Waukegan parade organizer accuses alderman of intimidation; ‘This behavior is … inappropriate and very unethical'
Elizabeth Marrero, a director of not-for-profit organization Juntos — the organizer of the Viva la Independencia parade in September — said Felix asked the group to withdraw its special-use permit granted by the city on Jan. 14. The group began working on it in December.
'Felix stated that the parade had been promised to other individuals and warned us that if we do not withdraw, they will find loopholes to revoke the permit,' Marrero said. 'No public official should use their position to intimidate or manipulate (a) community group.'
Marrero made Felix's remarks to her and a colleague public during audience time at the Waukegan City Council meeting Monday at City Hall, asking for an investigation into the alderman's behavior.
After she finished her remarks, Marrero walked to the center of the dais and handed a copy of her speech to Mayor Sam Cunningham. When the meeting was over, Cunningham gave the paper to Corporation Counsel Joseph Miller, III.
'I'm giving it to our corporation counsel,' Cunningham said. 'We're making it an official document. Our goal is to have a successful parade.'
Near the end of the meeting, during a time reserved for council members to speak, Felix said he is committed to the city's event process and following the related rules and procedures. He did not specifically deny any of Marrero's allegations.
'If my actions were perceived as anything other than supportive, I sincerely apologize,' Felix said. 'I'm here to work alongside our community partners, not against them. I stand with those trying to bring positive and inclusive events to our city. I'm willing to support any parade that brings our city together in the right way.'
When asked specifically after the meeting if he had asked Juntos to withdraw its parade application, he said, 'No comment.' He gave the same answer when asked if any of Marrero's statements were inaccurate.
During her conversation with Felix, Marrero said at the meeting that she felt he was trying to intimidate her and her colleague. He told them that if they appealed the withdrawal of the permit, the council would vote against her.
'Felix stated that by Juntos withdrawing from coordinating the parade will be the best possible scenario for the city of Waukegan to avoid any drama,' Marrero said. 'We also learned this alderman has been questioning city staff about ways to find loopholes to revoke the permit.'
After the meeting, Marrero said she received a text from Felix on April 25 asking to meet in person. He insisted it happen quickly. She and her colleague met with Felix on April 27. Already working to organize the parade since December, Juntos was not about to leave the scene. He added pressure.
'This behavior is intimidating, inappropriate and very unethical,' Marrero said.
David Motley, the city's communications director, said the city received only one application for the annual parade, and it was already approved.
Jesus Uribe, another Juntos member, said through an interpreter during the meeting that the organization donates any excess money generated from the parade back into the community. It is already seeking donations and sponsorships.
'With the money we raised in (last year's) parade, we will be giving three (college) scholarships,' Uribe said. 'Whatever is raised from the next parade will be given to people who have cancer.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Andy Shaw: Why neophyte mayors need steady hands on the wheel
Public school teachers and state lawmakers fill important roles in a civil society, but those jobs hardly prepare their occupants for the daunting challenges and complexities of running a big city with millions of residents, tens of thousands of public employees and multibillion-dollar budgets. That sobering reality helps explain why Brandon Johnson, a relatively unknown teacher who broke out of a large pack to win Chicago's 2023 mayor's race, has stumbled badly enough in two-plus rocky years atop the City Hall food chain to tank in recent polls. And it's a cautionary tale that certainly can't be lost on wunderkind Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old New York state assemblyman who is favored to become New York City's next mayor. Mamdani won the Democratic nomination on a wave of youthful energy, grassroots excitement, social media savvy and the same kinds of progressive promises Johnson made during his campaign. But Mamdani has a chance to avoid many of the pitfalls that have bedeviled Johnson by choosing and co-existing comfortably with at least one veteran of NYC government to help him navigate the turbulent waters of Big Apple politics. This is crucial because leading a movement is world's apart from running a sprawling big city government. It's one thing to rail against the system from the outside and another to manage it from the inside. Mamdani may have idealism, charisma and social media followers, but he needs someone who understands city budgets, contracts, union negotiations, how bond markets react to fiscal instability and why slogans don't pave roads or staff homeless shelters. Johnson, to his credit, tapped Rich Guidice, a veteran of the Richard M. Daley administration, to be his first chief of staff. But that inconvenient marriage lasted only a few months, and none of Guidice's successors or Johnson's other top aides have been able to help him avoid two-plus years of unaffordable promises unkept, divisive City Council battles waged and media relations unnecessarily made fraught. Mamdani, apparently cognizant of the perils of inexperience, has forged a somewhat surprising political alliance and personal friendship with a former competitor-turned-ally in the mayor's race: city comptroller and former Brooklyn Councilman Brad Lander, and that could make all the difference. If Mamdani wins the general election in November, he would be smart to ask Lander to serve as his deputy mayor, NYC's equivalent of a chief of staff, to run the city's day-to-day operations while Mamdani focuses on the big picture. Lander has spent decades watching NYC's political theater