Is Apple getting ready to launch a PlayStation and Xbox competitor?
Other countries are stepping up after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the climate fight
Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals
Exclusive: Google is indexing ChatGPT conversations, potentially exposing sensitive user data
However, when it comes to being a device meant to sit at the center of your living room as an all-encompassing entertainment hub, the Apple TV is lacking in one big department: gaming. The Apple TV is technically a gaming console, since it can play rudimentary games and supports third-party console controllers. But no one is likely to replace their PlayStation or Xbox with one any time soon, because the current Apple TV lacks the processing power to run console-quality games.
Yet perhaps that could be changing. Recently, I've noticed that Apple has been making moves that suggest the company may be on the cusp of turning the Apple TV into a full-blown PlayStation and Xbox competitor. Doing so would open up another potential billion-dollar revenue stream for the company.
The new Apple Games app is currently MIA from tvOS 26
At Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) this year, the company unveiled a new cross-device app called Apple Games. The app acts as a central hub and launcher for all the games you've ever bought on Apple's App Store or have access to via the company's Apple Arcade subscription service.
The Apple Games app also gives you quick access to game events and challenges, and helps you discover new games to play and see what games your friends are playing. In other words, the new Apple Games app is similar to the PlayStation 5 Game Hub and the Xbox Dashboard—the interfaces on the consoles that significantly differentiate the living room gaming experience from PCs.
Apple announced that Apple Games is coming to the iPhone, iPad, and Mac with iOS 26, iPadOS 26, and macOS 26 this fall. But the new app is conspicuously absent from the Apple TV's next operating system, tvOS 26, which also ships this fall. This is a notable omission, especially considering that Apple markets its Apple Arcade gaming service as a core feature of the Apple TV experience. It also offers thousands of mobile-level games through the tvOS App Store.
The more I think about the Apple Games omission from tvOS 26, the more it makes sense—if Apple is set to turn the Apple TV into a true gaming console but doesn't want anyone to know it yet.
The next Apple TV is rumored to have two key hardware improvements essential to top-line gaming consoles
Apple doesn't update the Apple TV as often as it does iPhones or even its iPads. Typically, years pass between Apple TV updates. The most recent Apple TV, the Apple TV 4K, was last updated in November 2022, nearly three years ago. That means it's ripe for an update this year.
Rumors suggest that a new Apple TV is indeed coming later this year and that it will feature two significant hardware upgrades—ones that would enable it to become a true gaming console.
The first is an updated chipset. The current Apple TV 4K features the Apple A15 Bionic chip, the same one found in the iPhone 13 from 2021. Most people expect the next Apple TV to get a significant upgrade—perhaps to the A18 or A18 Pro, found in the current iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro series, or perhaps even the unreleased A19 chip, which will go into this year's iPhone 17 series. It's also possible Apple could put the M1 or M2 chip, previously found in Macs and iPads, into the new Apple TV.
This jump from the A15 to the A18, A19, M1, or M2 would give the Apple TV the performance boost it needs to run AAA console games, such as the Resident Evil series from Capcom, which are currently capable of running (with controller support, no less) on the iPhone 15 Pro, thanks to its A17 Pro chip.
Another upgrade the next Apple TV is expected to get is a new Apple-designed Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chipset that will support the Wi-Fi 7 standard (via MacRumors). This standard offers lower latency and faster Wi-Fi speeds than the current Wi-Fi 6 standard—something critical for gaming consoles and the bandwidth-hungry games that stream to them. The leading games console, the PlayStation 5 Pro, currently offers Wi-Fi 7 support.
In other words, the hardware components Apple needs to turn the next Apple TV into a PlayStation and Xbox competitor are all in the pipeline. And, increasingly, so is something else the Apple TV would need to become a true gaming console: increasing commitment to Apple's platforms from major games studios.
More AAA games are hitting the Mac—and iPhone—than ever before
In the video game industry, the top games are known as AAA (triple-A) titles. These are the games with the most advanced graphics and the biggest budgets, and are frequently the highlights of the console gaming experience.
Historically, AAA game developers have shied away from releasing their major titles on the Mac (the Apple device with the hardware power most comparable to professional gaming consoles). But in the past year, that's changed a lot, thanks to Apple's move to make game development on the Mac easier and more cost-effective than ever, thanks to tools like the company's Game Porting Toolkit 3 and the hardware-accelerated graphics API, Metal 4, which makes graphics-intensive games look better on Mac and iPhone. Considering Apple devices are more popular than ever, game studios stand to financially benefit by bringing their biggest titles to Apple's platforms and their millions of users.
