is low blow against hard-working barristers and solicitors, many of them at the beginning of their careers, often working for a pittance, who are only advocating for the implementation of the law that the Irish government voluntarily subscribed to. His remarks, suggesting that this work solely focussed on profit, also seem to be inconsistent with the Bar Council's code of conduct that barristers should not engage in conduct which may bring the barristers' profession into disrepute or which may injure the dignity and high standing of the profession. – Yours, etc. NICK HENDERSON, CEO, Irish Refugee Council, Dublin. Sir, – Once again, Michael McDowell recycles the arguments, language, and ideas of the far right on migration. Mr McDowell refers to asylum rights as a 'disastrous inclusion' in the EU Charter, calls asylum seeking an 'international racket', and urges Ireland to 'get real'. At the same time, he argues that it's the labelling of his rhetoric as far right that is dangerous. What's dangerous is the drift towards the Trump world view, someone Mr McDowell has been sharply critical of in the past, yet now quotes approvingly on migration. It is deeply disappointing to see a former minister for justice endorsing 'helpful advice' from Donald Trump, whose legacy includes caging children at the US border, separating families, and systematically undermining asylum protections. To suggest that the EU should take cues from such a record is shocking. Despite the fact that international protection applicants make up only a small share of inward migration, there is no acknowledgment of this, or of the essential contribution migrants make to Irish society. Mr McDowell frames his discussions on migration around the challenges of the international protection system. It is fortunate for the body politic that Mr McDowell has ruled out a presidential bid. His views on migration would likely have made him the candidate of choice for Ireland's small but vocal far right, especially if one of their Trump-lite or martial arts hopefuls fails to secure a nomination. – Yours, etc, SÉAMUS WHITE, Dublin 7. Sir, – In his thought-provoking opinion piece, Michael McDowell correctly calls out what has turned into an asylum industry in Ireland. For all the Government spin, processing of international protection claims is similar to a slow-spinning roulette wheel, with large numbers awaiting interviews and almost 14,000 in the appeals process. To compound the current ¤1.2 billion being spent on a kafkaesque asylum process, the Government is determined to sign up to an EU migration pact whose deadlines will prove impossible to meet and is highly likely to turn into a lawyer-fattening exercise. No wonder the still minuscule far right is likely to make political gains in forthcoming elections. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL FLYNN, Bayside, Dublin 13. Busy, busy Sir, – In relation to 'The greatest part of any job is learning to look busy,' (July 26th), and ensuing comment, seniors in my organisation know I am extremely busy when there is a dearth of letters in The Irish Times bearing my appellation. Probably prudent not to publish this one. – Yours, etc, FRANK J BYRNE Glasnevin, Dublin. Sir, – When working from home and in the absence of any covert surveillance, and when I really must get a move on, I'm minded to return my chair to the upright position and retract the footrest. –Yours, etc, TOMÁS FINN, Ballinasloe, Co Galway. US presidents and tariffs Sir. – Accepting and recognising the obvious frustration and the challenges expressed by the critics of the US/EU agreement, I wonder if can it really be absolutely argued this is 'a total capitulation' to the bully Donald Trump where the US won and the EU lost ? Unless EU exporters swallow the entire 15 per cent where applicable, US importers and/or ultimately the citizens of the US will pay more for their imported goods. However the citizens of the EU won't face the direct potential of increased costs on US imports. Who really are the winners, and who really are the losers ? History clearly shows that on the three occasions where US presidents oversaw the implementation of a tariff regime (in the 1820s/1890s/1930s), the outcomes each time proved disastrous for the US economy and its citizens, and were ultimately reversed. Who were the big losers in the end? Trump may appear to have won the battle, but chances are he will lose the trade war he so recklessly started. – Yours, etc, CRAIG DOUGLAS, Belfast. Sir, – To all those armchair commentators and negotiators who think the EU should have entered a trade war with Donald Trump, I have a simple question: Would you be prepared to give up your job so the EU could make a point? – Yours, etc, JOHN COTTER, Ferrybank, Waterford. HSE paying on the double Sir, – I note that the company which was paid in excess of ¤720,000 twice by the HSE on foot of the same invoice is now in liquidation (' Company paid €720,000 twice by HSE for same invoice is now in liquidation ,' July 31st). I suppose putting the HSE into liquidation and starting again would be out of the question? – Yours, etc, PAT O'BRIEN, Rathmines, Dublin 6. Give us a break Sir, –Is there any way the commentators could be inveigled upon to cease commentating for a couple of minutes and allow us listeners and viewers at home hear the wonderful playing of the Artane Band during our All-Ireland finals at Croke Park? While they are leading the two teams around the pitch might be a good time. – Yours, etc, URSULA HOUGH-GORMLEY, Donnybrook, Dublin. A