Occupied Territories Bill: Irish citizens grow more cautious
Occupied Territories Bill
in recent months, with almost half of all voters now favouring either not passing the Bill or investigating the possible consequences for Ireland before passing it.
Just one-fifth of voters (20 per cent) say the Bill should be passed quickly, with a further 14 per cent saying its scope should be expanded and it should be passed quickly.
About 38 per cent of people, however, say the
Government
'should investigate possible consequences for Ireland before passing the Bill', while a further 10 per cent are opposed to passing the Bill at all.
The Bill, which is being discussed by the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee and is due before the Dáil in the autumn, would ban trade in goods with the occupied Palestinian territories.
READ MORE
Pro-Palestine activists and Opposition parties want the Government to include a ban on trade in services – which ministers have said they are open to examining.
However, the Bill has been fiercely criticised as anti-Semitic by the Israeli government, by
US politicians
and by representatives of Jewish groups in Ireland, not least because it singles out Israel among participants in many global conflicts.
There is significant nervousness in Government about the possible economic consequences of passing the legislation. There is also strong support, however, for the Palestinians and a sense that Ireland is taking a leading role in the EU in advocating on their behalf.
Today's poll suggests that the public has shifted towards a more cautious position. When the subject was raised in the last Irish Times poll in April, a small majority of those who expressed a view said the Government should introduce the Bill as soon as possible, outnumbering those who favoured either pausing or dropping it altogether.
Today's poll shows the balance has shifted. The 'net pass' number – including those who want the bill passed as it is now or with the inclusion of services – is 34 per cent; the 'net don't pass' number – including those who want to wait and consider the consequences and those who want to drop it altogether – is 48 per cent.
[
Taoiseach rejects US politicians' claims that Occupied Territories Bill is 'diplomatic intoxication'
Opens in new window
]
The poll was conducted among a representative sample of adults aged 18 years and upwards across 120 sampling points throughout all constituencies.
The Irish Times/Ipsos B & A series is conducted through face-to-face sampling; personal in-home interviewing took place on July 14th and 15th. The number of interviews conducted was 1,200. The accuracy is estimated at plus or minus 2.8 per cent.
Meanwhile, head of employers' group
Ibec
, Danny McCoy, citing concerns about the consequences for business, said the Bill was 'hypocritical'.
'We're not talking about millions here,' he declared. 'This is not about actually helping in any material way. It's symbolism and moral positioning, and so on. However, with moral positions, you can also reveal hypocrisy.'
Ireland's stand on Israel is 'well intentioned', he said, but it is 'causing us significant damage. Quantifying it is really difficult, but we know it is going to have consequences'.
[
Irish Times poll: Shift in public mood noted on Occupied Territories Bill
Opens in new window
]
The head of
Amnesty International
has urged Ireland to resist 'bullying' from the US and pass the Bill in the autumn, which she said would be a 'precedent'.
After meetings with Taoiseach Micheál Martin, President Michael D Higgins and the Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Agnes Callamard told The Irish Times she believed the Government's assessment was that
the costs would be 'minimal'
.