In July alone, two major AAA titles made their debut on the Mac: CD Projekt Red's Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate and Deep Silver's Dead Island 2. Other major AAA titles have also been released on the Mac over the past few years, including Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed: Shadows and Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown, Remedy's Control Ultimate Edition, Kojima Productions' Death Stranding Director's Cut, Round 8 Studio's Lies of P, 11 Bit Studios' Frostpunk 2, and Capcom's Resident Evil series remastered editions. Additionally, more AAA titles are coming to the Mac this year, including IO Interactive's Hitman World of Assassination, InZOI Studio's InZOI, and Pearl Abyss' Crimson Desert.
Most of these games require an M1 series chip or later, found in the company's Apple Silicon Macs released since 2020. Some, like the Resident Evil series, can even run on the A17 Pro and later, first introduced in 2023. Apple's current A18 Pro is roughly equivalent to the M1 in terms of performance, and if Apple puts it, the M1 or M2, or the upcoming A19 Pro, inside the next Apple TV, as expected, there is no reason these AAA games that currently run on the Mac couldn't run on the new Apple TV. And if that happens, the Apple TV becomes a professional-level gaming console.
Turning the Apple TV into a gaming console makes sense for Apple's ecosystem and the company's bottom line
When Apple announced the upcoming Apple Games app for all its devices except the Apple TV, it stood out as a glaring hole in the company's lineup, especially since Apple Games is a natural fit for the Apple TV. But when you take in the odd omission, along with recent rumors that the next Apple TV is set to get powerful new CPU and wireless chipsets, and the flood of new AAA titles hitting the Mac and iPhone this year, things start to look a lot clearer.
Yet something else leads me to believe that Apple could be turning the Apple TV into a gaming console this year: the company's history of being unwilling to let software announcements spoil new hardware features.
In the past, Apple has withheld software announcements at WWDC to avoid revealing upcoming hardware improvements to its devices. The AAA titles available on the Mac appear in Apple Games on the macOS 26 beta. If Apple had previewed Apple Games on the tvOS 26 beta, Mac games that run on the new unreleased Apple TV, including these AAA titles, might have also shown there. That would spoil a major, as-yet-unannounced feature for the as-yet-unannounced Apple TV.
Of course, all this is just conjecture on my part. Still, all the signs seem to be pointing to Apple TV becoming a true gaming console. This would make a lot of business sense for Apple. At price points of $129 or $149, depending on whether you want more storage and an ethernet connection, the current Apple TV 4K is much more expensive than such competitors as the Roku Streaming Stick 4K ($49), the Roku Ultra ($99), and the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K ($49).
However, if Apple gives the new Apple TV gaming console capabilities, the current $129/$149 price suddenly looks like a bargain. A triple-A gaming experience on the Apple TV would be a unique selling point that Roku or Amazon couldn't compete with.
It could also give Apple a major new revenue stream in the form of 30% App Store commissions on AAA titles sold through the tvOS App Store. As of 2024, the global AAA gaming market is valued at approximately $75 billion annually, according to a July 2025 Business Research Insights report. It's expected to grow to nearly $108 billion by 2033.
But most of all, a new Apple TV with console gaming capabilities would further solidify the device as the digital heart of the living room and smart home, giving users another reason to stay within Apple's ecosystem, both inside and outside the house—an ancillary benefit Apple likely finds invaluable.
