Alarm.com comes to Apple CarPlay, now there's no excuse not to arm your home on the go
This builds on existing Android Auto integration, with a focus on safe, tap-based commands to keep drivers' eyes on the road.
Key perks include hassle-free garage access, one-tap Home/Away modes for automating devices, and custom scenes for homes or small businesses.
It requires a CarPlay-compatible vehicle and iPhone, with Alarm.com's pro-installed systems available in certain markets—check it out via the app store.
This Is Important Because: Smart homes are evolving beyond walls, and CarPlay integration makes security and automation truly mobile, syncing with geofencing via Alarm.com Places for location-based routines.
As IoT devices multiply – Alarm.com has millions on their platform—this bridges gaps in connectivity, especially with Apple dominating in-car tech updates like iOS 18's CarPlay enhancements.
Recommended Videos
Why I Should Care? If you're juggling a connected home while commuting, this slashes fumbling with apps—tap to disarm your system or crank the AC as you approach, all hands-free-ish (depending on your touchscreen and app settings).
It's a win for families or business owners needing quick checks, reducing 'did I lock up?' anxiety without pulling over. In my Rivian R1s, I am able to use the integrated Alexa app to arm my Alarm.com system, but for those with Apple Carplay, this adds simple functionality.
There is no mention as to whether there is Siri integration via Carplay, I will update the article if I get more information
Compared to basic smart locks or thermostats, Alarm.com's ecosystem (which we've praised for integrations like August Home) adds monitored security layers for peace of mind on the road.
At no extra cost beyond your setup, it's an easy upgrade in a CarPlay era where distractions kill—stay safe, stay smart.
Ok, What's Next?
Fresh off launches like the ADC-T25 smart thermostat and Cell Connector for video, expect deeper CarPlay tweaks or expanded IoT ties.
Rivals might follow suit; meanwhile, dive into our CarPlay guides for setup tips, or check Alarm.com's site for compatibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
24 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Meta's Rumored Smartwatch May Actually Be a Huge Win for Ray-Ban Glasses
Meta has been on a bit of a tear lately, snapping up AI researchers from Apple and OpenAI on an express train towards… something? What that something is, only time and a watchful eye will reveal, but apparently, a part of that future vision is a smartwatch. According to a report from DigiTimes, Meta is working on reviving its plans to make a smartwatch with a camera on it, and that watch could be revealed later this year. This isn't the first time Meta has been rumored to enter this space. Several years ago, it was reportedly interested in making a Facebook smartwatch with two cameras capable of video chatting and more. Obviously, those plans never materialized, but the timing this go-around may make a lot more sense, and that has a lot more to do with smart glasses than it does smartwatches. If you've been paying attention, you've probably noticed that Meta is pretty bullish on carving out a piece of the future and current smart glasses market, and those plans currently revolve around Meta Ray-Bans—the branded eyewear smart glasses that can play audio, take voice commands and pictures, and use the on-device camera for vision-based AI. While those have proven a surprisingly popular gadget, there's still one glaring shortcoming, and that's the fact that they don't have the one thing that most people would expect in a pair of true smart smart glasses—a screen. The thing about screens is that they're more complicated than you might think. They eat up battery, they need the right display for sharpness and legibility, and they also make smart glasses more expensive. So, what's a company hell-bent on becoming the king of smart glasses (present and future) in the U.S. to do? Well, one way to address all those problems while still giving people what they want would be—you guessed it—a smartwatch. A smartwatch wouldn't just be another conduit for Meta's AI push, it would be an ideal companion device for smart glasses for several reasons. One is that it has a screen, so instead of trying to shove one into its smart glasses, potentially increasing the size and price drastically, Meta could offload all of that screen information onto your wrist. Why not just do that with a phone, you ask? Well, it's not that simple. Another thing a Meta-made smartwatch could do is tighten the integration between its smart glasses and a crucial secondary device. Right now, Meta's smart glasses require a companion app (now rebranded as the Meta AI app, unfortunately), which is where lots of important stuff happens. Every time you take a picture, it goes to the Meta AI app first and needs to be imported to your phone from there. Want to adjust the settings on your glasses? Going to need the Meta AI app for that. Firmware updates? Meta AI app. Basically, anything that you need a screen for needs to go through the Meta AI app, which makes the experience of using the glasses feel a little tacked on. As far as phones are concerned, Meta's smart glasses are a foreign object. Imagine, though, being able to take a picture on your glasses and then having it show up immediately on your smartwatch? Or being able to tightly integrate hardware and software for things like video calling. You could use the smartwatch's camera to show yourself while using the glasses for audio. Not to mention, a smartwatch would also act as an ideal interface for controlling your