definite bargain Sir, – Without a doubt, the €45 million spent on the Dundrum to Dún Laoghaire cycle lane is a bargain – to those who use it without ever being expected to pay a cent in road tax, insurance or licensing. – Yours, etc, RITA O'BRIEN, Co Dublin. Spotify and the arms trade Sir, – Mark O'Connell (' If you didn't have qualms about Spotify before, wait until you hear what its founder has done ', July 26th) will presumably become a conscientious objector should Europe find itself at war with Russia. For if he finds 'something particularly galling' about Spotify co-founder Daniel Ek 'ploughing a massive amount of his personal wealth into the arms trade', who on earth does he imagine is going to build the defence industry Europe needs if it is to protect itself from Russian president Vladimir Putin's imperial visions? In the real world, strong militaries, supplied by high-tech defence manufacturers such as Helsing, the firm Ek has invested in and is now chairing, are needed precisely to give peace a chance. Perhaps he and Deerhoof, the band he cites as deserting Spotify on this news, should talk to Helsing's Ukrainian customers. Rather than sneering at AI drones as deadly products of the profit-seeking 'military-industrial complex', might Ukrainians instead see such weapons as an essential part of saving lives and their country's independence from an imperialist invader? The answer, my friend, is blowing in the cold wind from Moscow. – Yours, etc, BILL EMMOTT, Killiney, Co Dublin. Recognising Palestine Sir, – British prime minister Keir Starmer has threatened to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel improves the situation in Gaza. Palestinian groups have rightly called this stance 'outrageous'. Surely Palestine should be recognised on the basis of rights, not as diplomatic leverage? Ireland's recognition of Palestine was a principled stand. But recognition alone cannot substitute for immediate, concrete action which includes a ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian access, and accountability for atrocities. Ireland must now continue to press for these urgently at the international level. – Yours, etc, PETER MALBASHA, Booterstown, Co Dublin. Germ warfare Sir, – Norma Jessop's letter reminding us all of the existence of our immune system, and its function in keeping us in good health, was refreshing (Letters, July 31st). Is it not likely that all the stress caused by worrying constantly about the 'scary germs' we may encounter in everyday life is far more likely to finish us off than the occasional, mild and short-lived illnesses we may experience if and when the odd germ manages to break through our natural defences? – Yours, etc. KATHERINE QUIRKE, Co Dublin. Saving details of bank cards Sir, – I recently made a modest purchase from a supplier advertising through a social media platform. I completed the transaction using my credit card, believing that it was a straightforward purchase, using the usual security inputs. Thereafter, I received a 'welcome' email from the social media platform, advising me that my card details had been 'saved' and assuring me of the value of the benefits of this course of action. Since then, I have endeavoured to decouple my card from the platform. Having established the process for withdrawing from this 'service', I went through the interminable maze of conditions on the website, to submit my request. When submitted, I received the message: 'something went wrong with this request, please try again later'. Several failed attempts later, I gave up trying to shake this particular dog off my leg. Call me a cynic, but a platform that can harvest my card details, by stealth, within micro seconds of completing a transaction, should be able to facilitate a withdrawal from the same integrated payments platform without placing obstacles in my way. Perhaps both domestic and EU financial regulators might better inform consumers of their rights in this regard, and ensure that the process of cancelling such facilities be made less cumbersome. – Yours, etc, FRANK WALSH, Co Wexford. Not so open Golf Open Sir, – My husband and I recently purchased re-sale general admission tickets for day two (Friday) of The 153rd Open in Portrush. We intended to bring our eight-week-old exclusively breastfed newborn baby. We had (wrongly) assumed that a newborn baby could freely accompany their mother, as they generally can in society – on airplanes, at concerts, sporting events generally, etc. We had overlooked The Open's policy which required 'all children under the age of 16' to have their own ticket. On contacting The Open, we were advised that no junior tickets were available to purchase and an exemption could not be made to this policy. The Open advised that our only option was to purchase a full price general admission ticket for £110 for our eight-week-old. We made the decision not to attend. The Open clearly needs to reconsider this policy for babies under the age of one, who should be entitled to attend on a parent's ticket. We query whether any women were consulted in the making of this policy. An interesting policy to have strictly enforced for a sport looking to entice women. Available to be consulted for the 154th Open! – Yours, etc, CLARE McADAM, Ringsend, Dublin. An ear for radio Sir, – Marion Walsh says Ita McCormack should not fret (Letters, July 31st). I agree. I use my smart phone and can pick up almost all the BBC stations. BBC4 and World Service are also available on the app. – Yours, etc, GRÁINNE MEYER, Germany.