This post originally appeared at fastcompany.comSubscribe to get the Fast Company newsletter: http://fastcompany.com/newsletters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity
AI is expected to improve food manufacturers' productivity and efficiency but as with the development of any new technology there is an element of apprehension. Much of the anxiety seemingly comes down to a lack of understanding of the technology itself, how it works and the myriad of AI systems that could be employed for different applications and problem-solving. And then there's the question of labour, tech-skilled labour rather than the manual kind. Think about the evolution of phone technology – moving from analogue to digital devices and hefty back-of-the car handsets to those that now fit in a pocket – electric vehicles and their slow development due to a lack of infrastructure and the introduction of hybrid models as a half-way-house to address bottlenecks. Food manufacturers are adopting AI but reservations might come down to investing too much too quickly when the tech is advancing at pace, capital on hand and assessing the return on investment. Abhinav Agrawal, the co-lead of AI and data monetisation at consultancy AlixPartners, argues food manufacturers also face a bottleneck in that they 'are not exactly the desired location for data scientists, AI programmers and developers' to attract the desired talent pool. 'I don't recommend our clients make big bets right now,' Agrawal tells Just Food. 'One of our clients launched a $55-60m AI initiative about two years ago but there's no measurable ROI right now. There's no success that we can point to that $60m was worth investing. 'Instead, launch $5m projects and see. Maybe two of them fail but three of them produce a ROI and you gain a little more experience in which type of skills you need to hire. 'Then you launch another five, or maybe next time you can launch ten, so in the end you may end up spending $60m over three years, for instance.' 'Strategic advantage' It's a bit of a juggling act for food manufacturers. There's almost an obligation to invest in AI now or risk being left behind and losing a competitive edge. Or as Tom Clayton, the CEO of Sheffield-based IntelliAM, puts it, gaining a 'strategic advantage'. Clayton, the head of the tech company specialising in AI software and machine learning for manufacturers, believes productivity improvements through the tech are a way to address the increasing demand for food as global populations rise. 'In the food and beverage world, where you're talking about high volumes and low margins, it's really interesting because, if you can make an extra 100,000 SKUs a day, that's direct profit to the business. Similarly, if you can avoid wastage, you're moving costs from the bottom line. 'We're talking considerable amounts of money. Essentially, the driver of these organisations is to be able to improve capacity of the plants by being more intelligent and doing more with less.' AI not yet 'transformational' to profits There's an obvious buzz around AI, not just in the food industry but outside as the benefits (or otherwise) of the technology are debated across media. Clayton says there's been an 'immense increase' in interest over the last two years as boardrooms wake up to the fact the tech might give them an advantage. 'In any new technology convergence, there's always people who want to embrace it immediately. As your competitors do it, you've got to do it. Unfortunately, I think there's going to be a bit of first-mover advantage over the AI element,' he adds. Agrawal presents an example of how AI can work its magic in improving productivity and efficiency in terms of a salty snacks manufacturer for which AlixPartners acted as an adviser – assessing the size and shape of corn used in the production process to ensure quality and consistency. The production line's operating efficiency rate went up from the 80s percentage range into the 90s from employing an AI system, he says, adding each percentage point increase 'translated into a couple of million dollars of bottom-line impact'. However, Agrawal suggests the tech is not yet 'transformational' when it equates to output and profitability. 'For me, transformative means you're going after 30-40-50% plant P&L improvement, that type of thing. I would not say it is possible right now. It is in maybe the 20s with these technologies,' he argues. 'But I do think that in a year or so, the technology can improve, that it can produce like an 30-40-50% improvement.' Labour leverage Nevertheless, AI can translate into savings on the labour front, Agrawal says, proposing 'what was not possible even five years ago is possible now'. A bakery manufacturer in the US needed a lot of temporary, hourly paid staff to help run its 30 or so production plants, with managers having to assess shift arrangements and working patterns on a daily and weekly basis, he says. 'Our algorithms recommended how much labour they needed by the day, by zone and by type, and whatever. We tracked it for six months and those predictions saved them on average 20%,' Agrawal explains. For those food and CPG manufacturers already 'leveraging' AI tech, Chris Ashley, the vice president of strategy at Peak, a unit of software company UiPath, says the 'advantages compound over time'. He believes the 'more sophisticated they become, the more they can leverage these systems'. Ashley adds: 'They will accrue more working capital efficiency, more operating margin, more productivity and that will just continue to compound over time. We think this needs to be a topic of conversation in every boardroom currently on how to educate the teams. 