glasses, giving them a screen-based UI that doesn't require pulling open a companion app or some high-tech hand or eye tracking, similar to Orion's wristband. The possibilities are plenty when it comes to a smartwatch and glasses duo, and I'd be shocked if Meta didn't see that same potential. And the best part about smartwatches is that they can be made and sold fairly cheaply, so if you wanted to augment your glasses experience with one, you wouldn't need to spend a ton of money to do so. Frankly, I think one of the biggest challenges here will be making a smartwatch that works and also one that people want to wear on their body, and on that front, I'm less confident in Meta's ability, though it could theoretically pull a page from its glasses playbook and partner with a watch brand for some style advice. Either way, if you're a fan of smart glasses, you should be equally excited for a Meta-made smartwatch that would otherwise just be another boring budget wearable.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Leak Reveals Colors for Entire iPhone 17 Lineup, Including a Bold Orange for the 17 Pro
Looks like the iPhone 17 Pro won't come in sky blue after all. Long-time iPhone leaker Sonny Dickson has shared what he claims are dummy models for the entire iPhone 17 lineup expected to be announced in September. Notably, there's a new non-boring orange color for iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max. God, please be real! As you can see in his X post, there's an orange shade of the iPhone 17 Pro/17 Pro Max alongside the less flashy black, white, and navy blue. As I've said before, Apple desperately needs to bring some of the more fun colors to the iPhone Pros and orange would be the brightest yet, though dummy models don't always accurately depict colors. For example, dummy leaks suggested the iPhone 16 Pro's Desert Titanium would look copper/bronze, or as I called it, 'poop brown.' The actual Desert Titanium iPhone 16 Pros that shipped are more of a champagne/beige gold (and sometimes pink-ish in warmer lighting). It's not the first time a phone maker has made an orange phone. Google blessed the Pixel 4 with a vivid 'Oh So Orange' colorway way back in 2019. Cue all the 'orange is the new black' jokes. — Sonny Dickson (@SonnyDickson) July 30, 2025Dickson's X post also offers a preview for the skinny iPhone 17 Air. If accurate, the ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air will come in what appears to be black, white, gold, and light. Not the most eye-catching colors if I'm being honest. Sure, most people will throw a case over their iPhone, but still—if there's any iPhone that you won't want to cover up with a case, it's the one that tells everyone you've got the newest and thinnest iPhone ever made. The regular iPhone 17 could pick up the slack if you're looking for more color pop—supposedly coming in pink, lime green, light blue, white, and black. RIP teal iPhone 16… we hardly knew ye. Orange for the iPhone 17 Pros would be striking. All rumors point to Apple switching from a titanium frame back to aluminum for the iPhone 17 Pro/17 Pro Max, which may not only make the devices lighter but also open the door to more vibrant colors in the future. Anodizing titanium with dyes is a much harder process to achieve compared to aluminum. We're *checks calendar* about a month and a half away from Apple announcing the new iPhone 17 family, likely the new Apple Watch Series 11, and possibly even AirPods Pro 3. If you're on the fence about buying Apple products, especially any of the ones I just mentioned, you really should hold off unless you absolutely need a device to function.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple may raise iPhone 18 prices after Q2 pull-in, says Jefferies
-- Apple may increase prices for its upcoming iPhone 18 lineup following evidence of strong second-quarter demand and mounting cost pressures, according to analysts at Jefferies. 'We saw more evidence of strong iPhone demand in 2Q25,' said Jefferies, pointing to around 22% year-over-year growth in equipment sales reported by major U.S. telecoms. That figure, the highest in six quarters, was 'driven by pull-in' ahead of potential tariffs, the firm noted, suggesting that industry trackers like Counterpoint and IDC may be underestimating Apple's shipment growth. Jefferies reiterated its forecast of an 8% year-on-year increase in iPhone shipments for the June quarter, above Counterpoint's and IDC's reported figures of 4% and 1.5%, respectively. Despite this strength, Jefferies does not expect a stock re-rating based solely on current data. Looking ahead, Jefferies sees Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) raising the selling price of the iPhone 18 Slim, Plus, and Pro Max models by $50 to help offset 'higher component costs and China tariff.' The price hike would represent a 4%–5% increase year-over-year, but Jefferies cautioned that the move 'may barely cover the above cost increases.' Jefferies also highlighted Apple's accelerating shift of iPhone production to India. It expects 18% of iPhone 18 units to be made in India in the second half of 2025, rising to 35% by late 2026. However, it warned that lower yields and higher logistics costs in India could add pressure to margins. 'Supply chain security and India's localization requirement may prompt AAPL to move even if financially it does not justify the move,' Jefferies added. Related articles Apple may raise iPhone 18 prices after Q2 pull-in, says Jefferies Kering Q2 revenue falls 18% due to weak retail, wholesale sales and tourism slump Booking reports Q2 beat on strong travel demand, shares down on cautious outlook