play out from the front row. He's seen and participated in enough real-world policymaking to know that ideology needs structure — not just passion. As comptroller, he's no fiscal hawk, but he knows how to balance ambition with arithmetic, not smoke and mirrors. If he were to become deputy mayor, he would occupy the perfect power post to help translate Mamdani's passion and energy into sustainable and actionable governance. This is where the comparison with Johnson becomes instructive and sobering. Johnson was also a movement candidate, propelled into office by energized unions, frustrated progressives, and backlash from decades of police intemperance and economic inequality. But once he got the keys to City Hall's fifth floor, he couldn't keep a seasoned driver. After Guidice left a few months into the new administration, Johnson surrounded himself with loyal progressives — teachers, organizers and activists — who lacked valuable management experience. Admirable idealism? Maybe. Wise politics? Absolutely not. Chicago's finances remain wobbly. Public safety is still a top concern, the schools face a fiscal cliff, the transit system is hemorrhaging riders and credibility, and the shortage of affordable housing has reached crisis proportions. Johnson isn't a bad guy — he's smart and articulate, and he genuinely believes in his mission — but he was, at least initially, clearly in over his head. And without a seasoned deputy like a Lander or a Guidice, or even a former campaign rival with stellar big-city management chops such as Paul Vallas, no one on Johnson's leadership team has enough experience or stature to keep him on task and message. Competence trumps charisma. A city is not a college campus where you can endlessly debate systems of oppression. It's a living organism that needs to be fed, housed, policed, cleaned and financed. That takes pros. Not poets. Mamdani seems to understand that. Maybe it's because he's watched other progressive leaders get swallowed up by the system or their own inexperience. Maybe it's because he listens to the quiet voices that tell him values and vision aren't enough. Or maybe he's just smart enough to know what he doesn't know. That's leadership. It doesn't mean a Mamdani administration would avoid every pitfall. Big cities are hard to run, even for seasoned leaders. Every decision will anger someone. Every budget line item has a built-in opposition group. Every stumble would be amplified by right-wing media eager to paint him as 'another woke disaster.' But unlike Johnson, Mamdani would be giving himself a fighting chance if he elevates and keeps someone who knows where the wires are buried. Lander isn't flashy, and he doesn't inspire rally chants. But he understands the machinery of government in a way activists rarely do. Lander is the kind of steady hand Johnson hired but couldn't hold on to. Mamdani might be a progressive determined not to let his agenda die under a pile of rookie mistakes and fiscal naiveté. Maybe there's a lesson here for the next wave of liberal mayors and the movements that support them: Passion helps get you elected, but experience and competence enable you to do the job well. And if you're smart, you make room for both. Johnson has 19 months until the next Chicago election, and if he has even a slim chance of righting the ship and changing the narrative enough to be a viable candidate — something predecessor Lori Lightfoot was unable to do — he would be wise to quickly find and hire a Lander-type clone here in Chicago.
New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
The city and state's fiscal pain just got real —and it was all so avoidable
Albany and City Hall are now staring at some wicked fiscal headwinds, a key watchdog reports — but it's not like they weren't warned. The Citizens Budget Commission is flagging both the city and state's massive budgets, slamming them as 'unaffordable and unprepared' in light of federal funding cuts and a possible economic slowdown down the road. With passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which aims to (slightly) curb the growth of federal outlays, including aid to New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul is directing state agencies to cut $750 million from their budgets. When folks gripe, she'll just point her finger at Trump. Convenient, no? But about reckless and dishonest as can be. And she'll still have to find another $3 billion — and that's assuming no further cuts from Washington in the short term and an economy that remains robust. Plus, the long-term structural gap, CBC says, is now a monstrous $22 billion. It was all sadly predictable, but Hochul and state lawmakers nonetheless decided to blithely run up the tab — to a whopping quarter of a trillion dollars–plus — figuring they can blame the GOP when they have to make cuts or raise taxes. Take health care: Lawmakers boosted spending on it by 17%, even as the Empire Center's Bill Hammond predicted federal Medicaid cuts would shift over $3.3 billion in costs to the state. In April, budget expert E.J. McMahon slapped Hochul and the Legislature for 'whistling in the dark' instead of anticipating likely changes to the state's 'nearly out-of-control Medicaid program.' Now the gov's budget director won't rule out raising taxes, even though Hochul vowed she wouldn't. The CBC instead urges to keep her promise and instead shred her $2 billion 'inflation reduction checks' (i.e., reelection bribes), for starters. The group also called out the city's $116 billion spendapalooza and hit both Albany and City Hall for not squirreling away enough reserves. Whoever become mayor in November, it noted, will have to fill a $6 billon to $8 billion budget gap in just 16 days of taking office. It also ripped mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani's planned tax hikes to cover his ludicrous plans for $10 billion in new outlays. He'd be setting a record for irresponsibility. New Yorkers are now sure to be hit with some pain, whether it's spending cuts or tax hikes. The pols will try to shift blame, of course, but the public wouldn't be in this mess if their leaders had acted like adults from the start.