'I think the impacts can be transformational. The augmentation of these teams with AI-driven systems is driving more productivity and driving more economic upside for the business, which means more jobs.' Level playing field Meanwhile, Clayton at IntelliAM says AI helps improve the reliability and life of production components by identifying problems before they arise, reducing maintenance times and the potential for lines going out of action. AI does that by 'ingesting millions of data points from the brains of the machines in a factory and contextualising' them to 'understand tolerance settings to get maximum throughput speed settings, reduce bottlenecks, to understand the blend of different ingredients from different suppliers to achieve quality improvements, and to reduce waste streams', he explains. IntelliAM advised an unnamed dairy producer trying to make the best use of hygiene requirements between the production of different SKUs on the same line. 'If you're running ten SKUs a day, that might save an hour's production a day and an hour's production turns into hundreds of thousands of bottles of milk,' Clayton suggests. AI is impacting snacks much more than proteins or meat Abhinav Agrawal, AlixPartners However, it's not a level playing field in terms of benefits when it comes to assessing the AI productivity impact on different food categories, Agrawal proposes. In areas like meat and pastries, for instance, AI-driven robots don't yet have the 'delicate' touch to avoid damage, although developments are being made there. 'My experience is that for the protein manufacturer, the ROI from AI so far is still there but it is modest compared to snacks and things like that, largely because there are some regulations around humans doing certain inspections. 'In a nutshell, AI is impacting both sides but it is impacting snacks and those things much more than the proteins or meat and those types of products.' 'Secret sauce' Food manufacturers that Just Food approached to comment for this article were generally disinclined to chat or did not respond – Tyson Foods, Nestlé, Mondelez International and Kellanova fell into the former camp, for instance. It's a 'sensitive' topic, Agrawal says, because some food manufacturers are now using custom solutions rather than the 'out-of-the-box software' in the past – their 'secret sauce'. Cargill was, however, more willing by identifying its 'patent-pending' computer vision technology CarVe, which measures red meat yields. It was rolled out at the company's beef facility in Friona, Texas, in 2024 and additional plants will be added in a 'phased rollout'. Through cameras, CarVe uses AI-inputted models to assess human cutting and trimming techniques to ensure consistent quality and to reduce waste. 'Those gains, together with steadier throughput and better use of labour and materials, strengthen overall plant economics and help us stay cost-competitive for customers,' Jarrod Gillig, senior vice president for food at Cargill's North America beef unit, says. 'Our philosophy with CarVe is to test, learn, refine then scale. We pilot first, capture lessons quickly and scale once the business case is clear. This approach lets us invest wisely, stay nimble and roll out proven innovations across our facilities when they're ready to deliver value for producers and consumers.' Cargill's comments were echoed by Roger Gaemperle, the head of industry strategy and marketing in EMEA markets at US-headquartered automation and tech firm Rockwell Automation. 'There is a lot of potential or high impact on margin' through increased yield output when AI assisted robots can replace the human role in meat processing, which is often not 'nice work' conducted in a cold environment, Gaemperle says. 'If you really want to optimise the margin and also productivity or the output, I think these are the systems that producers need to look at. And, over the next few years, the systems will get smarter and smarter,' he envisages. Another AI benefit is the reduction of waste in raw materials, Gaemperle adds, using the example of milk powder production and the need to have a consistent milk fat percentage to ensure equal quality by production unit. It's becoming transformational because of the speed of the algorithms and computing power Roger Gaemperle, Rockwell Automation More generally, Gaemperle adds: 'It's really becoming transformational because of the speed now with the algorithms and computing power. That's really what has opened up many new opportunities that were not feasible in the past. 'Look at it holistically, the whole production process, and identify first where there are potential opportunities, and then prioritise those opportunities. If the return on the investment can be proven first with one line, then additional use cases can be implemented over time.' Implications for jobs It would be amiss here not to address one of the biggest concerns over the implications of AI technologies across industries – jobs. Opinions varied for this article but the underlying theme to emerge was new types of jobs will be created. 'If you take a modern food and beverage organisation, whilst there is arguably a high degree of automation, there is still a hell of a lot of human interaction and judgement. AI will replace all that,' Clayton opines. However, he throws in the caveat: 'There's an argument that jobs will change, that there will be a transfer of skills because of AI. But there will be better jobs, it's not about job reduction. 'People are intrinsically part of the solution because a) you need the automation engineers to support obtaining the data to create the insights in the first place and then b) they need to look at the people on the output to react to these or manipulate data, like data scientists.' Agrawal suggests the food industry will eventually replicate the semiconductor sector, where companies such as Nvidia and TSMC are using AI to the 'fullest'. 'What I see as the biggest change in four or five years is that we will not need as much human labour in manufacturing. I don't think it'll lead to mass unemployment because there'll be other manufacturing opportunities,' Agrawal suggests. For Ashley at Peak, boardroom education has a key role to play. 'Those jobs might look different going forwards in terms of individuals that can map decision logic and map processes and help architect AI systems. The nature of those jobs and the skills required may shift slightly but I think there is huge upside economically and for every workforce in the AI era,' he argues. 'I think that for the manufacturing industry it basically means that there's incredible opportunity to deploy pilots and capabilities that you can test very quickly to see if they drive business uplifts but it also means there's an education challenge in boardrooms. 'I think it is a watershed moment but it is evolving continuously and businesses need to lean into that and try and figure out how to harness it as best as possible.' "AI in food – 'secret sauce' solution sought for productivity" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You've probably been duped by AI on a dating app – but not the way you think