'I felt that there was a prudent recognition that the cost could be handled,' Ms Callamard said. 'That it is not something that will be a determining factor.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
22 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Tax group points out inconsistency in greenhouse gas taxes as farms escape cost
The group defends the carbon tax, which will rise again in the autumn budget, noting that revenues from it have been used to boost welfare payments and provide energy-efficiency supports for low-income households. It also notes that the tax – intended to discourage use of fossil fuels as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions – is not applied to the other primary source, methane. 'It should be noted that the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (ie methane) are not subject to any environmental tax,' the group says in analysis presented to ministers. Farmers did have to pay carbon tax on fuel for agricultural vehicles but it was at a reduced rate, it said. 'Marked gas oil' - as agricultural diesel is categorised – currently costs 48 cents less per litre than regular diesel, it said. 'Farmers continue to be eligible for a double income tax relief,' the group said. 'A farmer may take an income tax or corporation tax deduction for farm diesel and then a further deduction for farm diesel which is equal to the difference between the carbon tax charged and the carbon tax that would have been charged had it been calculated at 2012 levels.' The tax paper also highlights different environmental taxes in other EU countries, including a new tax on livestock emissions announced in Denmark. Danish farmers will pay a tax of €40 per tonne of livestock methane emissions from 2030 which will increase to €100 by 2035. Revenues will help finance what the Danish parliament has described as the 'reorganisation' of the landscape with more focus on forestry and natural spaces. The Tax Strategy Group make no recommendations based on the proposal but flag research recently undertaken in Ireland around similar ideas. 'The Pathways project, funded by the European Climate Foundation, in partnership with the Institute of International & European Affairs, has published a series of papers on the future of the Irish Agri-food sector,' it says. 'Their paper on 'Agricultural Climate Policy in Ireland from 2030 to Net Zero' recommends Ireland establish an independent Emissions Pricing Design Commission, modelled on Denmark's expert group, to assess the feasibility and design of emissions pricing in Ireland's agricultural sector.'


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on transport infrastructure: a road strewn with potholes
The Government's announcement this week of an unprecedented level of funding for the National Development Plan (NDP) ought to have been a moment of clarity. Instead, the lack of detail accompanying Tuesday's statement leaves too many key questions unanswered. This is particularly true when it comes to transport infrastructure. It was already clear that the Government intended to depart from the previous administration's approach to transport policy. Gone is the stated commitment to allocate twice as much funding to public transport and active travel as to roads. In its place is a more ambiguous outlook, with a greater openness to road-building. What is not yet clear is what this shift means in practice. Meanwhile, the inclusion of MetroLink, a massive public transport investment for Dublin, may distort the overall picture. While its scale is historic, it risks masking underinvestment in other vital areas. What of light rail proposals for Cork and Galway? What is the likelihood of accelerating the painfully slow rollout of the BusConnects project in the capital, or the long-overdue upgrades to regional bus and rail networks across the country? These are not luxuries, but necessities in a State with mounting infrastructure needs and legally binding climate commitments. The politics surrounding the NDP should also be acknowledged. When the Government was being formed, revisions to the plan were widely seen as part of the informal understandings struck with Independents for their support. If, as expected, projects are confirmed later in the year that benefit specific constituencies, it will come as little surprise if Independent TDs are quick to claim credit. That is how Irish politics works, for better or worse. READ MORE Nonetheless, deal-making cannot override legal obligations. Infrastructure development must be consistent with Ireland's climate goals. Courts north of the Border have already shown, in the case of the A5 road scheme, that they are willing to intervene when environmental commitments agreed by the Northern Ireland Executive come into conflict with road projects. The Government should be under no illusion that its own projects will be treated differently. Transport is only one strand of the wider infrastructure challenge Ireland faces, alongside housing, energy and water. But it is a crucial one. Investment decisions made now will shape emissions profiles, economic opportunities and quality of life for decades to come. The NDP must therefore be more than a series of headline figures and local announcements. This week's announcement may represent a fiscal high point, but it has so far delivered little in the way of strategic clarity. Without firm answers and full transparency, the road ahead is likely to remain strewn with pitfalls and, indeed, potholes.


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
The Mick Clifford Podcast: Unpacking the lacking National Development Plan with Louise Burne
The National Development Plan (NDP) review was launched earlier this week to an underwhelming response. An update of the previous plan, the review takes into account the Apple tax escrow fund the Government was eager not to claim, and promises a focus on providing infrastructure essential for housing delivery. Along with the Summer Economic Statement, both announcements this week make a statement about the forthcoming fiscal period, but without clarity on Trump's potential tariff plans—what does it all mean? Standing in for Mick this week, Opinion Editor Deirdre O'Shaughnessy speaks to Political Correspondent Louise Burne about the figures, the ambitions, and the lack of detail at the heart of the plan.