Newsweek
19 hours ago
- Newsweek
Howard Lutnick Claims Tariffs Will Spark Up to 1.5 GDP Growth
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During an interview appearance on CBS News' Face the Nation on Sunday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs would drive as much as 1.5 percent gross domestic product (GDP) growth and open hundreds of billions in export opportunities. Lutnick also outlined the administration's timeline for renegotiating major trade deals, challenged European threats of retaliatory tariffs, and accused Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell of inflicting economic pain on Americans through high interest rates. Why It Matters The Trump administration's latest round of tariffs—including a general 10 percent levy on U.S. imports and even higher rates on key trading partners—marks an expansion of trade policy intended to address longstanding U.S. trade deficits. Business and policy analysts have expressed concern about the impact tariffs would have since they're expected to lead to higher prices on imported goods, which could spur inflation and potentially dampen consumer spending. What To Know Lutnick projected that the new tariffs and subsequent trade negotiations could deliver between $300 and $400 billion of opportunity. "That's up to 1.5 percent GDP growth because the president's going to open all these markets up," he told host Margaret Brennan. The commerce secretary added that Trump's tariffs would force countries across the globe to "open their markets" to the U.S., which would allow American businesses to expand and sell overseas. "You should assume that the small countries, the Latin American countries, the Caribbean countries, many countries in Africa, they will have a baseline tariff of 10 percent, and then the bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America," Lutnick said. The commerce secretary confirmed that Trump administration's August 1 tariffs deadline remained firm, and most major U.S. trading partners can expect to see a significant rise in their tariff rate. However, Lutnick said the U.S. was still open to negotiations after the deadline passes. "President Trump is going to deliver for the American people. [The] next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books," he added. Meanwhile, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, told ABC News on Saturday that he believed tariff revenue could exceed $300 billion by the end of 2025, nearly 1 percent of U.S. GDP. However, he added that "it would not be prudent for lawmakers to count on this revenue in the future." "It is unclear whether the tariffs will remain in place given they may be found to be illegal or future presidents may decide to lower or eliminate them under executive order," Zandi said. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is seen in the East Room of the White House on July 18 in Washington, D.C. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is seen in the East Room of the White House on July 18 in Washington, D.C. Alex Brandon/AP Lutnick Reveals Timeline for Trump Renegotiating USMCA Deal Lutnick told Brennan that Trump intends to renegotiate the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) when the agreement comes up for review. The agreement was signed in 2020 to facilitate trade and stimulate economy and job growth in North America. He added that Trump will begin renegotiating one year from now, with the aim of securing greater market access for U.S. businesses and protecting American manufacturing jobs. "It makes perfect sense for the president to renegotiate it," he said. "He wants to protect American jobs. He doesn't want cars built in Canada or Mexico when they can be built in Michigan and Ohio," Lutnick said. Lutnick Suggests Europe Will Cave Over Tariff Threats to Boeing, Bourbon Lutnick addressed retaliatory threats from Europe targeting American goods during the interview. The European Union (EU) has finalized a list of U.S. goods worth $84 billion, including Boeing aircraft, American cars and bourbon, that they will hit with retaliatory tariffs if the trade war escalates. Lutnick said he was confident the EU would cave and open their market to the U.S. before it got to that point. "The president and the European Union, these are the two biggest trading partners in the world, talking to each other. We'll get a deal done. I am confident we'll get a deal done," he said. Jerome Powell 'Torturing' America, Says Lutnick Lutnick sharply criticized Powell for maintaining high interest rates, which he said costs "us, you and me and the American people, more than $500 billion." "I think he's costing us $700 billion a year by keeping rates too high. It's just wrong. I don't know why he's torturing America this way. Our rates should be lower." He predicted the Fed would be forced to lower rates, making mortgages "so much better off under Donald Trump." What People Are Saying Peter Schiff, chief economist and global strategist for Europac, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on last month: "Tariffs are not working. The U.S. trade deficit in goods surged to $96.6 billion in May, up 11% from April and 6.5% above expectations. Most problematic was the 5.2% decline in exports. Trump's goal to reduce trade deficits while expanding markets for U.S. exports has backfired." Brad Setser, an economist at the New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote on X: "I am not yet seeing a significant tariff impact on trade in capital goods -- and I do think the ongoing rise in the US deficit here is a problem (capital goods are a sector where the US should be competitive)." Denmark's foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, told reporters this week after Brussels suspended its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in hopes of reaching a trade deal: "We shouldn't impose countermeasures at this stage, but we should prepare to be ready to use all the tools in the toolbox. So we want a deal, but there's an old saying: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war.'" What Happens Next? The full economic and political consequences of the tariffs will likely unfold in the coming months, as the impact on trade balances, job growth, and consumer prices becomes clearer.