As I was hanging out with a couple of friends recently, one of them mentioned that he had used an artificial intelligence program to punch up his online dating profile. I didn't respond. The other guy we were with is so much an AI fanboy that it's hard to get through a conversation without him describing how much simpler the technology has made his life. Still, the idea of trusting machines to bridge the gender divide and unlock secrets generations of humans have sought seemed sketchy to me. I've heard all the hype. I've been told, repeatedly, about how AI will change our lives in wonderful and unimaginable ways. Even so, are we really ready to move toward a future where we rely on AI to fill our social calendars? Computer-assisted canoodling comes with risks Sharpening a business résumé with computer assistance is one thing. Since olden times, lots of books have been devoted to that subject, so enlisting AI's help is a logical progression there. Dating is − or at least should be − different. It is, after all, among the most interpersonal experiences human beings can have. Do we really want microprocessors more involved in matters of the heart than they already are? No question, if you are using a dating site, an algorithm already helps pick your matches. That decreases the likelihood of those Hallmark Channel pairings with people of very different backgrounds meeting by chance and falling in love. Maybe that's no great loss. The odds of mismatched couples staying together anywhere but in those fictitious and perpetually snowy Hallmark villages may be on the low side, anyway. Still, is it wise − or even ethical − to use AI to make a dating profile more attractive to potential matches? Opinion: 'Happy Gilmore 2' works because it has something for the woke and Trump crowds Using an old photo or a "glamour" portrait with a dating profile is a familiar trick. But AI has the ability to take photo doctoring to a whole new level. Rather than just sending would-be suitors images of what we looked like in our prime, AI can manufacture super-buff versions of ourselves that we might not recognize in a mirror. If relationships never advance past the online flirting stage, that's fine. If potential romantic partners finally meet face-to-face, that's when those AI-generated illusions will be shattered. Some might argue keeping virtual relationships going a while gives less physically attractive people more opportunities to demonstrate their good qualities, before being dismissed based on their appearance. I would counter that relationships grounded in deception probably aren't headed anywhere good. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Using AI to provide more clever answers to dating profile questions isn't much better than digitally altering photos. If your dating profile gives people the impression you are smarter, funnier or more self assured than you really are, you will be found out eventually. I think most people would agree that creating AI-generated profiles that are purely fake to scam people is wrong. Yet AI-assisted dating profiles are at least a step − and maybe several steps − in that direction. Opinion: AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it. Will AI have to teach us the facts of life someday? Overall, AI's intrusion into the dating world is a disturbing trend. If people become so reliant on technology to handle the most intimate details of their personal lives, it won't be long before a "date" might be two people sitting across from each other in a restaurant, parroting what their smartphones are telling them to say to each other. Some of us worry about AI eventually overthrowing human civilization. Research already suggests that AI programs would resort to blackmail to protect themselves from deactivation or replacement. The end for our species might not be as dramatic as Skynet commissioning an army of Terminators to wipe us out. At the rate we're going, maybe all AI would need to do is provide enough bad dating advice so we're no longer able to procreate. Blake Fontenay is USA TODAY's commentary editor. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Can AI help me get a date? That's the wrong question | Opinion Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Free summer concert in Gardner brings Eagles hits to Monument Park
The Long Run: Songs of the Eagles will perform at the Gardner Summer Concert Series on Aug. 9. According to a community announcement, the concert starts at 6 p.m. at Monument Park, located at Central Street and Route 101. This free event features music from the Eagles, covering their hits from the 1970s to the 1990s. The rain date is set for Aug. 10 at 2 p.m. The band includes Gardner resident Glenn Jackson and Westminster resident Dan Kirouac (formerly of Beatles For Sale), as well as Rick Barrett, Kathy Finn and Carl Bongiovi. Follow the band at Greater Gardner gears up for summer concerts starting June 14: Check out the lineup This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@ with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at This article originally appeared on Gardner News: Monument Park in Gardner MA will echo with Eagles classics Aug. 9 Solve the daily Crossword
