Starbucks Shortlists Dozen Firms Including Tencent for China Investment
The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded
An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival
We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach
Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild
San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus
Boyu Capital, Carlyle Group Inc., EQT AB, FountainVest Partners, KKR & Co., Hillhouse Investment and Primavera Capital are among the private equity firms invited to participate, along with tech giants JD.com Inc. and Tencent Holdings Ltd., the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information.
The shortlisted firms will be given access to the coffee chain's China financials so they can evaluate and prepare bids in the coming months, the people said.
Fresh backing and more local expertise could help Starbucks expand its store count and further develop its supply chain in China, as well as enhance mobile platforms and brand strategies for Chinese consumers, according to the people.
The search for a partner in China is 'not about capital,' Starbucks Chief Executive Officer Brian Niccol said on a July 29 earnings call with analysts. 'What this is about is how do we ensure that the Starbucks brand is in a much better place in the future.'
Niccol has previously said the China business could grow to 20,000 stores from roughly 7,800.
China is the Seattle-based chain's second-biggest market, but Starbucks has fallen behind local rivals such as Luckin Coffee Inc., which have boomed with much cheaper alternatives and frequent product launches.
Starbucks has started to follow suit by incorporating lower-priced and tailored offerings such as fruit teas and sugar-free alternatives to its China menus. And there are signs of some improvement, with same-store sales rising in the latest quarter for the first time since the end of 2023, the company said this week.
The process to introduce new backers in China attracted more than 20 potential investors in total, Niccol said on the call with analysts. Starbucks wants to retain a 'meaningful' stake in the business, he said.
Bloomberg News first reported in May that Starbucks was reviewing its China operations. By July, the company had received proposals from prospective investors with an eye on taking a controlling stake in the business. The company has said it isn't considering a full sale.
Deliberations are ongoing and may not lead to a transaction. Other industry and financial investors could also join at later stage when talks are more advanced, the people said.
Starbucks declined to comment. Representatives for EQT, FountainVest, Hillhouse, KKR and Primavera also declined to comment. Boyu, Carlyle, JD.com and Tencent didn't respond to requests for comment.
--With assistance from Echo Wong, Zheping Huang, Bei Hu and Claire Che.
Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App
Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off
It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan
Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts
How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It Might Not Be A Great Idea To Buy Australian Foundation Investment Company Limited (ASX:AFI) For Its Next Dividend
Australian Foundation Investment Company Limited (ASX:AFI) stock is about to trade ex-dividend in 2 days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. It is important to be aware of the ex-dividend date because any trade on the stock needs to have been settled on or before the record date. This means that investors who purchase Australian Foundation Investment's shares on or after the 5th of August will not receive the dividend, which will be paid on the 28th of August. The company's next dividend payment will be AU$0.195 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of AU$0.27 to shareholders. Last year's total dividend payments show that Australian Foundation Investment has a trailing yield of 3.5% on the current share price of AU$7.63. We love seeing companies pay a dividend, but it's also important to be sure that laying the golden eggs isn't going to kill our golden goose! So we need to check whether the dividend payments are covered, and if earnings are growing. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Dividends are usually paid out of company profits, so if a company pays out more than it earned then its dividend is usually at greater risk of being cut. Australian Foundation Investment distributed an unsustainably high 117% of its profit as dividends to shareholders last year. Without extenuating circumstances, we'd consider the dividend at risk of a cut. Generally, the higher a company's payout ratio, the more the dividend is at risk of being reduced. View our latest analysis for Australian Foundation Investment Click here to see how much of its profit Australian Foundation Investment paid out over the last 12 months. Have Earnings And Dividends Been Growing? Stocks in companies that generate sustainable earnings growth often make the best dividend prospects, as it is easier to lift the dividend when earnings are rising. Investors love dividends, so if earnings fall and the dividend is reduced, expect a stock to be sold off heavily at the same time. This is why it's a relief to see Australian Foundation Investment earnings per share are up 2.7% per annum over the last five years. Many investors will assess a company's dividend performance by evaluating how much the dividend payments have changed over time. Australian Foundation Investment has delivered 1.4% dividend growth per year on average over the past 10 years. To Sum It Up Is Australian Foundation Investment an attractive dividend stock, or better left on the shelf? While we like that its earnings are growing somewhat, we're not enamored that it's paying out 117% of last year's earnings. Australian Foundation Investment doesn't appear to have a lot going for it, and we're not inclined to take a risk on owning it for the dividend. Although, if you're still interested in Australian Foundation Investment and want to know more, you'll find it very useful to know what risks this stock faces. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 1 warning sign with Australian Foundation Investment and understanding them should be part of your investment process. A common investing mistake is buying the first interesting stock you see. Here you can find a full list of high-yield dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's weak job market stirs boom-era nostalgia on social media
By Marius Zaharia and Claire Fu HONG KONG/SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Dwindling job and income prospects in China are fuelling intense social media chatter about the fashion and culture of the country's high-growth period 20 years ago, in what analysts describe as a way to express discontent about the economy without attracting censorship. The hashtag phrase "beauty in the time of economic upswings," often accompanied by early 2000s pictures of celebrities wearing bright clothes and make-up or music videos and TV ads from that period, surged in social media mentions over the summer just as 12.2 million university students graduated. They entered one of the most challenging job markets in decades - pandemic years aside - as the world's second-largest economy grapples with higher U.S. trade tariffs, deflation, industrial overcapacity and sluggish domestic consumption. While China is growing at roughly 5% this year, analysts describe it as a dual-speed economy, with manufacturing and exports running strong, while households struggle. The current pace is half of that from the 2001-2010 decade. "The economy has its cycles, but youth doesn't come twice," a social media user wrote on a widely-shared post on the topic. The State Council Information Office, which handles media queries for the government, did not respond to a comment request. China's ruling Communist Party exerts a high degree of control over domestic media and social media in the name of safeguarding social stability and preventing the spread of rumours and fake news. Reports and public discussions on what the Party considers as sensitive are routinely removed from the internet, including views critical of the economy and any veiled criticism of policymakers. On RedNote, China's version of Instagram, the hashtag has so far garnered close to 50 million views. Most posts come from millennial women recalling greater career and consumption choices in their twenties, says Yaling Jiang, founder of consultancy ApertureChina, citing platform data. But it is today's young Chinese, who face far more limited options, engaging with these posts. "Considering when it has gone viral, this is likely a response to the widespread complaints about the declining value of higher education and the increasingly tough job market for young graduates this summer," Jiang said. Xiao Qiang, the founder of U.S.-based China Digital Times, which tracks China censorship, says the topic's popularity "poses a challenge to the authorities mainly because it uses everyday symbols, such as make-up and fashion, to subtly express dissatisfaction with economic decline and life pressure." "It creates a collective atmosphere of nostalgia and indirect criticism," Xiao said. "It can quietly erode public confidence in the official economic narrative." The content is "awkward" for censors, says Xiao, as most users share opinions over the aesthetics of China's recent past and express positive emotions. MARKETING OPPORTUNITY Fashion labels such as Giorgio Armani, Estee Lauder's Tom Ford and Valentino have sponsored "boom era"-themed posts on RedNote in the past 30 days, said Jiang. More than a dozen stores on Alibaba's Taobao e-commerce platform have used this tag to sell clothes. Bloggers have promoted the "Millennial Rose" shampoo by Procter & Gamble's Safeguard, or bulky Nike sneakers advertised on Taobao as "millennial classics reborn." L'Oreal-owned Maybelline, in a Weibo post promoting some of its brighter lipsticks, wrote "feel the beauty and vitality of the economic upswing." However, early-millennium looks are not prominent on Chinese streets. Jiang said marketing teams are leveraging the social media trend for brand awareness, not pushing new 2000s-inspired collections. Fashion bloggers posting under the "upswing" hashtag say styles often reflect the prevailing economic mood. This year's make-up trends, for instance, feature the more conservative, less expressive "glass skin," achieved through heavy use of moisturisers and hydrating primers or monochromatic looks where foundation, blushes or lipsticks can differ in gradient but belong to the same colour palette. The 2000s embraced futurism with metallic tones, glossy finishes and pearlescent blue or green eyeshadows. Full-eyeliner looks with smoky eyes contrasted with Barbie-pink lips for dramatic effect. "In times of economic growth, make-up is meant to look expensive and give out that glow of confidence that comes with flying careers and optimism," one beauty blogger wrote. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he's not ‘seeking' summit with Xi
President Trump said that he is not looking for a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, pushing back on reporting that the tariff talks this week could set the groundwork for a meeting with his counterpart. 'The Fake News is reporting that I am SEEKING a 'Summit' with President Xi of China. This is not correct, I am not SEEKING anything!' Trump said on Truth Social. 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Talks between the U.S. and China are going on in Stockholm this week with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and his counterparts, which marks the third round of talks between the two nations. The meeting could set up an extended tariff truce, which could lead to a meeting with Trump and Xi later this year, NBC News reported. China and the U.S. are facing an Aug. 12 deadline following agreements announced in May and June that brought down mutually imposed triple-digit tariffs. For other trading partners, Trump has set an Aug. 1 deadline for the resumption of tariffs. 'We have a good relationship with China,' Trump said Monday. 'China's tough.' The president last month said Xi was 'extremely hard to make a deal' with and the two leaders have had a fraught relationship in recent years. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
